Analyze Diet

Establishing an acceptability threshold for equine influenza vaccines.

Abstract: Shortcomings in the original methods (based on haemagglutination of erythrocytes) used to measure potency of equine influenza vaccines and antibody responses stimulated by vaccines, coupled with the lack of a reliable challenge system in the target species, has hindered progress in identifying the antigenic content required to provide protection. Reliable methods are now available for measuring the haemagglutinin (HA) content of vaccines and the antibody responses they elicit. The development of challenge systems in the target species has allowed antibody levels consistent with protection to be identified under experimental conditions. Comparison of vaccine performance under experimental conditions and in the field suggests that exposure to a nebulised virus aerosol provides a realistic challenge for the assessment of equine influenza vaccines.
Publication Date: 1992-01-01 PubMed ID: 1286748
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article focuses on finding a reliable measurement for the potency of equine influenza vaccines and determining the necessary antibody levels for protection against the disease.

Understanding the Problem

  • The study underlines previously faced issues regarding the measurement of potency in equine influenza vaccines and the resulting antibody responses that these vaccines elicit.
  • These problems stemmed from the original methods involving the haemagglutination of erythrocytes, coupled with the absence of a credible challenge system in the target species.
  • The inability to accurately measure the protection offered by these vaccines has impeded progress in identifying the antigenic content required to provide protection against equine influenza.

Innovations in Vaccine Measurement

  • The research highlights new, trustworthy methods for determining the haemagglutinin (HA) content of vaccines and the corresponding antibody responses.
  • Haemagglutinin is a protein found on the virus’s surface that is responsible for binding the virus to the cell that is being infected. Hence, determining the HA content in a vaccine offers a significant gauge of potential efficacy.

Progress in Challenge Systems

  • With the development of reliable challenge systems in the target species, the research has identified antibody levels that can consistently provide protection, albeit under experimental conditions.
  • These challenge systems simulate a disease attack, allowing researchers to assess the vaccine’s effectiveness and the protection it provides against equine influenza.

Comparative Assessment

  • The research also identifies a discrepancy between vaccine performance under controlled, laboratory conditions, and real-world scenarios or ‘in the field’.
  • The researchers propose that exposure to a nebulized virus aerosol may offer a more realistic challenge for evaluating equine influenza vaccines.
  • A nebulized virus aerosol refers to microscopic particles of the virus suspended in the air, mimicking real-world conditions where horses might be exposed to the virus.
  • By comparing these two settings, the researchers aim to refine vaccine testing so that it is more reflective of the conditions in which equine influenza typically spreads amongst horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Mumford JA, Wood J. (1992). Establishing an acceptability threshold for equine influenza vaccines. Dev Biol Stand, 79, 137-146.

Publication

ISSN: 0301-5149
NlmUniqueID: 0427140
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 79
Pages: 137-146

Researcher Affiliations

Mumford, J A
  • Animal Health Trust, Newmarket, UK.
Wood, J

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Antibodies, Viral / blood
    • Disease Outbreaks / veterinary
    • England / epidemiology
    • Evaluation Studies as Topic
    • Female
    • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
    • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
    • Horses
    • Influenza A virus / immunology
    • Influenza Vaccines / immunology
    • Influenza Vaccines / standards
    • Male
    • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / epidemiology
    • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / prevention & control
    • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / veterinary
    • Reference Standards
    • South Africa / epidemiology

    Citations

    This article has been cited 20 times.
    1. Carnet F, Paillot R, Fortier C, Hue ES, Briot L, de Geoffroy F, Vidalain PO, Pronost S. Immunostimulating Effect of Inactivated Parapoxvirus Ovis on the Serological Response to Equine Influenza Booster Vaccination. Vaccines (Basel) 2022 Dec 14;10(12).
      doi: 10.3390/vaccines10122139pubmed: 36560549google scholar: lookup
    2. Olufemi OT, Edeh ER, Isyaku MS, Haliru M, Samaila S, Mshelia PW, Owolodun OA, Newton JR, Daly JM. Seroprevalence of Equine Influenza and Its Associated Risk Factors in Northwest Nigeria. Pathogens 2022 Nov 17;11(11).
      doi: 10.3390/pathogens11111372pubmed: 36422623google scholar: lookup
    3. Whitlock F, Grewar J, Newton R. An epidemiological overview of the equine influenza epidemic in Great Britain during 2019. Equine Vet J 2023 Jan;55(1):153-164.
      doi: 10.1111/evj.13874pubmed: 36054725google scholar: lookup
    4. Oladunni FS, Oseni SO, Martinez-Sobrido L, Chambers TM. Equine Influenza Virus and Vaccines. Viruses 2021 Aug 20;13(8).
      doi: 10.3390/v13081657pubmed: 34452521google scholar: lookup
    5. Pavulraj S, Bergmann T, Trombetta CM, Marchi S, Montomoli E, Alami SSE, Ragni-Alunni R, Osterrieder N, Azab W. Immunogenicity of Calvenza-03 EIV/EHV(®) Vaccine in Horses: Comparative In Vivo Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2021 Feb 17;9(2).
      doi: 10.3390/vaccines9020166pubmed: 33671378google scholar: lookup
    6. Daly JM, Megid J, Langoni H, de Nardi Júnior G, Ribeiro MG. Retrospective serological survey for influenza in horses from Brazil. Braz J Microbiol 2021 Mar;52(1):461-466.
      doi: 10.1007/s42770-020-00398-8pubmed: 33175343google scholar: lookup
    7. Kinsley R, Pronost S, De Bock M, Temperton N, Daly JM, Paillot R, Scott S. Evaluation of a Pseudotyped Virus Neutralisation Test for the Measurement of Equine Influenza Virus-Neutralising Antibody Responses Induced by Vaccination and Infection. Vaccines (Basel) 2020 Aug 21;8(3).
      doi: 10.3390/vaccines8030466pubmed: 32825702google scholar: lookup
    8. Entenfellner J, Gahan J, Garvey M, Walsh C, Venner M, Cullinane A. Response of Sport Horses to Different Formulations of Equine Influenza Vaccine. Vaccines (Basel) 2020 Jul 10;8(3).
      doi: 10.3390/vaccines8030372pubmed: 32664411google scholar: lookup
    9. Cullinane A, Gahan J, Walsh C, Nemoto M, Entenfellner J, Olguin-Perglione C, Garvey M, Huang Fu TQ, Venner M, Yamanaka T, Barrandeguy M, Fernandez CJ. Evaluation of Current Equine Influenza Vaccination Protocols Prior to Shipment, Guided by OIE Standards. Vaccines (Basel) 2020 Feb 29;8(1).
      doi: 10.3390/vaccines8010107pubmed: 32121419google scholar: lookup
    10. Fougerolle S, Fortier C, Legrand L, Jourdan M, Marcillaud-Pitel C, Pronost S, Paillot R. Success and Limitation of Equine Influenza Vaccination: The First Incursion in a Decade of a Florida Clade 1 Equine Influenza Virus that Shakes Protection Despite High Vaccine Coverage. Vaccines (Basel) 2019 Nov 2;7(4).
      doi: 10.3390/vaccines7040174pubmed: 31684097google scholar: lookup
    11. Dilai M, Piro M, El Harrak M, Fougerolle S, Dehhaoui M, Dikrallah A, Legrand L, Paillot R, Fassi Fihri O. Impact of Mixed Equine Influenza Vaccination on Correlate of Protection in Horses. Vaccines (Basel) 2018 Oct 4;6(4).
      doi: 10.3390/vaccines6040071pubmed: 30287762google scholar: lookup
    12. Paillot R, Garrett D, Lopez-Alvarez MR, Birand I, Montesso F, Horspool L. The Immunity Gap Challenge: Protection against a Recent Florida Clade 2 Equine Influenza Strain. Vaccines (Basel) 2018 Jul 2;6(3).
      doi: 10.3390/vaccines6030038pubmed: 30004410google scholar: lookup
    13. Gildea S, Garvey M, Lyons P, Lyons R, Gahan J, Walsh C, Cullinane A. Multifocal Equine Influenza Outbreak with Vaccination Breakdown in Thoroughbred Racehorses. Pathogens 2018 Apr 17;7(2).
      doi: 10.3390/pathogens7020043pubmed: 29673169google scholar: lookup
    14. Paillot R, El-Hage CM. The Use of a Recombinant Canarypox-Based Equine Influenza Vaccine during the 2007 Australian Outbreak: A Systematic Review and Summary. Pathogens 2016 Jun 10;5(2).
      doi: 10.3390/pathogens5020042pubmed: 27294963google scholar: lookup
    15. Paillot R. A Systematic Review of Recent Advances in Equine Influenza Vaccination. Vaccines (Basel) 2014 Nov 14;2(4):797-831.
      doi: 10.3390/vaccines2040797pubmed: 26344892google scholar: lookup
    16. Scott S, Molesti E, Temperton N, Ferrara F, Böttcher-Friebertshäuser E, Daly J. The use of equine influenza pseudotypes for serological screening. J Mol Genet Med 2012;6:304-8.
      pubmed: 23515229
    17. Gildea S, Arkins S, Cullinane A. A comparative antibody study of the potential susceptibility of Thoroughbred and non-Thoroughbred horse populations in Ireland to equine influenza virus. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2010 Nov;4(6):363-72.
    18. Cullinane A, Elton D, Mumford J. Equine influenza - surveillance and control. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2010 Nov;4(6):339-44.
    19. Bryant NA, Paillot R, Rash AS, Medcalf E, Montesso F, Ross J, Watson J, Jeggo M, Lewis NS, Newton JR, Elton DM. Comparison of two modern vaccines and previous influenza infection against challenge with an equine influenza virus from the Australian 2007 outbreak. Vet Res 2010 Mar-Apr;41(2):19.
      doi: 10.1051/vetres/2009067pubmed: 19863903google scholar: lookup
    20. Elliott S, Olufemi OT, Daly JM. Systematic Review of Equine Influenza A Virus Vaccine Studies and Meta-Analysis of Vaccine Efficacy. Viruses 2023 Nov 28;15(12).
      doi: 10.3390/v15122337pubmed: 38140577google scholar: lookup