Analyze Diet
Australian veterinary journal2026; doi: 10.1111/avj.70064

Parasite management practices used by owners of Australian Pony Club horses and the factors influencing their decision-making processes.

Abstract: There is a lack of information on horse parasite management practices currently used by individual horse owners in Australia. A voluntary, anonymous online survey was developed for and distributed by Pony Club Australia to its members seeking information on horse population; housing; paddock, manure and parasite management; and owner attitudes. From a total of 98 completed responses, 95/98 of participants indicated their horses spent time in paddocks, 91/98 administered anthelmintics, 42/98 guessed their horse's body weight for dosing, 78/98 recalled the dewormer brand or active ingredient last administered, macrocyclic lactones represented the most common dewormer class used (75/78) and veterinarians and scientific papers were rated highly as trusted sources of information (83/97 and 80/97 respectively). Barriers to managing parasites included time and cost, peer practices, environmental challenges and inconsistent information regarding parasite control. Owners navigated through these supported by a sense of agency to improve their knowledge and seek expert advice, as well as creating healthy environments for their horses coupled with good pasture management. This study highlights some risky practices for anthelmintic use and opportunities for increased veterinary engagement and owner education to adopt a more holistic approach to horse parasite management.
Publication Date: 2026-02-19 PubMed ID: 41711349DOI: 10.1111/avj.70064Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Research Overview

  • This study investigated parasite management practices among Australian Pony Club horse owners and explored the factors that influence their decision-making processes.

Study Purpose and Context

  • There is limited information about how individual horse owners in Australia manage parasites in their horses.
  • Understanding these practices and influences can help identify gaps and risks to improve parasite management strategies and horse health.

Methodology

  • A voluntary, anonymous online survey was conducted among members of Pony Club Australia.
  • The survey topics included:
    • Horse population characteristics
    • Housing conditions
    • Paddock, manure, and parasite management practices
    • Owner attitudes toward parasite control
  • A total of 98 completed responses were analyzed.

Key Findings on Parasite Management Practices

  • Almost all respondents (95/98) reported that their horses spent time in paddocks, indicating outdoor exposure.
  • A high proportion (91/98) routinely administered anthelmintics (dewormers) to their horses.
  • Regarding dosing practices:
    • 42 out of 98 owners estimated their horse’s body weight rather than accurately measuring it, which may affect dosing accuracy.
    • 78 out of 98 could recall the specific dewormer brand or active ingredient last used, showing a reasonable level of owner awareness.
  • Macrocyclic lactones were the most commonly used class of dewormers (used by 75 out of 78 respondents who named a class), reflecting current deworming trends.

Sources of Information and Trusted Advice

  • Veterinarians and scientific papers were rated as highly trusted sources of information by the majority of respondents (83/97 and 80/97 respectively).
  • This shows owners generally value expert and research-based guidance for parasite management.

Barriers and Challenges Identified

  • Multiple barriers to optimal parasite control were reported by owners:
    • Time constraints limiting thorough management practices.
    • Cost concerns related to parasite control measures.
    • Influence of peer practices, which may perpetuate inconsistent or suboptimal methods.
    • Environmental challenges such as pasture contamination or management issues.
    • Conflicting information leading to confusion about the best parasite control strategies.

Owner Responses and Decision-Making

  • Despite challenges, many owners expressed a sense of agency and responsibility to improve their knowledge and seek expert advice.
  • Owners aimed to create healthy environments, emphasizing good pasture management and overall horse welfare.
  • This proactive approach supports a potential shift toward more effective and holistic parasite control strategies.

Implications and Recommendations

  • The study identified risky practices, such as inaccurate weight estimation for dosing, which can contribute to ineffective parasite control or drug resistance.
  • There are opportunities for:
    • Increased engagement by veterinarians to provide tailored advice and support.
    • Enhanced owner education focusing on accurate dosing, pasture management, and integrated parasite control.
    • Promotion of a holistic approach combining chemical control with environmental and management strategies.
  • Overall, fostering better knowledge and practices among horse owners can improve horse health and reduce parasite-related risks.

Cite This Article

APA
Nixon W, Buckley P, Butler R. (2026). Parasite management practices used by owners of Australian Pony Club horses and the factors influencing their decision-making processes. Aust Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.70064

Publication

ISSN: 1751-0813
NlmUniqueID: 0370616
Country: England
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Nixon, W
  • School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, 2678, Australia.
Buckley, P
  • School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, 2678, Australia.
Butler, R
  • School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, 2678, Australia.

References

This article includes 15 references
  1. Drudge JH, Lyons ET. Control of internal parasites of the horse.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1966;148:378–383.
  2. Nielsen MK. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes: current status and emerging trends.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2022;20:76–88.
  3. Tydén E, Enemark HL, Franko MA. Prevalence of Strongylus vulgaris in horses after ten years of prescription usage of anthelmintics in Sweden.. Vet Parasitol 2019;276:100013.
  4. Nielsen MK. Apparent treatment failure of praziquantel and pyrantel pamoate against anoplocephalid tapeworms.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2023;22:96–101.
  5. Wilkes EJA, Heller J, Raidal SL. A questionnaire study of parasite control in thoroughbred and standardbred horses in Australia.. Equine Vet J 2020;52:547–555.
    doi: 10.1111/evjgoogle scholar: lookup
  6. Beasley AM, Kotze AC, Barnes TS. Equine helminth prevalence and management practices on Australian properties as shown by coprological survey and written questionnaire.. Anim Prod Sci 2020;60:2131–2144.
    doi: 10.1071/an18378google scholar: lookup
  7. Buckley P, Dunn T, More SJ. Owners' perceptions of the health and performance of Pony Club horses in Australia.. Prev Vet Med 2004;63:121–133.
  8. Buckley P, Buckley D, Coleman GT. Preventive health care of Pony Club horses in rural New South Wales Australia.. Aust Vet J 2016;94:265–270.
    doi: 10.1111/avj.12464google scholar: lookup
  9. Stratford CH, Lester HE, Morgan ER. A questionnaire study of equine gastrointestinal parasite control in Scotland.. Equine Vet J 2014;46:25–31.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12101google scholar: lookup
  10. Papini RA, De Bernart FM, Sgorbini M. A questionnaire survey on intestinal worm control practices in horses in Italy.. J Equine Vet Sci 2015;35:70–75.
  11. Sallé G, Cortet J, Bois I. Risk factor analysis of equine strongyle resistance to anthelmintics.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2017;7:407–415.
  12. Kaplan RM, Denwood MJ, Nielsen MK. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) guideline for diagnosing anthelmintic resistance using the faecal egg count reduction test in ruminants, horses and swine.. Vet Parasitol 2023;319:109936.
  13. Muca E, Buonaiuto G, Lamanna M. Reaching a wider audience: Instagram's role in dairy cow nutrition education and engagement.. Animals 2023;13:3503.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13223503google scholar: lookup
  14. Abbas G, Stevenson MA, Bauquier J. Assessment of worm control practices recommended by equine veterinarians in Australia.. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1305360.
  15. Beasley A, Abbas G, Hughes K. Australian guidelines for equine internal parasite management.. Aust Vet J 2025;103:151–158.
    doi: 10.1111/avj.13424google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.