Analyze Diet

[Evaluation of intravenous immunotherapy with purified F(ab’)2 fragments (Viperfav)].

Abstract: To assess early clinical and biological prognosis factors in viper envenomings, and assess efficacy of Viperfav immunotherapy. Viperfav contains purified F(ab')2 fragments of equine antibodies. Methods: A retrospective case review study of viper envenomings collected by two poison centers in France, treated or not treated by Viperfav, was conducted. Two hundred seven cases of viper bites including 119 moderate or severe envenomings (Grade II and III, recorded in adults and children and collected from 1992 to 1997 were included. Before treatment, clinical gradation and early biological severity criteria were collected. After treatment, or grade II and III envenomings, the two treatment groups were compared concerning severity and frequency of complications and sequelae, duration of hospitalization in intensive care unit (ICU) and duration of total hospital stay. Results: Before treatment, both groups were not significantly different. In the Viperfav treatment group, there was a significantly lower incidence of complications (4% vs. 21%, p = 0.02) and sequelae (0% vs 14%, p = 0.006). ICU stay greater than 3 days occurred in 28% of patients in the symptomatic treatment group and no case was recorded in the Viperfav group (p = 0.0002). Total hospital stay was reduced significantly in the Viperfav group versus symptomatic treatment group (3.3 vs. 8.7 days, p = 0.000002). Conclusions: Viperfav immunotherapy was safe and effective for rapidly counteracting venom toxicity and improved markedly the prognosis of viper envenomations. The studied clinical and biological prognosis factors are valuable tools for predicting moderate or severe envenomings and are helpful for early prescription of Viperfav antivenom.
Publication Date: 1999-12-22 PubMed ID: 10598149
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study focuses on evaluating the efficiency of Viperfav, an immunotherapy treatment for venomous viper bites. The research illustrates that the application of Viperfav greatly decreases the severity of complications and the duration of hospital stays in comparison to conventional symptomatic treatments.

Research Methodology

  • A total of 207 cases of viper bites from two French poison centers were studied retrospectively, including 119 severe cases (Grade II and III).
  • The data collected spanned from 1992 to 1997 and included cases in both adults and children.
  • Before starting treatment, clinical grading and early biological severity criteria were gathered to create a baseline for evaluation.
  • After the treatment, the two groups (one treated with Viperfav and the other with conventional symptomatic treatments) were compared, primarily focusing on the level and frequency of complications and sequelae, duration of stay in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and total hospital stay.
  • The aim of the research was to draw comparisons between the two different methods of treatments and identify the efficiency of Viperfav.

Research Findings

  • The research found no significant differences between the two groups prior to treatment, suggesting a balanced distribution of patient conditions.
  • Post-treatment, the Viperfav group showed a considerably lower incidence of complications (4% compared to 21% in the symptomatic treatment group) and sequelae (0% compared to 14%).
  • Furthermore, patients from the symptomatic treatment group required ICU stay for more than three days in 28% of cases, while no such instance was recorded in the Viperfav group.
  • The total duration of hospital stay was significantly lower in the Viperfav group compared to the symptomatic treatment group (3.3 days vs 8.7 days).

Conclusion

  • The study concludes that Viperfav immunotherapy is effective and safe; it quickly counters venom toxicity and significantly improves the prognosis of viper bite patients.
  • The collected clinical and biological prognosis factors serve as valuable predictors of moderate to severe envenomings, assisting healthcare providers with early prescription of Viperfav antivenom.

Cite This Article

APA
Harry P, de Haro L, Asfar P, David JM. (1999). [Evaluation of intravenous immunotherapy with purified F(ab’)2 fragments (Viperfav)]. Presse Med, 28(35), 1929-1934.

Publication

ISSN: 0755-4982
NlmUniqueID: 8302490
Country: France
Language: fre
Volume: 28
Issue: 35
Pages: 1929-1934

Researcher Affiliations

Harry, P
  • Centre antipoison et Réanimation médicale, CHU, Angers.
de Haro, L
    Asfar, P
      David, J M

        MeSH Terms

        • Adult
        • Animals
        • Child
        • Female
        • Horses
        • Humans
        • Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments / administration & dosage
        • Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments / adverse effects
        • Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments / therapeutic use
        • Immunotherapy / adverse effects
        • Immunotherapy / methods
        • Male
        • Middle Aged
        • Poisoning / physiopathology
        • Poisoning / therapy
        • Retrospective Studies
        • Viper Venoms / immunology
        • Viper Venoms / poisoning

        Citations

        This article has been cited 4 times.
        1. Marano M, Pisani M, Zampini G, Pontrelli G, Roversi M. Acute Exposure to European Viper Bite in Children: Advocating for a Pediatric Approach. Toxins (Basel) 2021 May 2;13(5).
          doi: 10.3390/toxins13050330pubmed: 34063282google scholar: lookup
        2. Kurtović T, Brvar M, Grenc D, Lang Balija M, Križaj I, Halassy B. A Single Dose of Viperfav(TM) May Be Inadequate for Vipera ammodytes Snake Bite: A Case Report and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation. Toxins (Basel) 2016 Aug 19;8(8).
          doi: 10.3390/toxins8080244pubmed: 27548220google scholar: lookup
        3. Dixit R, Herz J, Dalton R, Booy R. Benefits of using heterologous polyclonal antibodies and potential applications to new and undertreated infectious pathogens. Vaccine 2016 Feb 24;34(9):1152-61.
          doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.01.016pubmed: 26802604google scholar: lookup
        4. de Haro L, Glaizal M, Tichadou L, Blanc-Brisset I, Hayek-Lanthois M. Asp Viper (Vipera aspis) envenomation: experience of the Marseille Poison Centre from 1996 to 2008. Toxins (Basel) 2009 Dec;1(2):100-12.
          doi: 10.3390/toxins1020100pubmed: 22069534google scholar: lookup