Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2014; 44(3); 386-391; doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12299.x

Ex vivo evaluation of carpal flexion after partial carpal arthrodesis in horses.

Abstract: To determine degrees of flexion after arthrodesis of the antebrachiocarpal (ABC) joint, middle carpal (MC), and carpometacarpal (CMC) joints combined (MC/CMC), and carpometacarpal (CMC) joint alone. Methods: Ex vivo study. Methods: Forelimbs (n = 9) from 2- to 10-year-old Quarter Horses (5), Thoroughbred (2), and American Paint Horse (2). Methods: Using 2 locking compression plates, 3 partial carpal arthrodesis techniques were performed. Cables and deadweights were connected to limbs and each angle of flexion determined 3 times using a protractor and then averaged. Control measurements were obtained before and after arthrodesis, the techniques randomized with Latin square design. Descriptive data were analyzed with Levene's test, Q-Q plots, ANOVA, and Bonferroni test. Results: Mean ± SD carpal flexion results were: controls 150° ± 8°, CMC arthrodesis 149° ± 9°, MC/CMC arthrodesis 43° ± 7.6°, and ABC arthrodesis 25° ± 6.3°. There was no significant reduction in flexion after a CMC arthrodesis compared with controls (P = .21), but there was after ABC (P < .001) and MC/CMC arthrodesis (P < .001), with the ABC arthrodesis significantly reduced compared with an MC/CMC arthrodesis (P < .001). Conclusions: Whereas CMC arthrodesis does not affect carpal flexion, CMC/MC and ABC arthrodesis markedly reduce the degree of carpal flexion.
Publication Date: 2014-10-25 PubMed ID: 25345811DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12299.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores the impact of partial carpal arthrodesis, a surgical procedure on the effects on wrist (carpal) joint flexion in horses. It discovers that while carpometacarpal (CMC) arthrodesis doesn’t affect carpal flexion, procedures involving the middle carpal (MC), and the antebrachiocarpal (ABC) joints result in significant reductions.

Methods

  • The study employed an ex vivo design, that is, it was conducted on removed body parts (forelimbs from horses). The horses used were Quarter Horses, Thoroughbreds, and Paint Horses aged 2-10 years old.
  • Partial carpal arthrodesis was performed using two locking compression plates. The tests included arthrodesis of just the CMC joint, a combination of MC and CMC joints (MC/CMC), and ABC joint.
  • Once the arthrodesis was performed, cables and deadweights were attached to the limbs. The degrees of flexion were measured thrice using a protractor, and these measures were then averaged for accuracy.
  • Control measurements, representing the natural state of carpal flexion, were obtained before and after the arthrodesis procedures.
  • A Latin square design was used to randomize the techniques of arthrodesis among the sampled forelimbs.
  • The analysis of this data was performed using Levene’s test, Q-Q plots, ANOVA, and the Bonferroni test.

Results

  • The results showed that the CMC arthrodesis procedure had little to no effect on carpal flexion as compared to control measurements.
  • In contrast, significant reductions in flexion were observed after both ABC and MC/CMC arthrodesis.
  • Further, the ABC arthrodesis procedure resulted in the most pronounced reduction in carpal flexion when compared with the combined MC/CMC arthrodesis.

Conclusions

  • The researchers concluded that CMC arthrodesis does not have a significant impact on carpal flexion in equine patients.
  • However, arthrodesis procedures involving both CMC/MC and ABC joints substantially curtail the degree of carpal flexion. This information can be critical when selecting surgical methods in situations demanding maintenance of joint mobility in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Tulloch PJ, Johnston JD, Barber SM, Gellert CL, Lang HM, Panizzi L. (2014). Ex vivo evaluation of carpal flexion after partial carpal arthrodesis in horses. Vet Surg, 44(3), 386-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12299.x

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 44
Issue: 3
Pages: 386-391

Researcher Affiliations

Tulloch, Patty J
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Johnston, James D
    Barber, Spencer M
      Gellert, Candace L
        Lang, Hayley M
          Panizzi, Luca

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Arthrodesis / veterinary
            • Bone Plates / veterinary
            • Cadaver
            • Carpus, Animal / injuries
            • Carpus, Animal / surgery
            • Forelimb
            • Fractures, Bone / surgery
            • Fractures, Bone / veterinary
            • Horses / injuries
            • Horses / surgery
            • Joint Instability / veterinary
            • Range of Motion, Articular

            Citations

            This article has been cited 0 times.