Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2025; 54(7); 1326-1336; doi: 10.1111/vsu.70013

Multicenter results for C7-T1 ventral interbody fusion in horses using the kerf cut cylinder.

Abstract: To describe the surgical approach used in horses undergoing C7-T1 ventral interbody fusion using a kerf cut cylinder (KCC) implant and report the short- and long-term outcomes. Methods: Observational retrospective study. Methods: A total of 38 client-owned horses. Methods: Medical records of horses that underwent ventral interbody fusion because of C7-T1 cervical vertebral stenotic myelopathy from 2004 to 2024 were reviewed. Preoperative variables included age, sex, breed, and affected site(s). Surgical variables included types of KCC used, intraoperative complications, and anesthesia related complications. Long-term outcomes were obtained by telephone interviews with the owners, trainers, and/or attending veterinarians. Results: A total of 38 horses had a KCC placed and 34 of 38 horses (89%) were discharged from the hospital and were alive >3 months postoperatively. Long-term follow-up was available for 32 horses (median, 48 months; range: 3-144), two horses were unavailable for long-term follow-up. A total of 30 of 38 horses (79%) were deemed to have successful outcomes; a total of 19 of 38 horses (50%) returned to riding, training, or showing in their respective disciplines and 11 of 38 horses (29%) were allowed unrestricted paddock turnout or were in active rehabilitation with improved clinical signs. Conclusions: Ventral interbody fusion of C7-T1 had anatomical challenges. Laryngeal spasm was the most common short-term complication, but C7-T1 ventral interbody fusion using the KCC was associated with acceptable morbidity and good long-term outcomes. Conclusions: Ventral interbody fusion of C7-T1 using a KCC implant can be successfully performed in equine patients with good prognosis, and ventral interbody fusion of the cervical spine should not be considered a salvage procedure.
Publication Date: 2025-09-08 PubMed ID: 40922452DOI: 10.1111/vsu.70013Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Multicenter Study
  • Observational Study
  • Veterinary

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Research Overview

  • This study evaluates the surgical approach and outcomes of C7-T1 ventral interbody fusion using a kerf cut cylinder (KCC) implant in horses diagnosed with cervical vertebral stenotic myelopathy.
  • The research summarizes both short- and long-term results, indicating that the procedure is feasible with acceptable risks and good prognosis in equine patients.

Introduction and Purpose

  • The surgery focuses on treating C7-T1 cervical vertebral stenotic myelopathy, a spinal condition causing compression and neurological deficits in affected horses.
  • Ventral interbody fusion aims to stabilize this cervical segment by inserting an implant to promote fusion between vertebrae.
  • The kerf cut cylinder (KCC) is a specific type of implant used for this fusion procedure.
  • The study’s objective was to describe the surgical approach, report intraoperative and anesthesia complications, and evaluate the short- and long-term clinical outcomes after the procedure in a large multicenter group of horses.

Methods

  • This was a retrospective observational study reviewing medical records from 2004 to 2024.
  • A total of 38 client-owned horses with C7-T1 cervical vertebral stenotic myelopathy that underwent the KCC ventral interbody fusion were included.
  • Preoperative data collected: age, sex, breed, and specific affected vertebral sites.
  • Surgical variables included:
    • Types of KCC implants used
    • Intraoperative complications
    • Anesthesia-related complications
  • Long-term outcomes were assessed through telephone interviews with owners, trainers, or attending veterinarians to gather post-discharge status and performance ability.

Results

  • Out of 38 horses treated, 34 (89%) were discharged alive and survived more than three months post-surgery.
  • The median long-term follow-up period was 48 months, ranging from 3 to 144 months, with data available for 32 horses.
  • Two horses were lost to long-term follow-up.
  • Successful outcomes were observed in 79% of the cases (30/38 horses), meaning significant clinical improvement or return to function.
  • Specific outcome details:
    • 50% (19/38) returned to active riding, training, or competitive showing.
    • 29% (11/38) either had unrestricted turnout or were undergoing rehabilitation with notable clinical improvement.
  • Laryngeal spasm was identified as the most common short-term complication associated with the surgery.

Discussion and Conclusions

  • Performing ventral interbody fusion at the C7-T1 vertebral level presents anatomical challenges due to the location.
  • Despite these challenges, the usage of the KCC implant had acceptable morbidity, meaning postoperative complications were manageable and not overly severe.
  • The procedure is shown to be effective in improving clinical signs and restoring function in many horses with cervical myelopathy affecting this critical spinal region.
  • The study advises that ventral interbody fusion of the cervical spine, particularly using KCC for C7-T1, should no longer be viewed solely as a salvage (last-resort) procedure but rather a viable treatment option.

Implications for Equine Veterinary Practice

  • This work supports offering surgical fusion with KCC implants to horses suffering from C7-T1 cervical vertebral stenotic myelopathy.
  • Veterinarians should anticipate and manage risks such as laryngeal spasm but can counsel owners on good chances of recovery and return to athletic activity.
  • Long-term follow-up data reinforce the durability of benefits from this surgical approach.

Cite This Article

APA
Janicek JC, Grant BD, Woodie JB, Reed SM, Mariën T, Anderson J. (2025). Multicenter results for C7-T1 ventral interbody fusion in horses using the kerf cut cylinder. Vet Surg, 54(7), 1326-1336. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.70013

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 54
Issue: 7
Pages: 1326-1336

Researcher Affiliations

Janicek, John C
  • Brazos Valley Equine Hospitals-Salado, Salado, Texas, USA.
Grant, Barrie D
  • Equine Consultant, California, USA.
Woodie, J Brett
  • Rood and Riddle Equine Hospital, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Reed, Steve M
  • Rood and Riddle Equine Hospital, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Mariën, Tom
  • EquiTom Equine Clinic, Lummen, Belgium.
Anderson, Jonathan
  • Rainbow Equine Hospital, Malton, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Spinal Fusion / veterinary
  • Spinal Fusion / instrumentation
  • Spinal Fusion / methods
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Male
  • Horse Diseases / surgery
  • Female
  • Cervical Vertebrae / surgery
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Thoracic Vertebrae / surgery
  • Spinal Stenosis / veterinary
  • Spinal Stenosis / surgery

References

This article includes 26 references
  1. Dyson SJ. Lesions of the equine neck resulting in lameness or poor performance.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2011;27:417‐437.
  2. Withers JM, Voûte LC, Hammond G, Lischer CJ. Radiographic anatomy of the articular process joints of the caudal cervical vertebrae in the horse on lateral and oblique projections.. Equine Vet J 2009;41:895‐902.
  3. Didierlaurent D, Contremoulins V, Denoix JM, Audigié F. Scintigraphic pattern of uptake of 99 m technetium by the cervical vertebrae of sound horses.. Vet Rec 2009;164:809‐813.
  4. Berg LC, Nielsen JV, Thoefner MB, Thomsen PD. Ultrasonography of the equine cervical region: a descriptive study in eight horses.. Equine Vet J 2003;35:647‐655.
  5. Moore BR, Holbrook TC, Stefanacci JD, Reed SM, Tate LP, Menard MC. Contrast‐enhanced computed tomography and myelography in six horses with cervical stenotic myelopathy.. Equine Vet J 1992;24:197‐202.
  6. Kristoffersen M, Puchalski SM, Skog S, Lindegaard C. Cervical computed tomography (CT) and CT myelography in live horses: 16 cases.. Equine Vet J 2014;46(Suppl. 47):11.
  7. Lingren CM, Wright L, Kristoffersen M, Puchalski SM. Computed tomography and myelography of the equine cervical spine: 180 cases (2013–2018).. Equine Vet Educ 2021;33:475‐483.
  8. Gough SL, Anderson JDC, Dixon JJ. Computed tomographic cervical myelography in horses: technique and findings in 51 clinical cases.. J Vet Intern Med 2020;34:2142‐2151.
  9. Janes JG, Garrett KS, McQuerry KJ. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with standing cervical radiographs for evaluation of vertebral canal stenosis in equine cervical stenotic myelopathy.. Equine Vet J 2014;46:681‐686.
  10. Sleutjens J, Cooley AJ, Sampson SN. The equine cervical spine: comparing MRI and contrast‐enhanced CT images with anatomic slices in the sagittal, dorsal, and transverse plane.. Vet Q 2014;34:74‐84.
  11. Moore BR, Reed SM, Robertson JT. Surgical treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy in horses: 73 cases (1983–1992).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993;203:108‐112.
  12. Wagner PC, Bagby GW, Grant BD, Gallina A, Ratzlaff M, Sande R. Surgical stabilization of the equine cervical spine.. Vet Surg 1979;8:7‐12.
  13. Wagner PC, Grant BD, Bagby GW, Gallina AM, Sande RD, Ratzlaff M. Evaluation of cervical fusion as a treatment in the equine “wobbler” syndrome.. Vet Surg 1979;8:84‐88.
  14. Grant BD, Barbee DD, Wagner PC. Long‐term results of surgery for cervical vertebral malformation.. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1985;31:91‐96.
  15. Walmsley J, Grant BD. Surgical treatment of developmental disorders of the spinal column.. Equine Surgery 2012:700‐711.
  16. Trostle T, Grant BD, Bagby G, Rantanen N. Clinical results of kerf cut cylinder (Seattle slew implant) to reduce implant migration and fracture in horses undergoing surgical interbody fusion.. Vet Surg 2003;32:499.
  17. Reardon R, Kummer M, Lischer C. Ventral locking compression plate for treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy in a 3‐month‐old warmblood foal.. Vet Surg 2009;38:537‐542.
  18. Kühnle C, Fürst AE, Ranninger E, Suárez Sánchez‐Andrade J. Outcome of ventral fusion of two or three cervical vertebrae with a locking compression plate for the treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy in eight horses.. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2018;31:356‐363.
  19. Aldrich E, Nout‐Lomas Y, Seim H, Easley J. Cervical stabilization with polyaxial pedicle screw and rod construct in horses: a proof of concept study.. Vet Surg 2018;47:932‐941.
  20. Pezzanite LM, Easley JT, Bayless R. Outcomes after cervical vertebral interbody fusion using an interbody fusion device and polyaxial pedicle screw and rod construct in 10 horses (2015‐2019).. Equine Vet J 2022;54:347‐358.
  21. Rossignol F. Spinal fusion – plating.. Proc Eur Coll Vet Surg 2024;33:509.
  22. DeBowes RM, Grant BD, Bagby G, Gallina A, Ratzlaff M, Sande RD. Cervical vertebral interbody fusion in the horse: a comparative study of bovine xenografts and equine autografts supported by stainless steel baskets.. AJVR 1984;45:191‐199.
  23. Grant BD, Huggons N, Bagby GW, Reed SM, Robertson JT. Review of surgical treatment of triple level cervical cord compression (12 cases).. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 2007;53:60‐63.
  24. Santos MM, Martinez J, Mollenhauer L, Schulze‐Gronover B, Lescun TB, Gudehus TH. Surgical treatment of cervical (C7‐T1) instability caused by discospondylitis in a horse.. Equine Vet Educ 2023;35:731‐737.
  25. Janicek JC. C7‐T1 ventral interbody fusions: opportunities, nuances, and expectations.. Equine Vet Educ 2023;35:633‐636.
  26. Reardon RJ, Bailey R, Walmsley JP, Heller J, Lischer C. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of a locking compression plate fixation and kerf‐cut cylinder fixation for ventral arthrodesis of the fourth and the fifth equine cervical vertebrae.. Vet Surg 2010;39:980‐990.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.