FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Horse Behavior towards Familiar and Unfamiliar Humans: Impli...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2021; 11(8); 2369; doi: 10.3390/ani11082369

Horse Behavior towards Familiar and Unfamiliar Humans: Implications for Equine-Assisted Services.

Abstract: While human benefits of animal-assisted therapy programs have been documented, relatively little research has been conducted on behavioral factors that predict a successful equine-assisted services (EAS) horse. This study compares the behavior of experienced and non-experienced EAS horses as well as horses selected for future EAS work in a series of sociability and temperament tests. No significant differences were found between experienced and non-experienced horses in the sociability measures or for most of the temperament tests; however, significant differences were found between groups in the brushing test, with non-experienced horses showing more affiliative behaviors towards the familiar handler and unfamiliar persons. No significant differences were found between selected and non-selected horses in the temperament tests. However, non-selected horses were found to show significantly more affiliative behaviors towards a familiar person during a sociability test compared with selected horses. These findings suggest that the social behavior and temperament of EAS horses may not be significantly different from other available horses not selected for EAS work. Instead, these decisions may primarily reflect subjective impressions of fit. Interestingly, on measures where significant differences were identified, the horses not actively engaged in or selected for therapy were the ones that showed greater affiliative responses to familiar and unfamiliar humans. Reasons for why this may be, as well as future directions in EAS selection, are discussed.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-08-11 PubMed ID: 34438825PubMed Central: PMC8388774DOI: 10.3390/ani11082369Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research in this article involves studying horse behavior towards familiar and unfamiliar humans, in order to understand the factors that may predict a successful horse in equine-assisted services (EAS). Using sociability and temperament tests, the authors found no significant differences in behavior between horses already experienced in EAS and those not experienced, nor did they find significant differences between horses selected and non-selected for EAS programs. However, the non-experienced and non-selected horses showed a greater affinity towards both familiar and unfamiliar handlers.

Methodology

  • The researchers used three groups of horses for the study: those with EAS experience, those without this experience, and those selected for future EAS work.
  • All horses were subjected to sociability and temperament tests which included the brushing test among others.

Key Findings

  • No significant differences were found in the sociability measures between experienced and non-experienced horses. This was also the case for most of the temperament tests.
  • Non-experienced horses showed a higher level of affiliative behavior towards both a familiar handler and unfamiliar persons during the brushing test, compared to experienced horses.
  • Selected and non-selected horses for EAS programs did not show significant differences in the temperament tests.
  • However, non-selected horses showed significantly more affiliative behavior towards a familiar person in a sociability test compared to horses that had been chosen for EAS.

Implications

  • The findings suggest that the social behavior and temperament of EAS horses may not be significantly different from other horses not chosen for EAS work.
  • Non-experienced and non-selected horses show greater affinity towards handlers, indicating a potential area for further exploration and research.
  • The study casts doubt over the subjective nature of EAS selection, suggesting it may not be based on measurable differences in sociability or temperament.

Future Directions

  • The researchers speculate on the reasons for non-experienced and non-selected horses showing more affinity towards humans, suggesting the need for further studies in this area.
  • They also bring attention to the need for more objective criteria in the selection of horses for EAS programs.

Cite This Article

APA
Brubaker L, Schroeder K, Sherwood D, Stroud D, Udell MAR. (2021). Horse Behavior towards Familiar and Unfamiliar Humans: Implications for Equine-Assisted Services. Animals (Basel), 11(8), 2369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082369

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 8
PII: 2369

Researcher Affiliations

Brubaker, Lauren
  • Animal and Rangeland Sciences, College of Agriculture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97333, USA.
Schroeder, Katy
  • Animal and Food Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA.
Sherwood, Dawn
  • Animal and Rangeland Sciences, College of Agriculture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97333, USA.
Stroud, Daniel
  • Private Practice, Charleston, SC 29401, USA.
Udell, Monique A R
  • Animal and Rangeland Sciences, College of Agriculture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97333, USA.

Grant Funding

  • D14HA-010 / Human Animal Bond Research Institute

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest pertaining to this research.

References

This article includes 48 references
  1. Fine A.H., editor. Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy: Theoretical Foundations and Guidelines for Practice. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2010.
  2. Stern C, Chur-hansen A. An umbrella review of the evidence for equine-assisted interventions. Aust. J. Psychol. 2019;71:361–374.
    doi: 10.1111/ajpy.12246google scholar: lookup
  3. Nobbe H. Evaluation of the Welfare of the Lesson Horse Used for Equine Assisted Activities and Therapies. 2016.
  4. De Santis M, Contalbrigo L, Borgi M, Cirulli F, Luzi F, Redaelli V, Stefani A, Toson M, Odore R, Vercelli C, Valle E, Farina L. Equine Assisted Interventions (EAIs): Methodological Considerations for Stress Assessment in Horses.. Vet Sci 2017 Sep 8;4(3).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci4030044pmc: PMC5644660pubmed: 29056702google scholar: lookup
  5. Bivens A, Leinart D, Klontz B, Klontz T. The Effectiveness of Equine-Assisted Experiential Therapy: Results of an Open Clinical Trial. Soc. Anim. 2007;15:257–267.
    doi: 10.1163/156853007X217195google scholar: lookup
  6. Hauge H, Kvalem I, Pedersen I, Braastad B. Equine-Assisted Activities for Adolescents: Ethogram-based behavioral analysis of persistence during horse-related tasks and communication patterns with the horse. Hum.-Anim. Interact. Bull. 2013;1:57–81.
  7. Holmes CMP, Goodwin D, Redhead ES, Goymour KL. The Benefits of Equine-Assisted Activities: An Exploratory Study. Child Adolesc. Soc. Work J. 2012;29:111–122.
    doi: 10.1007/s10560-011-0251-zgoogle scholar: lookup
  8. Horowitz S. Animal-Assisted Therapy for Inpatients: Tapping the Unique Healing Power of the Human–Animal Bond. Altern. Complement. Ther. 2010;16:339–343.
    doi: 10.1089/act.2010.16603pubmed: 0google scholar: lookup
  9. da Rocha Medeiros B, da Silva MM, Zanette PRK, Claus MP, Cardoso J. Miniature horse training (Equus caballus) for use in equine assisted therapy, according to equine learning theory. Acta Vet. Bras. 2020;14:21–29.
    doi: 10.21708/avb.2020.14.1.8932google scholar: lookup
  10. Schroeder K, Van Allen J, Dhurandhar E, Lancaster B, Heidari Z, Cazenave K, Boone D, Erdman P. Riding into Health: A Case Study on an Equine-Assisted Childhood Obesity Intervention.. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019 Dec 1;16(23).
    doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234835pmc: PMC6926900pubmed: 31805713google scholar: lookup
  11. Schroeder K, Stroud D, Sherwood DM, Udell MAR. Therapeutic Factors in Equine-Facilitated Group Psychotherapy for Women Survivors of Interpersonal Violence. J. Spec. Group Work. 2018;43:326–348.
    doi: 10.1080/01933922.2018.1516707google scholar: lookup
  12. DeBoer M. Defining the Qualities of an Equine-Facilitated Mental Health Horse or Pony: An Introductory Survey. 2017.
  13. Anderson MK, Friend TH, Evans JW, Bushong DM. Behavioral assessment of horses in therapeutic riding programs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999;63:11–24.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00237-8google scholar: lookup
  14. Batt LS, Batt MS, Baguley JA, McGreevy PD. Factors associated with success in guide dog training. J. Vet. Behav. 2008;3:143–151.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2008.04.003google scholar: lookup
  15. Lansade L, Pichard G, Leconte M. Sensory sensitivities: Components of a horse’s temperament dimension. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;114:534–553.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.02.012google scholar: lookup
  16. Lansade L, Bouissou M-F. Reactivity to humans: A temperament trait of horses which is stable across time and situations. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;114:492–508.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.04.012google scholar: lookup
  17. Lloyd AS, Martin JE, Bornett-Gauci HLI, Wilkinson RG. Horse personality: Variation between breeds. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;112:369–383.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.08.010google scholar: lookup
  18. Momozawa Y, Ono T, Sato F, Kikusui T, Takeuchi Y, Mori Y, Kusunose R. Assessment of equine temperament by a questionnaire survey to caretakers and evaluation of its reliability by simultaneous behavior test. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003;84:127–138.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2003.08.001google scholar: lookup
  19. Visser EK, Van Reenen CG, Blokhuis MZ, Morgan EK, Hassmén P, Rundgren TM, Blokhuis HJ. Does horse temperament influence horse-rider cooperation?. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2008;11(3):267-84.
    doi: 10.1080/10888700802101254pubmed: 18569223google scholar: lookup
  20. Bentosela M, Wynne CD, D'Orazio M, Elgier A, Udell MA. Sociability and gazing toward humans in dogs and wolves: Simple behaviors with broad implications.. J Exp Anal Behav 2016 Jan;105(1):68-75.
    doi: 10.1002/jeab.191pubmed: 26781052google scholar: lookup
  21. Payne E, Bennett PC, McGreevy PD. Current perspectives on attachment and bonding in the dog-human dyad.. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2015;8:71-9.
    doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S74972pmc: PMC4348122pubmed: 25750549google scholar: lookup
  22. Barrera G, Jakovcevic A, Elgier AM, Mustaca A, Bentosela M. Responses of shelter and pet dogs to an unknown human. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2010;5:339–344.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2010.08.012google scholar: lookup
  23. Maros K, Boross B, Kubinyi E. Approach and follow behaviour—Possible indicators of the human–horse relationship. Interact. Stud. 2010;11:410–427.
    doi: 10.1075/is.11.3.05margoogle scholar: lookup
  24. McGreevy PD, Oddie C, Burton FL, McLean AN. The horse-human dyad: can we align horse training and handling activities with the equid social ethogram?. Vet J 2009 Jul;181(1):12-8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.005pubmed: 19375965google scholar: lookup
  25. Cobb M, Branson N, McGreevy P, Lill A, Bennett P. The advent of canine performance science: offering a sustainable future for working dogs.. Behav Processes 2015 Jan;110:96-104.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.012pubmed: 25444772google scholar: lookup
  26. Svartberg K. Shyness-boldness predicts performance in working dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;79:157–174.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00120-Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  27. Arrazola A, Merkies K. Effect of Human Attachment Style on Horse Behaviour and Physiology during Equine-Assisted Activities-A Pilot Study.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jul 8;10(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10071156pmc: PMC7401529pubmed: 32650381google scholar: lookup
  28. Hama H, Yogo M, Matsuyama Y. Effects of stroking horses on both humans’ and horses’ heart rate responses1. Jpn. Psychol. Res. 1996;38:66–73.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5884.1996.tb00009.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  29. Merkies K, Sievers A, Zakrajsek E, MacGregor H, Bergeron R, von Borstel UK. Preliminary results suggest an influence of psychological and physiological stress in humans on horse heart rate and behavior. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2014;9:242–247.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2014.06.003google scholar: lookup
  30. Lansade L, Colson V, Parias C, Trösch M, Reigner F, Calandreau L. Female horses spontaneously identify a photograph of their keeper, last seen six months previously.. Sci Rep 2020 Apr 14;10(1):6302.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62940-wpmc: PMC7156667pubmed: 32286345google scholar: lookup
  31. Proops L, McComb K. Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus) extends to familiar humans.. Proc Biol Sci 2012 Aug 22;279(1741):3131-8.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0626pmc: PMC3385734pubmed: 22593108google scholar: lookup
  32. Smith AV, Proops L, Grounds K, Wathan J, McComb K. Functionally relevant responses to human facial expressions of emotion in the domestic horse (Equus caballus).. Biol Lett 2016 Feb;12(2):20150907.
    doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0907pmc: PMC4780548pubmed: 26864784google scholar: lookup
  33. Stone SM. Human facial discrimination in horses: can they tell us apart?. Anim Cogn 2010 Jan;13(1):51-61.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0244-xpubmed: 19533185google scholar: lookup
  34. DeAraugo J, McLean A, McLaren S, Caspar G, McLean M, McGreevy P. Training methodologies differ with the attachment of humans to horses. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2014;9:235–241.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2014.05.001google scholar: lookup
  35. Ijichi C, Griffin K, Squibb K, Favier R. Stranger danger? An investigation into the influence of human-horse bond on stress and behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018;206:59–63.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.05.034google scholar: lookup
  36. Maurstad A, Davis D, Cowles S. Co-being and intra-action in horse-human relationships: A multi-species ethnography of be(com)ing human and be(com)ing horse: Co-being and intra-action in horse-human relationships. Soc. Anthropol. 2013;21:322–335.
    doi: 10.1111/1469-8676.12029google scholar: lookup
  37. Sankey C, Richard-Yris M-A, Leroy H, Henry S, Hausberger M. Positive interactions lead to lasting positive memories in horses, Equus caballus. Anim. Behav. 2010;79:869–875.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.037google scholar: lookup
  38. Wanser SH, Udell MAR. Does attachment security to a human handler influence the behavior of dogs who engage in animal assisted activities?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2019;210:88–94.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.09.005google scholar: lookup
  39. Zilcha-Mano S, Mikulincer M, Shaver PR. Pet in the therapy room: an attachment perspective on Animal-Assisted Therapy.. Attach Hum Dev 2011 Nov;13(6):541-61.
    doi: 10.1080/14616734.2011.608987pubmed: 22011099google scholar: lookup
  40. Baragli P, Padalino B, Telatin A. The role of associative and non-associative learning in the training of horses and implications for the welfare (a review).. Ann Ist Super Sanita 2015;51(1):40-51.
    pubmed: 25857383doi: 10.4415/ann_15_01_08google scholar: lookup
  41. Brubaker L, Udell MA. Cognition and learning in horses (Equus caballus): What we know and why we should ask more.. Behav Processes 2016 May;126:121-31.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.03.017pubmed: 27018202google scholar: lookup
  42. Heitor F, Vicente L. Learning about horses: what is equine learning all about?. Behav Processes 2007 Sep;76(1):34-6; discussion 57-60.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.07.006pubmed: 17408881google scholar: lookup
  43. Hockenhull J, Creighton E. Training horses: Positive reinforcement, positive punishment, and ridden behavior problems. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2013;8:245–252.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2012.06.002google scholar: lookup
  44. Innes L, McBride S. Negative versus positive reinforcement: An evaluation of training strategies for rehabilitated horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;112:357–368.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.08.011google scholar: lookup
  45. McCall CA. Making equine learning research applicable to training procedures.. Behav Processes 2007 Sep;76(1):27-8; discussion 57-60.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.12.008pubmed: 17433568google scholar: lookup
  46. McGreevy PD, McLean AN. Roles of learning theory and ethology in equitation. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2007;2:108–118.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2007.05.003google scholar: lookup
  47. McLean AN, McGreevy PD. Horse-training techniques that may defy the principles of learning theory and compromise welfare. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2010;5:187–195.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2010.04.002google scholar: lookup
  48. Warren-Smith A, McGreevy PD. The use of blended positive and negative reinforcement in shaping the halting reponse of horses (Equus caballus). Anim. Welf. 2007;16:481–488.

Citations

This article has been cited 6 times.
  1. Rochais C, Lerch N, Gueguen L, Schmidlin M, Bonamy O, Grandgeorge M, Hausberger M. Horses' Tactile Reactivity Differs According to the Type of Work: The Example of Equine-Assisted Intervention. Vet Sci 2023 Feb 7;10(2).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci10020130pubmed: 36851434google scholar: lookup
  2. Mignot A, de Luca K, Servais V, Leboucher G. Handlers' Representations on Therapy Dogs' Welfare. Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 25;12(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12050580pubmed: 35268155google scholar: lookup
  3. Sabiniewicz A, Białek M, Tarnowska K, Świątek R, Dobrowolska M, Sorokowski P. A Preliminary Investigation of Interspecific Chemosensory Communication of Emotions: Can Humans (Homo sapiens) Recognise Fear- and Non-Fear Body Odour from Horses (Equus ferus caballus). Animals (Basel) 2021 Dec 8;11(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11123499pubmed: 34944275google scholar: lookup
  4. Visser EK, Jens AL, Nieuwe Weme LE, Spaapen AA, Maarleveld KN, Enzerink KH, Tromp PN, Haven-Pross SC. Assessing Equine Behavioural Responses in Equine-Assisted Services: A Field Study Analysis. Animals (Basel) 2025 Feb 25;15(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15050671pubmed: 40075954google scholar: lookup
  5. Hall C, Kay R. Living the good life? A systematic review of behavioural signs of affective state in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) and factors relating to quality of life. Part 2: Horse-human interactions. Anim Welf 2024;33:e41.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.41pubmed: 39469043google scholar: lookup
  6. Grandgeorge M, Lerch N, Delarue A, Hausberger M. From Human Perception of Good Practices to Horse (Equus Caballus) Welfare: Example of Equine-Assisted Activities. Animals (Basel) 2024 Sep 2;14(17).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14172548pubmed: 39272332google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,001 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.