Analyze Diet
Veterinary ophthalmology2018; 22(1); 24-30; doi: 10.1111/vop.12561

Intraocular pressure reference intervals in eyes of clinically normal miniature donkeys (Equus africanus asinus).

Abstract: To determine intraocular pressure (IOP) reference intervals in eyes of healthy miniature donkeys (Equus africanus asinus) via rebound and applanation tonometry. Methods: Complete ophthalmic and physical examinations were performed by board-certified veterinary ophthalmologists. Inclusion criteria for animals participating in this study were dictated by the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP) reference interval guidelines. Intraocular pressure estimates (TonoVet® and TonoPen XL® ) were obtained in both eyes. Forty animals (San Angelo group) received intramuscular xylazine hydrochloride 10% and auriculopalpebral (AP) nerve blocks prior to obtaining measurements. Twenty-two animals (Austin group) received no sedation or AP block. Statistical analysis followed ASVCP reference interval guidelines. Analysis was performed using the software sas V9 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Results: Fifty-seven (114 eyes) healthy miniature donkeys were included in this study. The mean IOP ± standard deviation (SD) was 25.75 ± 5.70 mm Hg for rebound tonometry with reference limits of 14.34 and 37.15. The mean IOP ± SD was 20.69 ± 5.06 mm Hg for applanation tonometry with reference limits of 12.82 and 33.38. No significant difference in IOP was found between the Austin and San Angelo groups (P = .34). A significant difference was noted between rebound and applanation IOP estimates (P < .0001) with rebound tonometric values being higher. Conclusions: Reference intervals for IOP's were established for this species. Intraocular pressure readings obtained by the rebound tonometer were significantly higher than with applanation. Sedation and AP block did not affect IOP estimates.
Publication Date: 2018-03-08 PubMed ID: 29517162DOI: 10.1111/vop.12561Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates and establishes reference intervals for intraocular pressure in healthy miniature donkeys, and finds that rebound tonometry methods yield significantly higher readings than applanation tonometry methods.

Objective of the Research

  • This study aims to identify and establish intraocular pressure (IOP) reference intervals, key benchmarks for eye health, in healthy miniature donkeys. The research team used both rebound and applanation tonometry – two distinctive methods for measuring IOP.

Methodology

  • Both full ophthalmic and physical exams were performed by board-certified veterinary ophthalmologists on each of the donkeys included in the study.
  • Donkeys were selected based on the criteria outlined by the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP) reference interval guidelines. The IOP levels were estimated using TonoVet and TonoPen XL tools.
  • Two groups were formed for the research. Forty animals, known as the San Angelo group, received intramuscular xylazine hydrochloride 10% and auriculopalpebral (AP) nerve blocks before obtaining measurements. The Austin group, comprised of twenty-two animals, received no sedation or AP block.
  • Data was analyzed following ASVCP reference interval guidelines with statistical analysis done using sas V9 software.

Results

  • Fifty-seven healthy miniature donkeys, accounting for 114 eyes, were included in the study.
  • The mean IOP was found to be 25.75 ± 5.70 mm Hg for rebound tonometry and 20.69 ± 5.06 mm Hg for applanation tonometry.
  • The study found no significant difference in IOP between the San Angelo group and Austin group, indicating that the sedation or AP block didn’t influence the results.
  • The study did find a significant disparity between IOP estimates obtained from rebound tonometry versus applanation tonometry, with rebound measurements being consistently higher.

Conclusions

  • The research successfully established reference intervals for intraocular pressure in healthy miniature donkeys. These reference intervals serve as an invaluable resource for veterinarians and researchers when checking for eye health in this particular species.
  • It was found that different methods of measuring IOP can yield significantly different results. In particular, readings from the rebound tonometer were notably higher than those from applanation.
  • It was also concluded that sedation and AP block did not influence the measurement of IOP, allowing for more consistent standards for future research and clinical practice.

Cite This Article

APA
Hibbs CD, Barrett PM, Dees DD. (2018). Intraocular pressure reference intervals in eyes of clinically normal miniature donkeys (Equus africanus asinus). Vet Ophthalmol, 22(1), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.12561

Publication

ISSN: 1463-5224
NlmUniqueID: 100887377
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 22
Issue: 1
Pages: 24-30

Researcher Affiliations

Hibbs, Carla D
  • Eye Care for Animals, El Paso, TX, USA.
Barrett, Paul M
  • Eye Care for Animals, El Paso, TX, USA.
Dees, D Dustin
  • Eye Care for Animals, Austin, TX, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Equidae / physiology
  • Female
  • Intraocular Pressure
  • Male
  • Reference Values
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Tonometry, Ocular / veterinary

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Bakula M, Kuzman T, Radoš M, Starčević K, Jurjević I, Mamić M, Pirkić B, Klarica M. Control values of intraocular pressure in different species: a review of literature. Croat Med J 2024 Dec 30;65(6):518-529.
    doi: 10.3325/cmj.2024.65.518pubmed: 39812101google scholar: lookup
  2. Bertens CJF, van Mechelen RJS, Berendschot TTJM, Gijs M, Wolters JEJ, Gorgels TGMF, Nuijts RMMA, Beckers HJM. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of three tonometers for measuring intraocular pressure in rabbits. Sci Rep 2021 Sep 28;11(1):19217.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98762-7pubmed: 34584185google scholar: lookup
  3. Mustikka MP, Pietilä EM, Mykkänen AK, Grönthal TSC. Comparison of two rebound tonometers in healthy horses. Vet Ophthalmol 2020 Sep;23(5):892-898.
    doi: 10.1111/vop.12819pubmed: 32888242google scholar: lookup