Girth pressure measurements reveal high peak pressures that can be avoided using an alternative girth design that also results in increased limb protraction and flexion in the swing phase.
Abstract: Girths are frequently blamed for veterinary and performance problems, but research into girth/horse interaction is sparse. The study objectives were (1) to determine location of peak pressure under a range of girths, and (2) to compare horse gait between the horse's standard girth and a girth designed to avoid detected peak pressure locations. In the first part of the study, and following validation procedures, a calibrated pressure mat placed under the girth of 10 horses was used to determine the location of peak pressures. A girth was designed to avoid peak pressure locations (Girth F). In the second part, 20 elite horses/riders with no lameness or performance problem were ridden in Girth F and their standard girth (Girth S) in a double blind crossover design. Pressure mat data were acquired from under the girths. High speed video was captured and forelimb and hindlimb protraction, maximal carpal and tarsal flexion during flight were determined in trot. In standard girths, peak pressures were located over the musculature behind the elbow. Pressure mat results revealed that the maximum forces with Girth S were 22% (left) and 14% (right) greater than Girth F, and peak pressures were 76% (left) and 98% (right) greater (P<0.01 for all). On gait evaluation, Girth F was associated with 6-11% greater forelimb protraction, 10-20% greater hindlimb protraction, 4% greater carpal flexion, and 3% greater tarsal flexion than Girth S (P<0.01 for all). Peak pressures were located where horses tend to develop pressure sores. Girth F reduced peak pressures under the girth, and improved limb protraction and carpal/ tarsal flexion, which may reflect improved posture and comfort.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2013-08-20 PubMed ID: 23973365DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.07.028Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article investigates the impact of girth design on horse comfort, performance, and gait. The study finds that specially designed girth can reduce pressure on the horse, increase limb protraction and flexion, and enhance overall horse posture and comfort.
Study Objectives
The study primarily aimed at:
- Determining the location of peak pressure under a range of girths.
- Comparing horse gait between a standard girth and a specially designed girth aimed to avoid detected peak pressure points.
Conduct of Study
- First, a calibrated pressure mat placed under the girth of 10 horses was used to determine the location of peak pressures. This led to the design of a new girth (Girth F) intended to avoid these pressure points.
- Following this, 20 elite horses/riders with no lameness or performance problem were ridden using Girth F and their standard girth (Girth S) to compare the effect on the horse’s gait.
- Both pressure mat data and high-speed video of the horses were taken for analysis.
Study Findings
- The research found that standard girths have peak pressures located over the musculature behind the elbow, a common location for pressure sores in horses.
- Girth F showed significantly lower maximum forces (22% left and 14% right) and peak pressures (76% left and 98% right) compared to Girth S.
- Gait evaluation showed that the use of Girth F was associated with 6-11% greater forelimb protraction, 10-20% greater hindlimb protraction, 4% greater carpal flexion, and 3% greater tarsal flexion than Girth S.
Conclusion
Girth F that is designed considering peak pressure points not only helped in reducing these pressures but also improved limb movement and potentially the comfort of the horse. The study highlights the potential influence of considerate girth design on a horse’s performance and overall comfort.
Cite This Article
APA
Murray R, Guire R, Fisher M, Fairfax V.
(2013).
Girth pressure measurements reveal high peak pressures that can be avoided using an alternative girth design that also results in increased limb protraction and flexion in the swing phase.
Vet J, 198(1), 92-97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.07.028 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Animal Health Trust, Lanwades Park, Kentford, Newmarket CB8 7UU, UK. Electronic address: rachel.murray@aht.org.uk.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Cross-Over Studies
- Double-Blind Method
- Equipment and Supplies / veterinary
- Female
- Forelimb / physiology
- Gait
- Hindlimb / physiology
- Horses / physiology
- Humans
- Male
- Physical Conditioning, Animal / instrumentation
- Physical Conditioning, Animal / methods
- Pressure
- Range of Motion, Articular
- Videotape Recording
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists