Analyze Diet
Behavioural processes1997; 40(3); 209-221; doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00784-5

Experimental tests to assess emotionality in horses.

Abstract: Different tests were used to assess different aspects of the emotionality of 1-3 year-old horses: arena test; a `novel object' test; and a handling test. In reaction to the test situations no important differences were observed according to age or sex in the behaviour patterns, but clear individual differences were observed within these classes. The arena test seemed to reveal the degree of gregariousness of the animals whereas the results in the two other tests were correlated and seemed to reflect an inherent degree of fearfulness in the horse. Indices were developed that enabled to rank the animals, by taking into account all behaviour patterns shown. Such individual characteristics might have some genetic basis: half-siblings tended to behave the same way in most cases.
Publication Date: 1997-09-01 PubMed ID: 24895882DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00784-5Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores the use of different tests to measure emotional responses in horses, highlighting individual differences but no significant differences due to age or sex.

Research Methodology

  • The researchers conducted three different tests on 1-3 year-old horses: an arena test, a ‘novel object’ test, and a handling test. These tests were designed to evaluate the horses’ reactions to different circumstances and environments.
  • The arena test was used to measure the horses’ social tendencies or their degree of gregariousness. It likely involved observing how the animals behaved in a large space and interacted with others.
  • The novel object test and handling test were utilized to gauge the inherent fear reactions of the horses. These tests likely involved introducing the horses to unfamiliar items or situations and assessing their responses.

Findings of the Research

  • The results revealed no significant differences in the behavior patterns relating to the horses’ age or sex across the test situations.
  • Notably, individual differences were clear and observable among the horses despite their age or sex. This could mean that each horse has unique emotional responses which might be more tied to their individual personalities rather than their age or sex.
  • The researchers also established indices from these tests to categorize the animals based on the various behavior patterns observed. This means that they created a way of ranking or classifying the horses based on their responses to the different tests.

Interpretations and Implications

  • One vital discovery from the tests is the potential genetic basis for these emotional differences. The researchers found that half-siblings tended to react in similar ways in most of the situations presented. This suggests that their emotional reactions could be at least partly hereditary.
  • This research has sizeable implications for horse breeding, training, and care. Understanding their inherent fearfulness or gregariousness can help in tailoring the approaches used for each individual horse. It can also inform breeding decisions, potentially allowing for certain desirable traits to be encouraged while less favorable traits are bred out.

Cite This Article

APA
Wolff A, Hausberger M, Le Scolan N. (1997). Experimental tests to assess emotionality in horses. Behav Processes, 40(3), 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00784-5

Publication

ISSN: 0376-6357
NlmUniqueID: 7703854
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 40
Issue: 3
Pages: 209-221

Researcher Affiliations

Wolff, A
  • Ethologie Evolution Ecologie, Université de Rennes I, UMR CNRS 373, Avenue du Général Leclerc, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France.
Hausberger, M
    Le Scolan, N

      Citations

      This article has been cited 30 times.
      1. d'Ingeo S, Siniscalchi M, Quaranta A, Cousillas H, Hausberger M. Chronic State and Relationship to Humans Influence How Horses Decode Emotions in Human Voices: A Brain and Behavior Study. Animals (Basel) 2025 Nov 5;15(21).
        doi: 10.3390/ani15213217pubmed: 41227547google scholar: lookup
      2. Klitzing L, Kirsch K, Schindler M, Merle R, Hoffmann G, Thöne-Reineke C, Wiegard M. Exploring factors that influence the behavior response to novel object tests in young thoroughbred horses: investigating sex, test site and auction history. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1478350.
        doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1478350pubmed: 39881719google scholar: lookup
      3. Gueguen L, Henry S, Delbos M, Lemasson A, Hausberger M. Selected Acoustic Frequencies Have a Positive Impact on Behavioural and Physiological Welfare Indicators in Thoroughbred Racehorses. Animals (Basel) 2023 Sep 20;13(18).
        doi: 10.3390/ani13182970pubmed: 37760370google scholar: lookup
      4. Janicka W, Wilk I, Próchniak T. Does social motivation mitigate fear caused by a sudden sound in horses?. Anim Cogn 2023 Sep;26(5):1649-1660.
        doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01805-xpubmed: 37450226google scholar: lookup
      5. Hole C, Murray R, Marlin D, Freeman P. Equine Behavioural and Physiological Responses to Auditory Stimuli in the Presence and Absence of Noise-Damping Ear Covers. Animals (Basel) 2023 May 8;13(9).
        doi: 10.3390/ani13091574pubmed: 37174609google scholar: lookup
      6. Harvey AM, Beausoleil NJ, Ramp D, Mellor DJ. Mental Experiences in Wild Animals: Scientifically Validating Measurable Welfare Indicators in Free-Roaming Horses. Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 28;13(9).
        doi: 10.3390/ani13091507pubmed: 37174544google scholar: lookup
      7. Lee KE, Kim JG, Lee H, Kim BS. Behavioral and cardiac responses in mature horses exposed to a novel object. J Anim Sci Technol 2021 May;63(3):651-661.
        doi: 10.5187/jast.2021.e51pubmed: 34189512google scholar: lookup
      8. Burattini B, Fenner K, Anzulewicz A, Romness N, McKenzie J, Wilson B, McGreevy P. Age-Related Changes in the Behaviour of Domestic Horses as Reported by Owners. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 7;10(12).
        doi: 10.3390/ani10122321pubmed: 33297447google scholar: lookup
      9. Panzera M, Alberghina D, Statelli A. Ethological and Physiological Parameters Assessment in Donkeys Used in Animal Assisted Interventions. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 13;10(10).
        doi: 10.3390/ani10101867pubmed: 33066258google scholar: lookup
      10. Lesimple C. Indicators of Horse Welfare: State-of-the-Art. Animals (Basel) 2020 Feb 13;10(2).
        doi: 10.3390/ani10020294pubmed: 32069888google scholar: lookup
      11. Schrimpf A, Single MS, Nawroth C. Social Referencing in the Domestic Horse. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jan 18;10(1).
        doi: 10.3390/ani10010164pubmed: 31963699google scholar: lookup
      12. Contreras-Aguilar MD, Henry S, Coste C, Tecles F, Escribano D, Cerón JJ, Hausberger M. Changes in Saliva Analytes Correlate with Horses' Behavioural Reactions to An Acute Stressor: A Pilot Study. Animals (Basel) 2019 Nov 18;9(11).
        doi: 10.3390/ani9110993pubmed: 31752194google scholar: lookup
      13. Briefer Freymond S, Bardou D, Beuret S, Bachmann I, Zuberbühler K, Briefer EF. Elevated Sensitivity to Tactile Stimuli in Stereotypic Horses. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:162.
        doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00162pubmed: 31275947google scholar: lookup
      14. Rosselot P, Mendonça T, González I, Tadich T. Behavioral and Physiological Differences between Working Horses and Chilean Rodeo Horses in a Handling Test. Animals (Basel) 2019 Jun 29;9(7).
        doi: 10.3390/ani9070397pubmed: 31261934google scholar: lookup
      15. Fenner K, Caspar G, Hyde M, Henshall C, Dhand N, Probyn-Rapsey F, Dashper K, McLean A, McGreevy P. It's all about the sex, or is it? Humans, horses and temperament. PLoS One 2019;14(5):e0216699.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216699pubmed: 31086385google scholar: lookup
      16. Sénèque E, Lesimple C, Morisset S, Hausberger M. Could posture reflect welfare state? A study using geometric morphometrics in riding school horses. PLoS One 2019;14(2):e0211852.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211852pubmed: 30721258google scholar: lookup
      17. Scopa C, Palagi E, Sighieri C, Baragli P. Physiological outcomes of calming behaviors support the resilience hypothesis in horses. Sci Rep 2018 Nov 30;8(1):17501.
        doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35561-7pubmed: 30504840google scholar: lookup
      18. Stomp M, Leroux M, Cellier M, Henry S, Lemasson A, Hausberger M. An unexpected acoustic indicator of positive emotions in horses. PLoS One 2018;13(7):e0197898.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197898pubmed: 29995876google scholar: lookup
      19. Rochais C, Sébilleau M, Houdebine M, Bec P, Hausberger M, Henry S. A novel test for evaluating horses' spontaneous visual attention is predictive of attention in operant learning tasks. Naturwissenschaften 2017 Aug;104(7-8):61.
        doi: 10.1007/s00114-017-1480-6pubmed: 28681089google scholar: lookup
      20. Henry S, Fureix C, Rowberry R, Bateson M, Hausberger M. Do horses with poor welfare show 'pessimistic' cognitive biases?. Naturwissenschaften 2017 Feb;104(1-2):8.
        doi: 10.1007/s00114-016-1429-1pubmed: 28083632google scholar: lookup
      21. Gronqvist G, Rogers C, Gee E, Bolwell C, Gordon S. The Challenges of Using Horses for Practical Teaching Purposes in Veterinary Programmes. Animals (Basel) 2016 Nov 11;6(11).
        doi: 10.3390/ani6110069pubmed: 27845702google scholar: lookup
      22. Chapman M, Thompson K. Preventing and Investigating Horse-Related Human Injury and Fatality in Work and Non-Work Equestrian Environments: A Consideration of the Workplace Health and Safety Framework. Animals (Basel) 2016 May 6;6(5).
        doi: 10.3390/ani6050033pubmed: 27164148google scholar: lookup
      23. Jacobs LN, Staiger EA, Albright JD, Brooks SA. The MC1R and ASIP Coat Color Loci May Impact Behavior in the Horse. J Hered 2016 May;107(3):214-9.
        doi: 10.1093/jhered/esw007pubmed: 26884605google scholar: lookup
      24. Masuda T, Takakura A, Kobayashi S. Flight distance and avoidance score in thoroughbred foals and yearlings and the relationship with handling frequency in the young ages. J Equine Sci 2008;19(1):19-24.
        doi: 10.1294/jes.19.19pubmed: 24833951google scholar: lookup
      25. Valenchon M, Lévy F, Prunier A, Moussu C, Calandreau L, Lansade L. Stress modulates instrumental learning performances in horses (Equus caballus) in interaction with temperament. PLoS One 2013;8(4):e62324.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062324pubmed: 23626801google scholar: lookup
      26. Durier V, Henry S, Sankey C, Sizun J, Hausberger M. Locomotor Inhibition in Adult Horses Faced to Stressors: A Single Postpartum Experience May be Enough!. Front Psychol 2012;3:442.
        doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00442pubmed: 23112783google scholar: lookup
      27. McBride SD, Mills DS. Psychological factors affecting equine performance. BMC Vet Res 2012 Sep 27;8:180.
        doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-180pubmed: 23016987google scholar: lookup
      28. Fureix C, Jego P, Henry S, Lansade L, Hausberger M. Towards an ethological animal model of depression? A study on horses. PLoS One 2012;7(6):e39280.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039280pubmed: 22761752google scholar: lookup
      29. Hausberger M, Muller C, Lunel C. Does work affect personality? A study in horses. PLoS One 2011 Feb 9;6(2):e14659.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014659pubmed: 21347405google scholar: lookup
      30. Berger J, Valdez S, Puschner B, Leutenegger CM, Gardner IA, Madigan JE. Effects of oral tetrachlorvinphos fly control (Equitrol) administration in horses: physiological and behavioural findings. Vet Res Commun 2008 Jan;32(1):75-92.
        doi: 10.1007/s11259-007-9004-zpubmed: 17522960google scholar: lookup