Equine parasite control under prescription-only conditions in Denmark–awareness, knowledge, perception, and strategies applied.
Abstract: Due to widespread development of anthelmintic resistance in equine parasites, recommendations for their control are currently undergoing marked changes with a shift of emphasis toward more coprological surveillance and reduced treatment intensity. Denmark was the first nation to introduce prescription-only restrictions of anthelmintic drugs in 1999, but other European countries have implemented similar legislations over recent years. A questionnaire survey was performed in 2008 among Danish horse owners to provide a current status of practices and perceptions with relation to parasite control. Questions aimed at describing the current use of coprological surveillance and resulting anthelmintic treatment intensities, evaluating knowledge and perceptions about the importance of various attributes of parasite control, and assessing respondents' willingness to pay for advice and parasite surveillance services from their veterinarians. A total of 1060 respondents completed the questionnaire. A large majority of respondents (71.9%) were familiar with the concept of selective therapy. Results illustrated that the respondents' self-evaluation of their knowledge about parasites and their control associated significantly with their level of interest in the topic and their type of education (P<0.0001). The large majority of respondents either dewormed their horses twice a year and/or performed two fecal egg counts per horse per year. This approach was almost equally pronounced in foals, horses aged 1-3 years old, and adult horses. The respondents rated prevention of parasitic disease and prevention of drug resistance as the most important attributes, while cost and frequent fecal testing were rated least important. Respondents' actual spending on parasite control per horse in the previous year correlated significantly with the amount they declared themselves willing to spend (P<0.0001). However, 44.4% declared themselves willing to pay more than what they were spending. Altogether, results indicate that respondents were generally familiar with equine parasites and the concept of selective therapy, although there was some confusion over the terms small and large strongyles. They used a large degree of fecal surveillance in all age groups, with a majority of respondents sampling and/or treating around twice a year. Finally, respondents appeared willing to spend money on parasite control for their horses. It is of concern that the survey suggested that foals and young horses are treated in a manner very similar to adult horses, which is against current recommendations. Thus, the survey illustrates the importance of clear communication of guidelines for equine parasite control.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2013-11-01 PubMed ID: 24275444DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.10.016Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research surveyed Danish horse owners about their practices and perceptions on controlling equine parasites following prescription-only restrictions introduced in Denmark in 1999. The findings reveal that while the majority understood the concept of selective therapy, treatment patterns did not align with current recommendations, highlighting the need for clear communication of equine parasite control guidelines.
Methodology and Respondents
- A questionnaire survey was deployed in 2008, gathering responses from 1060 Danish horse owners.
- The survey sought to understand current practices of equine parasite control, notability the use of coprological surveillance and anthelmintic treatment, how horse owners value various aspects of parasite control, and their willingness to spend on veterinary advice and parasite surveillance.
Survey Findings
- Most respondents (71.9%) were familiar with the concept of selective therapy in managing equine parasites.
- Horse owners’ understanding of parasite control correlated strongly with their level of interest in the topic and type of education (P<0.0001).
- Respondents typically either dewormed their horses twice annually, conducted twice-yearly fecal egg counts, or both. This pattern was observed for foals, horses aged 1 to 3 years, and adult horses.
- The most valued aspects of parasite control were the prevention of parasitic diseases and drug resistance. Less important were cost and the frequency of fecal testing.
- There was a significant correlation (P<0.0001) between what respondents spent on parasite control in the previous year and how much they claimed they were willing to spend. Yet notably, 44.4% were prepared to spend more than their current expenditure.
Conclusion and Recommendations
- The survey results indicate that although respondents generally understood equine parasites and selective therapy, they were confused about certain terminologies. Also, the common treatment practices did not fully conform to current guidelines, particularly for foals and young horses.
- Despite these shortcomings, respondents showed willingness to spend on equine parasite control.
- This study underscores the necessity for clearer communication and promotion of guidelines for equine parasite control among horse owners, especially given their willingness to invest in optimal health care for their animals.
Cite This Article
APA
Nielsen MK, Reist M, Kaplan RM, Pfister K, van Doorn DC, Becher A.
(2013).
Equine parasite control under prescription-only conditions in Denmark–awareness, knowledge, perception, and strategies applied.
Vet Parasitol, 204(1-2), 64-72.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.10.016 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. Electronic address: martin.nielsen@uky.edu.
- Sanisys SA, Place de la Gare 4, Bienne, Switzerland.
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
- Department of Comparative Tropical Medicine & Parasitology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Comparative Tropical Medicine & Parasitology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
MeSH Terms
- Animal Husbandry / statistics & numerical data
- Animal Husbandry / trends
- Animals
- Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
- Communicable Disease Control / economics
- Communicable Disease Control / statistics & numerical data
- Denmark
- Drug Resistance
- Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
- Helminthiasis, Animal / drug therapy
- Helminthiasis, Animal / prevention & control
- Horse Diseases / drug therapy
- Horse Diseases / prevention & control
- Horses
- Parasite Egg Count
- Surveys and Questionnaires
Citations
This article has been cited 6 times.- Schneider ST, Meemken D, Gehlen H, Merle R, Langkabel N. A comparative survey of veterinarians, equine owners, and equine keepers regarding the knowledge and implementation of legal requirements in Germany for the use and documentation of veterinary medicines in equines intended for slaughter. PLoS One 2023;18(4):e0283371.
- Misuno E, Clark CR, Anderson SL, Jenkins E, Wagner B, Dembek K, Petrie L. Characteristics of parasitic egg shedding over a 1-year period in foals and their dams in 2 farms in central Saskatchewan. Can Vet J 2018 Mar;59(3):284-292.
- Seyoum Z, Zewdu A, Dagnachew S, Bogale B. Anthelmintic Resistance of Strongyle Nematodes to Ivermectin and Fenbendazole on Cart Horses in Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:5163968.
- Sallé G, Cabaret J. A survey on parasite management by equine veterinarians highlights the need for a regulation change. Vet Rec Open 2015;2(2):e000104.
- Schneider S, Pfister K, Becher AM, Scheuerle MC. Strongyle infections and parasitic control strategies in German horses - a risk assessment. BMC Vet Res 2014 Nov 12;10:262.
- Hedberg Alm Y, Tydén E, Martin F, Lernå J, Halvarsson P. Farm size and biosecurity measures associated with Strongylus vulgaris infection in horses. Equine Vet J 2025 May;57(3):703-711.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists