Analyze Diet
Veterinary parasitology2024; 331; 110272; doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2024.110272

Occurrence of fenbendazole resistance in Parascaris spp. on breeding farms in Sweden.

Abstract: Anthelmintic resistance is an increasing problem in many gastrointestinal parasites of grazing animals. Among these, the equine roundworm, Parascaris spp., has developed wide-spread resistance to macrocyclic lactones over the past decades. Additionally, there are recent observations of emerging treatment failure of both tetrahydropyrimidine and fenbendazole. Therefore, the aims of this study were to further investigate the occurrence of fenbendazole resistance on breeding farms and to explore potential management-related risk factors associated with resistance in Parascaris spp. in Sweden. Eleven farms with 92 foals positive for Parascaris spp. were included in a faecal egg count reduction test during the years 2021-2023. According to the clinical protocol of the guidelines of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology, fenbendazole resistance was present on four farms with efficacies varying from 45 % to 96 %. Having previously reported reduced efficacy on one of these farms, we can now confirm that fenbendazole resistance in Parascaris spp. has established. Farms with more than 40 yearly born foals had a significantly higher probability of having resistant Parascaris spp. Populations compared with smaller farms, (generalized linear model (GLM), t = 70.39, p < 0.001). In addition, there was a correlation between the number of foals on the farm and the frequency of yearly treatments showing that farms with < 20 foals were notably inclined to administer treatments twice during the first year (GLM, t=2.76, p < 0.05) in contrast to larger farms with > 40 foals that were using more frequent treatment intervals. In conclusion, this study confirms the establishment of fenbendazole resistance in Parascaris spp. populations on Swedish stud farms with the number of foals on the farm identified as a risk factor for development of anthelmintic resistance.
Publication Date: 2024-07-22 PubMed ID: 39106597DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2024.110272Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigated the presence of fenbendazole resistance in Parascaris spp. (equine roundworms) on horse breeding farms in Sweden.
  • The researchers also explored how farm management factors, especially the number of foals born annually, relate to the development of this drug resistance.

Background

  • Anthelmintic resistance refers to the reduced effectiveness of drugs designed to eliminate parasitic worms.
  • Parascaris spp. is a common gastrointestinal parasite in foals that has shown increasing resistance to widely-used drugs like macrocyclic lactones over recent decades.
  • Recent reports indicate possible treatment failures with other drug classes such as tetrahydropyrimidines and fenbendazole, raising concerns about emerging resistance.

Study Objectives

  • To confirm the presence and extent of fenbendazole resistance in Parascaris spp. on Swedish breeding farms.
  • To investigate management-related risk factors associated with resistance, focusing on farm size and treatment practices.

Methodology

  • The study was conducted over a span of three years (2021-2023) and included:
    • Eleven horse breeding farms in Sweden.
    • 92 foals testing positive for Parascaris spp.
  • A faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) was used to evaluate the efficacy of fenbendazole treatment following guidelines from the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP).
  • Fenbendazole efficacy was measured by the reduction in parasitic egg counts in feces before and after treatment.

Key Findings

  • Fenbendazole resistance was confirmed on four of the eleven farms, with drug efficacy ranging widely from 45% up to 96%:
    • Efficacy below 90-95% is generally considered indicative of resistance in such tests.
  • One farm previously reported with reduced fenbendazole efficacy was confirmed to have established resistance, indicating persistence and potential spread of resistant worm populations.
  • The largest farms, those with more than 40 foals born annually, had a significantly higher likelihood of harboring fenbendazole-resistant Parascaris spp., based on a generalized linear model (GLM) with strong statistical significance (t = 70.39, p < 0.001).
  • There was a noted correlation between the number of foals on the farm and the frequency of parasite treatments given yearly:
    • Smaller farms (fewer than 20 foals) tended to treat foals twice during their first year of life.
    • Larger farms (more than 40 foals) were more likely to administer treatments at more frequent intervals.
  • This treatment frequency difference may influence selection pressure for resistance development.

Conclusions and Implications

  • Fenbendazole resistance in Parascaris spp. is now established on some Swedish breeding farms.
  • The size of the farm (measured by number of foals born per year) is a significant risk factor for the development and presence of anthelmintic resistance.
  • More frequent treatments on larger farms might contribute to increased selection pressure favoring resistant worm populations.
  • The study highlights the urgent need for targeted parasite control strategies that consider farm size and treatment frequency to reduce the emergence and spread of resistance.
  • It supports the importance of regular monitoring of drug efficacy using standardized tests like FECRT to inform sustainable parasite management on horse breeding farms.

Cite This Article

APA
Martin F, Halvarsson P, Alm YH, Tydén E. (2024). Occurrence of fenbendazole resistance in Parascaris spp. on breeding farms in Sweden. Vet Parasitol, 331, 110272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2024.110272

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2550
NlmUniqueID: 7602745
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 331
Pages: 110272
PII: S0304-4017(24)00161-4

Researcher Affiliations

Martin, Frida
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Biosciences, Section for Parasitology, Box 7036, Uppsala 750 07, Sweden.
Halvarsson, Peter
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Biosciences, Section for Parasitology, Box 7036, Uppsala 750 07, Sweden.
Alm, Ylva Hedberg
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Biosciences, Section for Parasitology, Box 7036, Uppsala 750 07, Sweden.
Tydén, Eva
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Biosciences, Section for Parasitology, Box 7036, Uppsala 750 07, Sweden. Electronic address: eva.Tyden@slu.se.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Fenbendazole / therapeutic use
  • Fenbendazole / pharmacology
  • Horses
  • Sweden / epidemiology
  • Drug Resistance
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Horse Diseases / parasitology
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Ascaridoidea / drug effects
  • Ascaridida Infections / veterinary
  • Ascaridida Infections / drug therapy
  • Ascaridida Infections / epidemiology
  • Ascaridida Infections / parasitology
  • Anthelmintics / pharmacology
  • Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
  • Farms
  • Parasite Egg Count / veterinary
  • Feces / parasitology
  • Breeding
  • Female

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Frida Martin reports financial support, article publishing charges, and statistical analysis were provided by Swedish-Norwegian Foundation for Equine Research. Eva Tyden reports financial support, article publishing charges, and statistical analysis were provided by Swedish-Norwegian Foundation for Equine Research. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Nielsen MK, Pyatt A, Perrett J, Tydén E, van Doorn D, Pihl TH, Schmidt JS, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Beasley A, Abbas G, Jabbar A. Global equine parasite control guidelines: Consensus or confusion?. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2025 Aug;28:100600.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2025.100600pubmed: 40472642google scholar: lookup
  2. Rodriguez Velazquez D, Forte L, Varela Guerrero JA, Díaz Alvarado T, Elghandour MMMY, Maggiolino A, De Palo P, Salem AZM. Could Mesquite (Prosopis juliflora) Help Control Gastrointestinal Parasites in Horses?. Animals (Basel) 2025 Apr 28;15(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15091245pubmed: 40362060google scholar: lookup