Analyze Diet
Research in veterinary science2003; 76(2); 145-149; doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2003.10.004

Lower gastric ulcerogenic effect of suxibuzone compared to phenylbutazone when administered orally to horses.

Abstract: The objective was to compare the gastrointestinal and general toxicity of suxibuzone (SBZ) to that of phenylbutazone (PBZ) when administered orally in horses. Fifteen healthy horses were allocated to three treatment groups. One group received a high dose of PBZ for two weeks; the second group was given an equimolecular dosage of SBZ; and a third group received placebo. Horses were daily monitored, and blood samples were collected before and during the study. On day 18, complete post-mortem examinations were performed. One horse treated with PBZ showed clinical signs of NSAID toxicosis. Small oral ulcers were also detected in other two horses from the PBZ group and in two horses from the SBZ group. There were no statistical differences in the blood parameters among groups. Ulcers in the stomach's glandular mucosa were observed in all horses of the PBZ group, while only two horses of the SBZ group showed ulcerations. PBZ horses had a significant higher ulcerated area, and gastric ulcers were significantly deeper than those in the SBZ and placebo groups. No other lesions were found in any other tissue. In conclusion, SBZ causes significantly lower gastric ulcerogenic effect than PBZ when administered orally at equimolecular doses in horses.
Publication Date: 2003-12-16 PubMed ID: 14672858DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2003.10.004Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study reveals that suxibuzone (SBZ) causes significantly fewer stomach ulcers in horses when compared to phenylbutazone (PBZ), when both drugs are administered orally at equimolecular dosages.

Objective and Methodology

  • The research aimed to compare the gastrointestinal and general toxicity of suxibuzone and phenylbutazone, two drugs commonly used in horses.
  • The study included fifteen healthy horses, which were divided into three groups. Each group was administered different treatments – one received a high dose of phenylbutazone, the second received an equimolecular dosage of suxibuzone, and the third received a placebo.
  • Regular monitoring of the horses was conducted, and blood samples were collected before and during the study.
  • After the oral administration of the treatments for 18 days, post-mortem examinations were performed.

Results

  • One horse from the group treated with phenylbutazone exhibited signs of NSAID toxicosis. Two other horses from this group and two horses from the suxibuzone group were found to have small oral ulcers.
  • Comparatively, while blood parameters were similar among all groups, stomach ulcers were significantly less frequent and less severe in the suxibuzone group. All horses in the phenylbutazone group developed ulcers in the stomach’s glandular mucosa, while only two horses in the suxibuzone group exhibited ulceration.
  • Additionally, in the horses of the phenylbutazone group, ulcers covered a larger area and were significantly deeper than those in the suxibuzone and placebo groups.

Conclusion

  • The research concluded that suxibuzone causes significantly fewer gastric ulcers than phenylbutazone when administered orally at equivalent dosages to horses.
  • This leads to the potential implication that suxibuzone may be a safer drug for horses, posing fewer of the gastrointestinal risks associated with phenylbutazone.

In essence, the study highlights the comparative benefits of suxibuzone over phenylbutazone in reducing the risk of gastric ulcers in horses when administered orally – an important finding for enhancing animal welfare standards in equine care.

Cite This Article

APA
Monreal L, Sabaté D, Segura D, Mayós I, Homedes J. (2003). Lower gastric ulcerogenic effect of suxibuzone compared to phenylbutazone when administered orally to horses. Res Vet Sci, 76(2), 145-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2003.10.004

Publication

ISSN: 0034-5288
NlmUniqueID: 0401300
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 76
Issue: 2
Pages: 145-149

Researcher Affiliations

Monreal, L
  • Dept. Medicina i Cirurgia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain. lluis.monreal@uab.es
Sabaté, D
    Segura, D
      Mayós, I
        Homedes, J

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / toxicity
          • Female
          • Gastric Mucosa / drug effects
          • Gastric Mucosa / pathology
          • Horse Diseases / chemically induced
          • Horse Diseases / pathology
          • Horses
          • Male
          • Phenylbutazone / analogs & derivatives
          • Phenylbutazone / toxicity
          • Stomach Ulcer / chemically induced
          • Stomach Ulcer / pathology
          • Stomach Ulcer / veterinary

          Citations

          This article has been cited 6 times.
          1. Bognanni N, Zimbone S, Giuffrida ML, Di Natale G, Milardi D, Vecchio G, Lanza V. Unveiling the Potential of a New β-Cyclodextrin-Suxibuzone Conjugate in Proteasome Regulation. ChemMedChem 2025 Nov 28;20(23):e202500401.
            doi: 10.1002/cmdc.202500401pubmed: 41101360google scholar: lookup
          2. Tesena P, Vinijkumthorn R, Preuksathaporn T, Piyakul P, Chotikaprakal T, Sirireugwipas R, Wong-Aree K, Prapaiwan N. Evaluation of gastrointestinal tract lesions and serum malondialdehyde levels after repeated oral administration of phenylbutazone in horses. Vet Res Commun 2024 Aug;48(4):2343-2355.
            doi: 10.1007/s11259-024-10415-ypubmed: 38771448google scholar: lookup
          3. Vokes J, Lovett A, Sykes B. Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome: An Update on Current Knowledge. Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 5;13(7).
            doi: 10.3390/ani13071261pubmed: 37048517google scholar: lookup
          4. Tesena P, Yingchutrakul Y, Roytrakul S, Wongtawan T, Angkanaporn K. Serum protein expression in Equine Glandular Gastric Disease (EGGD) induced by phenylbutazone. J Vet Med Sci 2019 Mar 20;81(3):418-424.
            doi: 10.1292/jvms.18-0679pubmed: 30674748google scholar: lookup
          5. Banse HE, MacLeod H, Crosby C, Windeyer MC. Prevalence of and risk factors for equine glandular and squamous gastric disease in polo horses. Can Vet J 2018 Aug;59(8):880-884.
            pubmed: 30104780
          6. Vondran S, Venner M, Vervuert I. Effects of two alfalfa preparations with different particle sizes on the gastric mucosa in weanlings: alfalfa chaff versus alfalfa pellets. BMC Vet Res 2016 Jun 14;12(1):110.
            doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0733-5pubmed: 27301323google scholar: lookup