Analyze Diet
The Journal of experimental biology2005; 208(Pt 6); 1175-1190; doi: 10.1242/jeb.01486

In vivo muscle function vs speed. I. Muscle strain in relation to length change of the muscle-tendon unit.

Abstract: The activity of muscles can be concentric (shortening), eccentric (lengthening) or isometric (constant length). When studying muscle function it is important to know what the muscle fascicles are actually doing because the performance of muscle is strongly influenced by the type of activity: force decreases as a function of shortening velocity during concentric contractions; force produced during eccentric contractions can be stronger than maximum isometric force, and force production is enhanced if a concentric contraction follows an eccentric phase. It is well known that length changes of muscle fascicles may be different from length changes of the overall muscle-tendon unit because of the compliance of the series elasticity. Consequently, fascicles of joint extensor muscles may not undergo eccentric activity even when the joint flexes, but the extent to which this occurs may vary with the compliance of the series elasticity and may differ between species: the vastus lateralis, a knee extensor, shortens when active during trotting in dogs and lengthens in rats. Previous studies of kinematics of trotting in horses have shown that during stance, the elbow extends nearly continuously with a brief period of flexion near mid-stance and the knee exhibits two phases of flexion followed by extension. The lateral triceps (an elbow extensor) has no external tendon but the vastus lateralis has a relatively long external tendon and the fascicles insert on an aponeurosis. Thus, one might expect the relation between fascicle strain and overall length change of the muscle-tendon units to be quite different in these two muscles. In the present study in horses, fascicle length changes of the lateral triceps and vastus lateralis were measured with sonomicrometry and length changes of the muscle-tendon units were estimated from muscle architecture and joint kinematics for four horses trotting on a treadmill at nine speeds. Because the focus of this study was the relation between length changes of the muscle-tendon unit (estimated from kinematics) and length changes in the muscle fascicles, we divided the stance-phase sonomicrometry records into phases that corresponded to the alternating flexion and extension of the joint as indicated by the kinematic records. During its one eccentric phase, the triceps shortened by 0.7+/-0.4% despite a predicted lengthening of 1%. Similarly, the vastus shortened by 3.7+/-1.9% when kinematics predicted 3.2% lengthening. During their concentric phases the triceps shortened by 10.6% and the vastus shortened by 8.1%. Strain in the triceps did not change with speed but it did in the vastus. Strain rate increased with speed in both muscles as did the integrated EMG, indicating an increase in the volume of muscle recruited. Thus, despite differences in their architecture and the kinematic patterns of the associated joints, these two joint extensors exhibited similar activity.
Publication Date: 2005-03-16 PubMed ID: 15767316DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01486Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the relationship between muscle strain and the length change of the overall muscle-tendon system during various movements in horses. The specific muscles studied are the lateral triceps and vastus lateralis, comparing the observations in horses to previous findings in dogs and rats.

Introduction

  • The behavior of muscles can varies during activities. They can shorten (concentric), lengthen (eccentric) or stay constant size (isometric) with different activities resulting in varying impacts on muscle performance.
  • The research pays attention to the relationship between muscles and tendons from the compliance of the series elasticity aspect. This means that the change in the size of muscle fascicles might not align with the length change of the whole muscle-tendon unit. This would mean that even during the flexing of joints, the fascicles in the joint extensors may not lengthen.
  • The study focuses on two muscles —lateral triceps and vastus lateralis — in horses, where the lateral triceps lack an external tendon while the latter has a long one, linking the fascicles to an aponeurosis. This makes the behavior of these muscles under strain different.

Methodology

  • The research involved monitoring the size changes of the muscle fascicles in four horses. These were measured using sonomicrometry while the horses went through different speeds on a treadmill.
  • The experiment measured the length changes of the muscle-tendon unit, relying on the estimated muscle architecture and joint kinematics. These measurements were correlated with the flexion and extension phases of the horses’ joint movement as documented in the kinematic records.

Results

  • The tricep muscle exhibited a slight size reduction during its one eccentric phase, contrary to prediction. The vastus also shortened in size when it should’ve lengthened based on kinematic predictions.
  • The research also noted the muscle strains during the concentric phases, with the tricep shortening by over 10% while the vastus by over 8%. This strain in the tricep did not vary with speed, unlike in the vastus.
  • Both the muscles showed an increase in strain rate with the increase in speed, suggesting a direct relationship between the two. This also led to an increase in the volume of muscle recruited.

Conclusion

  • The joint extensor muscles, despite their architectural differences and varying kinematic patterns, exhibited similar behavior during the study.
  • This research helps in understanding muscle function, especially how their behavior changes under strain, and how this varies between different species and movements.

Cite This Article

APA
Hoyt DF, Wickler SJ, Biewener AA, Cogger EA, De La Paz KL. (2005). In vivo muscle function vs speed. I. Muscle strain in relation to length change of the muscle-tendon unit. J Exp Biol, 208(Pt 6), 1175-1190. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01486

Publication

ISSN: 0022-0949
NlmUniqueID: 0243705
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 208
Issue: Pt 6
Pages: 1175-1190

Researcher Affiliations

Hoyt, Donald F
  • Biological Sciences Department, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 91768-4032, USA. dfhoyt@csupomona.edu
Wickler, Steven J
    Biewener, Andrew A
      Cogger, Edward A
        De La Paz, Kristin L

          MeSH Terms

          • Analysis of Variance
          • Animals
          • Biomechanical Phenomena
          • Electromyography
          • Forelimb / physiology
          • Hindlimb / physiology
          • Horses / physiology
          • Joints / physiology
          • Locomotion / physiology
          • Muscle Contraction / physiology
          • Muscle, Skeletal / physiology
          • Tendons / physiology

          Grant Funding

          • S06 GM053933 / NIGMS NIH HHS

          Citations

          This article has been cited 10 times.
          1. Takahashi Y, Takahashi T, Mukai K, Ebisuda Y, Ohmura H. Effect of speed and leading or trailing limbs on surface muscle activities during canter in Thoroughbred horses.. PLoS One 2023;18(5):e0286409.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286409pubmed: 37235556google scholar: lookup
          2. St George LB, Spoormakers TJP, Smit IH, Hobbs SJ, Clayton HM, Roy SH, van Weeren PR, Richards J, Serra Bragança FM. Adaptations in equine appendicular muscle activity and movement occur during induced fore- and hindlimb lameness: An electromyographic and kinematic evaluation.. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:989522.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.989522pubmed: 36425119google scholar: lookup
          3. Konow N, Collias A, Biewener AA. Skeletal Muscle Shape Change in Relation to Varying Force Requirements Across Locomotor Conditions.. Front Physiol 2020;11:143.
            doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00143pubmed: 32265722google scholar: lookup
          4. Biewener AA. Locomotion as an emergent property of muscle contractile dynamics.. J Exp Biol 2016 Jan;219(Pt 2):285-94.
            doi: 10.1242/jeb.123935pubmed: 26792341google scholar: lookup
          5. Carr JA, Ellerby DJ, Marsh RL. Function of a large biarticular hip and knee extensor during walking and running in guinea fowl (Numida meleagris).. J Exp Biol 2011 Oct 15;214(Pt 20):3405-13.
            doi: 10.1242/jeb.060335pubmed: 21957104google scholar: lookup
          6. Carroll AM, Biewener AA. Mono- versus biarticular muscle function in relation to speed and gait changes: in vivo analysis of the goat triceps brachii.. J Exp Biol 2009 Oct;212(Pt 20):3349-60.
            doi: 10.1242/jeb.033639pubmed: 19801439google scholar: lookup
          7. Bonsfills N, Gómez-Barrena E, Raygoza JJ, Núñez A. Loss of neuromuscular control related to motion in the acutely ACL-injured knee: an experimental study.. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008 Oct;104(3):567-77.
            doi: 10.1007/s00421-008-0729-3pubmed: 18719937google scholar: lookup
          8. Higham TE, Nelson FE. The integration of lateral gastrocnemius muscle function and kinematics in running turkeys.. Zoology (Jena) 2008;111(6):483-93.
            doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2008.01.001pubmed: 18657958google scholar: lookup
          9. Carroll AM, Lee DV, Biewener AA. Differential muscle function between muscle synergists: long and lateral heads of the triceps in jumping and landing goats (Capra hircus).. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2008 Oct;105(4):1262-73.
          10. Toigo M, Boutellier U. New fundamental resistance exercise determinants of molecular and cellular muscle adaptations.. Eur J Appl Physiol 2006 Aug;97(6):643-63.
            doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0238-1pubmed: 16845551google scholar: lookup