Analyze Diet
Acta veterinaria Scandinavica1991; 32(3); 307-312; doi: 10.1186/BF03546959

Onset of luteal activity in foaling and seasonally anoestrous mares treated with artificial light.

Abstract: Sixty-four mares (27 foaling, 37 barren or maiden), mainly Finnhorses, were subjected to treatment with 14.5 h of light and 9.5 h of darkness, starting at the beginning of December. The onset of cycling in non-foaling mares was estimated by weekly serum progesterone determinations. All of the non-foaling mares cycled in the middle of March. They started to cycle on average in the middle of February, 11.1 weeks after the beginning of the trial. There were statistically significant differences in relation to breed (Finnhorses started to cycle 2 weeks later than warm blooded, p less than 0.02) and in relation to age (brood mares with mean age 10 years, started to cycle 10 days later than those 3 years old, p less than 0.03). However, there was no statistical significant relation to previous lactation, although lactating mares lactating up to the previous autumn started to cycle 7 days later than dry mares (p less than 0.15). Artificial insemination of 14 mares in the 2nd oestrus of the year, in March, resulted in 12 foalings in the subsequent year (86%). The following winter, all pregnant mares (N = 27) were exposed to the same kind of light treatment, starting on 1st December. The 1st mare foaled at the end of January. The time from foaling to 1st post partum ovulation was significantly longer (17.0 days) in foalings taking place within 10 weeks from the beginning of the light treatment period, than in foalings occurring after more than 10 weeks of lighting (12.1 days) (p less than 0.01). Sextiofyra ston (huvudsakligen finnhästar) av vilka 27 var fölston och 37 subfertila eller virginella ston, utsattes dagligen för 14,5 timmars artificiellt ljus åtföljt av 9,5 timmars mörker – behandlingen inleddes i början av december. Initieringen av brunstcykeln hos de icke-fölande stona fastställdes med hjälp av progesteronhalten i blodprover tagna en gång per vecka. I mitten av mars var alla icke-fölande ston igång med sin brunstcykel; igångsättningen skedde i genomsnitt i mitten av februari, dvs. 11.1 veckor efter det att studien påbörjades. Följande signifikanta skillnader påvisades: 1) ras: finnhästarna visade brunst 2 veckor senare än varmblodiga ston (p < 0.02); 2 ålder: ston som fölat (genomsnittsålder 10 år) inledde ovulationscykeln 10 dygn senare än treåriga ston (p < 0.03). Ingen signifikans påvisades däremot i relation till tidigare laktation, utom hos ston som hade lakterat under foregående höst. Dessa ston inledde brunstcykeln 7 dygn senare än de övriga stona (p < 0.15). Artificiell insemination av 14 ston under deras andra brunst för året (i mars) resulterade i 12 fölningar (86 %) under det följande året. Följande vinter utsattes dräktiga ston (N = 27) för samma ljusbehandling med början 1 december. Det första stoet fölade i slutet av januari. Intervallet melian fölning och den första Ovulationen var signifikant längre (17.0 dygn) hos de ston som fölat inom 10 veckor efter påbörjad ljusbehandling jämfört med ston som fölat senare an 10 veckor efter inledd ljusbehandling (17.0 vs. 12.1 dygn, p < 0.01).
Publication Date: 1991-01-01 PubMed ID: 1814179PubMed Central: PMC8127909DOI: 10.1186/BF03546959Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates how long hours of artificial light exposure can influence the onset of reproductive cycles and subsequent artificial insemination outcomes in horses, with specific differences seen based on breed, age, and lactation history.

Research Design and Participants

  • The study involved 64 mares, primarily Finnhorses, 27 of which had foaled before and 37 that were barren or maiden horses.
  • These horses were treated with 14.5 hours of artificial light and 9.5 hours of darkness, starting at the beginning of December.

Assessing the Onset of Reproductive Cycles

  • The researchers measured the onset of the reproductive cycles in the non-foaling mares by conducting weekly serum progesterone determinations.
  • It was found that all of these mares started their cycle around the middle of March, approximately 11.1 weeks after the trial began.

Significant Influencing Factors

  • Differences were also seen relating to breed. Finnhorses started to cycle about two weeks later than warm-blooded horses, showing a significant variation (p less than 0.02).
  • Age of the mares played a significant role too. Mares with an average age of 10 years began their cycle about ten days later than those aged 3 years (P less than 0.03).
  • Although lactation history did not show a statistically significant impact, mares that had been lactating until the previous autumn began their cycle around seven days later than dry mares (P less than 0.15).

Artificial Insemination and Consequent Results

  • Fourteen mares were artificially inseminated during the second oestrus cycle of the year (in March), leading to the birth of 12 foals the following year, a success rate of 86%.
  • The next winter, all pregnant mares were exposed to the same light treatment from December 1. The first mare gave birth at the end of January.

Postpartum Ovulation

  • The timeframe between giving birth and the first postpartum ovulation was significantly longer (17.0 days) in mares that gave birth within 10 weeks from the beginning of the light treatment period compared to mares that gave birth after more than 10 weeks of light treatment (12.1 days) (P less than 0.01).

Cite This Article

APA
Koskinen E, Kurki E, Katila T. (1991). Onset of luteal activity in foaling and seasonally anoestrous mares treated with artificial light. Acta Vet Scand, 32(3), 307-312. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03546959

Publication

ISSN: 0044-605X
NlmUniqueID: 0370400
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 32
Issue: 3
Pages: 307-312

Researcher Affiliations

Koskinen, E
  • Agricultural Research Centre, Equine Research Station, Ypäjä, Finland.
Kurki, E
    Katila, T

      MeSH Terms

      • Anestrus / radiation effects
      • Animals
      • Corpus Luteum / physiology
      • Female
      • Horses / physiology
      • Light
      • Ovulation / radiation effects
      • Pregnancy
      • Pregnancy, Animal / radiation effects
      • Seasons

      References

      This article includes 19 references
      1. Allen WR. Practical control of anestrus in thoroughbred broodmares. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhof Publishers; 1985. pp. 98–107.
      2. Burkhardt J. Transition from anoestrus in the mare and the effects of artificial lighting. J. Agr. Sci. 1947;37:64–68.
        doi: 10.1017/S0021859600013083google scholar: lookup
      3. Cooper WL, Wert NE. Wintertime breeding of mares using artificial light and insemination: six years’ experience. Proc. 21st Amer. Ass. Equine Pract. 1975, pp 245–253.
      4. Freedman LJ, Garcia MC, Ginther OJ. Influence of photoperiod and ovaries on seasonal reproductive activity in mares. Biol. Reprod. 1979;20:567–574.
        doi: 10.1095/biolreprod20.3.567pubmed: 572238google scholar: lookup
      5. Kenney RM, Ganjam VK, Bergman R V. Non-infectious breeding problems in mares. Veterinary Scope 1975;19:16–24.
      6. Koskinen E. Post-partum ovarian activity in Finn-horse mares with special reference to seasonal effects. Acta vet. scand. 1991;32:000–000.
        pmc: PMC8127901pubmed: 1814180
      7. Koskinen E, Katila T. Onset of luteal activity in non-foaling mares during the early breeding season in Finland. Acta vet. scand. 1991;32:319–325.
        pmc: PMC8127913pubmed: 1814181
      8. Kooistra LH, Ginther OJ. Effect of photoperiod on reproductive activity and hair in mares. Amer J. vet. Res. 1975;36:1413–1419.
        pubmed: 1238038
      9. Loy RG. Effects of artificial lighting regimens on reproductive patterns in mares. Proc. 14th Amer. Ass. Equine Pract. 1968, pp 159–169.
      10. Loy RG. Characteristics of postpartum reproduction in mares. Vet. Clin. N. Amer. Large Anim. Pract. 1980;2:345–359.
        doi: 10.1016/S0196-9846(17)30167-2pubmed: 7233773google scholar: lookup
      11. Nishikawa Y. Studies on Reproduction in Horses. Japan Racing Association, Tokyo, Japan, 1959, pp 43–48.
      12. Oxender WD, Noden PA, Hafs HD. Estrus, ovulation, and serum progesterone, estradiol, and LH concentrations in mares after an increased photoperiod during winter. Amer. J. vet. Res. 1977;38:203–207.
        pubmed: 557304
      13. Palmer E. Reproductive management of mares without detection of oestrus. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1979, Suppl. 27, 263–270.
        pubmed: 289799
      14. Palmer E, Driancourt MA, Ortavant R. Photoperiodic stimulation of the mare during winter anestrus. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1982, Suppl. 32, 275–282.
        pubmed: 6820061
      15. Palmer E, Driancourt MA. Some interactions of season of foaling, photoperiod and ovarian activity in the equine. Livestock Prod. Sci. 1983;10:197–210.
      16. Scraba ST, Ginther OJ. Effects of lighting programs on onset of the ovulatory season in mares. Theriogenology 1985;24:667–679.
      17. Sharp DC, Ginther OJ. Effects of light and temperature in anestrous mares. J. Anim. Sci. 1973;36:250–251.
        pubmed: 1238385
      18. Sharp DC, Ginther OJ. Stimulation of follicular activity and estrous behavior in anestrous mares with light and temperature. J. Anim. Sci. 1975;41:1368–1372.
        doi: 10.2527/jas1975.4151368xpubmed: 1238385google scholar: lookup
      19. Sharp DC. Transition into the breeding season: clues to the mechanisms of seasonality. Equine vet. J. 1988;20:159–161.