Analyze Diet

Masticatory motor patterns in ungulates: a quantitative assessment of jaw-muscle coordination in goats, alpacas and horses.

Abstract: We investigated patterns of jaw-muscle coordination during rhythmic mastication in three species of ungulates displaying the marked transverse jaw movements typical of many large mammalian herbivores. In order to quantify consistent motor patterns during chewing, electromyograms were recorded from the superficial masseter, deep masseter, posterior temporalis and medial pterygoid muscles of goats, alpacas and horses. Timing differences between muscle pairs were evaluated in the context of an evolutionary model of jaw-muscle function. In this model, the closing and food reduction phases of mastication are primarily controlled by two distinct muscle groups, triplet I (balancing-side superficial masseter and medial pterygoid and working-side posterior temporalis) and triplet II (working-side superficial masseter and medial pterygoid and balancing-side posterior temporalis), and the asynchronous activity of the working- and balancing-side deep masseters. The three species differ in the extent to which the jaw muscles are coordinated as triplet I and triplet II. Alpacas, and to a lesser extent, goats, exhibit the triplet pattern whereas horses do not. In contrast, all three species show marked asynchrony of the working-side and balancing-side deep masseters, with jaw closing initiated by the working-side muscle and the balancing-side muscle firing much later during closing. However, goats differ from alpacas and horses in the timing of the balancing-side deep masseter relative to the triplet II muscles. This study highlights interspecific differences in the coordination of jaw muscles to influence transverse jaw movements and the production of bite force in herbivorous ungulates.
Publication Date: 2007-04-17 PubMed ID: 17436331DOI: 10.1002/jez.362Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates how jaw-muscle coordination during chewing varies among three species of herbivorous hoofed animals – goats, alpacas, and horses. The differences arise mainly in the synchronization of certain distinct muscle groups, affecting the timing of jaw movements and the generation of bite force.

Methodology:

  • The researchers studied patterns of jaw-muscle coordination during rhythmic mastication in goats, alpacas, and horses. These species demonstrate the broad, horizontal jaw movements typical of many large herbivorous mammals.
  • They utilised electromyograms, or electrical recordings of muscle activity, to document the action of several key jaw muscles: the superficial masseter, deep masseter, posterior temporalis, and medial pterygoid muscles.
  • They assessed timing differences between muscle pairs using an evolutionary model of jaw-muscle function that identifies two distinct muscle groups responsible for the closing and food reduction phases of mastication.

Findings:

  • The closing and food reduction phases of mastication are primarily controlled by two distinct muscle groups, termed triplet I and II. The muscles involved in these triplet groups are the balancing-side superficial masseter and medial pterygoid, the working-side posterior temporalis (triplet I), the working-side superficial masseter and medial pterygoid, and the balancing-side posterior temporalis (triplet II), along with the asynchronous action of the deep masseters on the working and balancing sides of the jaw.
  • There were significant differences between the species in terms of the coordination of these muscle triplets. Alpacas, and to a lesser extent, goats, exhibited the triplet coordination pattern, while horses did not.
  • All three species demonstrated asynchrony or lack of simultaneous action in the deep masseter muscles on the working and balancing sides of the jaw. The process of jaw closing was initiated by the working-side muscle, while the balancing-side muscle activated significantly later during closing.
  • However, goats differed from the other two species concerning the timing of the balancing-side deep masseter relative to the triplet II muscles.

Implications:

  • The research provides valuable insights into variations in the coordination of jaw muscles across different species of herbivorous mammals. These differences can influence the transverse movements of the jaw as well as the production of bite force during mastication.
  • These variations can potentially be linked to evolutionary factors, diet, and other ecological and functional influences on the masticatory process.

Cite This Article

APA
Williams SH, Vinyard CJ, Wall CE, Hylander WL. (2007). Masticatory motor patterns in ungulates: a quantitative assessment of jaw-muscle coordination in goats, alpacas and horses. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol, 307(4), 226-240. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.362

Publication

ISSN: 1932-5223
NlmUniqueID: 101297745
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 307
Issue: 4
Pages: 226-240

Researcher Affiliations

Williams, Susan H
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH 45701, USA. willias7@ohio.edu
Vinyard, Christopher J
    Wall, Christine E
      Hylander, William L

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Bite Force
        • Camelids, New World / anatomy & histology
        • Camelids, New World / physiology
        • Electromyography
        • Female
        • Goats / anatomy & histology
        • Goats / physiology
        • Horses / anatomy & histology
        • Horses / physiology
        • Jaw / anatomy & histology
        • Jaw / physiology
        • Male
        • Mastication / physiology
        • Masticatory Muscles / anatomy & histology
        • Masticatory Muscles / physiology
        • Motor Activity / physiology

        Citations

        This article has been cited 10 times.
        1. Spence M, Rull-Garza M, Roba YT, Konow N. Do salamanders chew? An X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology analysis of ambystomatid intraoral feeding behaviours.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2023 Dec 4;378(1891):20220540.
          doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0540pubmed: 37839445google scholar: lookup
        2. Cox PG, Watson PJ. Masticatory biomechanics of red and grey squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris and Sciurus carolinensis) modelled with multibody dynamics analysis.. R Soc Open Sci 2023 Feb;10(2):220587.
          doi: 10.1098/rsos.220587pubmed: 36816846google scholar: lookup
        3. Swiderski DL, Zelditch ML. Complex adaptive landscape for a "Simple" structure: The role of trade-offs in the evolutionary dynamics of mandibular shape in ground squirrels.. Evolution 2022 May;76(5):946-965.
          doi: 10.1111/evo.14493pubmed: 35398910google scholar: lookup
        4. Fraser D, Haupt RJ, Barr WA. Phylogenetic signal in tooth wear dietary niche proxies.. Ecol Evol 2018 Jun;8(11):5355-5368.
          doi: 10.1002/ece3.4052pubmed: 29938058google scholar: lookup
        5. Ram Y, Ross CF. Evaluating the triplet hypothesis during rhythmic mastication in primates.. J Exp Biol 2018 Jan 16;221(Pt 2).
          doi: 10.1242/jeb.165985pubmed: 29133297google scholar: lookup
        6. Liu ZJ, Rafferty KL, Ye W, Herring SW. Differential response of pig masseter to botulinum neurotoxin serotypes a and b.. Muscle Nerve 2015 Jul;52(1):88-93.
          doi: 10.1002/mus.24492pubmed: 26039454google scholar: lookup
        7. Vinyard CJ, Williams SH, Wall CE, Doherty AH, Crompton AW, Hylander WL. A preliminary analysis of correlations between chewing motor patterns and mandibular morphology across mammals.. Integr Comp Biol 2011 Aug;51(2):260-70.
          doi: 10.1093/icb/icr066pubmed: 21724618google scholar: lookup
        8. Williams SH, Vinyard CJ, Wall CE, Doherty AH, Crompton AW, Hylander WL. A preliminary analysis of correlated evolution in Mammalian chewing motor patterns.. Integr Comp Biol 2011 Aug;51(2):247-59.
          doi: 10.1093/icb/icr068pubmed: 21719433google scholar: lookup
        9. Wall CE, Vinyard CJ, Williams SH, Gapeyev V, Liu X, Lapp H, German RZ. Overview of FEED, the feeding experiments end-user database.. Integr Comp Biol 2011 Aug;51(2):215-23.
          doi: 10.1093/icb/icr047pubmed: 21700574google scholar: lookup
        10. Williams SH, Vinyard CJ, Wall CE, Hylander WL. Mandibular corpus bone strain in goats and alpacas: implications for understanding the biomechanics of mandibular form in selenodont artiodactyls.. J Anat 2009 Jan;214(1):65-78.