Analyze Diet
Epidemiology and infection2016; 144(9); 1830-1836; doi: 10.1017/S0950268816000091

Experiences with a voluntary surveillance system for early detection of equine diseases in Switzerland.

Abstract: Clinical observations made by practitioners and reported using web- and mobile-based technologies may benefit disease surveillance by improving the timeliness of outbreak detection. Equinella is a voluntary electronic reporting and information system established for the early detection of infectious equine diseases in Switzerland. Sentinel veterinary practitioners have been able to report cases of non-notifiable diseases and clinical symptoms to an internet-based platform since November 2013. Telephone interviews were carried out during the first year to understand the motivating and constraining factors affecting voluntary reporting and the use of mobile devices in a sentinel network. We found that non-monetary incentives attract sentinel practitioners; however, insufficient understanding of the reporting system and of its relevance, as well as concerns over the electronic dissemination of health data were identified as potential challenges to sustainable reporting. Many practitioners are not yet aware of the advantages of mobile-based surveillance and may require some time to become accustomed to novel reporting methods. Finally, our study highlights the need for continued information feedback loops within voluntary sentinel networks.
Publication Date: 2016-02-05 PubMed ID: 26846449PubMed Central: PMC9150615DOI: 10.1017/S0950268816000091Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research is about Equinella, a voluntary electronic reporting system in Switzerland for early detection of equine diseases, and explores the motivating factors and challenges for its use among veterinary practitioners. It also examines the adoption of mobile technologies in reporting these diseases.

Objective of the Research

  • The main goal of this study was to understand the experiences of veterinary practitioners in Switzerland using Equinella, a voluntary surveillance system for early detection of infectious equine diseases. The research looked at the factors that motivate or deter these professionals from using the system including their adoption of web and mobile-based technologies in reporting instances of diseases.

Methods and Process

  • The researchers carried out telephone interviews during the system’s first year of implementation. These interviews were designed to gain insight into the practitioners’ motivations, incentives, and constraints in using the system.

Key Findings

  • The study found that non-monetary incentives such as aiding in the early detection and control of diseases were significant attraction factors for the veterinary practitioners using Equinella.
  • It was discovered that potential challenges to sustainable reporting included a lack of clear understanding of the reporting system and its importance, as well as concerns over the security of health data disseminated electronically.
  • The researchers observed that many practitioners were not fully aware of the benefits of utilizing mobile technology for disease surveillance and reporting. This implies a need for further training or information dissemination about the use of the platform.

Implications of the Findings

  • The findings emphasize the need for a feedback mechanism within the voluntary sentinel networks to ensure active participation from the practitioners and effective operation of the system.
  • The study also suggests that more efforts are needed to educate veterinary practitioners on the benefits of mobile-based surveillance and salient features of this reporting system to improve its acceptance and usage.

Cite This Article

APA
Struchen R, Hadorn D, Wohlfender F, Balmer S, Süptitz S, Zinsstag J, Vial F. (2016). Experiences with a voluntary surveillance system for early detection of equine diseases in Switzerland. Epidemiol Infect, 144(9), 1830-1836. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268816000091

Publication

ISSN: 1469-4409
NlmUniqueID: 8703737
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 144
Issue: 9
Pages: 1830-1836

Researcher Affiliations

Struchen, R
  • Veterinary Public Health Institute,Vetsuisse Faculty,University of Bern,Switzerland.
Hadorn, D
  • Swiss Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office,Bern,Switzerland.
Wohlfender, F
  • Veterinary Public Health Institute,Vetsuisse Faculty,University of Bern,Switzerland.
Balmer, S
  • Swiss Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office,Bern,Switzerland.
Süptitz, S
  • Swiss Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office,Bern,Switzerland.
Zinsstag, J
  • Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute,University of Basel,Switzerland.
Vial, F
  • Veterinary Public Health Institute,Vetsuisse Faculty,University of Bern,Switzerland.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Disease Notification / methods
  • Early Diagnosis
  • Epidemiological Monitoring
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Horses
  • Internet
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Switzerland / epidemiology

References

This article includes 20 references
  1. Chunara R, Freifeld CC, Brownstein JS. New technologies for reporting real-time emergent infections.. Parasitology 2012 Dec;139(14):1843-51.
    pmc: PMC3760201pubmed: 22894823doi: 10.1017/s0031182012000923google scholar: lookup
  2. Madder M. E-surveillance in animal health: use and evaluation of mobile tools. Parasitology 2012; 139: 1831–1842.
    pubmed: 0
  3. Walker J. New media methods for syndromic surveillance and disease modelling. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 2013; 8: 1–13.
  4. Rodríguez-Prieto V. Systematic review of surveillance systems and methods for early detection of exotic, new and re-emerging diseases in animal populations. Epidemiology and Infection 2014; 143: 2018–2042.
    pubmed: 0
  5. Halliday J. Bringing together emerging and endemic zoonoses surveillance: shared challenges and a common solution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences 2012; 367: 2872–2880.
    pubmed: 0
  6. Freifeld CC. Participatory epidemiology: use of mobile phones for community-based health reporting. PLoS Medicine 2010; 7: e1000376.
    pubmed: 0
  7. Vourc'h G. Detecting emerging diseases in farm animals through clinical observations. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2006; 12: 204–210.
    pubmed: 0
  8. Robertson C, Sawford K, Daniel SL, Nelson TA, Stephen C. Mobile phone-based infectious disease surveillance system, Sri Lanka.. Emerg Infect Dis 2010 Oct;16(10):1524-31.
    pmc: PMC3294391pubmed: 20875276doi: 10.3201/eid1610.100249google scholar: lookup
  9. Sawford K, Vollman AR, Stephen C. A focused ethnographic study of Alberta cattle veterinarians' decision making about diagnostic laboratory submissions and perceptions of surveillance programs.. PLoS One 2013;8(5):e64811.
  10. Sawford K, Vollman AR, Stephen C. A focused ethnographic study of Sri Lankan government field veterinarians’ decision making about diagnostic laboratory submissions and perceptions of surveillance. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e48035.
    pubmed: 0
  11. Robinson PA, Epperson WB. Farm animal practitioners’ views on their use and expectations of veterinary diagnostic laboratories. Veterinary Record 2013; 172: 503.
    pubmed: 0
  12. Wohlfender FD. A review of twenty years of equine infectious disease monitoring in Switzerland: past, present and future. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2012; 32: S92.
  13. Wohlfender F. Equine infectious disease monitoring in Switzerland: past, present and future [in German]. ALP Science 2013; 543: 22–23.
  14. Anonymous. Re-launch of Equinella: sentinel veterinarians wanted! [in German]. Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde 2013; 155: 594–595.
  15. Hauser R, Meier HP. Equinella – the monitoring of infectious equine diseases in Switzerland. In Proceedings of the 9th Symposium of the International Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Breckenridge, Colorado, USA. Respiratory disease in horses session, p. 300, August 2000 International Symposia on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics.
  16. Struchen R. Investigating the potential of reported cattle mortality data in Switzerland for syndromic surveillance. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2015; 121: 1–7.
    pubmed: 0
  17. Perrin JB. Assessment of the utility of routinely collected cattle census and disposal data for syndromic surveillance. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2012; 105: 244–252.
    pubmed: 0
  18. Smyth GB, Dagley K, Tainsh J. Insights into the economic consequences of the 2007 equine influenza outbreak in Australia. Australian Veterinary Journal 2011; 89 (Suppl. 1): 151–158.
    pubmed: 0
  19. Waller AS. Strangles: taking steps towards eradication. Veterinary Microbiology 2013; 167: 50–60.
    pubmed: 0
  20. Leblond A, Hendrikx P, Sabatier P. West Nile Virus outbreak detection using syndromic monitoring in horses. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 2007; 7: 403–410.
    pubmed: 0

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
  1. Grajeda LM, McCracken JP, Berger-González M, López MR, Álvarez D, Méndez S, Pérez O, Cordón-Rosales C, Zinsstag J. Sensitivity and representativeness of one-health surveillance for diseases of zoonotic potential at health facilities relative to household visits in rural Guatemala.. One Health 2021 Dec;13:100336.
    doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100336pubmed: 34703874google scholar: lookup
  2. Özçelik R, Remy-Wohlfender F, Küker S, Visschers V, Hadorn D, Dürr S. Potential and Challenges of Community-Based Surveillance in Animal Health: A Pilot Study Among Equine Owners in Switzerland.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:641448.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.641448pubmed: 34150880google scholar: lookup
  3. Garza M, Ågren ECC, Lindberg A. Nudging in Animal Disease Control and Surveillance: A Qualitative Approach to Identify Strategies Used to Improve Compliance With Animal Health Policies.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:383.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00383pubmed: 32850995google scholar: lookup
  4. Özçelik R, Graubner C, Remy-Wohlfender F, Dürr S, Faverjon C. Evaluating 5.5 Years of Equinella: A Veterinary-Based Voluntary Infectious Disease Surveillance System of Equines in Switzerland.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:327.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00327pubmed: 32695799google scholar: lookup
  5. Dórea FC, Vial F. Animal health syndromic surveillance: a systematic literature review of the progress in the last 5 years (2011-2016).. Vet Med (Auckl) 2016;7:157-170.
    doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S90182pubmed: 30050848google scholar: lookup