Analyze Diet
Ultrasound in medicine & biology1996; 22(7); 907-915; doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(96)00085-3

Factors affecting the ultrasonic properties of equine digital flexor tendons.

Abstract: The velocity, attenuation and apparent backscattering coefficient of 6-11-MHz ultrasound were measured in three orthogonal directions in equine deep digital flexor (DDF) and superficial digital flexor (SDF) tendons at 0 degree C. Ultrasonic measurements were examined for correlation with tendon water, collagen, DNA and glycosaminoglycans contents, determined by chemical analyses and with structure observed by scanning electron microscopy. The SDF tendon contained more water, more DNA (i.e., more cells), less collagen and less glycosaminoglycans and exhibited lower velocities and attenuations than the DDF tendon. Velocities were governed primarily by the adiabatic bulk modulus and density, perturbed by a highly direction-dependent rigidity. Ultrasound propagating across tendon generated frequency-independent backscattering which appeared to derive from the large interfaces between the fascicles, while along the fibres backscattering varied as f3.62 +/- 0.88 and appeared to derive from small structures such as collagen fibres. The mechanisms by which ultrasound is attenuated by tendon remain unknown.
Publication Date: 1996-01-01 PubMed ID: 8923709DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(96)00085-3Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research studied the impact of various factors on the ultrasound properties of horse tendons. The findings revealed differences in water, cell, collagen and glycosaminoglycan content, as well as in ultrasonic measurements, between two different types of tendons. The exact processes affecting ultrasound attenuation in tendons, however, remain unclear.

Methodology

  • The researchers used ultrasound frequency ranges between 6-11 MHz to measure the velocity, attenuation, and apparent backscattering coefficient of two types of horse tendons – the Deep Digital Flexor (DDF) and Superficial Digital Flexor (SDF).
  • These measurements were conducted in three different directions at zero degree Celsius.
  • The researchers also analyzed the water, collagen, DNA, and glycosaminoglycans content in the tendons through chemical analyses.
  • The structure of these tendons was observed using scanning electron microscopy.

Findings

  • The SDF tendon had more water and DNA (indicative of more cells), but less collagen and glycosaminoglycans than the DDF tendon.
  • The SDF tendon also showed lower velocities and attenuations compared to the DDF tendon.
  • Velocity was mainly affected by the adiabatic bulk modulus (the property showing how the volume of a substance changes with pressure at constant entropy) and density, with the change particularly directional-dependent.
  • Ultrasound propagation across the tendon resulted in frequency-independent backscattering, seemingly originating from the large interfaces between the fascicles (bundles of muscle fibers).
  • Backscattering along the fibers varied and appeared to originate from smaller structures, such as collagen fibers.

Unresolved Questions

  • Despite these findings, the study concluded that the specific mechanisms causing ultrasound to be attenuated by tendon are not yet fully understood.

The implications of these findings could be important for understanding tendon health in horses and may contribute to the development of improved diagnostic and treatment methods for tendon-related issues.

Cite This Article

APA
Miles CA, Fursey GA, Birch HL, Young RD. (1996). Factors affecting the ultrasonic properties of equine digital flexor tendons. Ultrasound Med Biol, 22(7), 907-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-5629(96)00085-3

Publication

ISSN: 0301-5629
NlmUniqueID: 0410553
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 22
Issue: 7
Pages: 907-915

Researcher Affiliations

Miles, C A
  • Muscle and Collagen Research Group, University of Bristol, UK.
Fursey, G A
    Birch, H L
      Young, R D

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Body Water / metabolism
        • Collagen / analysis
        • DNA / analysis
        • Forelimb
        • Glycosaminoglycans / analysis
        • Horses / anatomy & histology
        • Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
        • Tendons / chemistry
        • Tendons / diagnostic imaging
        • Tendons / ultrastructure
        • Ultrasonography

        Grant Funding

        • Wellcome Trust

        Citations

        This article has been cited 4 times.
        1. Wearing SC, Kuhn L, Pohl T, Horstmann T, Brauner T. Transmission-Mode Ultrasound for Monitoring the Instantaneous Elastic Modulus of the Achilles Tendon During Unilateral Submaximal Vertical Hopping. Front Physiol 2020;11:567641.
          doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.567641pubmed: 33343380google scholar: lookup
        2. Wulf M, Shanker M, Schuetz M, Lutz M, Langton CM, Hooper SL, Smeathers JE, Brauner T, Wearing SC. Lower material stiffness in rupture-repaired Achilles tendon during walking: transmission-mode ultrasound for post-surgical tendon evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018 Jul;26(7):2030-2037.
          doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4624-5pubmed: 28660438google scholar: lookup
        3. Lin YH, Yang TH, Wang SH, Su FC. Quantitative Assessment of First Annular Pulley and Adjacent Tissues Using High-Frequency Ultrasound. Sensors (Basel) 2017 Jan 7;17(1).
          doi: 10.3390/s17010107pubmed: 28067854google scholar: lookup
        4. Wearing SC, Hooper SL, Langton CM, Keiner M, Horstmann T, Crevier-Denoix N, Pourcelot P. The Biomechanics of Musculoskeletal Tissues during Activities of Daily Living: Dynamic Assessment Using Quantitative Transmission-Mode Ultrasound Techniques. Healthcare (Basel) 2024 Jun 24;12(13).
          doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131254pubmed: 38998789google scholar: lookup