FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Front Vet Sci / Inside the Interaction: Contact With Familiar Humans Modulat...
Frontiers in veterinary science2020; 7; 582759; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.582759

Inside the Interaction: Contact With Familiar Humans Modulates Heart Rate Variability in Horses.

Abstract: A human-animal relationship can be developed through subsequent interactions, affected by the positive or negative emotional valence of the proceeding one. Horses implement a process of categorization to classify humans with whom they interact as positive, negative, or neutral stimuli by evaluating the kind of approach and the nature of the contact. In these terms, human-animal interactions are emotionally charged events, eliciting specific emotional states in both subjects involved. Although the human-horse relationship has been mainly investigated through behavioral analysis, physiological indicators are needed for a more objective assessment of the emotional responses. Heart rate variability (HRV) is a commonly used autonomic nervous system (ANS) correlate estimating the sympathovagal balance as a psychophysiological marker of emotion regulation in horses. We have assumed that long-term positive relationships with humans may have a positive and immediate impact on the emotional arousal of the horse, detectable, ANS activity, during the interaction. We analyzed horses' heartbeat dynamics during their interaction with either familiar or unfamiliar handlers, applying a standardized experimental protocol consisting of three different conditions shifting from the absence of interaction to physical contact. The ANS signals were monitored through an innovative non-invasive wearable system, not interfering with the unconscious emotional response of the animal. We demonstrated that horses appeared to feel more relaxed while physically interacting (e.g., grooming on the right side) with some familiar handlers compared to the same task performed by someone unfamiliar. The shift of the sympathovagal balance toward a vagal predominance suggests that the horses experienced a decrease in stress response as a function not only of the handler's familiarity but also of the type of interaction they are experiencing. These results constitute the objective evidence of horses' capacity to individually recognize a familiar person, adding the crucial role of familiarity with the handler as a paramount component of human-animal interaction. Our rigorous methodological approach may provide a significant contribution to various fields such as animal welfare while further investigating the emotional side of the human-animal relationships.
Copyright © 2020 Scopa, Greco, Contalbrigo, Fratini, Lanatà, Scilingo and Baragli.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-11-30 PubMed ID: 33330706PubMed Central: PMC7734029DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.582759Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explored how interaction with familiar and unfamiliar humans affects the heart rate variability (HRV) of horses, with results indicating that horses feel more relaxed with people they’re familiar with.

Research Objective

  • The main goal of the research was to examine how relationships between horses and humans affect the emotional response of the animals. This was evaluated using their heart rate variability (HRV), which estimates the balance between two parts of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), thereby indicating emotional regulation in horses.

Methodology

  • A standardized experimental protocol was used, featuring three different situations ranging from no interaction to physical contact. They compared how horses reacted to interaction with familiar and unfamiliar handlers.
  • An innovative non-invasive wearable system was employed to monitor the autonomic nervous signals of horses. This ensured that the emotional response of the animals was not influenced by the monitoring process.

Findings

  • Horses showed a more relaxed state when interacting physically (example used was grooming on the right side) with familiar handlers versus unfamiliar ones.
  • The shift in the balance between the two parts of the ANS towards the vagal section indicates a decrease in the stress response of horses. This was dependent not only on the familiarity of the handler but also on the type of interaction experienced.

Significance of the Research

  • The results provide objective evidence supporting the ability of horses to recognize familiar humans, thereby emphasizing the importance of handler familiarity in human-animal interactions.
  • Due to its rigorous methodology, the research contributes significantly to various fields including animal welfare. It provides a method for further investigation into the emotional aspects of human-animal relationships.

Cite This Article

APA
(2020). Inside the Interaction: Contact With Familiar Humans Modulates Heart Rate Variability in Horses. Front Vet Sci, 7, 582759. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.582759

Publication

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 7
Pages: 582759
PII: 582759

Researcher Affiliations

Conflict of Interest Statement

AG, AL, and ES are founding partners of the company Feel-Ing S.r.l. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 56 references
  1. Proops L, McComb K. Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus) extends to familiar humans.. Proc Biol Sci 2012 Aug 22;279(1741):3131-8.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0626pmc: PMC3385734pubmed: 22593108google scholar: lookup
  2. d'Ingeo S, Quaranta A, Siniscalchi M, Stomp M, Coste C, Bagnard C, Hausberger M, Cousillas H. Horses associate individual human voices with the valence of past interactions: a behavioural and electrophysiological study.. Sci Rep 2019 Aug 9;9(1):11568.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47960-5pmc: PMC6689011pubmed: 31399629google scholar: lookup
  3. Sankey C, Richard-Yris MA, Leroy H, Henry S, Hausberger M. Positive interactions lead to lasting positive memories in horses, Equus caballus.. Anim Behav (2010) 79:869–75.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.037google scholar: lookup
  4. Sankey C, Henry S, Clouard C, Richard-Yris MA, Hausberger M. Asymmetry of behavioral responses to a human approach in young naive vs. trained horses.. Physiol Behav 2011 Sep 1;104(3):464-8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.05.009pubmed: 21605580google scholar: lookup
  5. Fureix C, Jego P, Sankey C, Hausberger M. How horses (Equus caballus) see the world: humans as significant "objects".. Anim Cogn 2009 Jul;12(4):643-54.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0223-2pubmed: 19381698google scholar: lookup
  6. Lansade L, Colson V, Parias C, Trösch M, Reigner F, Calandreau L. Female horses spontaneously identify a photograph of their keeper, last seen six months previously.. Sci Rep 2020 Apr 14;10(1):6302.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62940-wpmc: PMC7156667pubmed: 32286345google scholar: lookup
  7. Baragli P, Padalino B, Telatin A. The role of associative and non-associative learning in the training of horses and implications for the welfare (a review).. Ann Ist Super Sanita 2015;51(1):40-51.
    doi: 10.4415/ANN_15_01_08pubmed: 25857383google scholar: lookup
  8. Lansade L, Nowak R, Lainé AL, Leterrier C, Bonneau C, Parias C, Bertin A. Facial expression and oxytocin as possible markers of positive emotions in horses.. Sci Rep 2018 Oct 2;8(1):14680.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32993-zpmc: PMC6168541pubmed: 30279565google scholar: lookup
  9. Hinde RA. Towards Understanding Relationships.. London: Academic Press; (1979).
  10. Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedersen V, Tosi MV, Janczak AM, Visser EK. Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2006) 101:185–242.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001google scholar: lookup
  11. Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Emotion and motivation.. Handbook of Psychophysiology, 2nd Edn Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univeristy Press; (2007). p. 581–607.
    doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511546396.025google scholar: lookup
  12. Mendl M, Burman OH, Paul ES. An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood.. Proc Biol Sci 2010 Oct 7;277(1696):2895-904.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0303pmc: PMC2982018pubmed: 20685706google scholar: lookup
  13. Hausberger M, Roche H, Henry S, Visser EK. A review of the human–horse relationship.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2008) 109:1–24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.015google scholar: lookup
  14. Boissy A. Fear and fearfulness in animals.. Q Rev Biol 1995 Jun;70(2):165-91.
    doi: 10.1086/418981pubmed: 7610234google scholar: lookup
  15. Ramos A, Mormède P. Stress and emotionality: a multidimensional and genetic approach.. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1998;22(1):33-57.
    doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(97)00001-8pubmed: 9491939google scholar: lookup
  16. Forkman B, Boissy A, Meunier-Salaün MC, Canali E, Jones RB. A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses.. Physiol Behav 2007 Oct 22;92(3):340-74.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.03.016pubmed: 18046784google scholar: lookup
  17. Berger A, Scheibe KM, Michaelis S, Streich WJ. Evaluation of living conditions of free-ranging animals by automated chronobiological analysis of behavior.. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2003 Aug;35(3):458-66.
    doi: 10.3758/BF03195524pubmed: 14587555google scholar: lookup
  18. Squibb K, Griffin K, Favier R, Ijichi C. Poker Face: discrepancies in behaviour and affective states in horses during stressful handling procedures.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2018) 202:34–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.02.003google scholar: lookup
  19. Yarnell K, Hall C, Billett E. An assessment of the aversive nature of an animal management procedure (clipping) using behavioral and physiological measures.. Physiol Behav 2013 Jun 13;118:32-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.05.013pubmed: 23685232google scholar: lookup
  20. Baragli P, Vitale V, Banti L, Sighieri C. Effect of aging on behavioural and physiological responses to a stressful stimulus in horses (Equus caballus).. Behaviour (2014) 151:1513–33.
    doi: 10.1163/1568539X-00003197google scholar: lookup
  21. Boissy A, Manteuffel G, Jensen MB, Moe RO, Spruijt B, Keeling LJ, Winckler C, Forkman B, Dimitrov I, Langbein J, Bakken M, Veissier I, Aubert A. Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare.. Physiol Behav 2007 Oct 22;92(3):375-97.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003pubmed: 17428510google scholar: lookup
  22. Fox E. Emotion Science Cognitive and Neuroscientific Approaches to Understanding Human Emotions.. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan; (2008).
    doi: 10.1007/978-1-137-07946-6google scholar: lookup
  23. Visser EK, van Reenen CG, van der Werf JT, Schilder MB, Knaap JH, Barneveld A, Blokhuis HJ. Heart rate and heart rate variability during a novel object test and a handling test in young horses.. Physiol Behav 2002 Jun 1;76(2):289-96.
    doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00698-4pubmed: 12044602google scholar: lookup
  24. Kuwahara M, Hashimoto S, Ishii K, Yagi Y, Hada T, Hiraga A, Kai M, Kubo K, Oki H, Tsubone H, Sugano S. Assessment of autonomic nervous function by power spectral analysis of heart rate variability in the horse.. J Auton Nerv Syst 1996 Aug 27;60(1-2):43-8.
    doi: 10.1016/0165-1838(96)00028-8pubmed: 8884694google scholar: lookup
  25. Scopa C, Palagi E, Sighieri C, Baragli P. Physiological outcomes of calming behaviors support the resilience hypothesis in horses.. Sci Rep 2018 Nov 30;8(1):17501.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35561-7pmc: PMC6269543pubmed: 30504840google scholar: lookup
  26. Rietmann TR, Stuart AEA, Bernasconi P, Staﾬher M, Auer JA, Weishaupt MA. Assessment of mental stress in warmblood horses: heart rate variability in comparison to heart rate and selected behavioural parameters.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2004) 88:121–36.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.02.016google scholar: lookup
  27. von Borell E, Langbein J, Després G, Hansen S, Leterrier C, Marchant J, Marchant-Forde R, Minero M, Mohr E, Prunier A, Valance D, Veissier I. Heart rate variability as a measure of autonomic regulation of cardiac activity for assessing stress and welfare in farm animals -- a review.. Physiol Behav 2007 Oct 22;92(3):293-316.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.01.007pubmed: 17320122google scholar: lookup
  28. Pomfrett CJ, Glover DG, Bollen BG, Pollard BJ. Perturbation of heart rate variability in cattle fed BSE-infected material.. Vet Rec 2004 May 29;154(22):687-91.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.154.22.687pubmed: 15200074google scholar: lookup
  29. Ille N, Erber R, Aurich C, Aurich J. Comparison of heart rate and heart rate variability obtained by heart rate monitors and simultaneously recorded electrocardiogram signals in non-exercising horses.. J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res (2014) 9:341–6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2014.07.006google scholar: lookup
  30. Baragli P, Gazzano A, Martelli F, Sighieri C. How do horses appraise humans' actions? A brief note over a practical way to assess stimulus perception.. J Equine Vet Sci (2009) 29:739–42.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2009.08.006google scholar: lookup
  31. Baragli P, Mariti C, Petri L, De Giorgio F, Sighieri C. Does attention make the difference? Horses' response to human stimulus after two different training strategies.. J Vet Behav (2011) 6:31–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2010.08.020google scholar: lookup
  32. Vitale V, Balocchi R, Varanini M, Sgorbini M, Macerata A, Sighieri. The effects of restriction of movement on the reliability of heart rate variability measurements in the horse (Equus caballus).. J Vet Behav (2013) 8:400–3.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2013.02.003google scholar: lookup
  33. Lanata A, Guidi A, Baragli P, Paradiso R, Valenza G, Scilingo EP. Removing movement artifacts from equine ECG recordings acquired with textile electrodes.. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2015;2015:1955-8.
    doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318767pubmed: 26736667google scholar: lookup
  34. Greco A, Valenza G, Bicchi A, Bianchi M, Scilingo EP. Assessment of muscle fatigue during isometric contraction using autonomic nervous system correlates.. Biomed Signal Proces Control (2019) 51:42–9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2019.02.007google scholar: lookup
  35. Guidi A, Lanata A, Valenza G, Scilingo EP, Baragli P. Validation of smart textile electrodes for electrocardiogram monitoring in free-moving horses.. J Vet Behav (2017) 17:19–23.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2016.10.001google scholar: lookup
  36. Felici M, Nardelli M, Lanatà A, Sgorbini M, Pasquale Scilingo E, Baragli P. Smart textiles biotechnology for electrocardiogram monitoring in horses during exercise on treadmill: Validation tests.. Equine Vet J 2021 Mar;53(2):373-378.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13296pubmed: 32491229google scholar: lookup
  37. Lanatà A, Valenza G, Scilingo EP. The contribution of the phase spectrum in automatic multiple cardiac arrhythmias recognition in wearable systems.. In: 2010 3rd International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies (ISABEL 2010). Rome: (2010). p. 1–5.
    doi: 10.1109/ISABEL.2010.5702855google scholar: lookup
  38. Rajendra Acharya U, Paul Joseph K, Kannathal N, Lim CM, Suri JS. Heart rate variability: a review.. Med Biol Eng Comput 2006 Dec;44(12):1031-51.
    doi: 10.1007/s11517-006-0119-0pubmed: 17111118google scholar: lookup
  39. . Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.. Circulation 1996 Mar 1;93(5):1043-65.
    doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.93.5.1043pubmed: 8598068google scholar: lookup
  40. Pan J, Tompkins WJ. A real-time QRS detection algorithm.. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1985 Mar;32(3):230-6.
    doi: 10.1109/TBME.1985.325532pubmed: 3997178google scholar: lookup
  41. Cottin F, Médigue C, Lopes P, Petit E, Papelier Y, Billat VL. Effect of exercise intensity and repetition on heart rate variability during training in elite trotting horse.. Int J Sports Med 2005 Dec;26(10):859-67.
    doi: 10.1055/s-2005-837462pubmed: 16320171google scholar: lookup
  42. Stucke D, Ruse MG, Lebelt D. Measuring heart rate variability in horses to investigate the autonomic nervous system activity–Pros and cons of different methods.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2015) 166:1–10.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.02.007google scholar: lookup
  43. Benjamini Y, Krieger AM, Yekutieli D. Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate.. Biometrika (2006) 93:491–507.
    doi: 10.1093/biomet/93.3.491pubmed: 0google scholar: lookup
  44. Briefer EF, Maigrot AL, Mandel R, Freymond SB, Bachmann I, Hillmann E. Segregation of information about emotional arousal and valence in horse whinnies.. Sci Rep 2015 Apr 21;4:9989.
    doi: 10.1038/srep09989pmc: PMC4404681pubmed: 25897781google scholar: lookup
  45. Hama H, Yogo M, Matsuyama Y. Effects of stroking horses on both humans' and horses' heart rate responses.. Jpn Psychol Res (1996) 38:66–73.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5884.1996.tb00009.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  46. Proops L, Grounds K, Smith AV, McComb K. Animals Remember Previous Facial Expressions that Specific Humans Have Exhibited.. Curr Biol 2018 May 7;28(9):1428-1432.e4.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.035pubmed: 29706519google scholar: lookup
  47. Khairudin R, Nasir R, Halim FW, Zainah AZ, Wan Shahrazad WS, Ismail K. Emotion and explicit verbal memory: evidence using Malay Lexicon.. Asian Soc Sci (2012) 8:38.
    doi: 10.5539/ass.v8n9p38google scholar: lookup
  48. Goldstein DS, Bentho O, Park MY, Sharabi Y. Low-frequency power of heart rate variability is not a measure of cardiac sympathetic tone but may be a measure of modulation of cardiac autonomic outflows by baroreflexes.. Exp Physiol 2011 Dec;96(12):1255-61.
    doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2010.056259pmc: PMC3224799pubmed: 21890520google scholar: lookup
  49. Dalla Costa E, Dai F, Murray LAM, Guazzetti S, Canali E, Minero M. A study on validity and reliability of on-farm tests to measure human–animal relationship in horses and donkeys.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2015) 163:110–21.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.12.007google scholar: lookup
  50. Ijichi C, Griffin K, Squibb K, Favier R. Stranger danger? An investigation into the influence of human-horse bond on stress and behaviour.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2018) 206:59–63.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.05.034google scholar: lookup
  51. Lansade L, Bouissou MF. Reactivity to humans: a temperament trait of horses which is stable across time and situations.. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2008) 114:492–508.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.04.012google scholar: lookup
  52. Sankey C, Richard-Yris MA, Henry S, Fureix C, Nassur F, Hausberger M. Reinforcement as a mediator of the perception of humans by horses (Equus caballus).. Anim Cogn 2010 Sep;13(5):753-64.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0326-9pubmed: 20490592google scholar: lookup
  53. Paul ES, Harding EJ, Mendl M. Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach.. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2005 May;29(3):469-91.
    doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.01.002pubmed: 15820551google scholar: lookup
  54. Haubenhofer DK, Kirchengast S. Dog handlers' and dogs' emotional and cortisol secretion responses associated with animal-assisted therapy sessions.. Soc Anim (2007) 15:127–50.
    doi: 10.1163/156853007X187090google scholar: lookup
  55. Serpell JA. Animal-assisted interventions in historical perspective.. Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy: Theoretical Foundations and Guidelines for Practice, 3rd Edn San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc. (2010). p. 17–32.
    doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381453-1.10002-9google scholar: lookup
  56. Scopa C, Contalbrigo L, Greco A, Lanatà A, Scilingo EP, Baragli P. Emotional Transfer in Human-Horse Interaction: New Perspectives on Equine Assisted Interventions.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Nov 26;9(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9121030pmc: PMC6941042pubmed: 31779120google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 13 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,359 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.