FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2022; 12(11); 1334; doi: 10.3390/ani12111334

Horses’ Response to a Novel Diet: Different Herbs Added to Dry, Wet or Wet-Sweetened Oats.

Abstract: The commercial horse feed industry uses palatants to mask undesirable tastes of feeds and enhance product acceptance. However, an unknown odour or taste may also hinder feed intake, due to, inter alia, novelty. The objective of the study was to assess the horses' response to novel diet: five different herbs added alternately to dry, wet or wet-sweetened oats. Twenty adult horses were given different diet combinations of a feed presentation and a herb: field mint, common yarrow, common chamomile, common sage and common nettle, consecutively, once daily. The response to novelty was assessed regarding traits showing the willingness to consume: times of olfaction and consumption, times and numbers of intervals in consumption and drinking water, and the mass of leftovers. The results show that properties of the herbs studied did not hinder the consumption and only the odour of the dry common sage delayed the intake. Wetting or wetting and sweetening the diet accelerated the intake. In conclusion, herbs in small amounts do not significantly affect the willingness to consume feed. Although wet and wet-sweetened diet presentations may be novel to horses, they increase the feed palatability and can be suggested for use when preparing horse diets.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-05-24 PubMed ID: 35681799PubMed Central: PMC9179354DOI: 10.3390/ani12111334Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study aimed to analyze how horses respond to a diet with five different herbs added to oats in different forms: dry, wet, or wet-sweetened. The research showed that herbs did not significantly hinder a horse’s willingness to consume feed, and wet or wet-sweetened food tended to be consumed faster.

Objectives and Methods of the Study

  • The primary purpose of this research was to examine how horses react to different feed: dry, wet, or wet-sweetened oats with an addition of different herbs.
  • The study was based on the premise that uniqueness in odour or taste can either enhance or hinder the horse’s feed intake.
  • Twenty adult horses were experimented upon by providing them with diet combinations containing herbs like field mint, common yarrow, common chamomile, common sage, and common nettle.
  • The researchers tracked multiple behavioral signs to assess the horses’ response to the new diet. These indicators included the time spent smelling and eating the feed, intervals in consumption and drinking water, and the amount of leftover food.

Key Findings from the Study

  • The study indicated that the introduction of herbs did not considerably deter the horses’ willingness to consume their feed.
  • Horses delayed their feed intake when presented with the scent of dry common sage, showcasing that particular odours could affect their eating habits.
  • Interestingly, the horses were found to consume their feed faster when the oats were either wet or wet-sweetened, regardless of the novelty.
  • Despite the addition of herbs being a new factor in their diet, the horses did not exhibit drastic changes in their eating patterns or habits.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The study concluded that small quantities of herbs do not significantly affect a horse’s willingness to consume feed.
  • Both wet and wet-sweetened oats were found to increase feed palatability, implying that they could be recommended when preparing horse diets.
  • The findings can be beneficial to the commercial horse feed industry, as they suggest ways to enhance product acceptance by altering the form of feeds and adding different herbs.

Cite This Article

APA
Stachurska A, Tkaczyk E, Różańska-Boczula M, Janicka W, Janczarek I. (2022). Horses’ Response to a Novel Diet: Different Herbs Added to Dry, Wet or Wet-Sweetened Oats. Animals (Basel), 12(11), 1334. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12111334

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 11
PII: 1334

Researcher Affiliations

Stachurska, Anna
  • Department of Horse Breeding and Use, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Tkaczyk, Ewelina
  • Department of Horse Breeding and Use, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Różańska-Boczula, Monika
  • Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Janicka, Wiktoria
  • Department of Horse Breeding and Use, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Janczarek, Iwona
  • Department of Horse Breeding and Use, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 42 references
  1. Mayes E, Duncan P. Temporal patterns of feeding behaviour in free-ranging horses.. Behaviour 1986;96:105–129.
    doi: 10.1163/156853986X00243google scholar: lookup
  2. Goodwin D, Davidson HPB, Harris P. Selection and acceptance of flavours in concentrate diets for stabled horses.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005;95:223–232.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.04.007google scholar: lookup
  3. Goodwin D, Davidson HPB, Harris P. Sensory varieties in concentrate diets for stabled horses: Effects on behaviour and selection.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005;90:337–349.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.013google scholar: lookup
  4. Ralston SL. Feeding behavior.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1986 Dec;2(3):609-21.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30709-5pubmed: 3492248google scholar: lookup
  5. Marinier SL, Alexander AJ. Use of field observations to measure individual grazing ability in horses.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1992;33:1–10.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80078-4google scholar: lookup
  6. Sroka L, Müller C, Hass ML, These A, Aboling S, Vervuert I. Horses' rejection behaviour towards the presence of Senecio jacobaea L. in hay.. BMC Vet Res 2022 Jan 7;18(1):25.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-03124-0pmc: PMC8740075pubmed: 34996467google scholar: lookup
  7. Rørvang MV, Nielsen BL, McLean AN. Sensory Abilities of Horses and Their Importance for Equitation Science.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:633.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00633pmc: PMC7509108pubmed: 33033724google scholar: lookup
  8. Francis JM, Thompson-Witrick KA, Perry EB. Palatability of Horse Treats: Comparing the Preferences of Horses and Humans.. J Equine Vet Sci 2021 Apr;99:103357.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103357pubmed: 33781427google scholar: lookup
  9. Culda CA, Stermin AN. Horses’ Senses Involvement in Food Location and Selection.. Bulletin UASVM Animal Science and Biotechnologies 2019; p. 76.
    doi: 10.15835/buasvmcn-asb:0008.19google scholar: lookup
  10. Janczarek I, Wilk I, Pietrzak S, Liss M, Tkaczyk S. Taste Preferences of Horses in Relation to Their Breed and Sex.. J Equine Vet Sci 2018 May;64:59-64.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.02.010pubmed: 30973154google scholar: lookup
  11. Van den Berg M, Hinch GN. Effect of flavour change on food intake by horses. Proceedings of the 8th European Workshop on Equine Nutrition; Dijon, France. 16–18 June 2016; pp. 84–86.
  12. Van den Berg M, Giagos V, Lee C, Brown WY, Cawdell-Smith AJ, Hinch GN. The influence of odour, taste and nutrients on feeding behaviour and food preferences in horses.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016;184:41–50.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.08.015google scholar: lookup
  13. Randall RP, Schurg WA, Church DC. Response of horses to sweet, salty, sour and bitter solutions.. J Anim Sci 1978 Jul;47(1):51-5.
    doi: 10.2527/jas1978.47151xpubmed: 711642google scholar: lookup
  14. Provenza FD, Balph DF. Development of dietary choice in livestock on rangelands and its implications for management.. J. Anim. Sci. 1988;66:2356–2368.
    doi: 10.2527/jas1988.6692356xgoogle scholar: lookup
  15. Berridge KC. Measuring hedonic impact in animals and infants: microstructure of affective taste reactivity patterns.. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2000 Mar;24(2):173-98.
    doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(99)00072-Xpubmed: 10714382google scholar: lookup
  16. Ganchrow JR, Steiner JE, Bartana A. Behavioral reactions to gustatory stimuli in young chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus).. Dev Psychobiol 1990 Mar;23(2):103-17.
    doi: 10.1002/dev.420230202pubmed: 2365134google scholar: lookup
  17. Steiner JE, Glaser D, Hawilo ME, Berridge KC. Comparative expression of hedonic impact: affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates.. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2001 Jan;25(1):53-74.
    doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00051-8pubmed: 11166078google scholar: lookup
  18. Van den Bos R, Meijer MK, Spruijt BM. Taste reactivity patterns in domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus).. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2000 Sep 1;69(2):149-168.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00124-6pubmed: 10906399google scholar: lookup
  19. Jankunis ES, Whishaw IQ. Sucrose Bobs and Quinine Gapes: horse (Equus caballus) responses to taste support phylogenetic similarity in taste reactivity.. Behav Brain Res 2013 Nov 1;256:284-90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.08.024pubmed: 23973764google scholar: lookup
  20. Francis JM, Neander CR, Roeder MJ, Perry EB. The Influence of Topically Applied Oil-Based Palatants on Eating Behavior in Horses.. J Equine Vet Sci 2020 Aug;91:102995.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102995pubmed: 32684247google scholar: lookup
  21. Khelil-Arfa H, Reigner F, Blard T, Barrière P, Gesbert A, Lansade L, Faugeron J, Blanchard A. Feed Concentrate Palatability in Welsh Ponies: Acceptance and Preference of Flavors.. J Equine Vet Sci 2021 Jul;102:103619.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103619pubmed: 34119203google scholar: lookup
  22. Thorne JB, Goodwin D, Kennedy MJ, Davidson HPB, Harris P. Foraging enrichment for individually 305 housed horses: Practicality and effects on behavior.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005;94:149–164.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.02.002google scholar: lookup
  23. Bhatt N. Herbs and herbal supplements, a novel nutritional approach in animal nutrition.. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2005;5:497–516.
    doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4688.9444google scholar: lookup
  24. Deans SG, Simpson EJM. Antioxidants from Salvia officinalis.. In: Kintzios SE, editor. Sage: The Genus Salvia. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2005.
  25. Schaffer A, Caicoya AL, Colell M, Holland R, von Fersen L, Widdig A, Amici F. Neophobia in 10 ungulate species-a comparative approach.. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2021;75(7):102.
    doi: 10.1007/s00265-021-03041-0pmc: PMC8219784pubmed: 34177046google scholar: lookup
  26. Van den Berg M, Giagos V, Lee C, Brown WY, Hinch GN. Acceptance of novel food by horses: The influence of food cues and nutrient composition.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016;183:59–67.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.07.005google scholar: lookup
  27. Johnson M, Wesely EG, Kavitha MS, Uma V. Antibacterial activity of leaves and inter-nodal callus extracts of Mentha arvensis L.. Asian Pac J Trop Med 2011 Mar;4(3):196-200.
    doi: 10.1016/S1995-7645(11)60068-0pubmed: 21771452google scholar: lookup
  28. Benedek B, Kopp B. Achillea millefolium L. s.l. revisited: recent findings confirm the traditional use.. Wien Med Wochenschr 2007;157(13-14):312-4.
    doi: 10.1007/s10354-007-0431-9pubmed: 17704978google scholar: lookup
  29. Singh O, Khanam Z, Misra N, Srivastava MK. Chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.): An overview.. Pharmacogn Rev 2011 Jan;5(9):82-95.
    doi: 10.4103/0973-7847.79103pmc: PMC3210003pubmed: 22096322google scholar: lookup
  30. Miraj S, Kiani S. A review study of therapeutic effects of Salvia officinalis L.. Pharm. Lett. 2016;8:299–303.
  31. Bozin B, Mimica-Dukic N, Samojlik I, Jovin E. Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of rosemary and sage (Rosmarinus officinalis L. and Salvia officinalis L., Lamiaceae) essential oils.. J Agric Food Chem 2007 Sep 19;55(19):7879-85.
    doi: 10.1021/jf0715323pubmed: 17708648google scholar: lookup
  32. Joshi BC, Mukhija M, Kalia AN. Pharmacognostical review of Urtica dioica L.. Int. J. Green Pharm. 2014;8:201–209.
    doi: 10.4103/0973-8258.142669google scholar: lookup
  33. Upton R. Stinging nettles leaf (Urtica dioica L.) Extraordinary vegetable medicine.. J. Herb. Med. 2013;3:9–38.
    doi: 10.1016/j.hermed.2012.11.001google scholar: lookup
  34. De Oliveira Tribucci AM, Brandi RA, de Carvalho Balieiro JC, Titto EAL, da Silva Bueno IC. Palatability of horse diets containing citrus pulp (Citrus Sinensis) through the preference test.. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2013;12:e33.
    doi: 10.4081/ijas.2013.e33google scholar: lookup
  35. Pereira DG, Afonso A, Medeiros FM. Overview of Friedman’s test and post-hoc analysis.. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 2015;44:2636–2653.
    doi: 10.1080/03610918.2014.931971google scholar: lookup
  36. Ellis AD. Biological basis of feed intake.. In: Ellis AD, Longland AC, Coenen M, Miraglia M, editors. The Impact of Nutrition on the Health and Welfare of Horses. Wageningen Academic Publishers; Wageningen, The Netherlands: 2010. pp. 53–74. EAAP Publication No. 128.
  37. Couladis M, Tzakou O, Mimica-Dukic N, Jancic R, Stojanovic D. Essential oil of Salvia officinalis L. from Serbia and Montenegro.. Flav. Fragr. J. 2002;17:119–126.
    doi: 10.1002/ffj.1065google scholar: lookup
  38. Figueroa J, Frías D, Solà-Oriol D, Tadich T, Franco-Rosselló R, Nuñez V, Dwyer DM. Palatability in pigs, the pleasure of consumption1.. J Anim Sci 2019 Apr 29;97(5):2165-2174.
    doi: 10.1093/jas/skz085pmc: PMC6488332pubmed: 30873521google scholar: lookup
  39. Redgate SE, Cooper JJ, Hall S, Eady P, Harris PA. Dietary experience modifies horses' feeding behavior and selection patterns of three macronutrient rich diets.. J Anim Sci 2014 Apr;92(4):1524-30.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5579pubmed: 24496846google scholar: lookup
  40. Murphy K, Wishart S, Mills D. The acceptability of various flavoured solutions by Thoroughbred horses.. Equine Vet. J. 1999;31((Suppl. 28)):67.
  41. Edris AE, Jirovetz L, Buchbauer G, Denkova Z, Stoyanova A, Slavchev A. Chemical-composition, antimicrobial activities and olfactory evaluation of Salvia officinalis L. (sage) essential oils from Egypt.. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2007;19:186–189.
    doi: 10.1080/10412905.2007.9699256google scholar: lookup
  42. Shawl AS, Srivastava SK, Syamasundar KV, Tripathi S, Raina VK. Essential oil composition of Achillea millefolium L. growing wild in Kashmir, India.. Flavour Fragr. J. 2002;17:165–168.
    doi: 10.1002/ffj.1074google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Mańkowska A, Dobraczyńska BM, Szewczak J, Chodup Z, Radzanowski B, Matychyn I, Witkowska D. Preliminary Assessment of Leisure Horses' Preferences for Different Forms of Carrot (Daucus carota subsp. sativus). Animals (Basel) 2025 Nov 24;15(23).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15233385pubmed: 41375444google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,780 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.