Abstract: Adherence to recommendations for environmental management is central to equine asthma (EA) treatment. Reasons for non-adherence warrant further investigation. Objective: To: (1) evaluate adherence to recommendations for environmental changes, identify reasons for incomplete implementation, assess changes in clinical signs and medication use; (2) evaluate owner acceptability, practicality and perceived usefulness of a structured stable-side protocol. Methods: (1) Retrospective online survey and (2) prospective onsite testing with owners of EA-affected horses. Methods: (1) Online survey on implementation of standardised recommendations, clinical progression and medication use; and (2) environmental protocol evaluation during stable visits. Results: Seventeen of 40 horses still received dry hay and 13/40 were bedded on straw. Reasons for non-implementation included time, financial and infrastructural constraints, boarding stable restrictions, group housing, weather dependence, use of self-produced roughage, perceived ineffectiveness and individual horse preferences. Owners reported that overall clinical impression had improved and the proportion of coughing horses decreased from 88% to 55% (p < 0.001, OR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.002-0.47, n = 40). The other clinical outcomes did not reach the Bonferroni-adjusted significance threshold. Twenty-two horses were still coughing, and 7/40 had received medication within the previous 3 months. All interviewed owners found the environmental protocol helpful, 11 reviewed it again and 5 used it for discussion with others. Conclusions: Use of small convenience samples, lack of a control group and potential selection and recall bias. Conclusions: Owner non-adherence arose from diverse and often structural constraints. The environmental protocol was well accepted by owners and helped to structure discussions on risk factors.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This study investigated how horse owners adhere to environmental management recommendations to control equine asthma and evaluated a structured protocol designed to assist owners in managing the condition more effectively.
It also explored the reasons why owners might not fully implement these recommendations, the impact on clinical symptoms, and the acceptability and utility of a stable-side environmental protocol.
Introduction and Objectives
Equine asthma (EA) requires strict environmental management to reduce exposure to dust and allergens that exacerbate symptoms.
Owner adherence to environmental recommendations is crucial but often incomplete.
The aims were to:
Evaluate how well owners follow environmental management recommendations.
Identify reasons for incomplete adherence.
Assess changes in clinical signs and medication use following management.
Test the practicality and usefulness of a structured environmental management protocol during stable visits.
Methods
The study was conducted in two phases:
(1) A retrospective online survey with owners of EA-affected horses, asking about their implementation of recommended environmental changes, clinical progression, and medication usage.
(2) A prospective onsite evaluation where researchers used a structured environmental protocol during stable visits to assess practicality and owner acceptance.
Key Findings: Owner Adherence and Constraints
Many horses still received potentially problematic environmental exposures:
17 out of 40 horses were fed dry hay, which can produce dust that aggravates equine asthma.
13 out of 40 were bedded on straw, another known environmental trigger.
Reasons for incomplete adoption of recommendations included:
Time and workload constraints limiting owners’ ability to change routines.
Financial limitations affecting the ability to buy alternative feed or bedding.
Stable infrastructure or boarding stable policies restricting management changes.
Group housing situations making individualized management difficult.
Weather dependence influencing the feasibility of some changes.
Use of self-produced roughage, limiting feed options.
Owner perceptions that some changes had little benefit or were ineffective.
Individual horse preferences and behaviors influencing management choices.
Clinical Outcomes and Medication Use
Owners reported an overall improvement in clinical impressions of their horses post-management changes.
The proportion of coughing horses decreased significantly from 88% to 55%, showing a positive response (statistically significant with p < 0.001).
Other measured clinical outcomes (not detailed here) did not meet stringent significance thresholds after statistical correction.
Despite improvements, 22 horses continued to cough and 7 horses had been treated with medication in the past 3 months, indicating persistent or partially controlled disease in some cases.
Evaluation of the Structured Environmental Protocol
All interviewed owners found the environmental management protocol helpful during stable visits.
Eleven owners reviewed the protocol again after the visit, indicating ongoing engagement.
Five owners used the protocol as a communication tool with other caretakers or veterinarians, suggesting it facilitated clearer discussions about environmental risk factors.
Limitations
The study used a small convenience sample (only 40 horses), which may limit the generalizability of findings.
No control group was included to compare the effects of management changes, limiting causal conclusions.
Potential biases such as selection bias (owners motivated to respond) and recall bias (self-reported data) may have influenced results.
Conclusions and Implications
Non-adherence to environmental recommendations is common and mainly driven by practical, financial, and structural constraints rather than a lack of willingness.
The structured environmental protocol was well accepted and useful for guiding owners through risk factor assessment and management discussions.
Supporting owners with practical tools and acknowledging real-world constraints may improve long-term adherence and health outcomes for horses with equine asthma.
Cite This Article
APA
Stucki L, Schüpbach G, Ramseyer A, Herholz C, Gerber V.
(2026).
Managing equine asthma: Owner adherence, practical constraints and environmental protocol evaluation.
Equine Vet J.
https://doi.org/10.1002/evj.70355
Barton AK, Gehrke R, Gehlen H. Diagnosis and therapy of severe equine asthma in Berlin‐Brandenburg—a questionnaire study.. Pferdeheilkunde 2022;38(1):39–44.
Lehmann B, Merle R, Klier J, Gehlen H. Besitzerbefragung zur chronisch‐obstruktiven bronchitis bei Warmblütern unter Verwendung eines online‐Fragebogens [Survey of horse owners on chronic obstructive bronchitis in warmblood horses through the use of an online questionnaire].. Pferdeheilkunde 2016;32:357–366.
Tanner MK, Swinker AM, Beard ML, Cosma GN, Traub‐Dargatz JL, Martinez AB. Effect of phone book paper versus sawdust and straw bedding on the presence of airborne gram‐negative bacteria, fungi and endotoxin in horse stalls. J Equine Vet Sci 1998;18(7):457–461.
Samadi S, Van Eerdenburg FJCM, Jamshidifard AR, Otten GP, Droppert M, Heederik DJJ. The influence of bedding materials on bio‐aerosol exposure in dairy barns. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2012;22(4):361–368.
Fleming K, Hessel EF, Van den Weghe HFA. Generation of airborne particles from different bedding materials used for horse keeping. J Equine Vet Sci 2008;28(7):408–418.
Auger EJ, Moore‐Colyer MJS. The effect of management regime on airborne respirable dust concentrations in two different types of horse stable design. J Equine Vet Sci 2017;51(2):105–109.
Herholz C, Kocher J, Küng P, Barren A. Digital monitoring of dust release in a horse stable, depending on ventilation opening area and bedding type. Pferdeheilkunde 2020;36(4):316–324.
Mostafa E, Szabo E, Gates RS, Buescher W. Identification of airborne particles and fungus spores concentrations within horses stables. Atmos Pollut Res 2021;12(2):93–103.