Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2023; 13(4); doi: 10.3390/ani13040581

Estimating the Prevalence and Factors Affecting the Shedding of Helminth Eggs in Irish Equine Populations.

Abstract: Gastrointestinal helminths are ubiquitous in horse populations across the world. Intensive anthelmintic treatments have succeeded in controlling some of the pathogenic effects of these parasites. However, the success of anthelmintic drugs has been threatened by the development of widespread resistance to those most commonly used. To develop improved control strategies, information on helminth distribution patterns is needed, which can be obtained by identifying animals regarded as high egg shedders and taking age, gender, and other risk factors into account. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of helminth infection in the Irish equine population using faecal egg counts and to evaluate the effects of risk factors on these faecal egg counts. For the 2700 horses that were included in the study, the prevalence of gastrointestinal helminth infection was 52.40%, 4.22%, 2.59%, and 0.89% for strongyle species, Parascaris spp., Anoplocephala spp., and Strongyloides westeri, respectively. Overall, strongyle faecal egg counts from 159 farms averaged 250.22 eggs per gram. Both age and season had significant effects on strongyle egg shedding. In conclusion, this study revealed high prevalence of strongyle worm infection in horses on Irish farms, which highlights the need to optimize and develop good management practices and strategic deworming.
Publication Date: 2023-02-07 PubMed ID: 36830368PubMed Central: PMC9951768DOI: 10.3390/ani13040581Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study investigates the percentage of horses in Ireland infected with gastrointestinal helminths (worms) and identifies various factors that influence how many helminth eggs these horses shed. The findings reveal a high prevalence of helminth infection, especially strongyle species, and point towards the importance of better management practices and strategic deworming for horse health.

Study Objectives and Methodology

The primary aim of the study was to determine how common helminth infections were among horses in Ireland. This was carried out using a method called ‘faecal egg counts’, which involved examining horse droppings for the presence of helminth eggs. Another objective of the study was to evaluate how various risk factors could influence these faecal egg counts, thus affecting the degree of infection in affected horses. These risk factors included aspects like the horse’s age and gender, among others. Overall, the study included 2700 horses.

  • The study estimated prevalence of different types of helminth infections- strongyle species, , and .
  • It also looked at factors affecting horses’ egg shedding rates, including age and season.
  • This is particularly significant because high egg shedders can spread the infection in a population much faster.

Key Findings

The research revealed that majority of the horses in the study were infected by gastrointestinal helminths. The infections were largely due to strongyle species, with a prevalence of 52.40%. The other helminth varieties —, — were considerably less prevalent, with prevalences of 4.22%, 2.59% and 0.89% respectively.

  • The average count of strongyle faecal eggs across 159 farms was 250.22 eggs per gram.
  • Both age and season had significant statistical impacts on strongyle egg shedding.

Conclusions and Implications

The research concluded that the prevalence of strongyle worm infection in Irish horse populations was high. The presence of significant correlations between certain factors (such as age and season) and the level of egg shedding indicates that such factors could be important considerations in attempting to control helminth infection. The results highlight the need to optimize management practices and strategic deworming in horse populations to limit the impacts of these helminth infections.

As such, this study provides valuable insight into helminth infection rates and influencing factors among horses in Ireland. It could prove valuable in creating improved strategies for controlling these infections and promoting better equine health.

Cite This Article

APA
Elghryani N, McOwan T, Mincher C, Duggan V, de Waal T. (2023). Estimating the Prevalence and Factors Affecting the Shedding of Helminth Eggs in Irish Equine Populations. Animals (Basel), 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040581

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 13
Issue: 4

Researcher Affiliations

Elghryani, Nagwa
  • Telenostic Ltd., R95 CRK2 Dublin, Ireland.
  • Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences-Gamines, University of Benghazi, Benghazi 33FX+QV9, Libya.
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 D6F6 Dublin, Ireland.
McOwan, Trish
  • Telenostic Ltd., R95 CRK2 Dublin, Ireland.
Mincher, Craig
  • Telenostic Ltd., R95 CRK2 Dublin, Ireland.
Duggan, Vivienne
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 D6F6 Dublin, Ireland.
de Waal, Theo
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 D6F6 Dublin, Ireland.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 61 references
  1. Bjørn H, Sommer C, Schougård H, Henriksen SA, Nansen P. Resistance to benzimidazole anthelmintics in small strongyles (Cyathostominae) of horses in Denmark.. Acta Vet. Scand. 1991;32:253–260.
    doi: 10.1186/BF03546987pmc: PMC8127888pubmed: 1803938google scholar: lookup
  2. Nielsen MK. Universal challenges for parasite control: A perspective from equine parasitology.. Trends Parasitol. 2015;31:282–284.
    doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2015.04.013pubmed: 26143301google scholar: lookup
  3. Saeed MA, Beveridge I, Abbas G, Beasley A, Bauquier J, Wilkes E, Jacobson C, Hughes KJ, El-Hage C, O’Handley R. Systematic review of gastrointestinal nematodes of horses from Australia.. Parasites Vectors 2019;12:188.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3445-4pmc: PMC6489199pubmed: 31036059google scholar: lookup
  4. Kornaś S, Skalska M, Nowosad B, Gawor J, Kharchenko V, Cabaret J. Occurrence of strongyles (Strongylidae) in horses from small farms on the basis of necropsy.. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2009;12:225–230.
    pubmed: 19645353
  5. Nielsen MK, Reinemeyer CR. Handbook of Equine Parasite Control.. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2018.
  6. Pilo C, Altea A, Pirino S, Nicolussi P, Varcasia A, Genchi M, Scala A. Strongylus vulgaris (Looss, 1900) in horses in Italy: Is it still a problem?. Vet. Parasitol. 2012;184:161–167.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.09.016pubmed: 21962966google scholar: lookup
  7. Duncan JL, Pirie HM. The life cycle of Strongylus vulgaris in the horse.. Res. Vet. Sci. 1972;13:374–379.
    doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)34017-7pubmed: 5072578google scholar: lookup
  8. Love S, Mckeand JB. Cyathostomosis: Practical issues of treatment and control.. Equine Vet. Educ. 1997;9:253–256.
  9. Kuzmina TA, Dzeverin I, Kharchenko VA. Strongylids in domestic horses: Influence of horse age, breed and deworming programs on the strongyle parasite community.. Vet. Parasitol. 2016;227:56–63.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.07.024pubmed: 27523938google scholar: lookup
  10. Herd RP. The changing world of worms: The rise of the cyathostomes and the decline of Strongylus vulgaris.. Compend. Contin. Educ. Pract. Vet. 1990;12:732–734, 736.
  11. Herd RP. Epidemiology and control of equine strongylosis at Newmarket.. Equine Vet. J. 1986;18:447–452.
  12. Uhlinger C. Equine small strongyles: Epidemiology, pathology, and control.. Compend. Contin. Educ. Pract. Vet. 1991;13:863–869.
  13. Walshe N, Duggan V, Cabrera-Rubio R, Crispie F, Cotter P, Feehan O, Mulcahy G. Removal of adult cyathostomins alters faecal microbiota and promotes an inflammatory phenotype in horses.. Int. J. Parasitol. 2019;49:489–500.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.02.003pubmed: 30986403google scholar: lookup
  14. Kuhnert-Paul Y, Schmäschke R, Daugschies A. Effect of distribution of eggs of strongyles and Parascaris equorum in faecal samples of horses on detection with a combined sedimentation-flotation method.. Tierarztl. Prax. Ausg. G Grosstiere Nutztiere 2012;40:21–26.
    pubmed: 22331287
  15. Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Collins SS. Prevalence of large endoparasites at necropsy in horses infected with Population B small strongyles in a herd established in Kentucky in 1966.. Parasitol. Res. 2006;99:114–118.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-005-0116-5pubmed: 16508764google scholar: lookup
  16. Fritzen B, Rohn K, Schnieder T, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Endoparasite control management on horse farms—Lessons from worm prevalence and questionnaire data.. Equine Vet. J. 2010;42:79–83.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X471485pubmed: 20121919google scholar: lookup
  17. Peregrine AS, Molento MB, Kaplan RM, Nielsen MK. Anthelmintic resistance in important parasites of horses: Does it really matter?. Vet. Parasitol. 2014;201:1–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.01.004pubmed: 24485565google scholar: lookup
  18. Nielsen MK. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes: Current status and emerging trends.. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2022;20:76–88.
  19. Lester HE, Matthews JB. Faecal worm egg count analysis for targeting anthelmintic treatment in horses: Points to consider.. Equine Vet. J. 2014;46:139–145.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12199pubmed: 24131301google scholar: lookup
  20. Joó K, Trúzsi RL, Kálmán CZ, Ács V, Jakab S, Bába A, Nielsen MK. Evaluation of risk factors affecting strongylid egg shedding on Hungarian horse farms.. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2022;27:100663.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2021.100663pubmed: 35012724google scholar: lookup
  21. Nielsen MK, Branan MA, Wiedenheft AM, Digianantonio R, Scare JA, Bellaw JL, Garber LP, Kopral CA, Phillippi-Taylor AM, Traub-Dargatz JL. Risk factors associated with strongylid egg count prevalence and abundance in the United States equine population.. Vet. Parasitol. 2018;257:58–68.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.05.006pubmed: 29773232google scholar: lookup
  22. Duncan JL, Love S. Preliminary observations on an alternative strategy for the control of horse strongyles.. Equine Vet. J. 1991;23:226–228.
  23. Krecek RC, Guthrie AJ, Van Nieuwenhuizen LC, Booth LM. A comparison between the effects of conventional and selective antiparasitic treatments on nematode parasites of horses from two management schemes.. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 1994;65:97–100.
    pubmed: 7595925
  24. Lloyd S. Effects of previous control programmes on the proportion of horses shedding small numbers of strongyle-type eggs.. Vet. Rec. 2009;164:108–111.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.164.4.108pubmed: 19168880google scholar: lookup
  25. Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Kuzmina TA. Investigation of strongyle EPG values in horse mares relative to known age, number positive, and level of egg shedding in field studies on 26 farms in Central Kentucky (2010–2011). Parasitol. Res. 2012;110:2237–2245.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2755-zpubmed: 22167377google scholar: lookup
  26. Matthee S, McGeoch MA. Helminths in horses: Use of selective treatment for the control of strongyles.. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 2004;75:8.
    doi: 10.4102/jsava.v75i3.468pubmed: 15628805google scholar: lookup
  27. Little D, Flowers JR, Hammerberg BH, Gardner SY. Management of drug-resistant cyathostominosis on a breeding farm in central North Carolina.. Equine Vet. J. 2003;35:246–251.
    doi: 10.2746/042516403776148264pubmed: 12755426google scholar: lookup
  28. Cringoli G, Amadesi A, Maurelli MP, Celano B, Piantadosi G, Bosco A, Ciuca L, Cesarelli M, Bifulco P, Montresor A. The Kubic FLOTAC microscope (KFM): A new compact digital microscope for helminth egg counts.. Parasitology 2021;148:427–434.
    doi: 10.1017/S003118202000219Xpmc: PMC7938342pubmed: 33213534google scholar: lookup
  29. Cringoli G, Maurelli MP, Levecke B, Bosco A, Vercruysse J, Utzinger J, Rinaldi L. The Mini-FLOTAC technique for the diagnosis of helminth and protozoan infections in humans and animals.. Nat. Protoc. 2017;12:1723–1732.
    doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.067pubmed: 28771238google scholar: lookup
  30. Nagamori Y, Sedlak RH, DeRosa A, Pullins A, Cree T, Loenser M, Larson BS, Smith RB, Penn C, Goldstein R. Further evaluation and validation of the VETSCAN IMAGYST: In-clinic feline and canine fecal parasite detection system integrated with a deep learning algorithm.. Parasites Vectors 2021;14:89.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04591-ypmc: PMC7844936pubmed: 33514412google scholar: lookup
  31. Elghryani N, Crispell J, Ebrahimi R, Krivoruchko M, Lobaskin V, McOwan T, O’Connor W, Power E, Voisin B, Scholz D. Preliminary evaluation of a novel, fully automated, Telenostic device for rapid field-diagnosis of cattle parasites.. Parasitology 2020;147:1249–1253.
    doi: 10.1017/S0031182020001031pmc: PMC10317713pubmed: 32576299google scholar: lookup
  32. Vlaminck J, Cools P, Albonico M, Ame S, Ayana M, Bethony J, Cringoli G, Dana D, Keiser J, Maurelli MP. Comprehensive evaluation of stool-based diagnostic methods and benzimidazole resistance markers to assess drug efficacy and detect the emergence of anthelmintic resistance: A Starworms study protocol.. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018;12:e0006912.
  33. Osterman Lind E, Höglund J, Ljungström BL, Nilsson O, Uggla A. A field survey on the distribution of strongyle infections of horses in Sweden and factors affecting faecal egg counts.. Equine Vet. J. 1999;31:68–72.
  34. Larsen MM, Lendal S, Chriél M, Olsen SN, Bjørn H. Risk factors for high endoparasitic burden and the efficiency of a single anthelmintic treatment of Danish horses.. Acta Vet. Scand. 2002;43:99.
    doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-43-99pmc: PMC1764195pubmed: 12173507google scholar: lookup
  35. Relf VE, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB. Helminth egg excretion with regard to age, gender and management practices on UK Thoroughbred studs.. Parasitology 2013;140:641–652.
    doi: 10.1017/S0031182012001941pubmed: 23351718google scholar: lookup
  36. Saeed K, Qadir Z, Ashraf K, Ahmad N. Role of intrinsic and extrinsic epidemiological factors on strongylosis in horses.. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2010;20:277–280.
  37. von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Traversa D, Demeler J, Rohn K, Milillo P, Schurmann S, Lia R, Perrucci S, di Regalbono AF, Beraldo P. Effects of worm control practices examined by a combined faecal egg count and questionnaire survey on horse farms in Germany, Italy and the UK.. Parasit Vectors 2009;2((Suppl. S2)):S3.
    doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-2-S2-S3pmc: PMC2751839pubmed: 19778464google scholar: lookup
  38. Wood ELD, Matthews JB, Stephenson S, Slote M, Nussey DH. Variation in fecal egg counts in horses managed for conservation purposes: Individual egg shedding consistency, age effects and seasonal variation.. Parasitology 2013;140:115–128.
    doi: 10.1017/S003118201200128Xpubmed: 22894917google scholar: lookup
  39. Scala A, Tamponi C, Sanna G, Predieri G, Dessì G, Sedda G, Buono F, Cappai MG, Veneziano V, Varcasia A. Gastrointestinal strongyles egg excretion in relation to age, gender, and management of horses in Italy.. Animals 2020;10:2283.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10122283pmc: PMC7761647pubmed: 33287298google scholar: lookup
  40. Barda BD, Rinaldi L, Ianniello D, Zepherine H, Salvo F, Sadutshang T, Cringoli G, Clementi M, Albonico M. Mini-FLOTAC, an innovative direct diagnostic technique for intestinal parasitic infections: Experience from the field.. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013;7:e2344.
  41. Bush AO, Lafferty KD, Lotz JM, Shostak AW. Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited.. J. Parasitol. 1997;83:575–583.
    doi: 10.2307/3284227pubmed: 9267395google scholar: lookup
  42. Wilson K, Ornstad O, Dobson A, Merler S, Poglayen G, Randolph S, Read A, Skorping A. Heterogeneities in macroparasite infections: Patterns and processes.. Ecol. Wildl. Dis. 2002;44:6–44.
  43. Muller KE, Stewart PW. Linear Model Theory: Univariate, Multivariate, and Mixed Models.. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2006.
  44. Mohammed Jajere S, Rabama Lawal J, Mohammed Bello A, Wakil Y, Aliyu Turaki U, Waziri I. Risk factors associated with the occurrence of gastrointestinal helminths among indigenous donkeys (Equus asinus) in Northeastern Nigeria.. Scientifica 2016;2016:3735210.
    doi: 10.1155/2016/3735210pmc: PMC4913051pubmed: 27366344google scholar: lookup
  45. Martins IVF, Verocai GG, Correia TR, Melo RMPS, Pereira MJS, Scott FB, Grisi L. Survey on control and management practices of equine helminthes infection.. Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 2009;29:253–257.
  46. Belay W, Teshome D, Abiye A. Study on the prevalance of gastrointestinal helminthes infection in Equines in and around Kombolcha.. J. Vet. Sci. Technol. 2016;7:367–372.
    doi: 10.4172/2157-7579.1000372google scholar: lookup
  47. Elghryani N, Duggan V, Relf V, de Waal T. Questionnaire survey on helminth control practices in horse farms in Ireland.. Parasitology 2019;146:873–882.
    doi: 10.1017/S0031182019000271pubmed: 30975241google scholar: lookup
  48. Francisco I, Arias M, Cortiñas FJ, Francisco R, Mochales E, Dacal V, Suárez JL, Uriarte J, Morrondo P, Sánchez-Andrade R. Intrinsic factors influencing the infection by helminth parasites in horses under an oceanic climate area (NW Spain). J. Parasitol. Res. 2009;2009:616173.
    doi: 10.1155/2009/616173pmc: PMC2915776pubmed: 20721327google scholar: lookup
  49. Matto TN, Bharkad GP, Bhat SA. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminth parasites of equids from organized farms of Mumbai and Pune.. J. Parasit. Dis. 2015;39:179–185.
    doi: 10.1007/s12639-013-0315-4pmc: PMC4456555pubmed: 26063996google scholar: lookup
  50. Matthee S, Krecek RC, Milne SA, Boshoff M, Guthrie AJ. Impact of management interventions on helminth levels, and body and blood measurements in working donkeys in South Africa.. Vet. Parasitol. 2002;107:103–113.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00113-9pubmed: 12072218google scholar: lookup
  51. Nielsen MK, Baptiste KE, Tolliver SC, Collins SS, Lyons ET. Analysis of multiyear studies in horses in Kentucky to ascertain whether counts of eggs and larvae per gram of feces are reliable indicators of numbers of strongyles and ascarids present.. Vet. Parasitol. 2010;174:77–84.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.08.007pubmed: 20850927google scholar: lookup
  52. Nielsen MK, Vidyashankar AN, Andersen UV, Delisi K, Pilegaard K, Kaplan RM. Effects of fecal collection and storage factors on strongylid egg counts in horses.. Vet. Parasitol. 2010;167:55–61.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.09.043pubmed: 19850412google scholar: lookup
  53. Lester HE, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB. Analysis of strongyle egg shedding consistency in horses and factors that affect It.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2018;60:113–119.e111.
  54. Coles GC, Jackson F, Pomroy WE, Prichard RK, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Silvestre A, Taylor MA, Vercruysse J. The detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance.. Vet. Parasitol. 2006;136:167–185.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.11.019pubmed: 16427201google scholar: lookup
  55. Reinemeyer CR. Diagnosis and control of anthelmintic-resistant Parascaris equorum.. Parasit Vectors 2009;2((Suppl. S2)):S8.
    doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-2-S2-S8pmc: PMC2751844pubmed: 19778469google scholar: lookup
  56. Bellaw JL, Pagan J, Cadell S, Phethean E, Donecker JM, Nielsen MK. Objective evaluation of two deworming regimens in young Thoroughbreds using parasitological and performance parameters.. Vet. Parasitol. 2016;221:69–75.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.03.018pubmed: 27084476google scholar: lookup
  57. Höglund J, Ljungström BL, Nilsson O, Lundquist H, Osterman E, Uggla A. Occurrence of Gasterophilus intestinalis and some parasitic nematodes of horses in Sweden.. Acta Vet. Scand. 1997;38:157–165.
    doi: 10.1186/BF03548495pmc: PMC8057032pubmed: 9257451google scholar: lookup
  58. Adams AA, Betancourt A, Barker VD, Siard MH, Elzinga S, Bellaw JL, Amodie DM, Nielsen MK. Comparison of the immunologic response to anthelmintic treatment in old versus middle-aged horses.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2015;35:873–881.e873.
  59. Lamason R, Zhao P, Rawat R, Davis A, Hall JC, Chae JJ, Agarwal R, Cohen P, Rosen A, Hoffman EP. Sexual dimorphism in immune response genes as a function of puberty.. BMC Immunol. 2006;7:2.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-7-2pmc: PMC1402325pubmed: 16504066google scholar: lookup
  60. Monteiro RV, Dietz JM, Beck BB, Baker AJ, Martins A, Jansen AM. Prevalence and intensity of intestinal helminths found in free-ranging golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia, Primates, Callitrichidae) from Brazilian Atlantic forest.. Vet. Parasitol. 2007;145:77–85.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.12.004pubmed: 17223269google scholar: lookup
  61. Eysker M, Boersema JH, Kooyman FN. Seasonally inhibited development of cyathostomine nematodes in Shetland ponies in The Netherlands.. Vet. Parasitol. 1990;36:259–264.
    doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(90)90037-Cpubmed: 2399646google scholar: lookup