FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Equine veterinary journal2010; 42(3); 219-226; doi: 10.2746/042516409X478532

Pack wounds of donkeys and mules in the Northern High Atlas and lowlands of Morocco.

Abstract: Wounds are one of the primary welfare concerns of working equids and are often related to harness or load-bearing packs. Objective: To identify and quantify factors associated with the presence of pack wounds in donkeys and mules working in the wood trade in the Midelt (Northern High Atlas) region of Morocco, and to compare wounds of these donkeys and mules to those working in other trades. Methods: The study population comprised equids working in the Midelt region involved in the wood trade. Comparison populations were comprised of equids working in other trades, in the same region and in Khemmiset region (lowlands of Central Morocco). Wounds were numbered and scored according to their severity. Questionnaires were used to gather data from owners, and objective data regarding the animal, berdaa (back-pack) and load were collected. Data were analysed using multilevel uniand multivariable regression models to allow for clustering of wound sites within an equid. Results: Analysis showed an overall pack wound prevalence of 54% (n=80/147). The most common site was the withers. Equids working in the wood trade were at increased risk of suffering pack wounds. Equids in the lowland study population were at increased risk of developing pack wounds, and donkeys were at increased risk of suffering pack wounds compared to mules both overall and within the wood trade. Other factors affecting the prevalence of wounds included the cleanliness of the berdaa and the frequency and distances of work imposed on the equid. Conclusions: Pack wounds in donkeys and mules are common in the 2 study regions of Morocco and appear to be associated with work factors including the trade the equids work in, the frequency and distances of work imposed and cleanliness of the pack. Donkeys are more susceptible than mules to developing pack wounds. Conclusions: These results allow recommendations to be made to owners of equids that may decrease the prevalence of wounds and, therefore, improve welfare and working capability of these equids. Research is required to identify reasons for regional difference in prevalence of pack wounds in equids not working in the wood trade.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2010-05-22 PubMed ID: 20486978DOI: 10.2746/042516409X478532Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research focuses on analyzing factors and conditions linked to the appearance and severity of pack wounds in working donkeys and mules involved in the wood trade within the Midelt region of Morocco’s Northern High Atlas. It found a pack wound prevalence of 54% and identified work-related factors including the animal’s trade work, frequency and intense workloads, and maintenance of the pack as responsible for the occurrence and severity of pack wounds. The study also concluded that donkeys are more prone to developing pack wounds than mules.

Objective and Methodology

  • The study aimed to identify and quantify the elements contributing to the incidence of pack wounds in working donkeys and mules engaged in the timber industry in the Midelt region of Morocco
  • The research involved gathering data from owners through questionnaires and discovering objective statistics about the animal, their load, and their “berdaa” or back-pack
  • The wounds were individually counted and scored based on their severity, and an analysis was conducted using multilevel univariable and multivariable regression models

Result and Findings

  • An overall pack wound prevalence of 54% was observed from the 147 equids examined in the study
  • Equids involved in the wood trade were more likely to be afflicted by pack wounds, and those located in the Khemmiset region’s lowland areas were also at a higher risk
  • The frequency and distance of the work, along with the cleanliness of the berdaa, were other factors implicated
  • Among the equids, donkeys were at a higher overall risk than mules, both within the wood trade and generally

Conclusion and Recommendations

  • From the study, it was concluded that pack wounds are common in both the studied regions of Morocco and are largely associated with the work environments and conditions such as the nature of trade work, frequency and intensity of labor, and cleanliness of the pack
  • The study’s findings offer valuable insights and recommendations to owners of equids for potentially reducing the prevalence of wounds, thus enhancing welfare and work productivity of these animals
  • Additional research is suggested to understand the regional differences in the prevalence of pack wounds among equids not involved in the wood trade

Cite This Article

APA
Sells PD, Pinchbeck G, Mezzane H, Ibourki J, Crane M. (2010). Pack wounds of donkeys and mules in the Northern High Atlas and lowlands of Morocco. Equine Vet J, 42(3), 219-226. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516409X478532

Publication

Equine veterinary journal
ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 42
Issue: 3
Pages: 219-226

Researcher Affiliations

Sells, P D
  • Rossdales Equine Hospital, Cotton End Road, Exning, Newmarket, Suffolk CB8 7NN, UK.
Pinchbeck, G
    Mezzane, H
      Ibourki, J
        Crane, M

          MeSH Terms

          • Animal Welfare
          • Animals
          • Equidae
          • Morocco
          • Work
          • Wounds and Injuries / pathology
          • Wounds and Injuries / veterinary

          Citations

          This article has been cited 13 times.
          1. Kithuka JM, Wachira TM, Ngetich W, Onono JO. Characterising donkey welfare challenges and opportunities associated with human activities and environmental factors in seven Kenyan counties. Anim Welf 2026;35:e5.
            doi: 10.1017/awf.2025.10057pubmed: 41567521google scholar: lookup
          2. Tadich T, Calderón-Amor J, González I, Palma B, Lagos J. Working like a mule? The physiological toll of heavy loads on mules. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1725279.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1725279pubmed: 41409470google scholar: lookup
          3. Merridale-Punter MS, Wiethoelter AK, El-Hage CM, Patrick C, Hitchens PL. Common clinical findings identified in working equids in low- and middle-income countries from 2005 to 2021. PLoS One 2024;19(6):e0304755.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304755pubmed: 38837970google scholar: lookup
          4. Merridale-Punter MS, Elias B, Wodajo AL, El-Hage CM, Zewdu H, Tesfaye R, Hailegebreal G, Sori T, Wiethoelter AK, Hitchens PL. Putting the cart before the horse: mixed-methods participatory investigation of working equid harnessing practices in three selected towns of the Oromia national regional state in Ethiopia. BMC Vet Res 2024 Mar 22;20(1):113.
            doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-03967-3pubmed: 38519893google scholar: lookup
          5. Yalew A, Darge D, Melake BM. Assessment of community-based intervention approaches to improve the health and welfare of working donkeys in selected areas of Sidama region, Southern Ethiopia. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1253448.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1253448pubmed: 38317786google scholar: lookup
          6. Bukhari SSUH, Rosanowski SM, McElligott AG, Parkes RSV. Welfare Concerns for Mounted Load Carrying by Working Donkeys in Pakistan. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:886020.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.886020pubmed: 35692297google scholar: lookup
          7. Farhat SF, McLean AK, Mahmoud HFF. Welfare Assessment and Identification of the Associated Risk Factors Compromising the Welfare of Working Donkeys (Equus asinus) in Egyptian Brick Kilns. Animals (Basel) 2020 Sep 9;10(9).
            doi: 10.3390/ani10091611pubmed: 32917031google scholar: lookup
          8. Fröhlich N, Sells PD, Sommerville R, Bolwell CF, Cantley C, Martin JE, Gordon SJG, Coombs T. Welfare Assessment and Husbandry Practices of Working Horses in Fiji. Animals (Basel) 2020 Feb 28;10(3).
            doi: 10.3390/ani10030392pubmed: 32121106google scholar: lookup
          9. Pinsky TC, Puja IK, Aleri J, Hood J, Sasadara MM, Collins T. A Pilot Welfare Assessment of Working Ponies on Gili Trawangan, Indonesia. Animals (Basel) 2019 Jul 9;9(7).
            doi: 10.3390/ani9070433pubmed: 31323983google scholar: lookup
          10. Stringer AP, Christley RM, Bell CE, Gebreab F, Tefera G, Reed K, Trawford A, Pinchbeck GL. Owner reported diseases of working equids in central Ethiopia. Equine Vet J 2017 Jul;49(4):501-506.
            doi: 10.1111/evj.12633pubmed: 27565130google scholar: lookup
          11. Magda S, Spohn O, Angkawanish T, Smith DA, Pearl DL. Risk factors for saddle-related skin lesions on elephants used in the tourism industry in Thailand. BMC Vet Res 2015 May 19;11:117.
            doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0438-1pubmed: 25986240google scholar: lookup
          12. Sánchez-Casanova RE, Masri-Daba M, Alonso-Díaz MÁ, Méndez-Bernal A, Hernández-Gil M, Fernando-Martínez JA. Prevalence of cutaneous pathological conditions and factors associated with the presence of skin wounds in working equids in tropical regions of Veracruz, Mexico. Trop Anim Health Prod 2014 Mar;46(3):555-61.
            doi: 10.1007/s11250-013-0529-6pubmed: 24488621google scholar: lookup
          13. Stringer AP, Bell CE, Christley RM, Gebreab F, Tefera G, Reed K, Trawford A, Pinchbeck GL. A cluster-randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of different knowledge-transfer interventions for rural working equid users in Ethiopia. Prev Vet Med 2011 Jun 15;100(2):90-9.
            doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.02.001pubmed: 21420748google scholar: lookup
          Subscribe to our newsletter
          Join 99,780 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.