Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2005; 36(8); 748-753; doi: 10.2746/0425164044848082

Influence of individual competition level on back kinematics of horses jumping a vertical fence.

Abstract: The costs and investments required for the purchase and training of showjumpers justify the need to find selection means for jumping horses. Use of objective kinematic criteria correlated to jumping ability could be helpful for this assessment. Objective: To compare back kinematics between 2 groups of horses of different competition levels (Group 1, competing at high level; Group 2 competing at low level) while free jumping over a 1 m vertical fence. Methods: Three-dimensional recordings were performed using 2 panning cameras. Kinematic parameters of the withers and tuber sacrale (vertical displacement, vertical and horizontal velocities), backline inclination and flexion-extension motion of the 3 main dorsal segments (thoracic, thoracolumbar and lumbosacral) were analysed. Results: Group 2 horses had a lower displacement of their withers and tuber sacrale from the end of the last approach stride until the first departure stride (P<0.05). As a result, they increased the flexion of their thoracolumbar and lumbosacral junctions during the hindlimb swing phase before take-off (P<0.05). However, withers and tuber sacrale velocities were slightly modified. Group 1 horses pitched their backline less forward during the forelimb stance phase before take-off and straightened it more after landing (P<0.05), probably indicating a more efficient strutting action of their forelimbs. Conclusions: Because significant differences in back motion were found between good and poor jumpers when jumping a 1 m high fence, criteria based on certain back kinematics can be developed that may help in the selection of talented showjumpers.
Publication Date: 2005-01-20 PubMed ID: 15656509DOI: 10.2746/0425164044848082Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigated the differences in back movements of elite-level and lower-level showjumping horses as they jumped a 1m high vertical fence. The results indicated that the backs of better-performing horses move in a different manner compared to their less advanced counterparts, suggesting these patterns could provide useful criteria for selecting horses who have a potential for higher-level competition.

Objective and Methodology

  • The study aimed to discern any variations in the back kinematics of top-tier show jumpers and their less accomplished counterparts while they navigate a 1m vertical fence. The intention was to find objective criteria connected to jumping prowess that could aid in the selection of promising showjumping horses.
  • The researchers used two panning cameras to obtain three-dimensional recordings of the horses as they jumped. They analyzed the movements of different parts of the horse’s back – most notably the withers (the ridge between the shoulder blades) and the tuber sacrale (at the base of the spine), as well as the incline and range of flexion-extension of the three main upper back segments.

Results

  • The study found that horses with less competitive ability had reduced vertical displacement of their withers and tuber sacrale between the end of the last approach stride and the beginning of the first departure stride. This led them to increase the flexion of their thoracolumbar (mid-back) and lumbosacral (low back) junctions during the hindlimb swing before take-off.
  • The researchers also noted that although the variance in the velocities of the withers and tuber sacrale was minor in the lower level group, more accomplished horses exhibited lesser inclination of their backline forward during the forelimb stance before take-off. They also straightened their backline more post-landing – showing a potentially superior strutting action of their forelimbs.

Concluding Thoughts

  • This study concluded that discernable differences in back movement were present when comparing highly performing and poorer jumping horses. This indicates that selecting talented showjumpers could involve criteria based on certain back kinematics.
  • However, more research may be needed to validate and expand upon these conclusions, and to establish a reliable, kinematics-based selection process for showjumping horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Cassiat G, Pourcelot P, Tavernier L, Geiger D, Denoix JM, Degueurce D. (2005). Influence of individual competition level on back kinematics of horses jumping a vertical fence. Equine Vet J, 36(8), 748-753. https://doi.org/10.2746/0425164044848082

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 36
Issue: 8
Pages: 748-753

Researcher Affiliations

Cassiat, G
  • UMR INRA-ENVA de Biomécanique et Pathologie Locomotrice du Cheval, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Avenue du Général de Gaulle, 94704 Maisons Alfort, France.
Pourcelot, P
    Tavernier, L
      Geiger, D
        Denoix, J M
          Degueurce, D

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Back / physiology
            • Biomechanical Phenomena
            • Female
            • Forelimb / physiology
            • Gait / physiology
            • Hindlimb / physiology
            • Horses / physiology
            • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
            • Imaging, Three-Dimensional / veterinary
            • Locomotion / physiology
            • Male
            • Video Recording

            Citations

            This article has been cited 3 times.
            1. Pogue J, Zink C, Kieves NR. Effects of jump height on forelimb landing forces in border collies. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:1006990.
              doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1006990pubmed: 36644531google scholar: lookup
            2. St George L, Clayton HM, Sinclair J, Richards J, Roy SH, Hobbs SJ. Muscle Function and Kinematics during Submaximal Equine Jumping: What Can Objective Outcomes Tell Us about Athletic Performance Indicators?. Animals (Basel) 2021 Feb 5;11(2).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11020414pubmed: 33562875google scholar: lookup
            3. Ricard A, Dumont Saint Priest B, Danvy S, Barrey E. Accelerometers Provide Early Genetic Selection Criteria for Jumping Horses. Front Genet 2020;11:448.
              doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00448pubmed: 32508876google scholar: lookup