Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2016; 217; 126-131; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.09.009

Magic angle effect on low field magnetic resonance images in the superficial digital flexor tendon in the equine proximal pastern region.

Abstract: Recognition of artefacts is an essential component of the accurate interpretation of diagnostic images. This study aimed to investigate the presence of magic angle effect in the superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) in the equine proximal pastern region. The proximal pastern of four cadaver limbs was imaged using a 0.27 Tesla magnet with high-resolution sequences that are commonly utilised in clinical equine practice. The limbs were imaged in a neutral position and positions that simulated the horse 'leaning in', 'leaning out' and having internal and external rotation of the distal limb. Signal intensity changes in the SDFT were described and compared. The simulated 'leaning in' and external rotation positions resulted in increased signal intensity in the axial and middle thirds of the lateral half of the SDFT on sequences with short echo times. The simulated 'leaning out' and internal rotation positions resulted in increased signal intensity in the axial and middle thirds of the medial half of the SDFT on sequences with short echo times. These signal intensity changes did not occur or were only mild and inconsistent on T2 fast spin echo sequences with longer echo times. The increases in signal intensity in the SDFT are consistent with a position-induced magic angle artefact that has been noted in clinical cases. Attention to positioning of the equine distal limb is essential during clinical imaging; radiologists should be aware of position-induced artefacts to ensure accurate image interpretation.
Publication Date: 2016-09-30 PubMed ID: 27810203DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.09.009Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research project focused on the impact of the “magic angle effect” on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in an area of a horse’s limb. This effect can cause errors or distractions during diagnostic image interpretation. Therefore, understanding its effects on images, specifically of the superficial digital flexor tendon in the equine proximal pastern region, was the main goal of this study.

Research Methodology

  • The project involved imaging the proximal pastern region of four cadaver horse limbs, employing a 0.27 Tesla magnet known for its high-resolution imaging sequences frequently used in clinical equine practice.
  • The imaging was done in various positions to stimulate the various movements and rotations a horse typically makes. This included neutral, ‘leaning in’, ‘leaning out’, and both internal and external rotations of the distal limb.
  • The researchers then described and compared the changes in signal intensity in the superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) for each different position.

Results and Findings

  • In the simulated ‘leaning in’ and external rotation positions, they found increased signal intensity in the axial and middle thirds of the lateral half of the SDFT when short echo time sequences were used.
  • Similarly, simulated ‘leaning out’ and internal rotation positions resulted in increased signal intensity in the axial and middle thirds of the medial half of the SDFT with short echo time sequences.
  • Contrarily, there were no, or only mild, inconsistent signal intensity changes with T2 fast spin echo sequences having long echo times.
  • The increases in signal intensity are consistent with a position-induced artifact, also known as the ‘magic angle effect’, which has been witnessed in clinical cases before.

Conclusion and Implications

  • The research stresses how important it is to pay close attention to the positioning of the equine distal limb during clinical imaging, as the positions can lead to an artifact in the image.
  • These findings will ultimately help radiologists become more aware of position-induced artifacts so they can ensure more accurate interpretation of images.

Cite This Article

APA
Sherlock CE, Mair TS. (2016). Magic angle effect on low field magnetic resonance images in the superficial digital flexor tendon in the equine proximal pastern region. Vet J, 217, 126-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.09.009

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 217
Pages: 126-131
PII: S1090-0233(16)30157-5

Researcher Affiliations

Sherlock, C E
  • Bell Equine Veterinary Clinic, Butchers Lane, Mereworth, Kent ME18 5GS, UK. Electronic address: cerisherlock@hotmail.com.
Mair, T S
  • Bell Equine Veterinary Clinic, Butchers Lane, Mereworth, Kent ME18 5GS, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Artifacts
  • Cadaver
  • Foot / diagnostic imaging
  • Foot Joints / diagnostic imaging
  • Horses
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / veterinary
  • Patient Positioning / veterinary
  • Tendons / diagnostic imaging

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Doll CU, von Pueckler K, Offhaus J, Berner D, Burk J. Characterization of Equine Chronic Tendon Lesions in Low- and High-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Vet Sci 2022 Jun 15;9(6).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci9060297pubmed: 35737349google scholar: lookup
  2. Horstmeier C, Ahrberg AB, Berner D, Burk J, Gittel C, Hillmann A, Offhaus J, Brehm W. In Vivo Magic Angle Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Cell Tracking in Equine Low-Field MRI. Stem Cells Int 2019;2019:5670106.
    doi: 10.1155/2019/5670106pubmed: 31933650google scholar: lookup
  3. Aßmann AD, Sànchez-Andrade JS, Argüelles D, Bischofberger AS. Does Low-Field MRI Tenography Improve the Detection of Naturally Occurring Manica Flexoria Tears in Horses?. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jul 31;15(15).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15152250pubmed: 40805040google scholar: lookup