Abstract: Equine herpes virus type 1 (EHV-1) infection in horses is associated with upper respiratory disease, neurological disease, abortions, and neonatal death. Objective: Does pharmacological therapy decrease either the incidence or severity of disease or infection caused by EHV-1 in domesticated horses? Methods: A systematic review was preformed searching AGRICOLA, CAB Abstracts, Cochrane, PubMed, Web of Science, and WHO Global Health Index Medicus Regional Databases to identify articles published before February 15, 2021. Selection criteria were original research reports published in peer reviewed journals, and studies investigating in vivo use of therapeutic agents for prevention or treatment of EHV-1 in horses. Outcomes assessed included measures related to clinical outcomes that reflect symptomatic EHV-1 infection or virus infection. We evaluated risk of bias and performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions. Results: A total of 7009 unique studies were identified, of which 9 met the inclusion criteria. Two studies evaluated valacyclovir or small interfering RNAs, and single studies evaluated the use of a Parapoxvirus ovis-based immunomodulator, human alpha interferon, an herbal supplement, a cytosine analog, and heparin. The level of evidence ranged between randomized controlled studies and observational trials. The risk of bias was moderate to high and sample sizes were small. Most studies reported either no benefit or minimal efficacy of the intervention tested. Conclusions: Our review indicates minimal or limited benefit either as a prophylactic or post-exposure treatment for any of the studied interventions in the mitigation of EHV-1-associated disease outcome.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This research article systematically reviews existing studies to determine whether pharmacological treatments reduce the incidence or severity of equine herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) infection in domesticated horses.
The review concludes that available pharmacologic interventions show minimal or limited benefit for preventing or treating EHV-1-related disease outcomes.
Background
Equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1) is a significant pathogen in horses causing upper respiratory illness, neurological disease, abortions in pregnant mares, and death of newborn foals.
Due to the serious clinical consequences of EHV-1 infections, effective treatments to reduce disease severity or infection rates are needed.
Objective
The primary question was: Does pharmacological therapy decrease the incidence or severity of EHV-1 infection or related disease in domesticated horses?
Methods
A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases: AGRICOLA, CAB Abstracts, Cochrane, PubMed, Web of Science, and WHO Global Health Index Medicus Regional Databases.
Articles published before February 15, 2021, were considered.
Inclusion criteria:
Original research published in peer-reviewed journals.
Studies investigating in vivo use of therapeutic agents for prevention or treatment of EHV-1 infection in horses.
Outcomes assessed were clinical measures indicating symptomatic EHV-1 infection or virus presence.
Risk of bias in studies was evaluated, and the GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of evidence for interventions.
Results
From 7009 unique studies identified, only 9 met all inclusion criteria.
Interventions evaluated in these studies included:
Valacyclovir (antiviral drug) – 2 studies
Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) – 2 studies
Parapoxvirus ovis-based immunomodulator – 1 study
Human alpha interferon – 1 study
Herbal supplement – 1 study
Cytosine analog (antiviral agent) – 1 study
Heparin (anticoagulant with potential anti-inflammatory effects) – 1 study
The types of studies included ranged from randomized controlled trials to observational trials.
Risk of bias assessment showed moderate to high risk, indicating potential limitations in study design or execution.
Most studies had small sample sizes, limiting the power to detect significant treatment effects.
The majority of studies either reported no benefit or only minimal efficacy of the pharmacologic agents tested in preventing or mitigating EHV-1 infection or disease severity.
Conclusions
Current pharmacologic interventions do not demonstrate strong or consistent evidence of effectiveness as either preventive or post-exposure treatments against EHV-1 in horses.
There is limited benefit observed from the tested drugs and immunomodulatory agents in controlling the clinical consequences of EHV-1 infection.
Further well-designed, larger-scale controlled studies are required to better evaluate potential therapeutic options.
Until such evidence emerges, management of EHV-1 infections relies primarily on supportive care and prevention strategies rather than pharmacologic treatment.
Cite This Article
APA
Goehring L, Dorman DC, Osterrieder K, Burgess BA, Dougherty K, Gross P, Neinast C, Pusterla N, Soboll-Hussey G, Lunn DP.
(2024).
Pharmacologic interventions for the treatment of equine herpesvirus-1 in domesticated horses: A systematic review.
J Vet Intern Med, 38(3), 1892-1905.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17016
University of Kentucky, College of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, 1400 Nicholasville Road, Lexington, Kentucky 40546-0099, USA.
Dorman, David C
College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, USA.
Osterrieder, Klaus
Institut für Virologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Robert-von-Ostertag-Str. 7, 14163 Berlin, Germany.
Burgess, Brandy A
College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, 2200 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.
Dougherty, Kelsie
College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, USA.
Gross, Peggy
College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, USA.
Neinast, Claire
College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, USA.
Pusterla, Nicola
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, One Garrod Drive, Davis, California 95616, USA.
Soboll-Hussey, Gisela
College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, Veterinary Medical Center, Room G331, 784 Wilson Road, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Lunn, David P
School of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston CH64 7TE, United Kingdom.
Henninger RW, Reed SM, Saville WJ. Outbreak of neurologic disease caused by equine herpesvirus−1 at a university equestrian center.. J Vet Intern Med 2007;21:157‐165.
Awan AR, Field HJ. Effects of phosphonylmethoxyalkyl derivatives studied with a murine model for abortion induced by equine herpesvirus 1.. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993;37:2478‐2482.
Gibson JS, Slater JD, Field HJ. The activity of (S)‐1‐[(3‐hydroxy−2‐phosphonyl methoxy) propyl] cytosine (HPMPC) against equine herpesvirus‐1 (EHV‐1) in cell cultures, mice and horses.. Antiviral Res 1992;19:219‐232.
Rollinson EA. Comparative efficacy of three 2′‐fluoropyrimidine nucleosides and 9‐(1,3‐dihydroxy‐2‐propoxymethyl)guanine (BW B759U) against pseudorabies and equine rhinopneumonitis virus infection in vitro and in laboratory animals.. Antiviral Res 1987;7:25‐33.
Higgins JPT, Lopez‐Lopez JA, Becker BJ. Synthesising quantitative evidence in systematic reviews of complex health interventions.. BMJ Glob Health 2019;4:e000858.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schunemann HJ. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:380‐382.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Committee on Endocrine‐Related Low‐Dose Toxicity. Application of Systematic Review Methods in an Overall Strategy for Evaluating Low‐Dose Toxicity from Endocrine Active Chemicals.. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2017.
Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT). Handbook for Conducting a Literature‐Base Health Assessment Using OHAT Approach for Systematic Review and Evidence Integration.. Bethesda, MD, USA: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; 2019.
Verma S, Tewari SC, Yadav MP. Use of polyherbal immunomodulator in conjunction with inactivated vaccine against equine herpes virus‐1.. Indian J Virol 1999;15:63‐67.
Adams J, Hillier‐Brown FC, Moore HJ. Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies.. Syst Rev 2016;5:164.
Alpi KM, Vo TA, Dorman DC. Language consideration and methodological transparency in “systematic” reviews of animal toxicity studies.. Int J Toxicol 2019;38:135‐145.
Di Girolamo N, Giuffrida MA, Winter AL. In veterinary trials reporting and communication regarding randomisation procedures is suboptimal.. Vet Rec 2017;181:195.
Leung V, Rousseau‐Blass F, Beauchamp G, Pang DSJ. ARRIVE has not ARRIVEd: support for the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of in vivo Experiments) guidelines does not improve the reporting quality of papers in animal welfare, analgesia or anesthesia.. PloS One 2018;13:e0197882.
Rufiange M, Rousseau‐Blass F, Pang DSJ. Incomplete reporting of experimental studies and items associated with risk of bias in veterinary research.. Vet Rec Open 2019;6:e000322.
Hooijmans CR, de Vries R, Leenaars M, Curfs J, Ritskes‐Hoitinga M. Improving planning, design, reporting and scientific quality of animal experiments by using the Gold Standard Publication Checklist, in addition to the ARRIVE guidelines.. Br J Pharmacol 2011;162:1259‐1260.
Tan YJ, Crowley RJ, Ioannidis JPA. An empirical assessment of research practices across 163 clinical trials of tumor‐bearing companion dogs.. Sci Rep 2019;9:11877.
Li L, Li S, Ma H, Akhtar MF, Tan Y, Wang T, Liu W, Khan A, Khan MZ, Wang C. An Overview of Infectious and Non-Infectious Causes of Pregnancy Losses in Equine. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jul 2;14(13).