Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2014; 47(4); 422-427; doi: 10.1111/evj.12298

Polo pony injuries: player-owner reported risk, perception, mitigation and risk factors.

Abstract: Polo, one of the world's oldest sports, is unique in merging human skill and balance with animal agility and performance in a contact sport. These modern-day 'centaurs' offer medical, dental and veterinary scientists an unrivalled, if quirky, opportunity to collaborate. Collection of epidemiological data on injuries to UK polo riders and ponies is the first step. Objective: To measure the reported risk and risk factors for injuries to UK polo ponies, their perception and mitigation by player-owners. Methods: A retrospective cohort design and telephone interviews were used. Methods: Data on equine injuries, preseason training and risk perception were collected from a random sample of player-owners using a structured questionnaire. Injuries were defined as requiring veterinary treatment. Frequencies were represented as percentages and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk factors for injuries were identified by univariable and multivariable analyses. Results: The cumulative incidence of player-owner-reported injury was 10.6% (95% CI 8.4-12.7). Tendon injuries were most common (4.3%; 95% CI 2.9-5.7), followed by wounds and splints. The only risk factor was stabling all season (odds ratio 4.79; 95% CI 1.46-15.73). Tendon injuries were perceived as the major risk and hard ground the most important risk factor. Risk mitigation practices were bandaging before exercise (45.7%; 95% CI 34.8-56.5), checking tendons (84.0%; 95% CI 76.0-91.9), cold hosing (40.7%; 95% CI 30.0-51.4), bandaging (38.3%; 95% CI 27.7-48.9) and using clays and coolants after exercise (24.7%; 15.3-34.1). Cuts and wounds were considered most frequent by only 2.5% (95% CI 0.0-3.6) of players but were the second most common injury, accounting for 21.6% of veterinary treatments. Splints accounted for 12.5% of injuries. Conclusions: The risk of injury to polo ponies is similar to that in the general horse population; musculoskeletal injuries, particularly tendon injuries, are most common, followed by wounds and splints. The association between stabling and injury, risk factors for wounds and splints and efficacy of cooling tendons post exercise warrant further study.
Publication Date: 2014-07-17 PubMed ID: 24819255DOI: 10.1111/evj.12298Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates the reported risk and risk factors for injuries to polo ponies in the UK, and how these are perceived and mitigated by player-owners.

Study Methods

  • The research utilized a retrospective cohort design, gathering the data via telephone interviews.
  • Equine injury data, preseason training, and risk perception were collected using a structured questionnaire targeted to a random selection of player-owners.
  • Injuries in this context were outlined as any harm requiring veterinary treatment.
  • Frequencies obtained were presented as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
  • The study conducted univariable and multivariable analyses to identify potential risk factors associated with these injuries.

Study Findings

  • The research found out that the cumulative incidence of player-owner-reported injury was 10.6%.
  • Tendon injuries topped the list of common injuries with 4.3%, followed by wounds and then splints.
  • The only risk factor found in the study was stabling all season, which increased the odds of injury by approximately five times.
  • Tendon injuries were considered the major risk factor, with hard ground recognized as the most important risk factor.

Risk Mitigation Practices

  • Among the risk mitigation practices used by player-owners, bandaging before exercise was most common, practiced by 45.7% of the respondents.
  • 84.0% of the respondents checked the tendons, 40.7% used cold hosing, and 38.3% used bandaging.
  • 24.7% applied clays and coolants after exercise.

Discrepancies in Perception and Reality

  • Notwithstanding the high frequency of cuts and wounds (21.6% of veterinary treatments), only 2.5% of the players regarded them as the most frequent injury; 12.5% of injuries were due to splints.

Conclusion and Further Study

  • The research concluded that the risk of injury to polo ponies mirrors the risk in the general horse population. Musculoskeletal injuries, particularly tendon injuries, were found to be most common, followed by wounds and splints.
  • The researchers noted the need for further examination of the link between stabling and injury, risk factors for wounds and splints, and the effectiveness of cooling tendons post exercise.

Cite This Article

APA
Inness CM, Morgan KL. (2014). Polo pony injuries: player-owner reported risk, perception, mitigation and risk factors. Equine Vet J, 47(4), 422-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12298

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 47
Issue: 4
Pages: 422-427

Researcher Affiliations

Inness, C M
  • School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK.
Morgan, K L
  • Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horse Diseases / etiology
  • Horse Diseases / pathology
  • Horses / injuries
  • Risk Factors
  • Sports
  • Wounds and Injuries / veterinary

Citations

This article has been cited 7 times.
  1. Schumacher A, Merle R, Stöckle S, Gehlen H. Player-Reported Perceptions of Lameness Risks and Contributing Factors for Polo Horses: Results from a Survey. Animals (Basel) 2025 Oct 29;15(21).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15213136pubmed: 41227466google scholar: lookup
  2. Schumacher A, Gehlen H. Health of Polo Horses. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jun 8;14(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14121735pubmed: 38929354google scholar: lookup
  3. Best R, Standing R. The Spatiotemporal Characteristics of 0-24-Goal Polo. Animals (Basel) 2019 Jul 16;9(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9070446pubmed: 31315210google scholar: lookup
  4. Kamus L, Rameau M, Theoret C. Feasibility of a disposable canister-free negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) device for treating open wounds in horses. BMC Vet Res 2019 Mar 6;15(1):78.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1829-5pubmed: 30841889google scholar: lookup
  5. Pollard D, Wylie CE, Verheyen KLP, Newton JR. Identification of modifiable factors associated with owner-reported equine laminitis in Britain using a web-based cohort study approach. BMC Vet Res 2019 Feb 12;15(1):59.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1798-8pubmed: 30755193google scholar: lookup
  6. Inness CM, Morgan KL. Falls and injuries to Polo players: risk perception, mitigation and risk factors. Sports Med Open 2015 Dec;1(1):2.
    doi: 10.1186/s40798-014-0002-8pubmed: 27747839google scholar: lookup
  7. Morgan KL, Handel IG, Tanya VN, Hamman SM, Nfon C, Bergman IE, Malirat V, Sorensen KJ, de C Bronsvoort BM. Accuracy of herdsmen reporting versus serologic testing for estimating foot-and-mouth disease prevalence. Emerg Infect Dis 2014 Dec;20(12):2048-54.
    doi: 10.3201/eid2012.140931pubmed: 25417556google scholar: lookup