Analyze Diet
Injury1991; 22(4); 295-298; doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(91)90009-4

Injuries caused by animals.

Abstract: Injuries caused by animals and treated at the University Hospital of Umeå were analysed. Dogs caused nearly one-half of the injuries, while horses caused one-third of the injuries and the highest number of fractures. The 'cost' of treatment and sickness benefit was fairly evenly distributed between horse-, cattle-, and dog-related injuries. The average 'cost' per injured person was, however, highest in those injured in cattle accidents and moose-car collisions. The impact of animal-related injuries on the health care and social security systems was similar to occupational accidents and car accidents in several respects.
Publication Date: 1991-07-01 PubMed ID: 1937726DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(91)90009-4Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores the incidence and economic impact of injuries caused by animals, primarily focusing on dogs, horses, and cattle, treated at the University Hospital of Umeå.

Study Method and Analysis

  • The researchers conducted a study at the University Hospital of Umeå, examining cases where patients were treated for injuries caused by animals.
  • Different types of animals were considered in the study, with a focus on dogs, horses, cattle, and incidents involving moose-car collisions.
  • As part of the analysis, the types of injuries, treatment given, and the cost of treatment alongside sickness benefits were examined and compared.

Findings of the Study

  • The analysis showed that nearly half of these injuries were caused by dogs, followed by horses which accounted for one-third of the injuries, including the highest number of fractures.
  • Despite horses causing a high number of injuries, the economic burden of treatment, combined with sickness benefits, was quite evenly distributed between horse-related, cattle-related, and dog-related injuries.
  • The average treatment cost per individual was found to be highest in cases involving cattle accidents and moose-car collisions. This might be due to the severity of trauma inflicted by these incidents, which might require more intensive care and longer recovery periods.

Implications

  • The study illustrates that animal-related injuries make a significant contribution to health care burden, with impacts on both the health care system and social security systems.
  • In fact, the study suggests that the burden of animal-related injuries is comparable to that of occupational accidents and car accidents in various aspects.
  • The findings imply a need for greater preventive measures and safety campaigns to reduce the risk of such injuries, particularly in environments where interactions with these animals are more common.

Cite This Article

APA
Björnstig U, Eriksson A, Ornehult L. (1991). Injuries caused by animals. Injury, 22(4), 295-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(91)90009-4

Publication

ISSN: 0020-1383
NlmUniqueID: 0226040
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 22
Issue: 4
Pages: 295-298

Researcher Affiliations

Björnstig, U
  • Umeå Accident Analysis Group, Department of Surgery, University of Umeå, Sweden.
Eriksson, A
    Ornehult, L

      MeSH Terms

      • Acute Disease
      • Animals
      • Animals, Domestic
      • Costs and Cost Analysis
      • Deer
      • Female
      • Horses
      • Humans
      • Male
      • Sweden / epidemiology
      • Wounds and Injuries / economics
      • Wounds and Injuries / epidemiology
      • Wounds and Injuries / etiology

      Citations

      This article has been cited 5 times.
      1. Rhind JH, Quinn D, Cosbey L, Mobley D, Britton I, Lim J. Cattle-Related Trauma: A 5-Year Retrospective Review in a Adult Major Trauma Center. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2021 Apr-Jun;14(2):86-91.
        doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_92_20pubmed: 34321806google scholar: lookup
      2. Shriyan SV, Mani UA, Bhot FB, Sada EC, Ursekar R, Adake D. Animal Injuries; a Case Series of Bull Induced Injuries in India. Adv J Emerg Med 2020 Winter;4(1):e5.
        doi: 10.22114/ajem.v0i0.244pubmed: 31938774google scholar: lookup
      3. Scott RM, Buckley HR, Domett K, Tromp M, Trinh HH, Willis A, Matsumura H, Oxenham MF. Domestication and large animal interactions: Skeletal trauma in northern Vietnam during the hunter-gatherer Da But period. PLoS One 2019;14(9):e0218777.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218777pubmed: 31483781google scholar: lookup
      4. Kall S, Vogt PM. [Surgical therapy for hand infections Part 2]. Chirurg 2005 Jul;76(7):721-30; quiz 731.
        doi: 10.1007/s00104-005-1044-8pubmed: 15983753google scholar: lookup
      5. Kall S, Vogt PM. [Surgical therapy for hand infections. Part I]. Chirurg 2005 Jun;76(6):615-25; quiz 626-7.
        doi: 10.1007/s00104-005-1043-9pubmed: 15928956google scholar: lookup