FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / PLoS One / Intrabladder pressure as predictor of intra-abdominal pressu...
PloS one2019; 14(10); e0223705; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223705

Intrabladder pressure as predictor of intra-abdominal pressure in horses.

Abstract: To investigate effects of postural changes and bladder distention on intrabladder pressure whilst estimating intra-abdominal pressure in horses. Two-year cohort study. Patients admitted for elective surgical procedures unrelated to gastrointestinal or genitourinary tract. School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. 20 adult horses, 11 males (stallions and geldings) and 9 females; between 3.5 and 12 years, weighing 350 to 500 kg. Intra-abdominal pressure was directly-recorded through abdominocentesis at the ventral midline with a fluid-filled system. Intrabladder pressure was obtained from a bladder catheter with the fluid-filled system zeroed at the level of the tuber ischia with patients in dorsal recumbency or pubic symphysis if in lateral recumbency. Body position directly influenced intra-abdominal pressure. In dorsal recumbency, intra-abdominal pressure differed (p < 0.05) from intrabladder pressure at end-inspiration and end-expiration regardless of whether the bladder was empty or distended. There was no correlation nor association between the two pressures in this body position. In lateral recumbency a difference (p <0.05) between intra-abdominal pressure and intrabladder pressure was recorded at end-inspiration with the bladder distended with 25 ml, and at end-expiration for distension volumes of 25 ml and 50 ml. There was a strong correlation between both pressures for left and right lateral recumbency, regardless of the distension volume. Ordinary least product (OLP) regression analysis showed no fixed or proportional bias between both pressures for distension volume of 50 ml, at both end-inspiration and end-expiration. Indirect assessment of equine intra-abdominal pressure cannot be made in dorsal recumbency. For that purpose, patients should be in left lateral recumbency with the bladder distended with 50 ml. Values can be recorded at end-inspiration or end-expiration. Occlusion of the catheter tip by the bladder wall when minimally distended.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2019-10-10 PubMed ID: 31600317PubMed Central: PMC6786750DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223705Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study examines the effects of body position on the intrabladder pressure and its potential as an estimator of intra-abdominal pressure in horses undergoing unrelated surgical procedures.

Research Context

  • The research was a two-year cohort study conducted at the School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil on 20 adult horses, composed of both males (stallions and geldings) and females that ranged in age from 3.5 to 12 years and weighed between 350 to 500 kg.

Methodology

  • The intra-abdominal pressure was directly recorded via abdominocentesis at the ventral midline by using a fluid-filled system.
  • Meanwhile, intrabladder pressure was determined from a bladder catheter with the fluid-filled system zeroed at the level of the tuber ischia while the patients were in dorsal recumbency, or pubic symphysis if they were in lateral recumbency.

Findings

  • Directional recumbency (the position of the horse laying flat on its back) influences intra-abdominal pressure. In this position, the intra-abdominal pressure was found to statistically differ from intrabladder pressure regardless of whether the bladder was empty or distended.
  • In dorsal recumbency, no correlation or association was found between intra-abdominal pressure and intrabladder pressure.
  • A difference between intra-abdominal pressure and intrabladder pressure was observed in lateral recumbency (the position of the horse laying on its side) at end-inspiration with the bladder distended with 25 ml, and at end-expiration for distension volumes of 25 ml and 50 ml.
  • In lateral recumbency, a strong correlation was established between both pressures, irrespective of the bladder distension volume.
  • Ordinary least product (OLP) regression analysis showed no fixed or proportional bias between both pressures for a distension volume of 50 ml, at both end-inspiration and end-expiration.

Implications

  • The findings of this study suggest that equine intra-abdominal pressure cannot be indirectly assessed in dorsal recumbency. For this purpose, horses should be in left lateral recumbency and have the bladder distended with 50 ml, with measurements taken at both end-inspiration and end-expiration.
  • Overall, the study advances our understanding of how to measure intra-abdominal pressures in horses, which can be vital information for equine medical interventions, potentially guiding treatment options or surgical procedures.

Cite This Article

APA
de Paula VB, Canola PA, Rivera GG, Z Filho D, Amaral GPD, Ferraz GC, Ferraudo AS, Canola JC. (2019). Intrabladder pressure as predictor of intra-abdominal pressure in horses. PLoS One, 14(10), e0223705. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223705

Publication

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 10
Pages: e0223705
PII: e0223705

Researcher Affiliations

de Paula, Vanessa B
  • Graduate Program in Veterinary Surgery, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Canola, Paulo A
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Rivera, Gabriela G
  • Graduate Program in Veterinary Surgery, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Z Filho, Dárcio
  • Graduate Program in Veterinary Surgery, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Amaral, Gabriel P D
  • Residency Program in Large Animal Surgery, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Ferraz, Guilherme C
  • Department of Animal Morphology and Physiology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Ferraudo, Antônio S
  • Department of Exact Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Canola, Júlio C
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.

MeSH Terms

  • Abdomen / physiology
  • Animals
  • Elective Surgical Procedures
  • Female
  • Horses / physiology
  • Male
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Posture
  • Pressure
  • Regression Analysis
  • Urinary Bladder / physiology

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

This article includes 36 references
  1. Malbrain ML, Cheatham ML, Kirkpatrick A, Sugrue M, Parr M, De Waele J, Balogh Z, Leppäniemi A, Olvera C, Ivatury R, D'Amours S, Wendon J, Hillman K, Johansson K, Kolkman K, Wilmer A. Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions.. Intensive Care Med 2006 Nov;32(11):1722-32.
    doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0349-5pubmed: 16967294google scholar: lookup
  2. Brosnahan MM, Holbrook TC, Gilliam LL, Ritchey JW, Confer AW. Intra-abdominal hypertension in two adult horses.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2009 Apr;19(2):174-80.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2009.00400.xpubmed: 19691568google scholar: lookup
  3. Kron IL, Harman PK, Nolan SP. The measurement of intra-abdominal pressure as a criterion for abdominal re-exploration.. Ann Surg 1984 Jan;199(1):28-30.
    doi: 10.1097/00000658-198401000-00005pmc: PMC1353253pubmed: 6691728google scholar: lookup
  4. Malbrain ML. Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): time for a critical re-appraisal.. Intensive Care Med 2004 Mar;30(3):357-71.
    doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2107-2pubmed: 14730376google scholar: lookup
  5. De Keulenaer BL, De Waele JJ, Powell B, Malbrain ML. What is normal intra-abdominal pressure and how is it affected by positioning, body mass and positive end-expiratory pressure?. Intensive Care Med 2009 Jun;35(6):969-76.
    doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1445-0pubmed: 19242675google scholar: lookup
  6. Hurcombe SD, Scott VH. Direct intra-abdominal pressures and abdominal perfusion pressures in unsedated normal horses.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2012 Aug;22(4):441-6.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2012.00774.xpmc: PMC3960595pubmed: 22765021google scholar: lookup
  7. Obeid F, Saba A, Fath J, Guslits B, Chung R, Sorensen V, Buck J, Horst M. Increases in intra-abdominal pressure affect pulmonary compliance.. Arch Surg 1995 May;130(5):544-7; discussion 547-8.
    doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430050094016pubmed: 7748095google scholar: lookup
  8. Turnbull D, Webber S, Hamnegard CH, Mills GH. Intra-abdominal pressure measurement: validation of intragastric pressure as a measure of intra-abdominal pressure.. Br J Anaesth 2007 May;98(5):628-34.
    doi: 10.1093/bja/aem060pubmed: 17456490google scholar: lookup
  9. Malbrain ML, Deeren DH. Effect of bladder volume on measured intravesical pressure: a prospective cohort study.. Crit Care 2006;10(4):R98.
    doi: 10.1186/cc4962pmc: PMC1750998pubmed: 16934130google scholar: lookup
  10. Cheatham ML. Abdominal compartment syndrome: pathophysiology and definitions.. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009 Mar 2;17:10.
    doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-10pmc: PMC2654860pubmed: 19254364google scholar: lookup
  11. Monteiro B, Pereira T, Fraga GP. SÍNDROME COMPARTIMENTAL ABDOMINAL. 2013.
  12. De Waele J, Pletinckx P, Blot S, Hoste E. Saline volume in transvesical intra-abdominal pressure measurement: enough is enough.. Intensive Care Med 2006 Mar;32(3):455-9.
    doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-0062-9pubmed: 16477411google scholar: lookup
  13. Canola PA, Perotta JH, Penteado DDM, Canola JC. Alternative Intrabladder Manometry Technique for the Indirect Measurement of Intra-abdominal Pressure in Horses. 2012.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2011.08.017google scholar: lookup
  14. De laet I, Hoste E, De Waele JJ. Transvesical intra-abdominal pressure measurement using minimal instillation volumes: how low can we go?. Intensive Care Med 2008 Apr;34(4):746-50.
    doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0985-4pubmed: 18227998google scholar: lookup
  15. Bersani AL, Gomes JO, Braga ILS, Guimarães HP, Lopes RD. Síndrome compartimental abdominal. Rev Bras Clínica Médica 2009; 7:313–21.
  16. Canola PA, Perotta JH, Laskoski LM, Escobar A, Melo e Silva CA, Canola JC, Johnson PJ, Valadão CA. Effect of passive pneumoperitoneum on oesophageal pressure, cardiovascular parameters and blood gas analysis in horses.. Equine Vet J 2011 Jul;43(4):446-50.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00304.xpubmed: 21496077google scholar: lookup
  17. Dechant JE, Nieto JE. Comparison of Techniques For Measurement of Intra-Abdominal Pressure In Horses. 2008.
  18. Munsterman AS, Hanson RR. Comparison of direct and indirect methods of intra-abdominal pressure measurement in normal horses.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2009 Dec;19(6):545-53.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2009.00482.xpubmed: 20017760google scholar: lookup
  19. Munsterman AS, Hanson RR. Evaluation of gastric pressures as an indirect method for measurement of intraabdominal pressures in the horse.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2011 Feb;21(1):29-35.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2010.00608.xpubmed: 21288291google scholar: lookup
  20. Canola PA, Perotta JH, Dias DPM, Canola JC, Valadão CAA. Indirect measurement of abdominal pressure in horses. 2009; 68–9.
  21. Desie N, Willems A, De Laet I, Dits H, Van Regenmortel N, Schoonheydt K, Van De Vyvere M, Malbrain ML. Intra-abdominal pressure measurement using the FoleyManometer does not increase the risk for urinary tract infection in critically ill patients.. Ann Intensive Care 2012 Jul 5;2 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S10.
    doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-2-S1-S10pmc: PMC3390297pubmed: 22873411google scholar: lookup
  22. Gallagher JJ. Intra-abdominal hypertension: detecting and managing a lethal complication of critical illness.. AACN Adv Crit Care 2010 Apr-Jun;21(2):205-19.
    doi: 10.1097/NCI.0b013e3181d94fd5pubmed: 20431449google scholar: lookup
  23. Hart S, Drevets K, Alford M, Salacinski A, Hunt BE. A method-comparison study regarding the validity and reliability of the Lactate Plus analyzer.. BMJ Open 2013;3(2).
    doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001899pmc: PMC3586176pubmed: 23449745google scholar: lookup
  24. Berkman C, Pereira MC, Nardi KB, Pereira GT, Soares OAB, Restan WAZ. Agreement between i-STAT and YSI 2300 devices to determine lactate concentrations in dogs undergoing exercise. Comp Exerc Physiol 2016; 12(2):75–82.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP160002google scholar: lookup
  25. Wilkins PA. Abdominal compartment syndrome in equine medicine. 2005.
  26. Ludbrook J. Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: a critical review.. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2002 Jul;29(7):527-36.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2002.03686.xpubmed: 12060093google scholar: lookup
  27. Kimball EJ, Baraghoshi GK, Mone MC, Hansen HJ, Adams DM, Alder SC, Jackson P, Cannon P, Horn J, Wolfe TR. A comparison of infusion volumes in the measurement of intra-abdominal pressure.. J Intensive Care Med 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):261-8.
    doi: 10.1177/0885066609335730pubmed: 19617230google scholar: lookup
  28. Hines M. Differential Diagnosis of Urinary Incontinence and Cauda Equina Syndrome. 2015; p.139–40.
    doi: 10.1002/9781118993712.ch12google scholar: lookup
  29. Shier D, Butler J, Lewis R. Urinary System. 2012; p. 467–84.
  30. Pielou N. Urinary System. 2005; p. 1–4.
  31. Toribio RE. Essentials of equine renal and urinary tract physiology.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2007 Dec;23(3):533-61, v.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2007.09.006pubmed: 18061849google scholar: lookup
  32. Carvalho MB. Semiologia do Sistema Urinário. 2014; p. 428–48.
  33. TORTORA GJ, DERRICKSON B. Sistema Urinário. 2017; p. 541.
  34. KÖNIG HE, LIEBICH H-G. Sistema Urinário. 2016; p. 409.
  35. Carvalho CR, Toufen C Jr, Franca SA. [Mechanical ventilation: principles, graphic analysis and ventilatory modalities].. J Bras Pneumol 2007;33 Suppl 2S:S54-70.
    pubmed: 18026665doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132007000800002google scholar: lookup
  36. Ahmadi-Noorbakhsh S, Malbrain ML. Integration of inspiratory and expiratory intra-abdominal pressure: a novel concept looking at mean intra-abdominal pressure.. Ann Intensive Care 2012 Dec 20;2 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S18.
    doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-2-S1-S18pmc: PMC3527153pubmed: 23282214google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Trimmel NE, Podgoršak A, Oertel MF, Jucker S, Arras M, Schmid Daners M, Weisskopf M. The Sheep as a Comprehensive Animal Model to Investigate Interdependent Physiological Pressure Propagation and Multiparameter Influence on Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics. Front Neurosci 2022;16:868567.
    doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.868567pubmed: 35431780google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.