Abstract: To recommend (1) the adoption of optimal terminology for referring to services in the United States that incorporate horses and other equines to benefit people, and (2) the discontinuation of especially problematic terminology. A diverse multidisciplinary consortium of individuals, including representatives of relevant national organizations, participated in an inclusive, systematic, and comprehensive 2-year consensus-building process. Twelve specific types of services were identified that relate to one of three broad areas of professional work: therapy, learning, or horsemanship. Related to the area of therapy, five distinct types of therapies were identified: counseling, occupational therapy, physical therapy, psychotherapy, and speech-language pathology. Therapy-first language is recommended that foregrounds the exact therapy (e.g., ) and adds precise equine-related descriptors as warranted (e.g., ). Related to the area of learning, three distinct types of nontherapy services were identified. The recommended terminology for referring to these services is , , and . Related to the area of horsemanship, four distinct types of nontherapy services were identified. The recommended terminology for referring to these services is or , , and . The plural term, , is recommended as a concise shorthand for easily referencing multiple services that differ from each other, yet share the horse as a common thread. Terms recommended for discontinuation include and . The consensus-building process culminated in extensive but not unanimous endorsements of all terminology recommendations. Terminology recommended for adoption clearly describes and distinguishes 12 distinct types of services. Terminology recommended for discontinuation was found to be ambiguous, misleading, no longer useful, or to have adversely affected stakeholders. It is hoped that all recommendations will prove useful and serve to enhance the professionalism and viability of specific identified services. It is also hoped that improved precision and clarity in terminology for naming specific services will advance their future scientific development and reliable measurement of effectiveness. Not all terminology-related challenges were resolved, however, and new challenges will likely arise as services continue to evolve and diversify. Significant impacts, if any, of the terminology recommendations herein merit ongoing monitoring and the question of optimal terminology merits revisiting in the foreseeable future.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research paper focuses on refining terminology related to using horses for therapeutic, learning, and horsemanship services in the United States, and suggests discontinuing the use of certain ambiguous or misleading terms.
Consortium and Consensus Process
A multidisciplinary consortium comprising individuals from various national organizations underwent a systematic and comprehensive process over two years to derive consensus on optimal terminology for services involving horse for therapeutic benefits.
Classification of Services
The consensus process identified twelve specific types of services, divided into three categories: therapy, learning, and horsemanship.
Under therapy, five distinct types of therapies were recognized: counseling, occupational therapy, physical therapy, psychotherapy, and speech-language pathology.
Under learning, three nontherapy services were categorized.
Under horsemanship, four nontherapy services were grouped.
Terminology Recommendations
The research recommends “therapy-first” language, which highlights the exact therapy and provides specific equine-related descriptions where needed.
For learning and horsemanship services, the research paper provides specific terminologies recommended for each service.
A plural term is suggested as a concise way of referencing multiple services that differ in procedure but have a common usage of horses.
Terminology Discontinuation
Some terminologies were suggested for discontinuation due to their ambiguous, misleading nature, loss of utility, or negative impact on stakeholders.
Outcomes and Future Implications
The recommended terminologies clearly distinguish the 12 service types, positively contributing to the professionalism and viability of these services.
The precision and clarity of the terminologies are expected to aid future scientific developments and reliable effectiveness measurement.
While not all challenges related to terminology were resolved, the paper acknowledges that new challenges may emerge as the services evolve and diversify. The impact of the recommended terminologies will require continued monitoring, and the terminology question will need revisiting in the future.
Cite This Article
APA
Wood W, Alm K, Benjamin J, Thomas L, Anderson D, Pohl L, Kane M.
(2020).
Optimal Terminology for Services in the United States That Incorporate Horses to Benefit People: A Consensus Document.
J Altern Complement Med, 27(1), 88-95.
https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0415
Howell TJ, Nieforth L, Thomas-Pino C, Samet L, Agbonika S, Cuevas-Pavincich F, Fry NE, Hill K, Jegatheesan B, Kakinuma M, MacNamara M, Mattila-Rautiainen S, Perry A, Tardif-Williams CY, Walsh EA, Winkle M, Yamamoto M, Yerbury R, Rawat V, Alm K, Avci A, Bailey T, Baker H, Benton P, Binney C, Boyle S, Brandes H, Carr AM, Coombe W, Coulter K, Darby A, Davies L, Delisle E, Enders-Slegers MJ, Fournier A, Fox M, Gee N, Graham TM, Hamilton-Bruce A, Hansen TGB, Hart L, Heirs M, Hooper J, Howe R, Johnson E, Jones M, Karagiannis C, Kieson E, Kim SA, Kivlen C, Lanning B, Lewis H, Linder D, Mai DL, Mariti C, Mead R, Ferreira GM, Ngai D, O'Keeffe S, O'Connor G, Olsen C, Ormerod E, Power ER, Pritchard PA, Rodriguez K, Rook D, Ruby MB, Schofield L, Signal T, Steel J, Stone W, Symonds M, Rooy DV, Warda T, Wilson M, Young J, Bennett P. Defining Terms Used for Animals Working in Support Roles for People with Support Needs. Animals (Basel) 2022 Aug 4;12(15).
Marchand WR, Andersen SJ, Smith JE, Hoopes KH, Carlson JK. Equine-Assisted Activities and Therapies for Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Current State, Challenges and Future Directions. Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks) 2021 Jan-Dec;5:2470547021991556.
Barron DC, Craft MP, Florek ER, Stanley BN, Stoner AM, Paschall NA, Newman S, Tumlin KI. Effects of therapeutic horsemanship on caregiver stress scores of children with autism. Front Psychiatry 2025;16:1574448.
Hediger K, Lunzenfichter M, Markzoll E, Arnskötter W, Schaudek M, Kluger G. Psychological aspects of hippotherapy for children with severe neurological impairment: An exploratory study. PLoS One 2025;20(4):e0320238.
Matlock SK, Singh A, Grandin T, Merritt T, Nett T, Reega SJ, Peters BC. Behavioral and physiological indicators of stress in horses during an equine-assisted learning program for youth with a history of trauma. Transl Anim Sci 2025;9:txaf027.
Berg EL, Gooch M, Feldmann LM, Knight B, Verlaine J, Bach-Gorman A. An Equine-Assisted Intervention Versus Non-Manualized Psychotherapy for Youth in a Residential Childcare Facility. J Child Adolesc Trauma 2025 Mar;18(1):139-149.
Aewerdieck LM, Martin RA, Graham FP, Hay-Smith J. Exploring In-Session Engagement in Equine-Assisted Services for Children and Youth Experiencing Disability: A Scoping Review. J Integr Complement Med 2024 Dec;30(12):1147-1161.
Nieforth LO, Leighton SC, Miller EA, O'Haire ME. Survey of international academic centers and institutes focused on human-animal bond: Scope and landscape in 2021. Hum Anim Interact 2022 Dec;2022.
Carlsson IM, Bräutigam Ewe M, Nymberg P, Jormfeldt H. Building up bit by bit, parent's experiences of equine-assisted intervention among children and adolescents with mental illness: a grounded theory study. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2024 Dec;19(1):2354945.
Sebalj M, Lakhani A, Grindrod A, Stuckey R. Equine-assisted services for people living with dementia: a systematic review. Alzheimers Res Ther 2024 Apr 9;16(1):76.
Helmer A, Delore E, Bart O. Equine Assisted Occupational Therapy for Children with Adhd (Astride): Protocol Development and Preliminary Study. Clin Neuropsychiatry 2024 Feb;21(1):88-98.
Hanson MR, Alm K, Fields B, Gabriels R, Schmid AA, Stallones L, Peters BC. The potential usefulness of standardized assessments to measure participant outcomes of adaptive/therapeutic horseback riding: a survey study. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1303991.