Analyze Diet

Harnessing the Horse for Human Osteoarthritis: microRNA-181a-5p Antisense Oligonucleotides in Clinically Normal Equine Fetlock Joints Are Safe and Well Tolerated.

Abstract: Horses serve as a translational model for human osteoarthritis (OA) due to their comparable joint size, cartilage thickness, and incidence of naturally occurring disease. Overexpression of microRNA-181a-5p has been implicated in cartilage degradation in OA, and its inhibition using locked nucleic acid antisense oligonucleotides (LNA-miR-181a-5p ASOs) represents a potential therapeutic strategy. This study evaluated the safety of intraarticular (IA) LNA-miR-181a-5p ASO injection in clinically normal horse fetlock joints. Twelve horses were randomized to receive two IA injections, 28 days apart, of either low-dose [2000 µg (n = 6)] or high-dose [4000 µg (n = 6)] LNA-miR-181a-5p ASO. Over 56 days, variables assessed included physical examinations, joint assessments (effusion, circumference, temperature), lameness scores, and biofluid analyses. Physical and lameness evaluation variables remained similar to baseline and did not differ by dose (p > 0.05). Joint effusion was mildly increased in high-dose joints at Day 3 post-injection (p  0.05). A transient, dose-independent increase (p  0.05). Although TNF-α concentrations were greater in the high-dose group (p < 0.05), values were variable across horses, even prior to treatment. Overall, IA LNA-miR-181a-5p ASO was well tolerated in clinically normal horse fetlocks, with only transient inflammatory changes, supporting its evaluation as a potential OA therapy.
Publication Date: 2026-10-25 PubMed ID: 42926329PubMed Central: PMC13695786DOI: 10.1002/jor.70298Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Research Overview

  • This study tested the safety of injecting a novel microRNA-targeting drug into healthy horse joints to assess its potential as a treatment for osteoarthritis.
  • The drug, antisense oligonucleotides against microRNA-181a-5p, was well tolerated with minimal and temporary joint inflammation observed.

Background and Purpose

  • Osteoarthritis (OA) is a joint disease involving cartilage breakdown and inflammation.
  • Horses are good models for human OA because their joint anatomy and disease development are similar.
  • MicroRNA-181a-5p is implicated in cartilage degradation in OA.
  • Inhibiting this microRNA with locked nucleic acid antisense oligonucleotides (LNA-miR-181a-5p ASOs) could be a novel therapeutic approach.
  • The main goal was to determine if injecting this ASO drug into healthy horse fetlock joints is safe and well tolerated.

Study Design

  • Twelve clinically normal horses were randomly assigned to two groups (6 horses each).
  • Each group received two intraarticular (IA) injections of either low dose (2000 µg) or high dose (4000 µg) ASO, 28 days apart.
  • The fetlock joint was chosen for injection and observation.
  • Follow-up lasted 56 days, including comprehensive clinical and laboratory assessments at multiple timepoints.

Assessments and Measurements

  • Physical examinations included monitoring for general health and signs of adverse effects.
  • Joint-specific parameters measured were effusion (fluid accumulation/swelling), joint circumference, and temperature.
  • Lameness scoring was used to detect functional impairment or discomfort in the horse.
  • Synovial fluid and blood samples were analyzed for inflammatory markers and cell counts.
  • Key inflammatory mediators included IL-1β, prostaglandin E (PGE), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α).

Results

  • Physical exams and lameness scores remained unchanged from baseline, indicating no significant adverse effects on general well-being or joint function.
  • Minor joint effusion increase was observed only in the high-dose group at 3 days after injection, suggesting mild, transient joint swelling.
  • Joint circumference and temperature did not change significantly in either dose group.
  • There was a transient, dose-independent rise in nucleated cell count in synovial fluid at day 3 post-injection, consistent with mild inflammation related to the injection process (arthrocentesis), not the drug itself.
  • Concentrations of IL-1β and PGE remained stable across doses and over time, indicating no significant inflammatory response.
  • TNF-α was slightly higher in the high-dose group but showed high variability even before treatment, limiting interpretation of this finding as an adverse drug effect.
  • Hematologic and biochemical parameters remained stable, demonstrating systemic safety.

Conclusions and Implications

  • Intraarticular administration of LNA-miR-181a-5p ASOs was safe and well tolerated in healthy horse fetlock joints.
  • Observed inflammatory changes were transient, mild, and likely related to injection trauma rather than the ASO drug itself.
  • This supports further investigation of this microRNA-targeting approach as a potential disease-modifying therapy for OA.
  • Using the horse model provides translational relevance due to similar joint characteristics with humans.
  • Future studies may assess efficacy in OA-affected joints and long-term safety.

Cite This Article

APA
Connor McCorkell T, Mortagy N, Luque RM, Koch TG, Beeler-Marfisi J, Raja Rampersaud Y, Lamarre J, Kapoor M, Koenig JB. (2026). Harnessing the Horse for Human Osteoarthritis: microRNA-181a-5p Antisense Oligonucleotides in Clinically Normal Equine Fetlock Joints Are Safe and Well Tolerated. J Orthop Res, 44(11), e70298. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.70298

Publication

ISSN: 1554-527X
NlmUniqueID: 8404726
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 44
Issue: 11
PII: e70298

Researcher Affiliations

Connor McCorkell, T
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Mortagy, Narman
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Luque, Rodrigo Munevar
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Koch, Thomas G
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Beeler-Marfisi, Janet
  • Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Raja Rampersaud, Y
  • Schroeder Arthritis Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lamarre, Jonathan
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Kapoor, Mohit
  • Schroeder Arthritis Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Koenig, Judith B
  • Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Osteoarthritis / veterinary
  • Osteoarthritis / therapy
  • Osteoarthritis / drug therapy
  • MicroRNAs
  • Oligonucleotides, Antisense / therapeutic use
  • Oligonucleotides, Antisense / administration & dosage
  • Injections, Intra-Articular
  • Male
  • Female

Grant Funding

  • 540277 / CIHR
  • Krembil Foundation
  • Tony and Shari Fell Platinum Chair in Arthritis Research

Conflict of Interest Statement

M.K. and Y.R.R. hold a patent “MiRNA biomarkers for cartilage degeneration: Patent number: 10888577”. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 49 references
  1. Xie X, Zhang K, Li Y. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Osteoarthritis From 1990 to 2021 and Projections to 2035: A Cross‐Sectional Study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. PLoS One 20, no. 5 (2025): e0324296.
  2. Arthritis Alliance of Canada. Impact of Arthritis in Canada: Today and Over the Next 30 years. 2011.
  3. Martel‐Pelletier J, Barr AJ, Cicuttini FM. Osteoarthritis. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2, no. 1 (2016): 16072.
    doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.72pubmed: 27734845google scholar: lookup
  4. Knäuper V, López‐Otin C, Smith B, Knight G, Murphy G. Biochemical Characterization of Human Collagenase‐3. Journal of Biological Chemistry 271, no. 3 (1996): 1544–1550.
    doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.3.1544pubmed: 8576151google scholar: lookup
  5. Verma P, Dalal K. ADAMTS‐4 and ADAMTS‐5: Key Enzymes in Osteoarthritis. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 112, no. 12 (2011): 3507–3514.
    doi: 10.1002/jcb.23298pubmed: 21815191google scholar: lookup
  6. Kapoor M, Martel‐Pelletier J, Lajeunesse D, Pelletier JP, Fahmi H. Role of Proinflammatory Cytokines in the Pathophysiology of Osteoarthritis. Nature Reviews Rheumatology 7, no. 1 (2011): 33–42.
    doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.196pubmed: 21119608google scholar: lookup
  7. Marcu KB, Otero M, Olivotto E, Maria Borzi R, Goldring MB. NF‐KappaB Signaling: Multiple Angles to Target OA. Current Drug Targets 11, no. 5 (2010): 599–613.
    doi: 10.2174/138945010791011938pmc: PMC3076145pubmed: 20199390google scholar: lookup
  8. Szala D, Kopańska M, Trojniak J. The Role of MicroRNAs in the Pathophysiology of Osteoarthritis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 12 (2024): 6352.
    doi: 10.3390/ijms25126352pmc: PMC11204066pubmed: 38928059google scholar: lookup
  9. Asahara H. Current Status and Strategy of microRNA Research for Cartilage Development and Osteoarthritis Pathogenesis. Journal of Bone Metabolism 23, no. 3 (2016): 121–127.
    doi: 10.11005/jbm.2016.23.3.121pmc: PMC5018604pubmed: 27622175google scholar: lookup
  10. Mirzamohammadi F, Papaioannou G, Kobayashi T. microRNAs in Cartilage Development, Homeostasis, and Disease. Current Osteoporosis Reports 12, no. 4 (2014): 410–419.
    doi: 10.1007/s11914-014-0229-9pmc: PMC4234170pubmed: 25091054google scholar: lookup
  11. Nakamura A, Rampersaud YR, Sharma A. Identification of micro RNA‐181a‐5p and Micro RNA‐4454 as Mediators of Facet Cartilage Degeneration. JCI Insight 1, no. 12 (2016): e86820.
    doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.86820pmc: PMC5033882pubmed: 27699225google scholar: lookup
  12. Nakamura A, Rampersaud YR, Sundararajan K. Zinc Finger Protein‐440 Promotes Cartilage Degenerative Mechanisms in Human Facet and Knee Osteoarthritis Chondrocytes. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 29, no. 3 (2021): 372–379.
    doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.12.004pubmed: 33347923google scholar: lookup
  13. Gagliardi M, Ashizawa AT. The Challenges and Strategies of Antisense Oligonucleotide Drug Delivery. Biomedicines 9, no. 4 (2021): 433.
    doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9040433pmc: PMC8072990pubmed: 33923688google scholar: lookup
  14. Nakamura A, Rampersaud YR, Nakamura S. microRNA‐181a‐5p Antisense Oligonucleotides Attenuate Osteoarthritis in Facet and Knee Joints. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 78, no. 1 (2019): 111–121.
  15. . Lameness and laminitis in U.S. horses.. .
  16. Murray R. C., Dyson S. J., Tranquille C., Adams V.. Association of Type of Sport and Performance Level With Anatomical Site of Orthopaedic Injury Diagnosis. Equine Veterinary Journal 38, no. S36 (2006): 411–416.
  17. Frisbie D. D., Cross M. W., McIlwraith C. W.. A Comparative Study of Articular Cartilage Thickness in the Stifle of Animal Species Used in Human Pre‐Clinical Studies Compared to Articular Cartilage Thickness in the Human Knee. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 19, no. 3 (2006): 142–146.
    pubmed: 16971996
  18. McIlwraith C. W., Frisbie D. D., Kawcak C. E.. The Horse as a Model of Naturally Occurring Osteoarthritis. Bone & Joint Research 1, no. 11 (2012): 297–309.
  19. Frisbie D. D., Trotter G. W., Powers B. E.. Arthroscopic Subchondral Bone Plate Microfracture Technique Augments Healing of Large Chondral Defects in the Radial Carpal Bone and Medial Femoral Condyle of Horses. Veterinary Surgery 28, no. 4 (1999): 242–255.
    doi: 10.1053/jvet.1999.0242pubmed: 10424704google scholar: lookup
  20. American Association of Equine Practitioners Horse Show Committee. Guide to Veterinary Services for Horse Shows. American Association of Equine Practitioners, 1999.
  21. Mortagy N., McCorkell T., Finnegan S., Russell K., Sears W., Koenig J.. Safety Assessment of Antisense miR‐181a‐5p in Equine Fetlock Joints. In: North American Veterinary Regenerative Medicine Association (NAVRMA) Conference. 2023.
  22. . ORG: True Random Number Service.. .
  23. Luque R. M., Henderson B., McCorkell T. C.. Treatment Outcomes for Equine Osteoarthritis With Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Hyaluronic Acid. Equine Veterinary Journal 57, no. 5 (2025): 1245–1254.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14531pmc: PMC12326944pubmed: 40364589google scholar: lookup
  24. Bertoni L., Branly T., Jacquet S.. Intra‐Articular Injection of 2 Different Dosages of Autologous and Allogeneic Bone Marrow‐ and Umbilical Cord‐Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Triggers a Variable Inflammatory Response of the Fetlock Joint on 12 Sound Experimental Horses. Stem Cells International 2019 (2019): 9431894.
    doi: 10.1155/2019/9431894pmc: PMC6525957pubmed: 31191689google scholar: lookup
  25. . Guide to Veterinary Services for Horse Shows. American Association of Equine Practitioners; 1999.
  26. Kaneps A. J.. 13 ‐ Diagnosis of lameness. Equine Sports Medicine and Surgery (Second Edition) W.B. Saunders, 2014, 239–251.
  27. Santos L. C. P., de Moraes A. N., Saito M. E.. Effects of Intraarticular Ropivacaine and Morphine on Lipopolysaccharide‐Induced Synovitis in Horses. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 36, no. 3 (2009): 280–286.
  28. Keegan K. G., Kramer J., Yonezawa Y.. Assessment of Repeatability of a Wireless, Inertial Sensor‐Based Lameness Evaluation System for Horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 72, no. 9 (2011): 1156–1163.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.72.9.1156pubmed: 21879972google scholar: lookup
  29. Nakamura A, Ali S A, Kapoor M. Antisense Oligonucleotide‐Based Therapies for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis: Opportunities and Roadblocks. Bone 138 (2020): 115461.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115461pubmed: 32485363google scholar: lookup
  30. Kamisan N, Naveen S V, Ahmad R E, Tunku K. Chondrocyte Density, Proteoglycan Content and Gene Expressions From Native Cartilage Are Species Specific and Not Dependent on Cartilage Thickness: A Comparative Analysis Between Rat, Rabbit and Goat. BMC Veterinary Research 9 (2013): 62.
    pmc: PMC3648397pubmed: 23547659
  31. Frisbie D D, Cross M W, McIlwraith C W. A Comparative Study of Articular Cartilage Thickness in the Stifle of Animal Species Used in Human Pre‐Clinical Studies Compared to Articular Cartilage Thickness in the Human Knee. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 19, no. 03 (2006): 142–146.
    doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1632990pubmed: 16971996google scholar: lookup
  32. Caron J P, Genovese R L. Chapter 85 ‐ Principles and Practices of Joint Disease Treatment. In: Ross MW, Dyson SJ, editors. Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse [Internet] (W.B. Saunders, 2003), 746–764.
  33. Terlinden A, Jacquet S, Manivong S. Double‐Blinded, Randomized Tolerance Study of a Biologically Enhanced Nanogel With endothelin‐1 and Bradykinin Receptor Antagonist Peptides via Intra‐Articular Injection for Osteoarthritis Treatment in Horses. BMC Veterinary Research 20 (2024): 547.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04352-wpmc: PMC11616385pubmed: 39633332google scholar: lookup
  34. Beck A A, Paz L B, Frank M I, Engelmann A M, Krause A, Côrte F D D L. Safety and Synovial Inflammatory Response After Intra‐Articular Injection of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Healthy Horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 110 (2022): 103865.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.103865pubmed: 35017040google scholar: lookup
  35. van den Boom R, van de Lest C H A, Bull S, Brama P A J, van Weeren P R, Barneveld A. Influence of Repeated Arthrocentesis and Exercise on Synovial Fluid Concentrations of Nitric Oxide, Prostaglandin E2 and Glycosaminoglycans in Healthy Equine Joints. Equine Veterinary Journal 37, no. 3 (2005): 250–256.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054530740pubmed: 15892235google scholar: lookup
  36. Steel C M. Equine Synovial Fluid Analysis. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 24, no. 2 (2008): 437–454.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveqpubmed: 18652964google scholar: lookup
  37. Curtiss P H. Changes Produced in the Synovial Membrane and Synovial Fluid by Disease. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 46, no. 4 (1964): 873–900.
    pubmed: 14161107
  38. Tulamo R M, Bramlage L R, Gabel A A. Sequential Clinical and Synovial Fluid Changes Associated With Acute Infectious Arthritis in the Horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 21, no. 5 (1989): 325–331.
  39. Wagner A E, Mcllwraith C W, Martin G S. Effect of Intra‐Articular Injection of Orgotein and Saline Solution on Equine Synovia. American Journal of Veterinary Research 43, no. 4 (1982): 594–597.
    pubmed: 7073079
  40. von Rechenberg B, McIlwraith C W, Akens M K, Frisbie D D, Leutenegger C, Auer J A. Spontaneous Production of Nitric Oxide (NO), Prostaglandin (PGE2) and Neutral Metalloproteinases (Nmps) in Media of Explant Cultures of Equine Synovial Membrane and Articular Cartilage From Normal and Osteoarthritic Joints. Equine Veterinary Journal 32, no. 2 (2000): 140–150.
    doi: 10.2746/042516400777591598pubmed: 10743970google scholar: lookup
  41. Kirker-Head C A, Chandna V K, Agarwal R K. Concentrations of Substance P and Prostaglandin E2 in Synovial Fluid of Normal and Abnormal Joints of Horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 61, no. 6 (2000): 714–718.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.714pubmed: 10850851google scholar: lookup
  42. Moreira JJ, Moraes APL, Brossi PM. Autologous Processed Plasma: Cytokine Profile and Effects Upon Injection Into Healthy Equine Joints. Journal of Veterinary Science 16, no. 1 (2015): 47–55.
    doi: 10.4142/jvs.2015.16.1.47pmc: PMC4367149pubmed: 25269714google scholar: lookup
  43. Jason TLH, Koropatnick J, Berg RW. Toxicology of Antisense Therapeutics. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 201, no. 1 (2004): 66–83.
    doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.04.017pubmed: 15519609google scholar: lookup
  44. Burdick AD, Sciabola S, Mantena SR. Sequence Motifs Associated With Hepatotoxicity of Locked Nucleic Acid—Modified Antisense Oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Research 42, no. 8 (2014): 4882–4891.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gku142pmc: PMC4005641pubmed: 24550163google scholar: lookup
  45. Henry SP, Beattie G, Yeh G. Complement Activation Is Responsible for Acute Toxicities in Rhesus Monkeys Treated With a Phosphorothioate Oligodeoxynucleotide. International Immunopharmacology 2, no. 12 (2002): 1657–1666.
    doi: 10.1016/s1567-5769(02)00142-xpubmed: 12469940google scholar: lookup
  46. van Poelgeest EP, Swart RM, Betjes MGH. Acute Kidney Injury During Therapy With An Antisense Oligonucleotide Directed Against Pcsk9. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 62, no. 4 (2013): 796–800.
    doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.02.359pubmed: 23561896google scholar: lookup
  47. Frazier KS. Antisense Oligonucleotide Therapies: The Promise and the Challenges From a Toxicologic Pathologist's Perspective. Toxicologic Pathology 43, no. 1 (January 2015): 78–89.
    doi: 10.1177/0192623314551840pubmed: 25385330google scholar: lookup
  48. Swayze EE, Siwkowski AM, Wancewicz EV. Antisense Oligonucleotides Containing Locked Nucleic Acid Improve Potency but Cause Significant Hepatotoxicity in Animals. Nucleic Acids Research 35, no. 2 (2007): 687–700.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl1071pmc: PMC1802611pubmed: 17182632google scholar: lookup
  49. Hanley JA. If Nothing Goes Wrong, Is Everything all Right?: Interpreting Zero Numerators. Journal of the American Medical Association 249, no. 13 (1983): 1743–1745.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.