Abstract: Keratomas are diseases of the equine hoof that can be associated with intermittent lameness and/or recurrent foot abscesses. Different surgical techniques for keratoma removal have been described. The aim of this retrospective study was to report the short- and long-term postoperative complications after keratoma removal using different surgical techniques: complete hoof wall resection (CR), partial hoof wall resection (PR) and a modified version of PR (MPR). The medical records of horses diagnosed with keratoma and space occupying lesion (SOL) of the hoof wall (2004-2025) at a Veterinary Teaching Hospital were reviewed. Fifty-five cases underwent surgery (18 CR, 35 MPR and 2 PR). Partial hoof wall resection cases were excluded from statistical analysis due to a very limited number. On the short term, 9/35 (25.7%) of MPR cases developed complications. Modified partial hoof wall resection showed significantly less complications (especially exuberant granulation tissue and hoof wall instability) than CR. Other short-term complications across surgical procedures included laminitis, infection, fracture, and colic. Long term follow-up (6-180 months) was available for 15 CR, 2 PR and 22 MPR cases. Modified partial hoof wall resection group showed significantly less hoof cracks than the CR group. Keratoma recurrence occurred in 3/15 cases in CR, 1/2 in PR, and only 1/22 in MPR groups. Return to activity was achieved in around 70% of CR and MPR cases. Mean time to return was significantly shorter in the MPR (6.5 months) than in the CR group and was in line with durations generally described in the literature for PR. In conclusion, MPR can be an effective alternative to traditional surgical approaches for keratoma removal.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This study investigated the outcomes of different surgical methods used to remove keratomas, a hoof condition in horses, focusing on complications and recovery times.
A particular modified partial hoof wall resection technique was found to result in fewer complications and faster return to activity compared to complete hoof wall resection.
Follow-up data ranging from 6 to 180 months post-surgery were available for:
15 horses in CR group
2 horses in PR group
22 horses in MPR group
The MPR group had significantly fewer hoof cracks compared to the CR group, indicating improved hoof integrity.
Keratoma recurrence rates were:
3 out of 15 in CR group
1 out of 2 in PR group
1 out of 22 in MPR group
Approximately 70% of horses in both CR and MPR groups returned to their previous level of activity.
The mean time to return to activity was shorter in the MPR group at 6.5 months, which aligns with durations reported in literature for PR cases, and significantly less than CR.
Conclusions
The modified partial hoof wall resection (MPR) technique showed promising results as an effective alternative to the traditional complete hoof wall resection.
MPR led to fewer short-term complications related to healing and hoof stability.
Long-term outcomes favored MPR with fewer hoof cracks and lower keratoma recurrence rates.
The shorter recovery time with MPR suggests it can enhance post-surgical rehabilitation and faster return to normal function.
This study supports considering MPR as a viable surgical option for equine keratoma management while highlighting the importance of careful postoperative monitoring for complications.
Cite This Article
APA
Caballero Delgado G, Grulke S, Evrard L, Sandersen C, de la Rebière de Pouyade G, Salciccia A.
(2026).
Outcome of keratoma removal using different surgical techniques, including a modified partial hoof wall resection: A retrospective study (2004-2025).
Res Vet Sci, 210, 106308.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2026.106308
Clinical Department of Equids, Surgery and Orthopaedics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; FARAH Comparative Veterinary Medicine, Liège University, Liège, Belgium. Electronic address: g.caballero@uliege.be.
Grulke, Sigrid
Clinical Department of Equids, Surgery and Orthopaedics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; FARAH Comparative Veterinary Medicine, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Evrard, Laurence
Clinical Department of Equids, Diagnostic Imaging, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; FARAH Comparative Veterinary Medicine, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Sandersen, Charlotte
Clinical Department of Equids, Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; FARAH Comparative Veterinary Medicine, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
de la Rebière de Pouyade, Geoffroy
Clinical Department of Equids, Surgery and Orthopaedics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; FARAH Comparative Veterinary Medicine, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Salciccia, Alexandra
Clinical Department of Equids, Surgery and Orthopaedics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; FARAH Comparative Veterinary Medicine, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests.