Analyze Diet

Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal equine pituitary gland.

Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly available for evaluation of horses with suspected pituitary adenomas; however, published studies describing the MRI features of normal equine pituitary glands are currently lacking. This retrospective, descriptive, anatomic study describes the MRI appearance and size of presumed normal equine pituitary glands and assesses potential correlations between pituitary size, brain size, and patient weight. These findings serve as a reference for MRI evaluation of the equine pituitary gland. Inclusion criteria consisted of adult horses (2-15 years old), over 300 kg with no evidence of Pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction (PPID) and no pituitary abnormalities identified with MRI, yielding 27 horses. Histology was available on seven pituitary glands; all were considered normal by a board-certified anatomic pathologist. Imaging features of the glands were evaluated on T2-weighted and pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted images. Pituitary length, width, and height and brain height and width were measured by two authors on transverse and mid-sagittal plane postcontrast T1 weighted images. The mean ± SD pituitary gland width was 21.0 ± 2.4 mm, height: 10.4 ± 1.9 mm, and length: 24.5 ± 2.7 mm. There were no significant correlations using a Pearson's correlation coefficient between pituitary and brain measurements, pituitary measurement, and body weight, or between brain measurements and body weight. A statistical difference was not identified using an unpaired t-test (p > 0.05) in pituitary and brain measurements between necropsied and non-necropsied horses. Relative to the cerebral white matter, all pituitary glands were isointense to slightly hyperintense on T1-weighted images and isointense on T2-weighted images, with the exception of a focal T1-weighted hyperintensity that was present in the caudal aspect of the pituitary gland in 88% of horses. All pituitary glands were homogenously contrast enhancing. Pituitary dimensions did not correlate with either brain size or body weight in horses.
Publication Date: 2022-02-21 PubMed ID: 35188303DOI: 10.1111/vru.13072Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses a study that seeks to establish the baseline appearance and dimensions of a normal equine pituitary gland using magnetic resonance imaging. The aim is to use this as a reference in diagnosing pituitary adenomas or abnormal growths in horses.

Research Methodology

  • The study is a retrospective one, with the researchers collecting and scrutinizing past data. The participants of the study were adult horses aged between 2 and 15 years old, each weighing over 300 kg. The horses were all selected under the premise that they did not show evidence of Pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction (PPID) and no abnormalities were identified in their pituitary glands through MRI.
  • A total of 27 horses were involved in the study. Histological data was available for only seven of the pituitary glands, with each gland considered normal as confirmed by an anatomic pathologist.
  • The imaging and size details of the glands were evaluated using T2-weighted and pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted images. This involved the measurement of the pituitary length, width, and height, and the brain height and width.

Findings

  • The average dimensions of the pituitary gland were determined to be a width of 21.0 ± 2.4 mm, height of 10.4 ± 1.9 mm, and length of 24.5 ± 2.7 mm.
  • The researchers found no significant correlations between the pituitary and brain measurements, pituitary measurement, and body weight, or between brain measurements and body weight. This non-correlation was determined using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
  • There was also no noticeable statistical difference in pituitary and brain measurements between necropsied and non-necropsied horses as determined by an unpaired t-test.

Imaging Features and Pituitary Gland Characteristic

  • All pituitary glands were isointense to slightly hyperintense on T1-weighted images and isointense on T2-weighted images. This feature was relative to the cerebral white matter.
  • In 88% of the horses, there was a noticeable focal T1-weighted hyperintensity in the caudal aspect of the pituitary gland.
  • All pituitary glands displayed homogenous contrast enhancement on the images.

In conclusion, the study establishes that pituitary gland dimensions do not have a significant relationship with the brain size or body weight of a horse. The research offers the much needed reference baseline for MRI evaluation and potential diagnosis of pituitary gland abnormalities in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Hobbs KJ, Porter E, Wait C, Dark M, MacKay RJ. (2022). Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal equine pituitary gland. Vet Radiol Ultrasound, 63(4), 450-455. https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.13072

Publication

ISSN: 1740-8261
NlmUniqueID: 9209635
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 63
Issue: 4
Pages: 450-455

Researcher Affiliations

Hobbs, Kallie J
  • Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Porter, Erin
  • Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Wait, Courtney
  • Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Dark, Michael
  • Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
MacKay, Robert J
  • Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Body Weight
  • Horse Diseases / diagnostic imaging
  • Horse Diseases / pathology
  • Horses
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / veterinary
  • Pituitary Gland / diagnostic imaging
  • Pituitary Neoplasms / veterinary
  • Retrospective Studies

References

This article includes 14 references
  1. Secombe CJ, Bailey SR, de Laat MA. Equine pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction: current understanding and recommendations from the Australian and New Zealand Equine Endocrine Group.. Aust Vet J 2018;96:233-242.
  2. McFarlane D, Miller LM, Craig LE. Agreement in histologic assessments of the pituitary pars intermedia in aged horses.. Am J Vet Res 2005;66:2055-2059.
  3. McKlveen TL, Jones JC, Sponenberg DP. Assessment of the accuracy of computed tomography for measurement of normal equine pituitary glands.. Am J Vet Res 2003;64:1387-1394.
  4. Arencibia A, Vazquez JM, Ramirez JA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal equine brain.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2001;42:405-409.
  5. Manso-Diaz G, Dyson SJ, Dennis R. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of equine head disorders: 84 cases.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 56:176-187.
  6. Furr M, Reed SM. Equine neurology (ed Second edition.).. Ames, Iowa, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2015.
  7. Bonneville F, Cattin F, Marsot-Dupuch K. T1 signal hyperintensity in the sellar region: spectrum of findings.. Radiographics 2006;26:93-113.
  8. Graham JP, Roberts GD, Newell SM. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the normal canine pituitary gland.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000;41:35-40.
  9. Colombo N, Berry I, Kucharczyk J. Posterior pituitary gland: appearance on MR images in normal and pathologic states.. Radiology 1987;165:481-485.
  10. Cote M, Salzman KL, Sorour M. Normal dimensions of the posterior pituitary bright spot on magnetic resonance imaging.. J Neurosurg 2014;120:357-362.
  11. Sato N, Ishizaka H, Matsumoto M. MR detectability of posterior pituitary high signal and direction of frequency encoding gradient.. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:355-358.
  12. Travetti O, White C, Labruyere J. Variation in the MRI appearance of the canine pituitary gland.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2020.
  13. Wallack ST, Wisner ER, Feldman EC. Mensuration of the pituitary gland from magnetic resonance images in 17 cats.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2003;44:278-282.
  14. van der Kolk JH, Heinrichs M, van Amerongen JD. Evaluation of pituitary gland anatomy and histopathologic findings in clinically normal horses and horses and ponies with pituitary pars intermedia adenoma.. Am J Vet Res 2004;65:1701-1707.

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Kirkwood NC, Hughes KJ, Stewart AJ. Pituitary Pars Intermedia Dysfunction (PPID) in Horses. Vet Sci 2022 Oct 10;9(10).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci9100556pubmed: 36288169google scholar: lookup