Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2018; 242; 1-7; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.10.001

Objective pain assessment in horses (2014-2018).

Abstract: In recent decades, much effort has been invested in scientific studies of objective and reliable assessment of pain in horses. Various types of pain assessment tools have been described and (partly) validated for different types of pain in horses. Currently, composite pain scales and facial expression-based pain scales seem to be the most promising tools for pain assessment in horses and numerous studies have recently been published on the use of these pain scales in horses. Therefore, this narrative review mainly focusses on these two types of pain scales and on the studies that have appeared describing these type of pain scales in horses. The extent to which these pain scales have been validated (sensitivity, specificity, inter-observer reliability etc.) and their potential use for clinical pain states is discussed. Possible future directions for new studies and their possible aid in assessing pain in hospitalised and ridden horses are presented. In this way, improved pain scoring could improve criteria used to evaluate the clinical efficacy of new analgesic drugs and techniques, potentially benefiting equine welfare.
Publication Date: 2018-10-09 PubMed ID: 30503538DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.10.001Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article centers around the developments in pain assessment in horses from 2014 to 2018, primarily focusing on the use and effectiveness of composite pain scales and facial expression-based pain scales.

Overview of Pain Assessment in Horses

  • The field of equine pain assessment has witnessed a surge of scientific studies over recent years primarily focused on providing objective and reliable tools for gauging pain in horses.
  • Several pain assessment tools have been described and partially validated, each aiming to accurately measure different types of pain horses experience.

Emergence of Composite Pain Scales and Facial Expression-Based Pain Scales

  • This review primarily deals with two types of pain scales: composite pain scales and facial expression-based pain scales, both of which appear to be promising methods for assessing pain in horses.
  • A significant number of recent studies have centered around these types of pain scales, experimenting with their use in horses.

Validation and Clinical Potentials of these Pain Scales

  • Each scale’s validation is also discussed in the article, including sensitivity, specificity, inter-observer reliability, and other important parameters.
  • The potential for these pain scales to be used for various clinical pain conditions in horses is examined.

Future Application and Roles in Drug Efficacy

  • The study hints at potential new directions for further research, considering how these scales could aid in assessing pain in different environments such as on hospitalised horses or those being ridden.
  • An improved pain scoring system could benefit equine welfare by amending the criteria used to evaluate the potency of new analgesic drugs and methods.

The review poses a significant contribution to the field, tackling the complex challenge of effectively gauging pain in animals that cannot communicate their discomfort verbally. By fine-tuning these pain assessment tools, researchers aim to improve the horses’ welfare and expand the capacity for effective equine healthcare treatments.

Cite This Article

APA
van Loon JPAM, Van Dierendonck MC. (2018). Objective pain assessment in horses (2014-2018). Vet J, 242, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.10.001

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 242
Pages: 1-7

Researcher Affiliations

van Loon, J P A M
  • Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 114, NL-3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: j.p.a.m.vanloon@uu.nl.
Van Dierendonck, M C
  • Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 114, NL-3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands; Veterinary Faculty Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Veterinary Sciences Antwerp University, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Castration / veterinary
  • Colic / diagnosis
  • Colic / veterinary
  • Female
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horses
  • Male
  • Pain Measurement / veterinary
  • Pain, Postoperative / diagnosis
  • Pain, Postoperative / veterinary
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Visceral Pain / diagnosis
  • Visceral Pain / veterinary

Citations

This article has been cited 25 times.
  1. Calatayud-Bonilla M, Carmona JU, Prades M. Clinical Effectiveness of Dry Needling on Myofascial Trigger Points in Horses: A Prospective Algometric Controlled Study. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jul 27;15(15).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15152207pubmed: 40804997google scholar: lookup
  2. Resano-Zuazu M, Carmona JU, Argüelles D. Short-Term Impact of Dry Needling Treatment for Myofascial Pain on Equine Biomechanics Through Artificial Intelligence-Based Gait Analysis. Animals (Basel) 2025 May 22;15(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15111517pubmed: 40508982google scholar: lookup
  3. Franzen V, Reisbeck D, Leibl Y, Schoster A, May A. Pain Assessment of Horses With Trigeminal-Mediated Headshaking (TMHS) at Rest Between Episodes. J Vet Intern Med 2025 May-Jun;39(3):e70064.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.70064pubmed: 40168040google scholar: lookup
  4. Laves J, Wergin M, Bauer N, Müller SF, Failing K, Büttner K, Hagen A, Melzer M, Röcken M. The effect of Traumeel LT ad us. vet. on the perioperative inflammatory response after castration of stallions: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1342345.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1342345pubmed: 39415958google scholar: lookup
  5. Flores JEM, Terrazas A, Lara Sagahon AV, Aleman M. Parasympathetic tone activity, heart rate, and grimace scale in conscious horses of 3 breeds before, during, and after nociceptive mechanical stimulation. J Vet Intern Med 2024 Sep-Oct;38(5):2739-2747.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.17174pubmed: 39150630google scholar: lookup
  6. Wickstead FA, Milner PI, Bardell DA. Use of wound infusion catheters for delivery of local anesthetic following standing partial ostectomy of thoracolumbar vertebral spinous processes in horses is not associated with increased surgical site infections. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1436308.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1436308pubmed: 39036797google scholar: lookup
  7. Mascaró Triedo CE, Karar S, Abunemeh M, Portier K. Effect of nose twitching on the pupillary dilation in awake and anesthetized horses. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1412755.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1412755pubmed: 39036796google scholar: lookup
  8. Citarella G, Heitzmann V, Ranninger E, Bettschart-Wolfensberger R. Analgesic Efficacy of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Therapy in Horses with Abdominal Pain: A Systematic Review. Animals (Basel) 2023 Nov 8;13(22).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13223447pubmed: 38003065google scholar: lookup
  9. Reed RA, Krikorian AM, Reynolds RM, Holmes BT, Branning MM, Lemons MB, Barletta M, Quandt JE, Burns CC, Dantino SC, Sakai DM. Post-anesthetic CPS and EQUUS-FAP scores in surgical and non-surgical equine patients: an observational study. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2023;4:1217034.
    doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1217034pubmed: 37502312google scholar: lookup
  10. Maldonado MD, Parkinson SD, Story MR, Haussler KK. The Effect of Chiropractic Treatment on Limb Lameness and Concurrent Axial Skeleton Pain and Dysfunction in Horses. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 19;12(20).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12202845pubmed: 36290230google scholar: lookup
  11. Broomé S, Ask K, Rashid-Engström M, Haubro Andersen P, Kjellström H. Sharing pain: Using pain domain transfer for video recognition of low grade orthopedic pain in horses. PLoS One 2022;17(3):e0263854.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263854pubmed: 35245288google scholar: lookup
  12. Lanci A, Benedetti B, Freccero F, Castagnetti C, Mariella J, van Loon JPAM, Padalino B. Development of a Composite Pain Scale in Foals: A Pilot Study. Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 11;12(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12040439pubmed: 35203146google scholar: lookup
  13. Hernández-Avalos I, Mota-Rojas D, Mendoza-Flores JE, Casas-Alvarado A, Flores-Padilla K, Miranda-Cortes AE, Torres-Bernal F, Gómez-Prado J, Mora-Medina P. Nociceptive pain and anxiety in equines: Physiological and behavioral alterations. Vet World 2021 Nov;14(11):2984-2995.
  14. de Mira MC, Lamy E, Santos R, Williams J, Pinto MV, Martins PS, Rodrigues P, Marlin D. Salivary cortisol and eye temperature changes during endurance competitions. BMC Vet Res 2021 Oct 14;17(1):329.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02985-9pubmed: 34649565google scholar: lookup
  15. Menchetti L, Dalla Costa E, Minero M, Padalino B. Development and Validation of a Test for the Classification of Horses as Broken or Unbroken. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 4;11(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11082303pubmed: 34438758google scholar: lookup
  16. van Loon JPAM, Macri L. Objective Assessment of Chronic Pain in Horses Using the Horse Chronic Pain Scale (HCPS): A Scale-Construction Study. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 18;11(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061826pubmed: 34207290google scholar: lookup
  17. Torcivia C, McDonnell S. Equine Discomfort Ethogram. Animals (Basel) 2021 Feb 23;11(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11020580pubmed: 33672338google scholar: lookup
  18. Kil N, Ertelt K, Auer U. Development and Validation of an Automated Video Tracking Model for Stabled Horses. Animals (Basel) 2020 Nov 30;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10122258pubmed: 33266297google scholar: lookup
  19. Cohen S, Beths T. Grimace Scores: Tools to Support the Identification of Pain in Mammals Used in Research. Animals (Basel) 2020 Sep 23;10(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10101726pubmed: 32977561google scholar: lookup
  20. van Loon J, Verhaar N, van den Berg E, Ross S, de Grauw J. Objective Assessment of Acute Pain in Foals Using a Facial Expression-Based Pain Scale. Animals (Basel) 2020 Sep 10;10(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10091610pubmed: 32927590google scholar: lookup
  21. Orth EK, Navas González FJ, Iglesias Pastrana C, Berger JM, Jeune SSL, Davis EW, McLean AK. Development of a Donkey Grimace Scale to Recognize Pain in Donkeys (Equus asinus) Post Castration. Animals (Basel) 2020 Aug 13;10(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10081411pubmed: 32823676google scholar: lookup
  22. Rioja-Lang F, Bacon H, Connor M, Dwyer CM. Prioritisation of animal welfare issues in the UK using expert consensus. Vet Rec 2020 Dec 19;187(12):490.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.105964pubmed: 32631849google scholar: lookup
  23. van Dierendonck MC, Burden FA, Rickards K, van Loon JPAM. Monitoring Acute Pain in Donkeys with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Donkeys Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-DONKEY-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Donkey Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-DONKEY-FAP). Animals (Basel) 2020 Feb 22;10(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10020354pubmed: 32098391google scholar: lookup
  24. Torcivia C, McDonnell S. In-Person Caretaker Visits Disrupt Ongoing Discomfort Behavior in Hospitalized Equine Orthopedic Surgical Patients. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jan 27;10(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10020210pubmed: 32012670google scholar: lookup
  25. DuBois C, Nakonechny L, Derisoud E, Merkies K. Examining Canadian Equine Industry Participants' Perceptions of Horses and Their Welfare. Animals (Basel) 2018 Nov 7;8(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani8110201pubmed: 30405030google scholar: lookup