Stem cells and development2006; 15(4); 523-531; doi: 10.1089/scd.2006.15.523

Horse embryonic stem cell lines from the proliferation of inner cell mass cells.

Abstract: Inner cell mass (ICM) cells were isolated immunosurgically from day 7-8 horse blastocysts and, after proliferation in vitro for 15-28 passages, three lines of cells were confirmed to be embryonic stem (ES) cells by their continued expression of alkaline phosphatase activity and their ability to bind antisera specific for the recognized stem cell markers, SSEA-1, TRA-1-60, TRA-1-81, and the key embryonic gene Oct-4. When maintained under feeder cell-free conditions in vitro, the three lines of cells differentiated into cells of ectodermal, endodermal, and mesodermal lineages. However, they did not form teratomata when injected into the testes of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)/beige immunoincompetent mice, thereby indicating a significant difference in phenotype between ES cells of the horse and those of the mouse and human.
Publication Date: 2006-09-19 PubMed ID: 16978056DOI: 10.1089/scd.2006.15.523Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research involved the isolation and cultivation of inner cell mass cells from horse blastocysts. After several phases of growth in a lab setting, three cell lines were confirmed as embryonic stem cells due to their alkaline phosphatase activity and ability to bind certain stem cell markers. Interestingly, these cells underwent differentiation into various cell types but did not form teratomata – a type of tumor – when tested on mice, highlighting a difference in cell behavior between horse stem cells and those from mice or humans.

Isolation and Growth of Inner Cell Mass Cells

  • This research study began with the isolation of inner cell mass (ICM) cells. These cells, derived from day 7-8 horse blastocysts, were subjected to a process called immunosurgery to separate them from the rest of the cells in the blastocyst.
  • Once isolated, these cells were allowed to grow in vitro (in a laboratory setting) for 15-28 passages, or cycles of growth and division. This process allowed the researchers to obtain a sufficient number of ICM cells for further investigation.

Identification of Embryonic Stem Cells

  • After the proliferation period, three distinct cell lines were identified. These were confirmed to be embryonic stem (ES) cells, a particular type of pluripotent stem cell capable of differentiating into any cell type in the body.
  • The confirmation of the ES cell nature of these cells was achieved by observing their continuous expression of alkaline phosphatase activity and their ability to bind antisera specific for recognized stem cell markers. These markers include SSEA-1, TRA-1-60, and TRA-1-81, as well as the significant embryonic gene Oct-4.

Cell Differentiation and Phenotypic Differences

  • The embryonic stem cells, when kept under feeder-cell-free conditions in vitro, went on to differentiate into cells of ectodermal, endodermal, and mesodermal lineages. These lineages represent the three germ layers from which all tissues and organs in the body originate.
  • Of significant note in this study was the fact that the ES cells did not form teratomata upon injection into the testes of mice. Teratomata are tumors derived from germ cells, typically containing several types of tissue such as hair, muscle, or bone.
  • This lack of tumor formation indicates a marked difference in phenotype (observable characteristics or traits) between ES cells derived from horses and those derived from mice or humans. While the implications of this difference aren’t explicitly stated, it could potentially affect how horse ES cells are used in research and therapeutic contexts.

Cite This Article

APA
Li X, Zhou SG, Imreh MP, Ahrlund-Richter L, Allen WR. (2006). Horse embryonic stem cell lines from the proliferation of inner cell mass cells. Stem Cells Dev, 15(4), 523-531. https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2006.15.523

Publication

ISSN: 1547-3287
NlmUniqueID: 101197107
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 4
Pages: 523-531

Researcher Affiliations

Li, Xihe
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Equine Fertility Unit, Mertoun Paddocks, University of Cambridge, Newmarket, Suffolk CB8 9BH, UK.
Zhou, S G
    Imreh, Marta P
      Ahrlund-Richter, L
        Allen, W R

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Biomarkers
          • Blastocyst / cytology
          • Cell Proliferation
          • Embryo, Mammalian / cytology
          • Equidae / metabolism
          • Humans
          • Mice
          • Mice, SCID
          • Phenotype
          • Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
          • Stem Cells / cytology
          • Teratoma / pathology

          Citations

          This article has been cited 25 times.
          1. El-Husseiny HM, Mady EA, Helal MAY, Tanaka R. The Pivotal Role of Stem Cells in Veterinary Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering.. Vet Sci 2022 Nov 21;9(11).
            doi: 10.3390/vetsci9110648pubmed: 36423096google scholar: lookup
          2. Przu0105dka P, Buczak K, Frejlich E, Gu0105sior L, Suliga K, Kieu0142bowicz Z. The Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) in Veterinary Medicine and Their Use in Musculoskeletal Disorders.. Biomolecules 2021 Aug 2;11(8).
            doi: 10.3390/biom11081141pubmed: 34439807google scholar: lookup
          3. Hisey E, Ross PJ, Meyers SA. A Review of OCT4 Functions and Applications to Equine Embryos.. J Equine Vet Sci 2021 Mar;98:103364.
            doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103364pubmed: 33663726google scholar: lookup
          4. Pain B. Organoids in domestic animals: with which stem cells?. Vet Res 2021 Mar 4;52(1):38.
            doi: 10.1186/s13567-021-00911-3pubmed: 33663614google scholar: lookup
          5. Kumar D, Talluri TR, Selokar NL, Hyder I, Kues WA. Perspectives of pluripotent stem cells in livestock.. World J Stem Cells 2021 Jan 26;13(1):1-29.
            doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v13.i1.1pubmed: 33584977google scholar: lookup
          6. Paterson YZ, Cribbs A, Espenel M, Smith EJ, Henson FMD, Guest DJ. Genome-wide transcriptome analysis reveals equine embryonic stem cell-derived tenocytes resemble fetal, not adult tenocytes.. Stem Cell Res Ther 2020 May 19;11(1):184.
            doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-01692-wpubmed: 32430075google scholar: lookup
          7. Pessu00f4a LVF, Pires PRL, Del Collado M, Pieri NCG, Recchia K, Souza AF, Perecin F, da Silveira JC, de Andrade AFC, Ambrosio CE, Bressan FF, Meirelles FV. Generation and miRNA Characterization of Equine Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Derived from Fetal and Adult Multipotent Tissues.. Stem Cells Int 2019;2019:1393791.
            doi: 10.1155/2019/1393791pubmed: 31191664google scholar: lookup
          8. McClellan A, Evans R, Sze C, Kan S, Paterson Y, Guest D. A novel mechanism for the protection of embryonic stem cell derived tenocytes from inflammatory cytokine interleukin 1 beta.. Sci Rep 2019 Feb 26;9(1):2755.
            doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39370-4pubmed: 30808942google scholar: lookup
          9. Moro LN, Amin G, Furmento V, Waisman A, Garate X, Neiman G, La Greca A, Santu00edn Velazque NL, Luzzani C, Sevlever GE, Vichera G, Miriuka SG. MicroRNA characterization in equine induced pluripotent stem cells.. PLoS One 2018;13(12):e0207074.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207074pubmed: 30507934google scholar: lookup
          10. Barboni B, Russo V, Berardinelli P, Mauro A, Valbonetti L, Sanyal H, Canciello A, Greco L, Muttini A, Gatta V, Stuppia L, Mattioli M. Placental Stem Cells from Domestic Animals: Translational Potential and Clinical Relevance.. Cell Transplant 2018 Jan;27(1):93-116.
            doi: 10.1177/0963689717724797pubmed: 29562773google scholar: lookup
          11. Zahedi M, Parham A, Dehghani H, Mehrjerdi HK. Stemness Signature of Equine Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.. Int J Stem Cells 2017 May 30;10(1):93-102.
            doi: 10.15283/ijsc16036pubmed: 28222255google scholar: lookup
          12. Donadeu FX, Esteves CL. Prospects and Challenges of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Equine Health.. Front Vet Sci 2015;2:59.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00059pubmed: 26664986google scholar: lookup
          13. Bavin EP, Smith O, Baird AE, Smith LC, Guest DJ. Equine Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells have a Reduced Tendon Differentiation Capacity Compared to Embryonic Stem Cells.. Front Vet Sci 2015;2:55.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00055pubmed: 26664982google scholar: lookup
          14. Paterson YZ, Rash N, Garvican ER, Paillot R, Guest DJ. Equine mesenchymal stromal cells and embryo-derived stem cells are immune privileged in vitro.. Stem Cell Res Ther 2014 Jul 30;5(4):90.
            doi: 10.1186/scrt479pubmed: 25080326google scholar: lookup
          15. Barsby T, Bavin EP, Guest DJ. Three-dimensional culture and transforming growth factor beta3 synergistically promote tenogenic differentiation of equine embryo-derived stem cells.. Tissue Eng Part A 2014 Oct;20(19-20):2604-13.
            doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0457pubmed: 24628376google scholar: lookup
          16. Whitworth DJ, Ovchinnikov DA, Sun J, Fortuna PR, Wolvetang EJ. Generation and characterization of leukemia inhibitory factor-dependent equine induced pluripotent stem cells from adult dermal fibroblasts.. Stem Cells Dev 2014 Jul 1;23(13):1515-23.
            doi: 10.1089/scd.2013.0461pubmed: 24555755google scholar: lookup
          17. Volk SW, Theoret C. Translating stem cell therapies: the role of companion animals in regenerative medicine.. Wound Repair Regen 2013 May-Jun;21(3):382-94.
            doi: 10.1111/wrr.12044pubmed: 23627495google scholar: lookup
          18. Spaas JH, Guest DJ, Van de Walle GR. Tendon regeneration in human and equine athletes: Ubi Sumus-Quo Vadimus (where are we and where are we going to)?. Sports Med 2012 Oct 1;42(10):871-90.
            doi: 10.1007/BF03262300pubmed: 22963225google scholar: lookup
          19. Breton A, Sharma R, Diaz AC, Parham AG, Graham A, Neil C, Whitelaw CB, Milne E, Donadeu FX. Derivation and characterization of induced pluripotent stem cells from equine fibroblasts.. Stem Cells Dev 2013 Feb 15;22(4):611-21.
            doi: 10.1089/scd.2012.0052pubmed: 22897112google scholar: lookup
          20. Khodadadi K, Sumer H, Pashaiasl M, Lim S, Williamson M, Verma PJ. Induction of pluripotency in adult equine fibroblasts without c-MYC.. Stem Cells Int 2012;2012:429160.
            doi: 10.1155/2012/429160pubmed: 22550508google scholar: lookup
          21. Prathalingam N, Ferguson L, Young L, Lietz G, Oldershaw R, Healy L, Craig A, Lister H, Binaykia R, Sheth R, Murdoch A, Herbert M. Production and validation of a good manufacturing practice grade human fibroblast line for supporting human embryonic stem cell derivation and culture.. Stem Cell Res Ther 2012 Mar 28;3(2):12.
            doi: 10.1186/scrt103pubmed: 22472092google scholar: lookup
          22. Hackett CH, Fortier LA. Embryonic stem cells and iPS cells: sources and characteristics.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2011 Aug;27(2):233-42.
            doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2011.04.003pubmed: 21872756google scholar: lookup
          23. Nagy K, Sung HK, Zhang P, Laflamme S, Vincent P, Agha-Mohammadi S, Woltjen K, Monetti C, Michael IP, Smith LC, Nagy A. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from equine fibroblasts.. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2011 Sep;7(3):693-702.
            doi: 10.1007/s12015-011-9239-5pubmed: 21347602google scholar: lookup
          24. Koch TG, Berg LC, Betts DH. Concepts for the clinical use of stem cells in equine medicine.. Can Vet J 2008 Oct;49(10):1009-17.
            pubmed: 19119371
          25. Talbot NC, Blomberg Le Ann. The pursuit of ES cell lines of domesticated ungulates.. Stem Cell Rev 2008 Sep;4(3):235-54.
            doi: 10.1007/s12015-008-9026-0pubmed: 18612851google scholar: lookup