Analyze Diet
The British journal of nutrition2003; 90(1); 109-118; doi: 10.1079/bjn2003869

Mathematical modelling of digesta passage rate, mean retention time and in vivo apparent digestibility of two different lengths of hay and big-bale grass silage in ponies.

Abstract: Welsh-cross pony geldings (about 300 kg live weight) were used in a 4x4 Latin square experiment to determine the rate of passage and apparent digestibility of unchopped big-bale grass silage (BBL), chopped big-bale grass silage (BBS), unchopped grass hay (HL) and chopped grass hay (HS) offered at approximately 15 g/kg live weight per d. On day 1 of collection weeks, ponies were fed 85 g ytterbium chloride hexahydrate-marked feed 1.5 h after the morning meal. Total faecal collections commenced 8 h later and continued for 168 h. Apparent digestibilities of feed DM, organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP, Nx6.25), acid-detergent fibre (ADF) and neutral-detergent fibre (NDF) were also determined. Faecal excretion data were subjected to the models of Pond et al. (1988) and digesta mean retention time (MRT) calculated from these models and using the algebraic method of Thielmans et al. (1978). Silage had significantly (P<0.05) higher digestibilities of DM, OM, CP, ADF and NDF than hay; however, chop length had no effect. All the models of Pond et al. (1988) accurately described (R(2)>0.8) the pattern of faecal marker excretion. MRT of BBL (29.0 h)>BBS(27 h)>HS and HL (26 h). Compartmental analysis using the G3 model of Pond et al. (1988) showed BBL and HS diets had longer MRT in the time-dependent compartment, whereas BBS and HL had longer MRT in the time-independent compartment. Results from this experiment indicate that BBL and BBS are readily accepted and digested by ponies. While Yb is a successful external marker for determining total tract MRT and for modelling faecal excretion curves in horses, the results did not allow any definite conclusions to be drawn on digesta MRT within the different compartments of the equid gut.
Publication Date: 2003-07-08 PubMed ID: 12844382DOI: 10.1079/bjn2003869Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses an experiment on Welsh-cross pony geldings to determine the rate of passage and apparent digestibility of certain types of feed. The study used mathematical modelling to ascertain that silage has higher digestibilities than hay but the length of the chop does not affect it.

Objective of the Research

  • The primary objective of the research was to study the digestibility rate and passage rate of different types of feed (grass silage and hay) in Welsh-cross pony geldings. They specifically compared unchopped big-bale grass silage, chopped big-bale grass silage, unchopped grass hay, and chopped grass hay.
  • Furthermore, the research aimed to determine whether the length of the chop affected the digestibility of the feed.

Methodology

  • The experiment used a 4×4 Latin square design and the feed was offered at about 15 g/kg body weight per day.
  • To track the passage rate, the ponies were fed with ytterbium chloride hexahydrate-marked feed and total faecal collection was done 8 hours later, continuing for a total of 168 hours.
  • Apparent digestibilities of various components like feed DM (Dry Matter), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP, Nx6.25), acid-detergent fibre (ADF) and neutral-detergent fibre (NDF) were determined.
  • The researchers used the models of Pond et al. (1988) and the algebraic method of Thielmans et al. (1978) to calculate and interpret the data.

Findings

  • The research concluded that silage had significantly higher digestibilities of DM, OM, CP, ADF and NDF than hay. This indicates that ponies can more effectively digest silage than hay.
  • However, the results showed that the chop length of the feed had no significant effect on its digestibility.
  • The different models accurately described the pattern of faecal marker excretion, indicating that the retention time varied for different feeds.
  • The research also found that big-bale grass silage and chopped hay diets had longer mean retention time (MRT) in the time-dependent compartment, whereas chopped big-bale grass silage and unchopped hay had longer MRT in the time-independent compartment.

Conclusion

  • The research concluded that both unchopped and chopped big-bale grass silage are readily accepted and digested by the ponies.
  • The use of Ytterbium chloride hexahydrate as an external marker was effective for determining total tract MRT and for modelling faecal excretion curves in horses.
  • Despite the considered approach, the results did not allow any definite conclusions to be drawn on the digesta MRT within the different compartments of the equid gut.

Cite This Article

APA
Moore-Colyer MJ, Morrow HJ, Longland AC. (2003). Mathematical modelling of digesta passage rate, mean retention time and in vivo apparent digestibility of two different lengths of hay and big-bale grass silage in ponies. Br J Nutr, 90(1), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn2003869

Publication

ISSN: 0007-1145
NlmUniqueID: 0372547
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 90
Issue: 1
Pages: 109-118

Researcher Affiliations

Moore-Colyer, M J S
  • Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales-Aberystwyth, Llanbadarn Campus, Aberystwyth SY23 3AL, Wales, UK. mem@aber.ac.uk
Morrow, H J
    Longland, A C

      MeSH Terms

      • Animal Feed
      • Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
      • Animals
      • Digestion / physiology
      • Gastrointestinal Transit
      • Horses / physiology
      • Male
      • Models, Biological
      • Poaceae
      • Silage

      Citations

      This article has been cited 3 times.
      1. Schwarm A, Clauss M, Ortmann S, Jensen RB. No size-dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2022 Nov;106(6):1356-1363.
        doi: 10.1111/jpn.13757pubmed: 35894118google scholar: lookup
      2. Hansen TL, Chizek EL, Zugay OK, Miller JM, Bobel JM, Chouinard JW, Adkin AM, Skurupey LA, Warren LK. Digestibility and Retention Time of Coastal Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) Hay by Horses. Animals (Basel) 2019 Dec 14;9(12).
        doi: 10.3390/ani9121148pubmed: 31847350google scholar: lookup
      3. Bachmann M, Bochnia M, Wensch-Dorendorf M, Glatter M, Schäfer S, Simroth K, Greef JM, Zeyner A. Feed intake, digestibility and passage kinetics in grazing horses. Sci Rep 2026 Jan 22;16(1):3052.
        doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-35647-7pubmed: 41571885google scholar: lookup