Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2026; 105855; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105855

Is there a difference in pressures and forces under the roller with different pads when lunging horses with the Pessoa training aid?

Abstract: Elevated pressures beneath training rollers during the Pessoa training aid (PTA) use have been reported, particularly over the thoracic region, which may contribute to back discomfort. Objective: To investigate the effect of different pads on pressures and forces beneath a training roller during lunging with a PTA. Methods: Six clinically sound horses (13.8 ± 5.2 years) were lunged on a 16-m circle in trot and canter using a randomised crossover design under three conditions: no padding (Pad 1), a folded cotton saddle cloth (Pad 2), and a purpose-made roller foam pad (Pad 3). Kinetic data were collected using a pressure-mapping system. Outcome variables included average pressure, box pressure, contact pressure (kPa), force and peak force (N), and peak pressures (kPa). Data were analysed using Friedman tests with Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc comparisons. Results: Differences were identified between pad conditions for all kinetic variables. In trot, average pressure decreased from 5.15 ± 1.69 kPa (Pad 1) to 3.15 ± 0.84 kPa (Pad 2) and 1.30 ± 0.15 kPa (Pad 3) (P = 0.014 and P < 0.001). Peak box pressure decreased from 15.05 ± 3.94 kPa (Pad 1) to 9.35 ± 2.67 kPa (Pad 2) and 2.65 ± 0.62 kPa (Pad 3), respectively (P = 0.014; P < 0.001). Similar reductions were observed in canter, where average pressure decreased from 5.05 ± 1.87 kPa (Pad 1) to 3.60 ± 0.71 kPa (Pad 2) and 1.30 ± 0.18 kPa (Pad 3) (P = 0.014; P < 0.001). The purpose-made roller pad reduced several pressure variables by approximately 75-82% compared with the control condition. Conclusions: Padding beneath a training roller significantly reduces pressures and forces during lunging with a PTA.
Publication Date: 2026-03-14 PubMed ID: 41839320DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105855Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Elevated pressures beneath the training roller of the Pessoa training aid during lunging were studied to see how different padding affects these pressures and forces, with the goal of understanding how to reduce potential back discomfort in horses.

Research Objective and Background

  • Identify if different types of pads used under the roller of the Pessoa training aid (PTA) influence the pressure and force exerted on the horse’s back during lunging.
  • Elevated pressure in the thoracic region beneath the PTA roller has been previously reported, potentially causing back discomfort in horses.

Methodology

  • Subjects: Six clinically sound horses averaging 13.8 years old.
  • Design: Randomized crossover trial with three conditions for pad placement under the PTA roller:
    • Pad 1: No padding (control).
    • Pad 2: Folded cotton saddle cloth.
    • Pad 3: Purpose-made foam roller pad designed specifically for this purpose.
  • Procedure: Horses lunged on a 16-meter circle at two gaits – trot and canter.
  • Data Collection: Kinetic data recorded using a pressure-mapping system measuring:
    • Average pressure (kPa)
    • Box pressure (kPa)
    • Contact pressure (kPa)
    • Force and peak force (Newtons)
    • Peak pressures (kPa)
  • Analysis: Data subjected to Friedman tests and Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc comparisons to identify significant differences caused by pad types.

Findings / Results

  • Significant differences found between all three pad conditions across all kinetic variables measured.
  • In trot gait:
    • Average pressure decreased from 5.15 kPa without padding to 3.15 kPa with a cotton saddle cloth and further down to 1.30 kPa with the foam pad.
    • Peak box pressure reduced from 15.05 kPa (no pad) to 9.35 kPa (cotton pad) and 2.65 kPa (foam pad).
  • In canter gait:
    • Average pressure likewise decreased from 5.05 kPa (no pad) to 3.60 kPa (cotton pad) and 1.30 kPa (foam pad).
  • The purpose-made foam pad was especially effective, reducing pressure variables by approximately 75-82% compared to no padding.

Conclusions

  • Applying padding underneath the PTA roller significantly reduces pressures and forces experienced by the horse’s back during lunging.
  • The use of a purpose-designed foam pad is more effective than a folded cotton cloth in mitigating elevated pressure and force.
  • This reduction in pressure potentially decreases discomfort and risk of injury related to PTA use.
  • These findings support the recommendation to use appropriate padding when employing the PTA to enhance horse welfare during training.

Cite This Article

APA
Loosley H, Rehbein LS, Lima EMM, Blake R. (2026). Is there a difference in pressures and forces under the roller with different pads when lunging horses with the Pessoa training aid? J Equine Vet Sci, 105855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105855

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Pages: 105855
PII: S0737-0806(26)00091-2

Researcher Affiliations

Loosley, H
  • School of Agriculture, Animal and Environmental Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Lordship Road, Writtle, CM1 3RR, United Kingdom.
Rehbein, L S
  • Postgraduate Program in Animal Sciences, University of Brasília, ICC-FAV, Brasília/DF/Brazil, 70910-970.
Lima, E M M
  • Postgraduate Program in Animal Sciences, University of Brasília, ICC-FAV, Brasília/DF/Brazil, 70910-970.
Blake, R
  • School of Agriculture, Animal and Environmental Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Lordship Road, Writtle, CM1 3RR, United Kingdom. Electronic address: roberta.blake@aru.ac.uk.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.