Analyze Diet

Field observations on influenza vaccination among horses in Britain, 1971-1976.

Abstract: The observations reported in this paper were obtained as part of a long term surveillance programme designed to monitor the efficacy of influenza vaccines and study the prevalence of influenza and other respiratory viruses among horses in Britain. Inactivated influenza vaccines were found to be effective in protecting horses from disease caused by influenza A/equine-1 but were less successful in protecting horses against influenza A/equine-2. The paper presents the clinical, epidemiological virological and serological findings obtained between 1971 and 1976.
Publication Date: 1977-06-01 PubMed ID: 604119
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This British research study presents findings from 1971 to 1976 on the use of influenza vaccines in horses. It found that they were effective against one type of flu but less so against another, despite being part of a wider surveillance program.

Study Objective

The research aimed to gauge the effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccines in horses and observe the prevalence of influenza and other respiratory viruses endemic in Britain. The study was conducted over an extended period from 1971 to 1976, making it a long-term survey aimed at understanding influenza among horses better.

  • The study was intended to use the findings to monitor vaccine performance.
  • The research also hoped to evaluate the prevalence of other respiratory viruses apart from influenza.

Influenza Vaccination Efficacy

The main outcome of this research is that the inactivated influenza vaccine was found effective against influenza A/equine-1 but was less successful in guarding horses against influenza A/equine-2.

  • The vaccine managed to protect the horses from ailment triggered by influenza A/equine-1, demonstrating its success.
  • However, the same vaccines showed limited success in protecting horses against influenza A/equine-2, thus indicating a need for further study and development in influenza vaccines for horses.

Clinical, Epidemiological and Virological Findings

The journal article dives deeper into the specifics by providing clinical, epidemiological, virological, and serological findings.

  • Clinical findings would involve observation of physical symptoms in horses, potentially flights of fever, loss of appetite, cough, or nasal discharge, symptomatic of equine influenza.
  • Epidemiological findings would include data about how, when, and where horses got infected, contributing to understanding the disease’s spread.
  • Virological findings would examine the specific viruses causing the disease, diving into their structure, replication process, genetics, and other characteristics.
  • Serological findings would relate to the response of the horse’s immune system towards the influenza virus, including types and amounts of antibodies produced.

Cite This Article

APA
Powell DG, Burrows R, Spooner P, Mumford J, Thomson G. (1977). Field observations on influenza vaccination among horses in Britain, 1971-1976. Dev Biol Stand, 39, 347-352.

Publication

ISSN: 0301-5149
NlmUniqueID: 0427140
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 39
Pages: 347-352

Researcher Affiliations

Powell, D G
    Burrows, R
      Spooner, P
        Mumford, J
          Thomson, G

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Antibodies, Viral
            • Hemagglutinins, Viral
            • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
            • Horses
            • Immunization, Secondary
            • Influenza A virus / immunology
            • Influenza Vaccines
            • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / prevention & control
            • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / veterinary
            • United Kingdom
            • Vaccination / adverse effects
            • Vaccination / veterinary

            Citations

            This article has been cited 3 times.
            1. Bryant NA, Paillot R, Rash AS, Medcalf E, Montesso F, Ross J, Watson J, Jeggo M, Lewis NS, Newton JR, Elton DM. Comparison of two modern vaccines and previous influenza infection against challenge with an equine influenza virus from the Australian 2007 outbreak.. Vet Res 2010 Mar-Apr;41(2):19.
              doi: 10.1051/vetres/2009067pubmed: 19863903google scholar: lookup
            2. Goto H, Shimizu K, Taya Y, Noda H, Tokunaga T. Antibody responses of horses to equine influenza viruses during a postepizootic period in Japan.. Can J Comp Med 1982 Jan;46(1):27-32.
              pubmed: 7074415
            3. Mumford J, Wood JM, Scott AM, Folkers C, Schild GC. Studies with inactivated equine influenza vaccine. 2. Protection against experimental infection with influenza virus A/equine/Newmarket/79 (H3N8).. J Hyg (Lond) 1983 Jun;90(3):385-95.
              doi: 10.1017/s0022172400029016pubmed: 6306098google scholar: lookup