Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record1989; 125(20); 497-499; doi: 10.1136/vr.125.20.497

Field efficacy of ivermectin, fenbendazole and pyrantel embonate paste anthelmintics in horses.

Abstract: Three anthelmintic pastes were compared in terms of their ability to suppress the output of parasite eggs in the faeces of 108 grazing horses at four sites in Britain; the horses were treated once with either ivermectin, fenbendazole or pyrantel. At each site, the horses grazed together throughout the trials which took place during the summers of 1985 and 1986. The median periods before parasite eggs reappeared in faeces were 70 days for ivermectin, 14 days for fenbendazole and 39 days for pyrantel embonate. Geometric mean faecal egg counts in the groups treated with ivermectin and pyrantel were significantly less (P less than 0.05) than in the fenbendazole group on days 21, 28, 35 and 42 after treatment. On days 49, 56, 63 and 70 the mean egg counts in the ivermectin group were significantly lower (P less than 0.05) than those in either of the other groups. The results indicated that in order to ensure minimal contamination of pastures, grazing horses treated with ivermectin paste would have required a second treatment approximately 10 weeks after the first, and to achieve similar control with fenbendazole or pyrantel embonate, a second treatment would have been required after approximately two weeks and six weeks, respectively.
Publication Date: 1989-11-11 PubMed ID: 2595978DOI: 10.1136/vr.125.20.497Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research compares the efficacy of three deworming treatments (ivermectin, fenbendazole, and pyrantel embonate) in reducing parasite egg counts in horse feces, showing that ivermectin offers the longest duration of suppression.

Research Context

  • The main aim of the research was to compare the effectiveness of three antiparasitic pastes: ivermectin, fenbendazole, and pyrantel embonate in horses.
  • The study tested their ability to suppress the output of parasite eggs in horse feces over time after a single treatment.
  • The samples were collected from 108 horses across four grazing sites in Britain during the summers of 1985 and 1986.

Research Method and Findings

  • Each of the horses was treated with either ivermectin, fenbendazole, or pyrantel embonate. Their feces were then observed for the reappearance of parasite eggs.
  • The median period before parasite eggs reappeared was 70 days for the ivermectin group, 14 days for the fenbendazole group, and 39 days for the pyrantel embonate group.
  • Geometric mean faecal egg counts in the groups treated with ivermectin and pyrantel embonate were significantly less (P less than 0.05) than in the fenbendazole group after 21, 28, 35, and 42 days from the treatment. After days 49, 56, 63, and 70, the egg counts in the ivermectin group were even significantly lower (P less than 0.05) from those in the other groups.

Implications of the Study

  • The results show that ivermectin treatment is the most effective among the three in suppressing the output of parasite eggs, halting their appearance in feces for a longer duration.
  • According to this research, to achieve minimum pasture contamination, a second treatment would have been necessary 10 weeks after the first treatment for horses treated with ivermectin.
  • For fenbendazole or pyrantel embonate treatments, second treatments would be required after approximately two weeks and six weeks respectively.
  • The findings have implications for effective horse deworming and pasture management, suggesting ivermectin paste yields longer periods of effectiveness in preventing pasture contamination compared to the other tested treatments.

Cite This Article

APA
Lumsden GG, Quan-Taylor R, Smith SM, Washbrooke IM. (1989). Field efficacy of ivermectin, fenbendazole and pyrantel embonate paste anthelmintics in horses. Vet Rec, 125(20), 497-499. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.125.20.497

Publication

ISSN: 0042-4900
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 125
Issue: 20
Pages: 497-499

Researcher Affiliations

Lumsden, G G
  • Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Summerhall, Edinburgh.
Quan-Taylor, R
    Smith, S M
      Washbrooke, I M

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Benzimidazoles / therapeutic use
        • Feces / parasitology
        • Female
        • Fenbendazole / therapeutic use
        • Helminthiasis / drug therapy
        • Helminthiasis / parasitology
        • Helminthiasis, Animal
        • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
        • Horse Diseases / parasitology
        • Horses
        • Ivermectin / therapeutic use
        • Male
        • Parasite Egg Count / veterinary
        • Pyrantel / analogs & derivatives
        • Pyrantel Pamoate / therapeutic use
        • Random Allocation
        • Recurrence
        • Statistics as Topic
        • Time Factors

        Citations

        This article has been cited 2 times.
        1. Piché CA, Kennedy MJ, Herbers HA, Newcomb KM. Comparison of ivermectin, oxibendazole, and pyrantel pamoate in suppressing fecal egg output in horses. Can Vet J 1991 Feb;32(2):104-7.
          pubmed: 17423731
        2. Nielsen MK. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes: Current status and emerging trends. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2022 Dec;20:76-88.
          doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2022.10.005pubmed: 36342004google scholar: lookup