Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2021; 50(2); 365-374; doi: 10.1111/vsu.13560

Feasibility, indications, and radiographically confirmed diagnoses of standing extremity cone beam computed tomography in the horse.

Abstract: To report on the feasibility, indications, and diagnostic yield of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of horses' extremities performed under standing sedation. Methods: Retrospective clinical case series. Methods: Fifty-nine CBCT examinations in 58 horses. Methods: Examinations were categorized for indications for CBCT dependent on a suspicion, presence, or absence of a diagnosis prior to CBCT. The number of acquisitions per examination, total time for the examination, diagnostic score of each acquisition (diagnostic, diagnostic-compromised, nondiagnostic), and additional diagnostic information regarding preexisting diagnostic information were recorded. Results: Three (median) acquisitions were performed per examination in a median study time of 14 minutes. In 24 of 33 cases with a suspected diagnosis, this diagnosis was confirmed or definitively refuted; in seven of 33 cases, the suspected diagnosis was refuted without a new diagnosis; and, in two of 33 cases, the suspected diagnosis could not be confirmed nor could a new diagnosis be made. In five of nine cases without a preexisting diagnosis, a diagnosis was established. In 16 cases with a diagnosis prior to CBCT, additional information was recorded, or a surgical plan was prepared. In 14 of 18 cases in which additional contrast techniques were used, additional information was gained. Conclusions: Standing CBCT of the horses' extremities is feasible and can produce diagnostic information in a timely fashion. Conclusions: The results provide evidence of the practicality and diagnostic potential of standing CBCT of horses' extremities.
Publication Date: 2021-01-09 PubMed ID: 33421172DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13560Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses the feasibility and applicability of using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to examine horses’ extremities while they are standing and under sedation.

Methodology

  • A total of 59 CBCT examinations were conducted on 58 horses.
  • The reasons for performing CBCT were classified based on a preliminary diagnosis (or the lack of one) before the scan was performed.
  • Various data were collected, including the number of image acquisitions during each examination, the total examination time, the diagnostic quality of each acquisition, and any additional diagnostic information that was gleaned.

Results

  • A median of three image acquisitions were performed per examination, taking a median total time of 14 minutes.
  • For the 33 cases where a suspected diagnosis was already identified before CBCT, 24 of these were confirmed or refuted. In seven out of these 33 cases, the suspected diagnosis was refuted but no new diagnosis could be made. In two cases, neither confirmation nor refutation of the initial diagnosis was achieved, as well as the inability to make a new diagnosis.
  • In five out of the nine cases with no pre-existing diagnosis, a diagnosis was able to be made after the CBCT scan.
  • For the 16 cases that already had a diagnosis before the CBCT, additional information was recorded which could aid in forming a surgical plan.
  • Of the 18 cases where contrast techniques were used alongside the CBCT, 14 cases provided extra diagnostic information.

Conclusions

  • The study supports the feasibility of performing a CBCT scan on a horse’s extremities while it is standing and sedated. It has been proven that the process is manageable and can be carried out in a relatively short amount of time.
  • Furthermore, the results demonstrate the potential of the CBCT scan as a diagnostic tool. It can either confirm or refute a suspected diagnosis, and in some cases, it can establish a diagnosis where none previously existed, or supplement an existing diagnosis with additional information needed for treatment planning.

Cite This Article

APA
Pauwels FE, Van der Vekens E, Christan Y, Koch C, Schweizer D. (2021). Feasibility, indications, and radiographically confirmed diagnoses of standing extremity cone beam computed tomography in the horse. Vet Surg, 50(2), 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13560

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 50
Issue: 2
Pages: 365-374

Researcher Affiliations

Pauwels, Frederik E
  • Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Division of Clinical Radiology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Van der Vekens, Elke
  • Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Division of Clinical Radiology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Christan, Yan
  • Swiss Institute of Equine Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Agroscope, Switzerland, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Koch, Christoph
  • Swiss Institute of Equine Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Schweizer, Daniela
  • Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Division of Clinical Radiology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / methods
  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / veterinary
  • Conscious Sedation / veterinary
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Forelimb / diagnostic imaging
  • Hindlimb / diagnostic imaging
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / diagnostic imaging
  • Horses
  • Male
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Standing Position
  • Switzerland

References

This article includes 21 references
  1. Desbrosse FG, Vandeweerd JMEF, Perrin RAR. A technique for computed tomography (CT) of the foot in the standing horse.. Equine Vet Educ 2008;20(2):93-98.
  2. Vandeweerd J-ME, Perrin R, Launois T, Brogniez L, Clegg PD, Desbrosse FG. Use of computed tomography in standing position to identify guidelines for screw insertion in the distal phalanx of horses: an ex vivo study.. Vet Surg 2009;38(3):373-379.
  3. Dugdale AHA, Taylor PM. Equine anaesthesia-associated mortality: where are we now?. Vet Anaesth Analg 2016;43(3):242-255.
  4. Dakin SG, Lam R, Rees E, Mumby C, West C, Weller R. Technical set-up and radiation exposure for standing computed tomography of the equine head.. Equine Vet Educ 2014;26(4):208-215.
  5. Powell SE. Standing computed tomography (CT) of the equine head.. Paper presented at: ACVS Surgery Summit; November 3-5, 2011; Chicago, IL.
  6. Veraa S, Beukers M, van den Belt A, J. The use of sliding gantry CT in the standing sedated horse.. Paper presented at: EVDI Annual Conference; August 31 to September 3, 2016; Wroklaw, Poland.
  7. Koch C, Pauwels FE, Schweizer D. Technical setup and case illustrations of orthopaedic cone-beam computed tomography in the standing horse.. Equine Vet Educ In press.
  8. Bregger MDK, Koch C, Zimmermann R, Sangiorgio D, Schweizer-Gorgas D. Cone-beam computed tomography of the head in standing equids.. BMC Vet Res 2019;15(1):289.
  9. Lacitignola L, Luca PD, Guarracino A, Crovace A. Computed tomographic tenography of normal equine digital flexor tendon sheath: an ex vivo study.. Vet Med Int 2015;2015:903169-Article ID 903169.
  10. Agass R, Dixon J, Fraser B. Computed tomographic contrast tenography of the digital flexor tendon sheath of the equine hindlimb.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2018;59(3):279-288.
  11. Coleridge M, Pauwels FE, O'Brien T, Coleridge D, Kelly G. Standing cone beam computed tomography of the equine metacarpal/metatarsophalangeal joint.. Paper presented at: ACVS Surgery Summit; October 17-19, 2019; Las Vegas, NV.
  12. Mair TS, Kinns J, Jones RD, Bolas NM. Magnetic resonance imaging of the distal limb of the standing horse.. Equine Vet Educ 2005;17(2):74-78.
  13. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM. Modes of CT acquisition.. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging Vol 1. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2011:341-350.
  14. Sanchez-Andrade JS, Richter H, Kuhn K, Bischofberger AS, Kircher PR, Hoey S. Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and arthrography to identify artificially induced cartilage defects of the equine carpal joints.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2018;59(3):312-325.
  15. Gray SN, Puchalski SM, Galuppo LD. Computed tomographic arthrography of the intercarpal ligaments of the equine carpus.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2013;54(3):245-252.
  16. Nelson BB, Goodrich LR, Barrett MF, Grinstaff MW, Kawcak CE. Use of contrast media in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in horses: techniques, adverse events and opportunities.. Equine Vet J 2017;49(4):410-424.
  17. Nelson BB, Kawcak CE, Goodrich LR, Werpy NM, Valdes-Martinez A, McIlwraith CW. Comparison between computed tomographic arthography, radiography, ultrasonography, and arthroscopy for the diagnosis of femorotibial joint disease in western performance horses.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2016;57(4):387-402.
  18. Getman LM, Davidson EJ, Ross MW, Leitch M, Richardson DW. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging-assisted partial hoof wall resection for keratoma removal.. Vet Surg 2011;40(6):708-714.
  19. Katzman SA, Spriet M, Galuppo LD. Outcome following computed tomographic imaging and subsequent surgical removal of keratomas in equids: 32 cases (2005-2016).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2019;254(2):266-274.
  20. Gasiorowski JC, Richardson DW. Clinical use of computed tomography and surface markers to assist internal fixation within the equine hoof.. Vet Surg 2015;44(2):214-222.
  21. de Preux M, Klopfenstein Bregger MD, Brünisholz HP, Van der Vekens E, Schweizer-Gorgas D, Koch C. Clinical use of computer-assisted orthopedic surgery in horses.. Vet Surg 2020;49(6):1075-1087.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.