Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2010; 39(7); 833-838; doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00696.x

In vitro biomechanical comparison of a modified 5.5 mm locking compression plate fixation with a 5.5 mm locking compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones.

Abstract: To compare number of cycles to failure for palmarodorsal 4-point bending of a modified 5.5 mm broad locking compression plate (M5.5-LCP) fixation with a 5.5 mm broad LCP (5.5-LCP) fixation used to repair osteotomized equine third metacarpal (MC3) bones. Methods: In vitro biomechanical testing. Methods: Adult equine cadaveric MC3 bones (n=6 pairs). Methods: An 8-hole, M5.5-LCP, obtained by having a 1.0 mm thickness removed from the bone contact portion of the 5.5-LCP, was applied to the dorsal surface of 1 randomly selected MC3 from each pair, and an 8-hole, 5.5-LCP was applied dorsally to the contralateral bone from each pair using a combination of cortical and locking screws. Plates and screws were applied using standard ASIF techniques to MC3 bones with a mid-diaphyseal osteotomy. MC3 constructs had palmarodorsal 4-point bending cyclic fatigue testing. Mean cycles to failure for each method were compared using a paired t-test within each group. Significance was set at P<.05. Results: Mean±SD cycles to failure of the M5.5-LCP fixation (188,641±17,971) was significantly greater than that of the 5.5-LCP fixation (166,497±15,539). Conclusions: M5.5-LCP fixation was superior to 5.5-LCP fixation of osteotomized equine MC3 bones in resisting cyclic fatigue under palmarodorsal 4-point bending. Conclusions: This suggests that biological plate fixation is not the ideal choice for osteotomized equine MC3 bones.
Publication Date: 2010-05-13 PubMed ID: 20459499DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00696.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research compared two types of plates used to fix bone fractures in horses, finding that the modified 5.5 mm locking compression plate provided better resistance to bending and fatigue than the standard version.

Objective of the Study

  • The purpose of this study was to compare the fatigue resistance and fixation strength of two types of plates, a 5.5 mm broad locking compression plate (5.5-LCP) and a modified version (M5.5-LCP), in repairing osteotomized (cut) equine third metacarpal (MC3) bones.

Methodology

  • The study was conducted in vitro using adult equine cadaveric MC3 bones.
  • Each pair of bones was fixed with either an 8-hole M5.5-LCP or an 8-hole 5.5-LCP.
  • The M5.5-LCP was modified by removing a 1.0 mm thickness from the bone contact portion of the 5.5-LCP
  • Plates and screws were applied using standard ASIF techniques to MC3 bones with a mid-diaphyseal osteotomy, a surgical fracturing technique.
  • The repaired MC3 bone constructs were subjected to a palmarodorsal 4-point bending cyclic fatigue test, a method of testing the resistance of the constructs to repeated bending stresses.
  • The number of cycles to failure for each method was then statistically compared using a paired t-test.

Results

  • The results showed the M5.5-LCP fixation (188,641±17,971 cycles) outperformed the standard 5.5-LCP fixation (166,497±15,539 cycles) in terms of cycles to failure, indicating it had better resistance to cyclic fatigue.

Conclusions

  • The study concluded that the M5.5-LCP fixation was superior to 5.5-LCP fixation in repairing osteotomized equine MC3 bones, indicating that it may be a better choice in clinical practice.
  • The findings also suggested that biological plate fixation, which is represented by the 5.5-LCP, is likely not the optimal choice for osteotomized equine MC3 bones due to its lesser resistance to fatigue.

Cite This Article

APA
Sod GA, Riggs LM, Mitchell CF, Martin GS, Gill MS. (2010). In vitro biomechanical comparison of a modified 5.5 mm locking compression plate fixation with a 5.5 mm locking compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones. Vet Surg, 39(7), 833-838. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00696.x

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 39
Issue: 7
Pages: 833-838

Researcher Affiliations

Sod, Gary A
  • Equine Health Studies Program, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA. gsod@vetmed.lsu.edu
Riggs, Laura M
    Mitchell, Colin F
      Martin, George S
        Gill, Marjorie S

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Biomechanical Phenomena
          • Bone Plates / veterinary
          • Compressive Strength
          • Fracture Fixation, Internal / methods
          • Fracture Fixation, Internal / veterinary
          • Horses / surgery
          • Internal Fixators / veterinary
          • Materials Testing / veterinary
          • Metacarpal Bones / surgery
          • Osteotomy / veterinary

          Citations

          This article has been cited 0 times.