Analyze Diet
The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice2008; 24(1); 177-189; doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2007.11.004

Less invasive techniques for equine fracture repair and arthrodesis.

Abstract: To repair equine fractures successfully, surgeons traditionally have done aggressive open approaches with maximal internal fixation to achieve adequate stability and comfort. Although the need for stability is unquestionable, newer technologies and imaging modalities have allowed improvement in the biology of internal fixation in selected fractures and arthrodeses.
Publication Date: 2008-03-04 PubMed ID: 18314042DOI: 10.1016/j.cveq.2007.11.004Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The researchers explore newer, less invasive techniques for repairing fractures and fusing joints (arthrodesis) in horses. They suggest that while stability is undeniably important, advancements in technology and imaging have improved the way internal fixation can be done.

Context and Background

  • The research is focusing on the traditional approach taken by surgeons to repair fractures in horses that usually involves open surgery with plenty of internal fixation for achieving adequate stability and comfort. The study stresses on the significance of stability in equine fracture repair.
  • The traditional method of surgery is viewed as “aggressive” by the researchers, who argue for the adoption of less invasive techniques that leverage the latest advancements in the field of veterinary science.

Newer Technologies and Imaging Portentials

  • The paper suggests that the recent advancements in technology and imaging methodologies provide an opportunity for enhancing the biology of internal fixation in fractures and joint fusions for horses. In other words, these advancements offer new possibilities for less invasively managing fractures and arthrodeses in horses.
  • It hints at the incorporation of advanced technologies, including better imaging systems that could augment the way internal fixation is performed and interpreted, subsequently leading to improved outcomes in equine fracture repair.

Implications

  • By using less invasive techniques for equine fracture repair, it could lead to quicker recovery times for the animal and less post-operative discomfort. This could, in turn, improve the overall quality of life for the animal after a fracture or an arthrodesis procedure.
  • This research review could have a major impact on how veterinarians approach equine surgery going forward, moving away from traditional aggressive surgical techniques towards less invasive procedures leveraging modern technology and imaging tools.

Cite This Article

APA
Richardson DW. (2008). Less invasive techniques for equine fracture repair and arthrodesis. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract, 24(1), 177-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2007.11.004

Publication

ISSN: 1558-4224
NlmUniqueID: 8511904
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 24
Issue: 1
Pages: 177-189

Researcher Affiliations

Richardson, Dean W
  • Department of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, 382 West Street Road, Kennett Square, PA 19348-1692, USA. dwr@vet.upenn.edu

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Arthrodesis / methods
  • Arthrodesis / veterinary
  • Fracture Fixation / methods
  • Fracture Fixation / veterinary
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / methods
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / veterinary
  • Fractures, Bone / surgery
  • Fractures, Bone / veterinary
  • Horses / injuries
  • Horses / surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / veterinary
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Weight-Bearing

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Spadari A, Forni G, Del Magno S, Tagliavia C, Canova M, Grandis A, Rinnovati R. The Comparison of Latero-Medial versus Dorso-Palmar/Plantar Drilling for Cartilage Removal in the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 21;11(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061838pubmed: 34205601google scholar: lookup
  2. Marcondes GM, Paretsis NF, Souza AF, Ruivo MRBA, Rego MAF, Nóbrega FS, Cortopassi SRG, De Zoppa ALDV. Locking compression plate fixation of critical-sized bone defects in sheep. Development of a model for veterinary bone tissue engineering. Acta Cir Bras 2021;36(6):e360601.
    doi: 10.1590/ACB360601pubmed: 34190837google scholar: lookup
  3. Seo JP, Yamaga T, Tsuzuki N, Yamada K, Haneda S, Furuoka H, Tabata Y, Sasaki N. Minimally invasive proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis using a locking compression plate and tissue engineering in horses: a pilot study. Can Vet J 2014 Nov;55(11):1050-6.
    pubmed: 25392547