Analyze Diet

Interspecies comparison of subchondral bone properties important for cartilage repair.

Abstract: Microfracture repair tissue in young adult humans and in rabbit trochlea is frequently of higher quality than in corresponding ovine or horse models or in the rabbit medial femoral condyle (MFC). This may be related to differences in subchondral properties since repair is initiated from the bone. We tested the hypothesis that subchondral bone from rabbit trochlea and the human MFC are structurally similar. Trochlea and MFC samples from rabbit, sheep, and horse were micro-CT scanned and histoprocessed. Samples were also collected from normal and lesional areas of human MFC. The subchondral bone of the rabbit trochlea was the most similar to human MFC, where both had a relatively thin bone plate and a more porous and less dense character of subchondral bone. MFC from animals all displayed thicker bone plates, denser and less porous bone and thicker trabeculae, which may be more representative of older or osteoarthritic patients, while both sheep trochlear ridges and the horse lateral trochlea shared some structural features with human MFC. Since several cartilage repair procedures rely on subchondral bone for repair, subchondral properties should be accounted for when choosing animal models to study and test procedures that are intended for human cartilage repair.
Publication Date: 2014-09-19 PubMed ID: 25242685DOI: 10.1002/jor.22740Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research examines the structural similarities between subchondral bone in rabbit trochlea and human medial femoral condyle (MFC). The study confirms a resemblance, suggesting potential implications for studying and testing cartilage repair procedures.

Study Objective and Hypothesis

  • The aim of this research was to examine the structural similarities between subchondral bone from rabbit trochlea and human MFC.
  • The researchers hypothesized that the subchondral bone of the rabbit trochlea would be the most structurally similar to that of the human MFC.

Research Methodology

  • To test their hypothesis, researchers collected trochlea and MFC samples from rabbits, sheep, and horses. These samples were then scanned using micro-Computed Tomography (micro-CT) and subsequently histoprocessed.
  • For comparison, samples were collected from normal and lesional areas of human MFC.

Findings

  • The researchers found that the subchondral bone of the rabbit trochlea was indeed the most similar to the human MFC, as they both have a relatively thin bone plate and a porous, less dense character of subchondral bone.
  • The MFC from other animals studied all displayed thicker bone plates, denser and less porous bone, along with thicker trabeculae. These characteristics may be more representative of older or osteoarthritic patients.
  • The study also highlighted that while both sheep trochlear ridges and horse lateral trochlea shared some structural features with human MFC, they also differed in several significant respects.

Implications

  • The study’s findings have potential implications for the study and testing of cartilage repair procedures, given that several such procedures rely on subchondral bone for repair.
  • The researchers suggest that the subchondral properties of bone should be considered when selecting animal models for studying and testing procedures that are intended for human cartilage repair.

Cite This Article

APA
Chevrier A, Kouao AS, Picard G, Hurtig MB, Buschmann MD. (2014). Interspecies comparison of subchondral bone properties important for cartilage repair. J Orthop Res, 33(1), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22740

Publication

ISSN: 1554-527X
NlmUniqueID: 8404726
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 33
Issue: 1
Pages: 63-70

Researcher Affiliations

Chevrier, Anik
  • Chemical Engineering Department, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, PO Box 6079, Succ Centre-Ville, Montreal, Q, Canada, H3C 3A7.
Kouao, Ahou S M
    Picard, Genevieve
      Hurtig, Mark B
        Buschmann, Michael D

          MeSH Terms

          • Adult
          • Animals
          • Bone Density / physiology
          • Bone and Bones / anatomy & histology
          • Bone and Bones / diagnostic imaging
          • Bone and Bones / physiology
          • Cadaver
          • Cartilage, Articular / anatomy & histology
          • Cartilage, Articular / diagnostic imaging
          • Cartilage, Articular / physiology
          • Female
          • Femur / anatomy & histology
          • Femur / diagnostic imaging
          • Femur / physiology
          • Fractures, Bone / physiopathology
          • Horses
          • Humans
          • Male
          • Models, Animal
          • Rabbits
          • Sheep
          • Species Specificity
          • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
          • Wound Healing / physiology

          Grant Funding

          • Canadian Institutes of Health Research

          Citations

          This article has been cited 18 times.
          1. Pohlig F, Wittek M, VON Thaden A, Lenze U, Glowalla C, Minzlaff P, Burgkart R, Prodinger PM. Biomechanical Properties of Repair Cartilage Tissue Are Superior Following Microdrilling Compared to Microfracturing in Critical Size Cartilage Defects.. In Vivo 2023 Mar-Apr;37(2):565-573.
            doi: 10.21873/invivo.13115pubmed: 36881065google scholar: lookup
          2. Lemirre T, Santschi E, Girard C, Fogarty U, Chapuis L, Richard H, Beauchamp G, Laverty S. Maturation of the equine medial femoral condyle osteochondral unit.. Osteoarthr Cartil Open 2020 Mar;2(1):100029.
            doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100029pubmed: 36474556google scholar: lookup
          3. Dias IE, Viegas CA, Requicha JF, Saavedra MJ, Azevedo JM, Carvalho PP, Dias IR. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Studies in the Goat Model for Biomedical Research-A Review of the Scientific Literature.. Biology (Basel) 2022 Aug 27;11(9).
            doi: 10.3390/biology11091276pubmed: 36138755google scholar: lookup
          4. Markhardt BK, Huang BK, Spiker AM, Chang EY. Interpretation of Cartilage Damage at Routine Clinical MRI: How to Match Arthroscopic Findings.. Radiographics 2022 Sep-Oct;42(5):1457-1473.
            doi: 10.1148/rg.220051pubmed: 35984752google scholar: lookup
          5. Peng L, Zhang B, Luo X, Huang B, Zhou J, Jiang S, Guo W, Tian G, Tian Z, Shen S, Li Y, Sui X, Liu S, Guo Q, Li H. Small Ruminant Models for Articular Cartilage Regeneration by Scaffold-Based Tissue Engineering.. Stem Cells Int 2021;2021:5590479.
            doi: 10.1155/2021/5590479pubmed: 34912460google scholar: lookup
          6. Liu H, Ding Q, Ma C, Qin H, Wei Y, Ren Y. [Comparison of two methods for preparing knee osteochondral injury models in mice].. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2021 Jul 15;35(7):862-867.
            doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202101098pubmed: 34308594google scholar: lookup
          7. Guo JL, Kim YS, Orchard EA, van den Beucken JJJP, Jansen JA, Wong ME, Mikos AG. A Rabbit Femoral Condyle Defect Model for Assessment of Osteochondral Tissue Regeneration.. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2020 Nov;26(11):554-564.
            doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2020.0261pubmed: 33050806google scholar: lookup
          8. Ihnatouski M, Pauk J, Karev B, Karev D. Nanomechanical Properties of Articular Cartilage Due to the PRP Injection in Experimental Osteoarthritis in Rabbits.. Molecules 2020 Aug 15;25(16).
            doi: 10.3390/molecules25163734pubmed: 32824204google scholar: lookup
          9. Meng X, Ziadlou R, Grad S, Alini M, Wen C, Lai Y, Qin L, Zhao Y, Wang X. Animal Models of Osteochondral Defect for Testing Biomaterials.. Biochem Res Int 2020;2020:9659412.
            doi: 10.1155/2020/9659412pubmed: 32082625google scholar: lookup
          10. Taheri S, Winkler T, Schenk LS, Neuerburg C, Baumbach SF, Zustin J, Lehmann W, Schilling AF. Developmental Transformation and Reduction of Connective Cavities within the Subchondral Bone.. Int J Mol Sci 2019 Feb 12;20(3).
            doi: 10.3390/ijms20030770pubmed: 30759738google scholar: lookup
          11. Lo Monaco M, Merckx G, Ratajczak J, Gervois P, Hilkens P, Clegg P, Bronckaers A, Vandeweerd JM, Lambrichts I. Stem Cells for Cartilage Repair: Preclinical Studies and Insights in Translational Animal Models and Outcome Measures.. Stem Cells Int 2018;2018:9079538.
            doi: 10.1155/2018/9079538pubmed: 29535784google scholar: lookup
          12. Bell AD, Hurtig MB, Quenneville E, Rivard GÉ, Hoemann CD. Effect of a Rapidly Degrading Presolidified 10 kDa Chitosan/Blood Implant and Subchondral Marrow Stimulation Surgical Approach on Cartilage Resurfacing in a Sheep Model.. Cartilage 2017 Oct;8(4):417-431.
            doi: 10.1177/1947603516676872pubmed: 28934884google scholar: lookup
          13. Murphy MP, Quarto N, Longaker MT, Wan DC. (*) Calvarial Defects: Cell-Based Reconstructive Strategies in the Murine Model.. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2017 Dec;23(12):971-981.
            doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0230pubmed: 28825366google scholar: lookup
          14. Pfeifer CG, Fisher MB, Saxena V, Kim M, Henning EA, Steinberg DA, Dodge GR, Mauck RL. Age-Dependent Subchondral Bone Remodeling and Cartilage Repair in a Minipig Defect Model.. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2017 Nov;23(11):745-753.
            doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0109pubmed: 28747146google scholar: lookup
          15. Seow D, Yasui Y, Hutchinson ID, Hurley ET, Shimozono Y, Kennedy JG. The Subchondral Bone Is Affected by Bone Marrow Stimulation: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Animal Studies.. Cartilage 2019 Jan;10(1):70-81.
            doi: 10.1177/1947603517711220pubmed: 28573889google scholar: lookup
          16. Moran CJ, Ramesh A, Brama PA, O'Byrne JM, O'Brien FJ, Levingstone TJ. The benefits and limitations of animal models for translational research in cartilage repair.. J Exp Orthop 2016 Dec;3(1):1.
            doi: 10.1186/s40634-015-0037-xpubmed: 26915001google scholar: lookup
          17. Madry H, Ochi M, Cucchiarini M, Pape D, Seil R. Large animal models in experimental knee sports surgery: focus on clinical translation.. J Exp Orthop 2015 Dec;2(1):9.
            doi: 10.1186/s40634-015-0025-1pubmed: 26914877google scholar: lookup
          18. Pauly HM, Larson BE, Coatney GA, Button KD, DeCamp CE, Fajardo RS, Haut RC, Haut Donahue TL. Assessment of cortical and trabecular bone changes in two models of post-traumatic osteoarthritis.. J Orthop Res 2015 Dec;33(12):1835-45.
            doi: 10.1002/jor.22975pubmed: 26147652google scholar: lookup