Horse Sector Participants’ Attitudes towards Anthropomorphism and Animal Welfare and Wellbeing.
Abstract: Anthropomorphizing can misinform the making of inferences about animal mental experiences. This is a consideration when implementing the Five Domains Model for animal welfare assessment. An online survey run in 2021 captured horse sector participants' perspectives about anthropomorphism and wellbeing in relation to horses. Most respondents, 82.9% ( = 431/520), believed that anthropomorphism could influence horse welfare and wellbeing. These respondents were then asked how, in their opinion, anthropomorphism might relate to horse welfare. A thematic analysis identified two themes: (1) 'Anthropomorphism can influence how people relate to horses' and (2) 'Anthropomorphism can have consequences for horse welfare and wellbeing'. The results suggested that experienced respondents were aware of the complexities surrounding anthropomorphic attitudes and that anthropomorphism can have beneficial and detrimental consequences on horse welfare and wellbeing. Benefits include a sense of relatedness to a horse, while detriments include the potential to misinterpret horse behaviors. The authors propose that anthropomorphism has a place in horse welfare and wellbeing when used critically and with caution. This study recommends that there is a need to actively manage anthropomorphism when organizations update policies and practices and implement the Five Domains Model. More research is required to understand the effects of anthropomorphism on horse-related practices.
Publication Date: 2024-08-26 PubMed ID: 39272267DOI: 10.3390/ani14172482Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The study investigates how anthropomorphism, or attributing human traits to animals, impacts horse welfare according to the perspectives of individuals in the horse industry. The researchers found that most participants believe anthropomorphism can affect horse welfare both positively and negatively, and suggest it should be carefully managed in animal welfare policies and practices.
Research Methods and Participants
- The research was conducted via an online survey in 2021, targeting individuals working in various capacities in the horse industry.
- Out of 520 respondents, 82.9% believed that anthropomorphism could impact the welfare and wellbeing of horses, offering significant insight to base the study on.
Key Themes Identified
- Based on the responses, the researchers identified two main themes regarding how anthropomorphism might affect horse welfare.
- The first theme, “Anthropomorphism can influence how people relate to horses”, suggests that viewing horses through a human lens can affect the human-horse relationship, potentially altering how humans interact with and care for horses.
- The second theme, “Anthropomorphism can have consequences for horse welfare and wellbeing”, implies that assigning human qualities to horses could lead to beneficial or harmful outcomes in terms of their welfare and wellbeing.
Benefits and Detriments of Anthropomorphism
- The perceived benefits of anthropomorphism included fostering a sense of connection with the horse, which could potentially motivate better care and attention to their needs.
- However, potential detriments included the risk of misunderstanding horse behaviors, which could lead to inappropriate or harmful treatment.
Recommendations and Future Research
- The authors advocate for a balanced approach to anthropomorphism – it should be used critically and cautiously in the context of horse welfare and wellbeing.
- There is a need for regulatory bodies and organizations in the horse sector to actively manage the role of anthropomorphism when they update policies and implement models like the Five Domains Model, an animal welfare assessment tool.
- The study concludes with a call for further research to better understand the impact of anthropomorphism on practices related to horse care and management.
Cite This Article
APA
Fiedler JM, Ayre ML, Rosanowski S, Slater JD.
(2024).
Horse Sector Participants’ Attitudes towards Anthropomorphism and Animal Welfare and Wellbeing.
Animals (Basel), 14(17), 2482.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172482 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, 250 Princes Highway, Werribee, Melbourne, VIC 3030, Australia.
- School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, University of Melbourne, Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
- Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, 250 Princes Highway, Werribee, Melbourne, VIC 3030, Australia.
- Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, 250 Princes Highway, Werribee, Melbourne, VIC 3030, Australia.
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists