FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Impact of Gait and Diameter during Circular Exercise on Fron...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2021; 11(12); doi: 10.3390/ani11123581

Impact of Gait and Diameter during Circular Exercise on Front Hoof Area, Vertical Force, and Pressure in Mature Horses.

Abstract: Circular exercise can be used at varying gaits and diameters to exercise horses, with repeated use anecdotally relating to increased lameness. This work sought to characterize mean area, mean vertical force, and mean pressure of the front hooves while exercising in a straight line at the walk and trot, and small (10-m diameter) and large circles (15-m diameter) at the walk, trot, and canter. Nine mature horses wore TekscanTM Hoof Sensors on their forelimbs adhered with a glue-on shoe. Statistical analysis was performed in SAS 9.4 with fixed effects of leg, gait, and exercise type (PROC GLIMMIX) and p < 0.05 as significant. For all exercise types, the walk had greater mean pressure than the trot (p < 0.01). At the walk, the straight line had greater mean area loaded than the large circle (p = 0.01), and both circle sizes had lower mean vertical force than the straight line (p = 0.003). During circular exercise at the canter, the outside front limb had greater mean area loaded than at the walk and trot (p = 0.001). This study found that gait is an important factor when evaluating circular exercise and should be considered when exercising horses to prevent injury.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-12-17 PubMed ID: 34944357PubMed Central: PMC8697886DOI: 10.3390/ani11123581Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article examines how different diameters and gaits during horse exercise affect the front hooves’ average area, vertical force, and pressure. It finds that gait is crucial and must be taken into account when exercising horses to prevent injuries.

Study Design and Approach

  • The researchers used nine mature horses for the study, equipping their forelimbs with Tekscan Hoof Sensors attached with a glue-on shoe. This was done to precisely measure and record the horse’s hoof area, vertical force and pressure when exercising.
  • Each horse was put through various exercises. These included moving at different gaits – walking, trotting, and cantering – and in a straight line, as well as in small (10-m diameter) and large (15-m diameter) circles.
  • After gathering the data, statistical analysis was conducted using SAS 9.4, a software used for advanced analytics. They examined fixed effects of leg, gait, and exercise type, and set a p value of < 0.05 to determine statistical significance.

Research Findings

  • The study found that for all types of exercises, walking resulted in a higher mean pressure on the hooves than trotting.
  • When the horse walked in a straight line, it had a greater mean area loaded – the surface area of the hoof touching the ground or the shoe – than when it walked in a large circle.
  • Both sizes of circular movement (10m and 15m diameters) resulted in a lower mean vertical force on the hooves than straight-line movement when the horse was walking.
  • While undertaking circular exercise at a canter, the horse’s outside front limb displayed a higher mean loaded area than while walking or trotting.

Conclusions and Implications

  • Based on their findings, the researchers concluded that the gait of a horse is a significant factor when evaluating circular exercise routines. This is because gait change during these exercises impacts the hoof’s mean area, vertical force, and pressure, affecting the horse’s comfort and health.
  • Therefore, the study urges appropriate consideration of horse gait when designing exercise routines to avoid overstraining the horses and potentially leading to injury.

Cite This Article

APA
Logan AA, Nielsen BD, Robison CI, Hallock DB, Manfredi JM, Hiney KM, Buskirk DD, Popovich JM. (2021). Impact of Gait and Diameter during Circular Exercise on Front Hoof Area, Vertical Force, and Pressure in Mature Horses. Animals (Basel), 11(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123581

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 12

Researcher Affiliations

Logan, Alyssa A
  • Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, 474 S. Shaw Ln., East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Nielsen, Brian D
  • Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, 474 S. Shaw Ln., East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Robison, Cara I
  • Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, 474 S. Shaw Ln., East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Hallock, David B
  • 3R Forge and Farriery, Dansville, MI 48819, USA.
Manfredi, Jane M
  • Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, 784 Wilson, Rd., East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Hiney, Kristina M
  • Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, 201J Animal Sciences, Stillwater, OK 74074, USA.
Buskirk, Daniel D
  • Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, 474 S. Shaw Ln., East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Popovich, John M
  • Department of Osteopathic Surgical Specialties, Michigan State University, 909 Fee Rd., B405, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

Grant Funding

  • PROTO101800148 / Michigan Alliance for Animal Agriculture
  • Influence of circle size and speed on forces experienced by exercising horses (2019-2020) / American Quarter Horse Foundation

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest and the funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

This article includes 51 references
  1. Parkes RSV, Pfau T, Weller R, Witte TH. The effect of curve running on distal limb kinematics in the Thoroughbred racehorse.. PLoS ONE 2020;15:e0244105.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244105pmc: PMC7771664pubmed: 33373408google scholar: lookup
  2. Parkes RSV, Weller R, Pfau T, Witte TH. The effect of training on stride duration in a cohort of two-year-old and three-year-old thoroughbred racehorses.. Animals 2019;9:466.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9070466pmc: PMC6680649pubmed: 31336595google scholar: lookup
  3. Atalaia T, Prazeres J, Abrantes J, Clayton HM. Equine rehabilitation: A scoping review of the literature.. Animals 2021;11:1508.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061508pmc: PMC8224607pubmed: 34067449google scholar: lookup
  4. Mackechnie-Guire R, Mackechnie-Guire E, Bush R, Fisher D, Fisher M, Weller R. Local back pressure caused by a training roller during lunging with and without a Pessoa training aid.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2018;67:112–117.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.03.018google scholar: lookup
  5. Morrice-West AV, Hitchens PL, Walmsley EA, Chris Whitton R. Track surfaces used for ridden workouts and alternatives to ridden exercise for thoroughbred horses in race training.. Animals 2018;8:221.
    doi: 10.3390/ani8120221pmc: PMC6316526pubmed: 30486234google scholar: lookup
  6. Dyson S, Greve L. Subjective gait assessment of 57 sports horses in normal work: A comparison of the response to flexion tests, movement in hand, on the lunge, and ridden.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2016;38:1–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.12.012google scholar: lookup
  7. Pfau T, Stubbs NC, Kaiser LJ, Brown LEA, Clayton HM. Effect of trotting speed and circle radius on movement symmetry in horses during lunging on a soft surface.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2012;73:1890–1899.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.12.1890pubmed: 23176414google scholar: lookup
  8. Greve L, Dyson S. Body lean angle in sound dressage horses in-hand, on the lunge and ridden.. Vet. J. 2016;217:52–57.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.06.004pubmed: 27810211google scholar: lookup
  9. Greve L, Dyson S. What can we learn from visual and objective assessment of non-lame and lame horses in straight lines, on the lunge and ridden?. Equine Vet. Educ. 2020;32:479–491.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13016google scholar: lookup
  10. Hobbs SJ, Licka T, Polman R. The difference in kinematics of horses walking, trotting and cantering on a flat and banked 10 m circle.. Equine Vet. J. 2011;43:686–694.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00334.xpubmed: 21496095google scholar: lookup
  11. Chang Y-H, Kram R. Limitations to maximum running speed on flat curves.. J. Exp. Biol. 2007;210:971–982.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.02728pubmed: 17337710google scholar: lookup
  12. Kawamoto R, Ishige Y, Watarai K, Fukashiro S. Influence of curve sharpness on torsional loading of the tibia in running.. J. Appl. Biomech. 2002;18:218–230.
    doi: 10.1123/jab.18.3.218pubmed: 14658374google scholar: lookup
  13. Mizobe F, Takahashi Y, Kusano K. Risk factors for jockey falls in Japanese Thoroughbred flat racing.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2021;106:103749.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103749pubmed: 34670697google scholar: lookup
  14. Beisser A, McClure S, Rezabek G, Soring KH, Wang C. Frequency of and risk factors associated with catastrophic musculoskeletal injuries in Quarter Horses at two Midwestern racetracks: 67 cases (2000–2011). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2014;245:1160–1168.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.245.10.1160pubmed: 25356718google scholar: lookup
  15. McGreevy PD, Thomson PC. Differences in motor laterality between breeds of performance horse.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006;99:183–190.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.09.010google scholar: lookup
  16. Beisser AL, McClure S, Wang C, Soring K, Garrison R, Peckham B. Evaluation of catastrophic musculoskeletal injuries in Thoroughbreds and Quarter Horses at three Midwestern racetracks.. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2011;239:1236–1241.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.239.9.1236pubmed: 21999798google scholar: lookup
  17. Rooney JR. Impulse and breakdown on straights and turns in racehorses.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 1983;3:137–139.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(83)80056-2google scholar: lookup
  18. Starke SD, Willems E, May SA, Pfau T. Vertical head and trunk movement adaptations of sound horses trotting in a circle on a hard surface.. Vet. J. 2012;193:73–80.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.10.019pubmed: 22104508google scholar: lookup
  19. Clayton HM, Sha DH. Head and body centre of mass movement in horses trotting on a circular path.. Equine Vet. J. 2006;38:462–467.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2006.tb05588.xpubmed: 17402467google scholar: lookup
  20. Robartes H, Fairhurst H, Pfau T. Head and pelvic movement symmetry in horses during circular motion and in rising trot.. Vet. J. 2013;198:e52–e58.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.033pubmed: 24144771google scholar: lookup
  21. Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ. A review of biomechanical gait classification with reference to collected trot, passage and piaffe in dressage horses.. Animals 2019;9:763.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9100763pmc: PMC6826507pubmed: 31623360google scholar: lookup
  22. McIlwraith CW, Kawcak CE, Frisbie DD, Little CB, Clegg PD, Peffers MJ, Karsdal MA, Ekman S, Laverty S, Slayden RA. Biomarkers for equine joint injury and osteoarthritis.. J. Orthop. Res. 2018;36:823–831.
    doi: 10.1002/jor.23738pubmed: 28921609google scholar: lookup
  23. Orsini JA, Ryan WG, Boston RC. Evaluation of oral administration of firocoxib for the management of musculoskeletal pain and lameness associated with osteoarthritis in horses and Wounds Involving Bone View project.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2012;73:664–671.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.5.664pubmed: 22533398google scholar: lookup
  24. Gessel T, Harrast MA. Running dose and risk of developing lower-extremity osteoarthritis.. Curr. Sports Med. Rep. 2019;18:201–209.
    doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000602pubmed: 31385835google scholar: lookup
  25. Chateau H, Camus M, Holden-Douilly L, Falala S, Ravary B, Vergari C, Lepley J, Denoix JM, Pourcelot P, Crevier-Denoix N. Kinetics of the forelimb in horses circling on different ground surfaces at the trot.. Vet. J. 2013;198:e20–e26.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.028pubmed: 24511634google scholar: lookup
  26. Logan AA, Nielsen BD, Hallock DB, Robison CI, Popovich JM. 27 Within- and between-session reliability of the TekscanTM Hoof System with a glue-on shoe.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2021;100:103490.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103490pubmed: 34979263google scholar: lookup
  27. Caldwell MN, Allan LA, Pinchbeck GL, Clegg PD, Kissick KE, Milner PI. A test of the universal applicability of a commonly used principle of hoof balance.. Vet. J. 2016;207:169–176.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.10.003pubmed: 26639831google scholar: lookup
  28. Oehme B, Grund S, Munzel J, Mülling CKW. Kinetic effect of different ground conditions on the sole of the claws of standing and walking dairy cows.. J. Dairy Sci. 2019;102:10119–10128.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-16183pubmed: 31495627google scholar: lookup
  29. Hüppler M, Häfner F, Geiger S, Mäder D, Hagen J. Modifying the surface of horseshoes: Effects of eggbar, heartbar, open toe, and wide toe shoes on the phalangeal alignment, pressure distribution, and the footing pattern.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2016;37:86–97.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.12.009google scholar: lookup
  30. Hagen J, Hüppler M, Häfner F, Geiger S, Mäder D. Modifying horseshoes in the mediolateral plane: Effects of side wedge, wide branch, and unilateral roller shoes on the phalangeal alignment, pressure forces, and the footing pattern.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2016;37:77–85.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.12.001google scholar: lookup
  31. Judy CE, Galuppo LD, Snyder JR, Willits NH. Evaluation of an in-shoe pressure measurement system in horses.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2001;62:23–28.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.23pubmed: 11197554google scholar: lookup
  32. Al Naem M, Litzke LF, Failing K, Burk J, Röcken M. Hoof kinetic patterns differ between sound and laminitic horses.. Equine Vet. J. 2020;53:503–509.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13311pubmed: 32542795google scholar: lookup
  33. Reilly PT. In-Shoe Force Measurements and Hoof Balance.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2010;30:475–478.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2010.07.013google scholar: lookup
  34. Perino VV, Kawcak CE, Frisbie DD, Reiser RF, McIlwraith CW. The accuracy and precision of an equine in-shoe pressure measurement system as a tool for gait analysis.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2007;27:161–166.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2007.02.006google scholar: lookup
  35. Back W, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Kinematic comparison of the leading and trailing fore- and hindlimbs at the canter.. Equine Vet. J. Suppl. 1997;29:80–83.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb05060.xpubmed: 9354296google scholar: lookup
  36. Weishaupt MA, Hogg HP, Auer JA, Wiestner T. Velocity-dependent changes of time, force and spatial parameters in Warmblood horses walking and trotting on a treadmill.. Equine Vet. J. 2010;42:530–537.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00190.xpubmed: 21059056google scholar: lookup
  37. Biewener AA, Thomason J, Goodship A, Lanyon LE. Bone stress in the horse forelimb during locomotion at different gaits: A comparison of two experimental methods.. J. Biomech. 1983;16:565–576.
    doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(83)90107-0pubmed: 6643529google scholar: lookup
  38. Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ. Ground reaction forces: The Sine Qua Non of legged locomotion.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2019;76:25–35.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.02.022pubmed: 31084749google scholar: lookup
  39. Byström A, Clayton HM, Hernlund E, Rhodin M, Egenvall A. Equestrian and biomechanical perspectives on laterality in the horse.. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2020;16:35–45.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP190022google scholar: lookup
  40. Oosterlinck M, Pille F, Back W, Dewulf J, Gasthuys F. A pressure plate study on fore and hindlimb loading and the association with hoof contact area in sound ponies at the walk and trot.. Vet. J. 2011;190:71–76.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.08.016pubmed: 20875762google scholar: lookup
  41. Greve L, Pfau T, Dyson S. Thoracolumbar movement in sound horses trotting in straight lines in hand and on the lunge and the relationship with hind limb symmetry or asymmetry.. Vet. J. 2017;220:95–104.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.01.003pubmed: 28190505google scholar: lookup
  42. Hobbs SJ, Bertram JEA, Clayton HM. An exploration of the influence of diagonal dissociation and moderate changes in speed on locomotor parameters in trotting horses.. PeerJ 2016;4:e2190.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.2190pmc: PMC4933092pubmed: 27413640google scholar: lookup
  43. Tokuriki M, Aoki O. Electromyographic activity of the hindlimb muscles during the walk, trot and canter.. Equine Vet. J. 1995;27:152–155.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb04909.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  44. Kienapfel K, Preuschoft H, Wulf A, Wagner H. The biomechanical construction of the horse’s body and activity patterns of three important muscles of the trunk in the walk, trot and canter.. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2018;102:e818–e827.
    doi: 10.1111/jpn.12840pubmed: 29135048google scholar: lookup
  45. Peterson M, Sanderson W, Kussainov N, Hobbs SJ, Miles P, Scollay MC, Clayton HM. Effects of Racing Surface and Turn Radius on Fatal Limb Fractures in Thoroughbred Racehorses.. Sustainability 2021;13:539.
    doi: 10.3390/sጂ0539google scholar: lookup
  46. Tan H, Wilson AM. Grip and limb force limits to turning performance in competition horses.. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2011;278:2105–2111.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2395pmc: PMC3107634pubmed: 21147799google scholar: lookup
  47. Brocklehurst C, Weller R, Pfau T. Effect of turn direction on body lean angle in the horse in trot and canter.. Vet. J. 2014;199:258–262.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.11.009pubmed: 24360754google scholar: lookup
  48. Davies HMS. The effects of different exercise conditions on metacarpal bone strains in Thoroughbred racehorses.. Pferdeheilkunde 1996;12:666–670.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM19960466google scholar: lookup
  49. Murray RC, Walters JM, Snart H, Dyson SJ, Parkin TDH. Identification of risk factors for lameness in dressage horses.. Vet. J. 2010;184:27–36.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.020pubmed: 19369100google scholar: lookup
  50. Mackechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Differential rotational movement of the thoracolumbosacral spine in high-level dressage horses ridden in a straight line, in sitting trot and seated canter compared to in-hand trot.. Animals 2021;11:888.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11030888pmc: PMC8003829pubmed: 33804702google scholar: lookup
  51. Weishaupt MA, Wiestner T, von Peinen K, Waldern N, Roepstorff L, Van Weeren R, Meyer H, Johnston C. Effect of head and neck position on vertical ground reaction forces and interlimb coordination in the dressage horse ridden at walk and trot on a treadmill.. Equine Vet. J. 2006;38:387–392.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2006.tb05574.xpubmed: 17402453google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.