Analyze Diet
Zoology (Jena, Germany)2007; 110(4); 271-289; doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2007.01.003

Posture, gait and the ecological relevance of locomotor costs and energy-saving mechanisms in tetrapods.

Abstract: A reanalysis of locomotor data from functional, energetic, mechanical and ecological perspectives reveals that limb posture has major effects on limb biomechanics, energy-saving mechanisms and the costs of locomotion. Regressions of data coded by posture (crouched vs. erect) reveal nonlinear patterns in metabolic cost, limb muscle mass, effective mechanical advantage, and stride characteristics. In small crouched animals energy savings from spring and pendular mechanisms are inconsequential and thus the metabolic cost of locomotion is driven by muscle activation costs. Stride frequency appears to be the principal functional parameter related to the decreasing cost of locomotion in crouched animals. By contrast, the shift to erect limb postures invoked a series of correlated effects on the metabolic cost of locomotion: effective mechanical advantage increases, relative muscle masses decrease, metapodial limb segments elongate dramatically (as limbs shift from digitigrade to unguligrade designs) and biological springs increase in size and effectiveness. Each of these factors leads to decreases in the metabolic cost of locomotion in erect forms resulting from real and increasing contributions of pendular savings and spring savings. Comparisons of the relative costs and ecological relevance of different gaits reveal that running is cheaper than walking in smaller animals up to the size of dogs but running is more expensive than walking in horses. Animals do not necessarily use their cheapest gaits for their predominant locomotor activity. Therefore, locomotor costs are driven more by ecological relevance than by the need to optimize locomotor economy.
Publication Date: 2007-05-07 PubMed ID: 17482802DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2007.01.003Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study explores the impact of limb posture on locomotion in tetrapods, including its effects on biomechanics, energy conservation, and locomotion cost. It finds that different postures and gaits have a significant effect on energy consumption and locomotion efficiency, with ecological relevance playing a more significant role than optimizing economy in locomotion.

Reanalysis of Locomotor Data

  • The study reassesses locomotor data with respect to functionality, energetic efficiency, mechanical properties, and ecological perspectives. It mainly focuses on the effects of different limb postures (crouched vs. erect).
  • Through regression analysis, it establishes non-linear associations between posture and many parameters including metabolic cost, muscle mass of the limb, effective mechanical advantage, and stride characteristics.

Crouched vs Erect Posture

  • In smaller animals with a crouched posture, energy savings mechanisms such as spring and pendular movements are found to be insignificant. Thus, the metabolic costs of their locomotion are majorly determined by muscle activation costs.
  • Stride frequency seems to be a significant functional parameter that influences decreasing locomotion costs in crouched animals.
  • Contrarily, an erect posture in animals invokes a series of effects on the metabolic cost of locomotion. It increases the effective mechanical advantage, decreases relative muscle masses, and dramatically elongates metapodial limb segments (as limbs shift from digitigrade to unguligrade designs).
  • Biological springs boost both in size and effectiveness in animals with an erect posture. All these factors contribute to reducing the metabolic cost of locomotion.

Cost and Ecological Relevance of Different Gaits

  • Comparing the relative costs and ecological significance of different gaits, the study notes that running is less energy consuming than walking for smaller animals, up to the size of dogs.
  • However, for larger animals like horses, walking is more economical than running.
  • Regardless of energy costs, animals do not necessarily use their cheapest gaits for their predominant locomotion activity. This suggests that the choice of gait depends more on its ecological relevance than the need to optimize the economy of locomotion.

Cite This Article

APA
Reilly SM, McElroy EJ, Biknevicius AR. (2007). Posture, gait and the ecological relevance of locomotor costs and energy-saving mechanisms in tetrapods. Zoology (Jena), 110(4), 271-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2007.01.003

Publication

ISSN: 0944-2006
NlmUniqueID: 9435608
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 110
Issue: 4
Pages: 271-289

Researcher Affiliations

Reilly, Stephen M
  • Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA. reilly@ohiou.edu
McElroy, Eric J
    Biknevicius, Audrone R

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Biomechanical Phenomena
      • Energy Metabolism / physiology
      • Gait / physiology
      • Locomotion / physiology
      • Models, Anatomic
      • Posture / physiology
      • Running / physiology
      • Vertebrates / physiology
      • Walking / physiology

      Citations

      This article has been cited 46 times.
      1. Rothier PS, Herrel A, Benson RBJ, Hedrick BP. Body mass evolution as a driver of morphological and ecological diversity in terrestrial mammals. BMC Ecol Evol 2025 Jul 11;25(1):69.
        doi: 10.1186/s12862-025-02393-9pubmed: 40646436google scholar: lookup
      2. Yaqoob B, Porfiri M, Pugno NM. Optimizing energetics of lateral undulatory locomotion: unveiling morphological adaptations in different environments. J R Soc Interface 2025 Apr;22(225):20240440.
        doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0440pubmed: 40262639google scholar: lookup
      3. Mossor AM, McKamy AJ, Young MW, Rochté AJ, Avey-Arroyo JA, Nyakatura JA, Granatosky MC, Butcher MT, Young JW. Three-Dimensional Limb Kinematics in Brown-Throated Three-Toed Sloths (Bradypus variegatus) During Suspensory Quadrupedal Locomotion. J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol 2025 Jun;343(5):564-577.
        doi: 10.1002/jez.2911pubmed: 40033687google scholar: lookup
      4. Kubo K, Kobayashi Y. Cursorial ecomorphology and temporal patterns in theropod dinosaur evolution during the mid-Cretaceous. R Soc Open Sci 2025 Jan;12(1):241178.
        doi: 10.1098/rsos.241178pubmed: 39816741google scholar: lookup
      5. Bird CN, Pirotta E, New L, Bierlich KC, Hildebrand L, Fernandez Ajó A, Torres LG. Bubble blasts! An adaptation for buoyancy regulation in shallow foraging gray whales. Ecol Evol 2024 Aug;14(8):e70093.
        doi: 10.1002/ece3.70093pubmed: 39108566google scholar: lookup
      6. Cross SRR, Marmol-Guijarro AC, Bates KT, Marrin JC, Tickle PG, Rose KA, Codd JR. Testing the form-function paradigm: body shape correlates with kinematics but not energetics in selectively-bred birds. Commun Biol 2024 Jul 24;7(1):900.
        doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06592-wpubmed: 39048787google scholar: lookup
      7. Polet DT, Labonte D. Optimal Gearing of Musculoskeletal Systems. Integr Comp Biol 2024 Sep 27;64(3):987-1006.
        doi: 10.1093/icb/icae072pubmed: 38901962google scholar: lookup
      8. Vincelette A. The Characteristics, Distribution, Function, and Origin of Alternative Lateral Horse Gaits. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 8;13(16).
        doi: 10.3390/ani13162557pubmed: 37627349google scholar: lookup
      9. Young MW, Webster C, Tanis D, Schurr AF, Hanna CS, Lynch SK, Ratkiewicz AS, Dickinson E, Kong FH, Granatosky MC. What does climbing mean exactly? Assessing spatiotemporal gait characteristics of inclined locomotion in parrots. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 2024 Jan;210(1):19-33.
        doi: 10.1007/s00359-023-01630-0pubmed: 37140643google scholar: lookup
      10. Granatosky MC, Young MW, Herr V, Chai C, Raidah A, Kairo JN, Anaekwe A, Havens A, Zou B, Ding B, Chen C, De Leon D, Shah H, Valentin J, Hildreth L, Castro T, Li T, Yeung A, Dickinson E, Youlatos D. Positional Behavior of Introduced Monk Parakeets (Myiopsitta monachus) in an Urban Landscape. Animals (Basel) 2022 Sep 11;12(18).
        doi: 10.3390/ani12182372pubmed: 36139232google scholar: lookup
      11. Jannel A, Salisbury SW, Panagiotopoulou O. Softening the steps to gigantism in sauropod dinosaurs through the evolution of a pedal pad. Sci Adv 2022 Aug 12;8(32):eabm8280.
        doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm8280pubmed: 35947665google scholar: lookup
      12. Danos N, Staab KL, Whitenack LB. The Core Concepts, Competencies, and Grand Challenges of Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy and Morphology. Integr Org Biol 2022;4(1):obac019.
        doi: 10.1093/iob/obac019pubmed: 35919560google scholar: lookup
      13. Polet DT, Bertram JEA. Competing Models of Work in Quadrupedal Walking: Center of Mass Work is Insufficient to Explain Stereotypical Gait. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;10:826336.
        doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.826336pubmed: 35646881google scholar: lookup
      14. Marmol-Guijarro A, Nudds R, Folkow L, Lees J, Codd J. Does posture explain the kinematic differences in a grounded running gait between male and female Svalbard rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta hyperborea) moving on snow?. Polar Biol 2021;44(6):1141-1152.
        doi: 10.1007/s00300-021-02872-xpubmed: 34720374google scholar: lookup
      15. Harel R, Loftus JC, Crofoot MC. Locomotor compromises maintain group cohesion in baboon troops on the move. Proc Biol Sci 2021 Jul 28;288(1955):20210839.
        doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0839pubmed: 34315256google scholar: lookup
      16. Hutchinson JR. The evolutionary biomechanics of locomotor function in giant land animals. J Exp Biol 2021 Jun 1;224(11).
        doi: 10.1242/jeb.217463pubmed: 34100541google scholar: lookup
      17. Wiseman ALA, Bishop PJ, Demuth OE, Cuff AR, Michel KB, Hutchinson JR. Musculoskeletal modelling of the Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) hindlimb: Effects of limb posture on leverage during terrestrial locomotion. J Anat 2021 Aug;239(2):424-444.
        doi: 10.1111/joa.13431pubmed: 33754362google scholar: lookup
      18. Granatosky MC, Ross CF. Differences in muscle mechanics underlie divergent optimality criteria between feeding and locomotor systems. J Anat 2020 Dec;237(6):1072-1086.
        doi: 10.1111/joa.13279pubmed: 32671858google scholar: lookup
      19. Jezovit JA, Rooke R, Schneider J, Levine JD. Behavioral and environmental contributions to drosophilid social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020 May 26;117(21):11573-11583.
        doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920642117pubmed: 32404421google scholar: lookup
      20. Polet DT, Bertram JEA. An inelastic quadrupedal model discovers four-beat walking, two-beat running, and pseudo-elastic actuation as energetically optimal. PLoS Comput Biol 2019 Nov;15(11):e1007444.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007444pubmed: 31751339google scholar: lookup
      21. Druelle F, Goyens J, Vasilopoulou-Kampitsi M, Aerts P. Small vertebrates running on uneven terrain: a biomechanical study of two differently specialised lacertid lizards. Sci Rep 2019 Nov 14;9(1):16858.
        doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53329-5pubmed: 31727966google scholar: lookup
      22. Channon SB, Young IS, Cordner B, Swann N. Ontogenetic scaling of pelvic limb muscles, tendons and locomotor economy in the ostrich (Struthio camelus). J Exp Biol 2019 Sep 3;222(Pt 17).
        doi: 10.1242/jeb.182741pubmed: 31350301google scholar: lookup
      23. Miller CE, Johnson LE, Pinkard H, Lemelin P, Schmitt D. Limb phase flexibility in walking: a test case in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Front Zool 2019;16:5.
        doi: 10.1186/s12983-019-0299-8pubmed: 30820237google scholar: lookup
      24. Kubo T, Sakamoto M, Meade A, Venditti C. Transitions between foot postures are associated with elevated rates of body size evolution in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019 Feb 12;116(7):2618-2623.
        doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814329116pubmed: 30692262google scholar: lookup
      25. Halsey LG, White CR. Terrestrial locomotion energy costs vary considerably between species: no evidence that this is explained by rate of leg force production or ecology. Sci Rep 2019 Jan 24;9(1):656.
        doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36565-zpubmed: 30679474google scholar: lookup
      26. Olberding JP, Deban SM. Scaling of work and power in a locomotor muscle of a frog. J Comp Physiol B 2018 Jul;188(4):623-634.
        doi: 10.1007/s00360-018-1148-3pubmed: 29480359google scholar: lookup
      27. Weihmann T, Brun PG, Pycroft E. Speed dependent phase shifts and gait changes in cockroaches running on substrates of different slipperiness. Front Zool 2017;14:54.
        doi: 10.1186/s12983-017-0232-ypubmed: 29225659google scholar: lookup
      28. Gruss LT, Gruss R, Schmitt D. Pelvic Breadth and Locomotor Kinematics in Human Evolution. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2017 Apr;300(4):739-751.
        doi: 10.1002/ar.23550pubmed: 28297175google scholar: lookup
      29. Shi L, Vasseur L, Huang H, Zeng Z, Hu G, Liu X, You M. Adult Tea Green Leafhoppers, Empoasca onukii (Matsuda), Change Behaviors under Varying Light Conditions. PLoS One 2017;12(1):e0168439.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168439pubmed: 28103237google scholar: lookup
      30. White CR, Alton LA, Crispin TS, Halsey LG. Phylogenetic comparisons of pedestrian locomotion costs: confirmations and new insights. Ecol Evol 2016 Sep;6(18):6712-6720.
        doi: 10.1002/ece3.2267pubmed: 27777742google scholar: lookup
      31. Gormezano LJ, McWilliams SR, Iles DT, Rockwell RF. Costs of locomotion in polar bears: when do the costs outweigh the benefits of chasing down terrestrial prey?. Conserv Physiol 2016;4(1):cow045.
        doi: 10.1093/conphys/cow045pubmed: 27757238google scholar: lookup
      32. Riskin DK, Kendall CJ, Hermanson JW. The crouching of the shrew: Mechanical consequences of limb posture in small mammals. PeerJ 2016;4:e2131.
        doi: 10.7717/peerj.2131pubmed: 27413633google scholar: lookup
      33. Pontzer H. A unified theory for the energy cost of legged locomotion. Biol Lett 2016 Feb;12(2):20150935.
        doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0935pubmed: 26911339google scholar: lookup
      34. Kubo T, Kubo MO. Nonplantigrade Foot Posture: A Constraint on Dinosaur Body Size. PLoS One 2016;11(1):e0145716.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145716pubmed: 26790003google scholar: lookup
      35. Rose KA, Nudds RL, Butler PJ, Codd JR. Sex differences in gait utilization and energy metabolism during terrestrial locomotion in two varieties of chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) selected for different body size. Biol Open 2015 Sep 24;4(10):1306-15.
        doi: 10.1242/bio.013094pubmed: 26405047google scholar: lookup
      36. Wilkinson H, Thavarajah N, Codd J. The metabolic cost of walking on an incline in the Peacock (Pavo cristatus). PeerJ 2015;3:e987.
        doi: 10.7717/peerj.987pubmed: 26056619google scholar: lookup
      37. Rose KA, Nudds RL, Codd JR. Intraspecific scaling of the minimum metabolic cost of transport in leghorn chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus): links with limb kinematics, morphometrics and posture. J Exp Biol 2015 Apr;218(Pt 7):1028-34.
        doi: 10.1242/jeb.111393pubmed: 25657211google scholar: lookup
      38. Sayers K, Lovejoy CO. Blood, bulbs, and bunodonts: on evolutionary ecology and the diets of Ardipithecus, Australopithecus, and early Homo. Q Rev Biol 2014 Dec;89(4):319-57.
        doi: 10.1086/678568pubmed: 25510078google scholar: lookup
      39. Andrada E, Rode C, Sutedja Y, Nyakatura JA, Blickhan R. Trunk orientation causes asymmetries in leg function in small bird terrestrial locomotion. Proc Biol Sci 2014 Dec 22;281(1797).
        doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1405pubmed: 25377449google scholar: lookup
      40. Kilbourne BM, Hoffman LC. Scale effects between body size and limb design in quadrupedal mammals. PLoS One 2013;8(11):e78392.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078392pubmed: 24260117google scholar: lookup
      41. Bender JA, Simpson EM, Tietz BR, Daltorio KA, Quinn RD, Ritzmann RE. Kinematic and behavioral evidence for a distinction between trotting and ambling gaits in the cockroach Blaberus discoidalis. J Exp Biol 2011 Jun 15;214(Pt 12):2057-64.
        doi: 10.1242/jeb.056481pubmed: 21613522google scholar: lookup
      42. Tullis A, Andrus SC. The cost of incline locomotion in ghost crabs (Ocypode quadrata) of different sizes. J Comp Physiol B 2011 Oct;181(7):873-81.
        doi: 10.1007/s00360-011-0582-2pubmed: 21567169google scholar: lookup
      43. Fujiwara S, Endo H, Hutchinson JR. Topsy-turvy locomotion: biomechanical specializations of the elbow in suspended quadrupeds reflect inverted gravitational constraints. J Anat 2011 Aug;219(2):176-91.
      44. Wall-Scheffler CM, Chumanov E, Steudel-Numbers K, Heiderscheit B. Electromyography activity across gait and incline: The impact of muscular activity on human morphology. Am J Phys Anthropol 2010 Dec;143(4):601-11.
        doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21356pubmed: 20623603google scholar: lookup
      45. Nudds RL, Codd JR, Sellers WI. Evidence for a mass dependent step-change in the scaling of efficiency in terrestrial locomotion. PLoS One 2009 Sep 7;4(9):e6927.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006927pubmed: 19738898google scholar: lookup
      46. Bishop KL, Pai AK, Schmitt D. Whole body mechanics of stealthy walking in cats. PLoS One 2008;3(11):e3808.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003808pubmed: 19043580google scholar: lookup