Analyze Diet
The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice2014; 30(1); 239-268; doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2013.11.001

New concepts in standing advanced diagnostic equine imaging.

Abstract: This article addresses the clinical application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) as applied to the standing equine patient. This discussion includes the logistics, advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of imaging a standing horse. In addition, a brief review is given of the physics of these modalities as applied in clinical practice, and the currently available hardware and software required by these techniques for image acquisition and artifact reduction. The appropriate selection of clinical cases for standing MRI and CT is reviewed, focusing on cases that are capable of undergoing standing surgeries following lesion diagnosis.
Publication Date: 2014-01-31 PubMed ID: 24680215DOI: 10.1016/j.cveq.2013.11.001Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article discusses the use of advanced imaging technologies such as MRI and CT scans for diagnosing ailments in standing horses. The article covers the benefits, drawbacks, and limitations of such procedures, as well as requisite equipment and software.

Logistics, Advantages, Disadvantages, and Limitations

  • The logistics of imaging a standing horse are complex, considering the size, weight and unpredictable behavior of the horse. It requires specialized scanning equipment which can accommodate the horse’s size.
  • The main advantage of using these imaging techniques on a standing horse are that the images provide a clearer view of the structures in their natural, weight-bearing state, which is not possible with a sedated horse lying down. This aids in the accurate diagnosis of structural abnormalities or injuries.
  • However, the disadvantages include difficulty in positioning the horse accurately for the scan, potential stress for the animal, the need for specially trained personnel and high costs of the procedure.
  • Limitations of this technique arise from the fact that only those parts of the horse that fit within the scan machine, such as the head and legs, can be imaged. Furthermore, there can be artifacts in the images due to motion.

Physics & Technology Involved

  • The physics behind MRI and CT imaging uses the concept of electromagnetic radiation and its interaction with the horse’s body tissues. The difference in tissue responses are then interpreted by the scanner to produce detailed images.
  • These processes require advanced technology, both in terms of hardware and software. The hardware includes the large-scale scanning machine, while the software is responsible for interpreting the data collected, reducing artifacts and producing clear and precise images.

Case Selection for Standing MRI and CT

  • The researchers also delve into the prudent selection of cases for this kind of diagnostic imaging. It’s essential to consider cases where standing surgeries might be required post diagnosis.
  • These are usually cases where the lesion is located in a place that would be difficult to reach or visualize properly when the horse is lying down. Thus, standing MRI and CT become essential diagnostic tools in such instances.

Cite This Article

APA
Porter EG, Werpy NM. (2014). New concepts in standing advanced diagnostic equine imaging. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract, 30(1), 239-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2013.11.001

Publication

ISSN: 1558-4224
NlmUniqueID: 8511904
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 30
Issue: 1
Pages: 239-268
PII: S0749-0739(13)00085-0

Researcher Affiliations

Porter, Erin G
  • Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, PO Box 100126, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. Electronic address: Gordone@ufl.edu.
Werpy, Natasha M
  • Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, PO Box 100126, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Diagnostic Imaging / methods
  • Diagnostic Imaging / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horses
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / veterinary
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / veterinary

Citations

This article has been cited 6 times.
  1. Thomas-Cancian A, Ségard-Weisse E, Drumond B, Cadoré JL. Diagnostic Imaging of Diseases Affecting the Guttural Pouch.. Vet Sci 2023 Aug 16;10(8).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci10080525pubmed: 37624312google scholar: lookup
  2. Stieger-Vanegas SM, Hanna AL. The Role of Computed Tomography in Imaging Non-neurologic Disorders of the Head in Equine Patients.. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:798216.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.798216pubmed: 35321060google scholar: lookup
  3. Evrard L, Joostens Z, Vandersmissen M, Audigié F, Busoni V. Comparison Between Ultrasonographic and Standing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in the Podotrochlear Apparatus of Horses With Foot Pain.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:675180.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.675180pubmed: 34291100google scholar: lookup
  4. Schmidt MJ, Knemeyer C, Heinsen H. Neuroanatomy of the equine brain as revealed by high-field (3Tesla) magnetic-resonance-imaging.. PLoS One 2019;14(4):e0213814.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213814pubmed: 30933986google scholar: lookup
  5. Lacombe VA. Seizures in horses: diagnosis and classification.. Vet Med (Auckl) 2015;6:301-308.
    doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S62078pubmed: 30101115google scholar: lookup
  6. Kaminsky J, Bienert-Zeit A, Hellige M, Rohn K, Ohnesorge B. Comparison of image quality and in vivo appearance of the normal equine nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses in computed tomography and high field (3.0 T) magnetic resonance imaging.. BMC Vet Res 2016 Jan 19;12:13.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0643-6pubmed: 26786270google scholar: lookup