FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
PloS one2017; 12(3); e0174059; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174059

Exogenous lactobacilli mitigate microbial changes associated with grain fermentation (corn, oats, and wheat) by equine fecal microflora ex vivo.

Abstract: Cereal grains are often included in equine diets. When starch intake exceeds foregut digestion starch will reach the hindgut, impacting microbial ecology. Probiotics (e.g., lactobacilli) are reported to mitigate GI dysbioses in other species. This study was conducted to determine the effect of exogenous lactobacilli on pH and the growth of amylolytic and lactate-utilizing bacteria. Feces were collected from 3 mature geldings fed grass hay with access to pasture. Fecal microbes were harvested by differential centrifugation, washed, and re-suspended in anaerobic media containing ground corn, wheat, or oats at 1.6% (w/v) starch and one of five treatments: Control (substrate only), L. acidophilus, L. buchneri, L. reuteri, or an equal mixture of all three (107 cells/mL, final concentration). After 24 h of incubation (37°C, 160 rpm), samples were collected for pH and enumerations of total amylolytics, Group D Gram-positive cocci (GPC; Enterococci, Streptococci), lactobacilli, and lactate-utilizing bacteria. Enumeration data were log transformed prior to ANOVA (SAS, v. 9.3). Lactobacilli inhibited pH decline in corn and wheat fermentations (P < 0.0001). Specifically, addition of either L. reuteri or L. acidophilus was most effective at mitigating pH decline with both corn and wheat fermentation, in which the greatest acidification occurred (P < 0.05). Exogenous lactobacilli decreased amylolytics, while increasing lactate-utilizers in corn and wheat fermentations (P < 0.0001). In oat fermentations, L. acidophilus and L. reuteri inhibited pH decline and increased lactate-utilizers while decreasing amylolytics (P < 0.0001). For all substrates, L. reuteri additions (regardless of viability) had the lowest number of GPC and the highest number of lactobacilli and lactate-utilizers (P < 0.05). There were no additive effects when lactobacilli were mixed. Exogenous lactobacilli decreased the initial (first 8 h) rate of starch catalysis when wheat was the substrate, but did not decrease total (24 h) starch utilization in any case. These results indicate that exogenous lactobacilli can impact the microbial community and pH of cereal grain fermentations by equine fecal microflora ex vivo. Additionally, dead (autoclaved) exogenous lactobacilli had similar effects as live lactobacilli on fermentation. This latter result indicates that the mechanism by which lactobacilli impact other amylolytic bacteria is not simple resource competition.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2017-03-30 PubMed ID: 28358885PubMed Central: PMC5373581DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174059Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the impact of adding lactobacilli to the ex vivo fermentation of cereal grains by horse gut bacteria. It found that the added lactobacilli significantly altered the microbial community and fermentation pH, demonstrating the potential use of lactobacilli as probiotics in equine diets.

Background

  • Horses’ diets often include cereal grains like corn, oats, and wheat. When the intake of starch from these grains exceeds the digestion capacity of the foregut, the excess starch will reach the hindgut and affect the microbial ecology.
  • This research was carried out to study the implications of adding lactobacilli, a kind of bacteria often used in probiotics, to the fermentation process of grains by equine gut bacteria (microflora) ex vivo, which means outside the living body. The impact on pH and the growth of specific types of bacteria was studied over a 24-hour period.

Methods

  • Fecal samples were collected from three mature geldings (castrated male horses) that were fed grass hay and given access to pasture.
  • The fecal microbes were extracted, washed, and mixed with media containing the ground grains and one of five treatments: no addition (control), L. acidophilus, L. buchneri, L. reuteri, or a mix of all three bacteria.
  • After incubation, samples were collected to measure pH levels and count populations of certain bacteria such as total amylolytics, Group D Gram-positive cocci (relating to strains of Enterococci and Streptococci), lactobacilli, and lactate-utilizing bacteria.

Findings

  • Lactobacilli inhibited the decrease in pH during the fermentation of corn and wheat. L. reuteri and L. acidophilus were notably effective at controlling pH decline in corn and wheat fermentations.
  • Exogenously added lactobacilli decreased the number of amylolytics while increasing the number of lactate-utilizers in corn and wheat fermentations. In oat fermentations, L. acidophilus and L. reuteri showed the same effect.
  • For all grain types, the addition of L. reuteri resulted in the lowest number of Group D Gram-positive cocci and the highest number of lactobacilli and lactate-utilizers.
  • No additive effects were noted when different lactobacilli were mixed together.
  • The addition of lactobacilli slowed down the initial rate of starch catalysis when wheat was used as the substrate, but did not impact the total amount of starch utilized over the 24-hour period.
  • Dead lactobacilli showed similar effects on fermentation as the live ones, suggesting that the impact of lactobacilli on other bacteria is not just simple resource competition.

Implications

  • The findings from this study suggest that the addition of exogenous lactobacilli can significantly alter the microbial community and pH balance during grain fermentations by equine gut microflora.
  • Given it doesn’t require the lactobacilli to be alive for them to have an impact implies that these bacteria may be used as probiotics in horse diets to modulate gut microflora, irrespective of their viability.

Cite This Article

APA
Harlow BE, Lawrence LM, Harris PA, Aiken GE, Flythe MD. (2017). Exogenous lactobacilli mitigate microbial changes associated with grain fermentation (corn, oats, and wheat) by equine fecal microflora ex vivo. PLoS One, 12(3), e0174059. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174059

Publication

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 3
Pages: e0174059
PII: e0174059

Researcher Affiliations

Harlow, Brittany E
  • Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY, United States of America.
Lawrence, Laurie M
  • Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY, United States of America.
Harris, Patricia A
  • Equine Studies Group, WALTHAM Centre for Pet Nutrition, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.
Aiken, Glen E
  • Forage Animal Production Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Lexington KY, United States of America.
Flythe, Michael D
  • Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY, United States of America.
  • Forage Animal Production Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Lexington KY, United States of America.

MeSH Terms

  • Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
  • Animals
  • Avena / chemistry
  • Digestion / physiology
  • Feces / chemistry
  • Feces / microbiology
  • Fermentation / drug effects
  • Gram-Positive Cocci / chemistry
  • Gram-Positive Cocci / metabolism
  • Horses / microbiology
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Lactobacillus / chemistry
  • Lactobacillus / metabolism
  • Probiotics / chemistry
  • Probiotics / metabolism
  • Starch / chemistry
  • Starch / metabolism
  • Triticum / chemistry
  • Zea mays / chemistry

Conflict of Interest Statement

BEH, LML, GEA and MDF declare no conflicts of interest. Patricia A. Harris is employed by one of the funders of this research (WALTHAM Centre for Pet Nutrition, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire. LE14 4RT). The authors confirm that this does not alter their adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

References

This article includes 28 references
  1. Harlow BE, Donley TM, Lawrence LM, Flythe MD. Effect of starch source (corn, oats or wheat) and concentration on fermentation by equine faecal microbiota in vitro.. J Appl Microbiol 2015 Nov;119(5):1234-44.
    doi: 10.1111/jam.12927pubmed: 26255645google scholar: lookup
  2. Harlow BE, Lawrence LM, Hayes SH, Crum A, Flythe MD. Effect of Dietary Starch Source and Concentration on Equine Fecal Microbiota.. PLoS One 2016;11(4):e0154037.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154037pmc: PMC4851386pubmed: 27128793google scholar: lookup
  3. Collins MD, Gibson GR. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics: approaches for modulating the microbial ecology of the gut.. Am J Clin Nutr 1999 May;69(5):1052S-1057S.
    pubmed: 10232648doi: 10.1093/ajcn/69.5.1052sgoogle scholar: lookup
  4. Desrochers AM, Dolente BA, Roy MF, Boston R, Carlisle S. Efficacy of Saccharomyces boulardii for treatment of horses with acute enterocolitis.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005 Sep 15;227(6):954-9.
    pubmed: 16190596doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.227.954google scholar: lookup
  5. Swyers KL, Burk AO, Hartsock TG, Ungerfeld EM, Shelton JL. Effects of direct-fed microbial supplementation on digestibility and fermentation end-products in horses fed low- and high-starch concentrates.. J Anim Sci 2008 Oct;86(10):2596-608.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0608pubmed: 18407981google scholar: lookup
  6. Wells JE, Krause DO, Callaway TR, Russell JB. A bacteriocin-mediated antagonism by ruminal lactobacilli against Streptococcus bovis. FEMS Microbiol Eco 1997; 22: 237–243.
  7. Bernard WV, Sebastian M, Hemming B. Salmonella antimicrobial activity of selected strains of enterolactobacillus species isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of the horse. J Equine Vet Sci 2011; 31: 396–399.
  8. Oude Elferink SJ, Krooneman J, Gottschal JC, Spoelstra SF, Faber F, Driehuis F. Anaerobic conversion of lactic acid to acetic acid and 1, 2-propanediol by Lactobacillus buchneri.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001 Jan;67(1):125-32.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.1.125-132.2001pmc: PMC92530pubmed: 11133436google scholar: lookup
  9. Kleinschmit DH, Kung L Jr. A meta-analysis of the effects of Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn and grass and small-grain silages.. J Dairy Sci 2006 Oct;89(10):4005-13.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72444-4pubmed: 16960077google scholar: lookup
  10. Garner HE, Moore JN, Johnson JH, Clark L, Amend JF, Tritschler LG, Coffmann JR, Sprouse RF, Hutcheson DP, Salem CA. Changes in the caecal flora associated with the onset of laminitis.. Equine Vet J 1978 Oct;10(4):249-52.
    pubmed: 738266doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1978.tb02273.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  11. Mantovani HC, Russell JB. Nisin resistance of Streptococcus bovis.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001 Feb;67(2):808-13.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.2.808-813.2001pmc: PMC92651pubmed: 11157247google scholar: lookup
  12. Mackie RI, Heath S. Enumeration and isolation of lactate-utilizing bacteria from the rumen of sheep.. Appl Environ Microbiol 1979 Sep;38(3):416-21.
    pmc: PMC243510pubmed: 16345430doi: 10.1128/aem.38.3.416-421.1979google scholar: lookup
  13. FASS. Guide for the care and use of agricultural animals in research and teaching. FASS Inc. Champaign, IL: 2010.
  14. Harlow BE, Lawrence LM, Kagan IA, Flythe MD. Inhibition of fructan-fermenting equine faecal bacteria and Streptococcus bovis by hops (Humulus lupulus L.) β-acid.. J Appl Microbiol 2014 Aug;117(2):329-39.
    doi: 10.1111/jam.12532pubmed: 24775300google scholar: lookup
  15. Sveinbjörnsson J, Murphy M, Udén P. In vitro evaluation of starch degradation from feeds with or without various heat treatments. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2007; 1323: 171–185.
  16. Kopp-Hoolihan L. Prophylactic and therapeutic uses of probiotics: a review.. J Am Diet Assoc 2001 Feb;101(2):229-38; quiz 239-41.
    doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00060-8pubmed: 11271697google scholar: lookup
  17. Valeur N, Engel P, Carbajal N, Connolly E, Ladefoged K. Colonization and immunomodulation by Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 in the human gastrointestinal tract.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004 Feb;70(2):1176-81.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.1176-1181.2004pmc: PMC348788pubmed: 14766603google scholar: lookup
  18. Vollenweider S, Lacroix C. 3-hydroxypropionaldehyde: applications and perspectives of biotechnological production.. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2004 Mar;64(1):16-27.
    doi: 10.1007/s00253-003-1497-ypubmed: 14669058google scholar: lookup
  19. Cleusix V, Lacroix C, Vollenweider S, Duboux M, Le Blay G. Inhibitory activity spectrum of reuterin produced by Lactobacillus reuteri against intestinal bacteria.. BMC Microbiol 2007 Nov 12;7:101.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-101pmc: PMC2222629pubmed: 17997816google scholar: lookup
  20. Axelsson L, Chung T, Dobrogosz W, Lindgren S. Production of a broad spectrum antimicrobial substance by Lactobacillus reuteri. Microb Ecol Health Dis 1989; 2: 131–136.
  21. De Fombelle A, Varloud AM, Goachet AG, Jacotot E, Philippeau C, Drogoul C. Characterization of the microbial and biochemical profile of the different segments of the digestive tract in horses given two distinct diets. Anim Sci 2003; 77: 293–304.
  22. Willing B, Vörös A, Roos S, Jones C, Jansson A, Lindberg JE. Changes in faecal bacteria associated with concentrate and forage-only diets fed to horses in training.. Equine Vet J 2009 Dec;41(9):908-14.
    pubmed: 20383990doi: 10.2746/042516409x447806google scholar: lookup
  23. Faubladier C, Julliand V, Danel J, Philippeau C. Bacterial carbohydrate-degrading capacity in foal faeces: changes from birth to pre-weaning and the impact of maternal supplementation with fermented feed products.. Br J Nutr 2013 Sep 28;110(6):1040-52.
    doi: 10.1017/S0007114512006162pubmed: 23388384google scholar: lookup
  24. Harlow BE, Lawrence LM, Flythe MD. Diarrhea-associated pathogens, lactobacilli and cellulolytic bacteria in equine feces: responses to antibiotic challenge.. Vet Microbiol 2013 Sep 27;166(1-2):225-32.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.05.003pubmed: 23769300google scholar: lookup
  25. Dougal K, de la Fuente G, Harris PA, Girdwood SE, Pinloche E, Geor RJ, Nielsen BD, Schott HC 2nd, Elzinga S, Newbold CJ. Characterisation of the faecal bacterial community in adult and elderly horses fed a high fibre, high oil or high starch diet using 454 pyrosequencing.. PLoS One 2014;9(2):e87424.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087424pmc: PMC3913607pubmed: 24504261google scholar: lookup
  26. Fuller R. Probiotics in human medicine.. Gut 1991 Apr;32(4):439-42.
    pmc: PMC1379087pubmed: 1902810doi: 10.1136/gut.32.4.439google scholar: lookup
  27. Musa H, Wu S, Zhu C, Seri H, Zhu G. The potential benefits of probiotics in animal production and health. J Anim Vet Adv 2009; 8: 313–321.
  28. Huang R, Tao X, Wan C, Li S, Xu H, Xu F, Shah NP, Wei H. In vitro probiotic characteristics of Lactobacillus plantarum ZDY 2013 and its modulatory effect on gut microbiota of mice.. J Dairy Sci 2015 Sep;98(9):5850-61.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9153pubmed: 26142853google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Chaucheyras-Durand F, Sacy A, Karges K, Apper E. Gastro-Intestinal Microbiota in Equines and Its Role in Health and Disease: The Black Box Opens. Microorganisms 2022 Dec 19;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10122517pubmed: 36557769google scholar: lookup
  2. Boucher L, Leduc L, Leclère M, Costa MC. Current Understanding of Equine Gut Dysbiosis and Microbiota Manipulation Techniques: Comparison with Current Knowledge in Other Species. Animals (Basel) 2024 Feb 28;14(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14050758pubmed: 38473143google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,780 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.