FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Sci Rep / Lower attention to daily environment: a novel cue for detect...
Scientific reports2016; 6; 20117; doi: 10.1038/srep20117

Lower attention to daily environment: a novel cue for detecting chronic horses’ back pain?

Abstract: Chronic pain is thought to affect patients' cognitive functioning, including attention. Loss of attention is likely to have an impact on the execution of daily tasks, and, therefore, to have negative effects. However, relationships between chronic pain and cognitive deficits are still debated. Pre-clinical studies using laboratory animals prove useful to model pain-related cognitive impairment, but animal models had to predict effects in the real world. This study investigates attentional engagement of domestic horses by comparing observations in a home setting and evaluations of vertebral disorders. We found that lower attentional engagement and the level of back disorders were correlated. Two different evaluation techniques of the state of horses' spines gave similar results. We suggest that novel animal models would prove useful for identifying spontaneous behaviours indicative of chronic pain. We suggest that more ethological studies in human patients' home environments would help to improve our understanding of the processes involved. Finally, these results yield interesting indications for evaluating animal welfare, as attentional engagement could become a reliable indicator of chronic pain and thus a useful tool for identification of suffering individuals.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2016-01-29 PubMed ID: 26823123PubMed Central: PMC4731760DOI: 10.1038/srep20117Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigates the correlation between chronic back pain and attention levels in horses, finding that lower attentional engagement is linked to severe back disorders. The research suggests that observing such spontaneous behaviors could help identify chronic pain in animal models and could provide valuable insight for the evaluation of animal welfare.

Objective of the Study

  • The study aimed at investigating the relationship between chronic pain and cognitive functioning, with particular emphasis on attention.
  • There was a special focus on domestic horses as the subject of the study because observing their spontaneous behaviors in the real world could predict effects of chronic pain on attention engagement.
  • Its ultimate goal was to reveal the viability of back disorders as an indication of attentional disorders in animal models.

Methodology

  • The researchers employed two different techniques to evaluate the state of the horses’ spines.
  • The attentional engagement of domestic horses was compared by contrasting observations made in a home setting and evaluations made with vertebral disorders.

Findings

  • Lower attentional engagement was found to be correlated with severe back disorders in horses.
  • A similar correlation was discovered across two different techniques of evaluation.
  • This suggests that observation of spontaneous behaviours could become a reliable method of identifying chronic pain in animals.

Implications

  • The results indicate that decreased attention to daily environment could be a likely cue for detecting chronic pain in horses.
  • Utilizing these findings could significantly enhance the evaluation process of animal welfare as pain-induced cognitive impairments can be better identified.
  • The research promotes more ethological studies in human patients’ home environments aimed at improving our understanding of the relationship between chronic pain and cognitive functioning.

Conclusion

  • The study effectively demonstrates a correlation between attentional engagement and the level of back disorders in horses, suggesting potential usefulness of attentional engagement as an indicator of chronic pain.
  • The results from this study could significantly contribute to the development of better animal welfare assessment techniques and promote more studies in this direction.

Cite This Article

APA
Rochais C, Fureix C, Lesimple C, Hausberger M. (2016). Lower attention to daily environment: a novel cue for detecting chronic horses’ back pain? Sci Rep, 6, 20117. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20117

Publication

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
NlmUniqueID: 101563288
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 6
Pages: 20117

Researcher Affiliations

Rochais, C
  • Université de Rennes 1, UMR CNRS 6552 -Laboratoire Ethologie Animale et Humaine-EthoS- Station biologique, 35380, Paimpont, France.
Fureix, C
  • Université de Rennes 1, UMR CNRS 6552 -Laboratoire Ethologie Animale et Humaine-EthoS- Station biologique, 35380, Paimpont, France.
Lesimple, C
  • Université de Rennes 1, UMR CNRS 6552 -Laboratoire Ethologie Animale et Humaine-EthoS- Station biologique, 35380, Paimpont, France.
Hausberger, M
  • CNRS- UMR 6552 Université de Rennes 1, -Laboratoire Ethologie Animale et Humaine- 263 avenue du général Leclerc, 35042, Rennes cedex, France.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Back Pain / diagnosis
  • Back Pain / physiopathology
  • Back Pain / veterinary
  • Chronic Pain / diagnosis
  • Chronic Pain / physiopathology
  • Female
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / physiopathology
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Male

References

This article includes 45 references
  1. Moriarty O, McGuire B E, Finn D P. The effect of pain on cognitive function: A review of clinical and preclinical research.. Prog. Neurobiol. 93, 385–404 (2011).
    pubmed: 21216272
  2. Eccleston C. Chronic pain and attention: A cognitive approach.. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 33, 535–547 (1994).
    pubmed: 7874045
  3. Hart R P, Martelli M F, Zasler N D. Chronic pain and neuropsychological functioning.. Neuropsychol. Rev. 10, 131–149 (2000).
    pubmed: 10983898
  4. Apkarian A V, Baliki M N, Geha P Y. Towards a theory of chronic pain.. Prog. Neurobiol. 87, 81–97 (2009).
    pmc: PMC2650821pubmed: 18952143
  5. Apkarian A V, Hashmi J A, Baliki M N. Pain and the brain: specificity and plasticity of the brain in clinical chronic pain.. Pain 152, S49–64 (2011).
    pmc: PMC3045648pubmed: 21146929
  6. May A. Chronic pain may change the structure of the brain.. Pain 137, 7–15 (2008).
    pubmed: 18410991
  7. Dick B, Eccleston C, Crombez G. Attentional functioning in fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, and musculoskeletal pain patients.. Arthritis Rheum. 47, 639–644 (2002).
    pubmed: 12522838
  8. Grisart J M, Plaghki L H. Impaired selective attention in chronic pain patients.. Eur. J. Pain 3, 325–333 (1999).
    pubmed: 10700360
  9. Weiner D K, Rudy T E, Morrow L, Slaboda J, Lieber S. The relationship between pain, neuropsychological performance, and physical function in community-dwelling older adults with chronic low back pain.. Pain Med. Malden Mass 7, 60–70 (2006).
    pubmed: 16533199
  10. Bantick S J et al. Imaging how attention modulates pain in humans using functional MRI.. Brain 125, 310–319 (2002).
    pubmed: 11844731
  11. Mao C P et al. Decreased activation of cingulo-frontal-parietal cognitive/attention network during an attention-demanding task in patients with chronic low back pain.. Neuroradiology 56, 903–912 (2014).
    pubmed: 24986218
  12. Tamburin S et al. Cognition and emotional decision-making in chronic low back pain: an ERPs study during Iowa gambling task.. Front. Psychol. 5, (2014).
    pmc: PMC4243494pubmed: 25505440
  13. Pais-Vieira M, Lima D, Galhardo V. Sustained attention deficits in rats with chronic inflammatory pain.. Neurosci. Lett. 463, 98–102 (2009).
    pubmed: 19631256
  14. Warburton D M. From mice to men and vice versa: comparative cognition and behavioural pharmacology. Commentary on Olton et al. ‘Comparative cognition and assessment of cognitive processes in animals’.. Behav. Pharmacol. 3, 319–322 (1992).
    pubmed: 11224133
  15. Bushnell P J. Behavioral approaches to the assessment of attention in animals.. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 138, 231–259 (1998).
    pubmed: 9725746
  16. Dunnet S B, Whishaw I Q, Jones G H, Bunch S T. Behavioural, biochemical and histochemical effects of different neurotoxic amino acids injected into nucleus basalis magnocellularis of rats.. Neuroscience 20, 653–669 (1987).
    pubmed: 3295586
  17. Eccleston C, Crombez G. Pain demands attention: a cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain.. Psychol. Bull. 125, 356–366 (1999).
    pubmed: 10349356
  18. Webb A A. Potential Sources of Neck and Back Pain in Clinical Conditions of Dogs and Cats: A Review.. Vet. J. 165, 193–213 (2003).
    pubmed: 12672365
  19. Jeffcott L B. Disorders of the thoracolumbar spine of the horse — a survey of 443 cases.. Equine Vet. J. 12, 197–210 (1980).
    pubmed: 7439145
  20. Fureix C, Menguy H, Hausberger M. Partners with Bad Temper: Reject or Cure? A Study of Chronic Pain and Aggression in Horses.. PLoS ONE 5, e12434 (2010).
    pmc: PMC2928779pubmed: 20865160
  21. Lesimple C et al. Towards a Postural Indicator of Back Pain in Horses (Equus caballus).. Plos One 7, e44604 (2012).
    pmc: PMC3436792pubmed: 22970261
  22. Lesimple C, Fureix C, Hausberger M. Detecting horses’ sickness: The example of back disorders.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. (in press).
  23. Haussler K K. Equine rehabilitation. Chiropractic treatment for athletic horses.. Equine Sports Med. Surg. 10.1016/B978-0-7020-4771-8.00063-6 1225–1229 (2014).
    doi: 10.1016/B978-0-7020-4771-8.00063-6google scholar: lookup
  24. Lesimple C, Fureix C, Biquand V, Hausberger M. Comparison of clinical examinations of back disorders and humans’ evaluation of back pain in riding school horses.. BMC Vet. Res. 9, 209 (2013).
    pmc: PMC4015870pubmed: 24128080
  25. Donaldson S, Donaldson M, Snelling L. SEMG Evaluations: An Overview.. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 28, 121–127 (2003).
    pubmed: 12827990
  26. Cauin E. Assessment of back pain in horses.. In Pract. 19, 522–533 (1997).
  27. Burn C C, Dennison T L, Whay H R. Relationships between behaviour and health in working horses, donkeys, and mules in developing countries.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 126, 109–118 (2010).
  28. Hausberger M, Fureix C, Lesimple C. Detecting horses’ sickness: in search of visible signs.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. (in press).
  29. Scheid C, Range F, Bugnyar T. When, what, and whom to watch? Quantifying attention in ravens (Corvus corax) and jackdaws (Corvus monedula).. J. Comp. Psychol. 121, 380–386 (2007).
    pubmed: 18085921
  30. Schloegl C, Kotrschal K, Bugnyar T. Gaze following in common ravens, Corvus corax: ontogeny and habituation.. Anim. Behav. 74, 769–778 (2007).
  31. McNelis N L, Boatright-Horowitz S L. Social monitoring in a primate group: the relationship between visual attention and hierarchical ranks.. Anim. Cogn. 1, 65–69 (1998).
  32. Hattori Y, Kuroshima H, Fujita K. I know you are not looking at me: capuchin monkeys’ (Cebus apella) sensitivity to human attentional states.. Anim. Cogn. 10, 141–148 (2007).
    pubmed: 16944232
  33. Xitco G J D, Ii S A K. Dolphin pointing is linked to the attentional behavior of a receiver.. Anim. Cogn. 7, 231–238 (2004).
    pubmed: 15088149
  34. Sankey C, Henry S, André N, Richard-Yris M-A, Hausberger M. Do Horses Have a Concept of Person?. PLoS ONE 6, e18331 (2011).
    pmc: PMC3068175pubmed: 21479184
  35. Waring G H. Horse Behavior.. (Noyes Publications/William Andrew Pub., 2003).
  36. Kiley-Worthington M. The tail movements of ungulates, canids and felids with particular references to their causation and function as displays.. Behaviour (1976).
  37. Paul E S, Harding E J, Mendl M. Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach.. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 29, 469–491 (2005).
    pubmed: 15820551
  38. Ashley F H, Waterman-Pearson A E, Whay H R. Behavioural assessment of pain in horses and donkeys: application to clinical practice and future studies.. Equine Vet. J. 37, 565–575 (2005).
    pubmed: 16295937
  39. Fureix C, Jego P, Henry S, Lansade L, Hausberger M. Towards an Ethological Animal Model of Depression? A Study on Horses.. PLoS ONE 7, e39280 (2012).
    pmc: PMC3386251pubmed: 22761752
  40. Fureix C et al. Investigating anhedonia in a non-conventional species: Do some riding horses Equus caballus display symptoms of depression?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 162, 26–36 (2015).
  41. Altmann J. Observational Study of Behavior: Sampling Methods.. Behaviour 49, 227–266 (1974).
    pubmed: 4597405
  42. Wood T G, Colloca C J, Matthews R. A pilot randomized clinical trial on the relative effect of instrumental (MFMA) versus manual (HVLA) manipulation in the treatment of cervical spine dysfunction.. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther. 24, 260–271 (2001).
    pubmed: 11353937
  43. Shearar K A, Colloca C J, White H L. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Manual Versus Mechanical Force Manipulation in the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome.. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther. 28, 493–501 (2005).
    pubmed: 16182023
  44. Sullivan K A, Hill A E, Haussler K K. The effects of chiropractic, massage and phenylbutazone on spinal mechanical nociceptive thresholds in horses without clinical signs.. Equine Vet. J. 40, 14–20 (2008).
    pubmed: 18083655
  45. Siegel S, Castellan N J. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences.. (McGraw-Hill, 1988).

Citations

This article has been cited 19 times.
  1. Rochais C, Akoka E, Amiot Girard S, Grandgeorge M, Henry S. Through a Horse's Eyes: Investigating Cognitive Bias and Responses to Humans in Equine-Assisted Interventions. Animals (Basel) 2025 Feb 19;15(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15040607pubmed: 40003087google scholar: lookup
  2. Phelipon R, Hennes N, Ruet A, Bret-Morel A, Górecka-Bruzda A, Lansade L. Forage, freedom of movement, and social interactions remain essential fundamentals for the welfare of high-level sport horses. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1504116.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1504116pubmed: 39634765google scholar: lookup
  3. Hall C, Kay R. Living the good life? A systematic review of behavioural signs of affective state in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) and factors relating to quality of life. Part 2: Horse-human interactions. Anim Welf 2024;33:e41.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.41pubmed: 39469043google scholar: lookup
  4. Gueguen L, Henry S, Delbos M, Lemasson A, Hausberger M. Selected Acoustic Frequencies Have a Positive Impact on Behavioural and Physiological Welfare Indicators in Thoroughbred Racehorses. Animals (Basel) 2023 Sep 20;13(18).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13182970pubmed: 37760370google scholar: lookup
  5. Romero MH, Meneses F, Sanchez JA. Welfare assessment of horses and mules used in recreational and muleteer work in the Colombian coffee region. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:1031192.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1031192pubmed: 36467651google scholar: lookup
  6. Rochais C, Stomp M, Sébilleau M, Houdebine M, Henry S, Hausberger M. Horses' attentional characteristics differ according to the type of work. PLoS One 2022;17(7):e0269974.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269974pubmed: 35877616google scholar: lookup
  7. Hausberger M, Lesimple C, Henry S. Detecting Welfare in a Non-Verbal Species: Social/Cultural Biases and Difficulties in Horse Welfare Assessment. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 30;11(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11082249pubmed: 34438708google scholar: lookup
  8. Torcivia C, McDonnell S. Equine Discomfort Ethogram. Animals (Basel) 2021 Feb 23;11(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11020580pubmed: 33672338google scholar: lookup
  9. Stomp M, d'Ingeo S, Henry S, Lesimple C, Cousillas H, Hausberger M. EEG individual power profiles correlate with tension along spine in horses. PLoS One 2020;15(12):e0243970.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243970pubmed: 33315932google scholar: lookup
  10. Hausberger M, Lerch N, Guilbaud E, Stomp M, Grandgeorge M, Henry S, Lesimple C. On-Farm Welfare Assessment of Horses: The Risks of Putting the Cart before the Horse. Animals (Basel) 2020 Feb 25;10(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10030371pubmed: 32106531google scholar: lookup
  11. Lesimple C. Indicators of Horse Welfare: State-of-the-Art. Animals (Basel) 2020 Feb 13;10(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10020294pubmed: 32069888google scholar: lookup
  12. Grandgeorge M, Lemasson A, Hausberger M, Koda H, Masataka N. Enhanced cognitive processing by viewing snakes in children with autism spectrum disorder. A preliminary study. BMC Psychol 2019 Nov 27;7(1):74.
    doi: 10.1186/s40359-019-0352-6pubmed: 31775887google scholar: lookup
  13. Stomp M, Leroux M, Cellier M, Henry S, Hausberger M, Lemasson A. Snort acoustic structure codes for positive emotions in horses. Naturwissenschaften 2018 Sep 12;105(9-10):57.
    doi: 10.1007/s00114-018-1582-9pubmed: 30291452google scholar: lookup
  14. Stomp M, Leroux M, Cellier M, Henry S, Lemasson A, Hausberger M. An unexpected acoustic indicator of positive emotions in horses. PLoS One 2018;13(7):e0197898.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197898pubmed: 29995876google scholar: lookup
  15. Rochais C, Sébilleau M, Menoret M, Oger M, Henry S, Hausberger M, Cousillas H. Attentional state and brain processes: state-dependent lateralization of EEG profiles in horses. Sci Rep 2018 Jul 5;8(1):10153.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28334-9pubmed: 29976936google scholar: lookup
  16. Pawluski J, Jego P, Henry S, Bruchet A, Palme R, Coste C, Hausberger M. Low plasma cortisol and fecal cortisol metabolite measures as indicators of compromised welfare in domestic horses (Equus caballus). PLoS One 2017;12(9):e0182257.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182257pubmed: 28886020google scholar: lookup
  17. Rochais C, Sébilleau M, Houdebine M, Bec P, Hausberger M, Henry S. A novel test for evaluating horses' spontaneous visual attention is predictive of attention in operant learning tasks. Naturwissenschaften 2017 Aug;104(7-8):61.
    doi: 10.1007/s00114-017-1480-6pubmed: 28681089google scholar: lookup
  18. Cousillas H, Oger M, Rochais C, Pettoello C, Ménoret M, Henry S, Hausberger M. An Ambulatory Electroencephalography System for Freely Moving Horses: An Innovating Approach. Front Vet Sci 2017;4:57.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00057pubmed: 28512633google scholar: lookup
  19. Henry S, Fureix C, Rowberry R, Bateson M, Hausberger M. Do horses with poor welfare show 'pessimistic' cognitive biases?. Naturwissenschaften 2017 Feb;104(1-2):8.
    doi: 10.1007/s00114-016-1429-1pubmed: 28083632google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.