Analyze Diet
Osteoarthritis and cartilage2008; 17(6); 705-713; doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.11.008

Preclinical animal models in single site cartilage defect testing: a systematic review.

Abstract: Review the literature for single site cartilage defect research and evaluate the respective strengths and weaknesses of different preclinical animal models. Methods: A literature search for animal models evaluating single site cartilage defects was performed. Variables tabulated and analyzed included animal species, age and number, defect depth and diameter and study duration. Cluster analyses were then used to separate animals with only distal femoral defects into similar groups based on defect dimensions. Representative human studies were included allowing comparison of common clinical lesions to animal models. The suitability of each species for single site cartilage defect research and its relevance to clinical human practice is then discussed. Results: One hundred thirteen studies relating to single site cartilage defects were reviewed. Cluster analysis included 101 studies and placed the murine, laprine, ovine, canine, porcine and caprine models in group 1. Group 2 contained ovine, canine, porcine, caprine and equine models. Group 3 contained only equine models and humans. Species in each group are similar with regard to defect dimensions. Some species occur in multiple groups reflecting utilization of a variety defect sizes. We report and discuss factors to be considered when selecting a preclinical animal model for single site cartilage defect research. Conclusions: Standardization of study design and outcome parameters would help to compare different studies evaluating various novel therapeutic concepts. Comparison to the human clinical counterpart during study design may help increase the predictive value of preclinical research using animal models and improve the process of developing efficacious therapies.
Publication Date: 2008-11-21 PubMed ID: 19101179DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.11.008Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article looks into the effectiveness and limitations of various preclinical animal models used in investigating single site cartilage defects, using a systematic review of existing literature.

Methodology

  • The researchers began by conducting a literature review of studies that employed animal models to understand single site cartilage defects.
  • Various variables were identified and analyzed, which included the species of the animal, its age and number, as well as the diameter and depth of the defect and the duration of the study.
  • A cluster analysis was also carried out to categorize animals with only distal femoral defects into groups based on the dimensions of the defect.
  • A few human studies were also incorporated into the research to compare common clinical lesions to those observed in animal models.
  • The researchers then examined the appropriateness of each species for single site cartilage defect research and its relevance to clinical practice involving humans.

Results

  • The researchers examined a total of 113 studies focusing on single site cartilage defects.
  • Out of these, 101 studies were included in the cluster analysis, which arranged murine, laprine, ovine, canine, porcine, and caprine models into group 1.
  • Group 2 consisted of ovine, canine, porcine, caprine, and equine models, whereas group 3 only included equine models and humans.
  • The species in each group were found to be similar in terms of defect dimensions. Some species appeared in multiple groups, which reflects the employment of various defect sizes.
  • The researchers also discussed factors that need to be considered when selecting a preclinical animal model for single site cartilage defect research.

Conclusions

  • The researchers concluded that standardizing the study design and outcome parameters would make comparing studies on different novel therapeutic concepts easier.
  • By comparing the outcomes of animal model studies to the human clinical counterpart during the study design phase, the predictability of preclinical research using animal models could be improved. This would subsequently enhance the development of efficient therapies.

Cite This Article

APA
Ahern BJ, Parvizi J, Boston R, Schaer TP. (2008). Preclinical animal models in single site cartilage defect testing: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 17(6), 705-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2008.11.008

Publication

ISSN: 1522-9653
NlmUniqueID: 9305697
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 17
Issue: 6
Pages: 705-713

Researcher Affiliations

Ahern, B J
  • Department of Clinical Studies, University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, New Bolton Center, Kennett Square, PA 19348, USA.
Parvizi, J
    Boston, R
      Schaer, T P

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Animals, Domestic
        • Biomechanical Phenomena
        • Cartilage, Articular / injuries
        • Cartilage, Articular / physiopathology
        • Cluster Analysis
        • Fracture Healing / physiology
        • Humans
        • Mice
        • Models, Animal
        • Species Specificity

        Citations

        This article has been cited 121 times.
        1. Thampi P, Seabaugh KA, Pezzanite LM, Chu CR, Phillips JN, Grieger JC, McIlwraith CW, Samulski RJ, Goodrich LR. A pilot study to determine the optimal dose of scAAVIL-1ra in a large animal model of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Gene Ther 2023 Sep 11;.
          doi: 10.1038/s41434-023-00420-2pubmed: 37696981google scholar: lookup
        2. Galarraga JH, Zlotnick HM, Locke RC, Gupta S, Fogarty NL, Masada KM, Stoeckl BD, Laforest L, Castilho M, Malda J, Levato R, Carey JL, Mauck RL, Burdick JA. Evaluation of surgical fixation methods for the implantation of melt electrowriting-reinforced hyaluronic acid hydrogel composites in porcine cartilage defects. Int J Bioprint 2023;9(5):775.
          doi: 10.18063/ijb.775pubmed: 37457945google scholar: lookup
        3. Nativel F, Smith A, Boulestreau J, Lépine C, Baron J, Marquis M, Vignes C, Le Guennec Y, Veziers J, Lesoeur J, Loll F, Halgand B, Renard D, Abadie J, Legoff B, Blanchard F, Gauthier O, Vinatier C, Rieux AD, Guicheux J, Le Visage C. Micromolding-based encapsulation of mesenchymal stromal cells in alginate for intraarticular injection in osteoarthritis. Mater Today Bio 2023 Apr;19:100581.
          doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100581pubmed: 36896417google scholar: lookup
        4. Wang Y, Chen Y, Wei Y. Osteoarthritis animal models for biomaterial-assisted osteochondral regeneration. Biomater Transl 2022;3(4):264-279.
        5. Sun D, Liu X, Xu L, Meng Y, Kang H, Li Z. Advances in the Treatment of Partial-Thickness Cartilage Defect. Int J Nanomedicine 2022;17:6275-6287.
          doi: 10.2147/IJN.S382737pubmed: 36536940google scholar: lookup
        6. Fu Y, Both SK, Plass JRM, Dijkstra PJ, Zoetebier B, Karperien M. Injectable Cell-Laden Polysaccharide Hydrogels: In Vivo Evaluation of Cartilage Regeneration. Polymers (Basel) 2022 Oct 12;14(20).
          doi: 10.3390/polym14204292pubmed: 36297870google scholar: lookup
        7. Thampi P, Samulski RJ, Grieger JC, Phillips JN, McIlwraith CW, Goodrich LR. Gene therapy approaches for equine osteoarthritis. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:962898.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.962898pubmed: 36246316google scholar: lookup
        8. Duchi S, Francis SL, Onofrillo C, O'Connell CD, Choong P, Di Bella C. Towards Clinical Translation of In Situ Cartilage Engineering Strategies: Optimizing the Critical Facets of a Cell-Laden Hydrogel Therapy. Tissue Eng Regen Med 2023 Feb;20(1):25-47.
          doi: 10.1007/s13770-022-00487-9pubmed: 36244053google scholar: lookup
        9. Liu TP, Ha P, Xiao CY, Kim SY, Jensen AR, Easley J, Yao Q, Zhang X. Updates on mesenchymal stem cell therapies for articular cartilage regeneration in large animal models. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022;10:982199.
          doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.982199pubmed: 36147737google scholar: lookup
        10. Dias IE, Viegas CA, Requicha JF, Saavedra MJ, Azevedo JM, Carvalho PP, Dias IR. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Studies in the Goat Model for Biomedical Research-A Review of the Scientific Literature. Biology (Basel) 2022 Aug 27;11(9).
          doi: 10.3390/biology11091276pubmed: 36138755google scholar: lookup
        11. Olstad K, Gangsei LE, Kongsro J. A method for labelling lesions for machine learning and some new observations on osteochondrosis in computed tomographic scans of four pig joints. BMC Vet Res 2022 Aug 31;18(1):328.
          doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03426-xpubmed: 36045350google scholar: lookup
        12. Mukherjee P, Roy S, Ghosh D, Nandi SK. Role of animal models in biomedical research: a review. Lab Anim Res 2022 Jul 1;38(1):18.
          doi: 10.1186/s42826-022-00128-1pubmed: 35778730google scholar: lookup
        13. Smith BL, Matuska AM, Greenwood VL, Gilat R, Wijdicks CA, Cole BJ. Autologous Fibrin Sealants Have Comparable Graft Fixation to an Allogeneic Sealant in a Biomechanical Cadaveric Model of Chondral Defect Repair. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2022 Jun;4(3):e1075-e1082.
          doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.03.003pubmed: 35747626google scholar: lookup
        14. McCready E, Easley JT, Risch M, Troyer KL, Johnson JW, Gadomski BC, McGilvray KC, Kisiday JD, Nelson BB. Biomechanical, Morphological, and Biochemical Characteristics of Articular Cartilage of the Ovine Humeral Head. Cartilage 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):19476035221081465.
          doi: 10.1177/19476035221081465pubmed: 35225009google scholar: lookup
        15. Schagemann JC, Galle L, Gille J, Frydrychowicz A, Welsch G, Salzmann G, Paech A, Mittelstaedt H. Correlation of the Histological ICRS II Score and the 3D MOCART Score for the Analysis of Aged Osteochondral Regenerates in a Large Animal Model. Cartilage 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):19476035211072254.
          doi: 10.1177/19476035211072254pubmed: 35176894google scholar: lookup
        16. Aşık EE, Damen AHA, van Hugten PPW, Roth AK, Thies JC, Emans PJ, Ito K, van Donkelaar CC, Pastrama M. Surface texture analysis of different focal knee resurfacing implants after 6 and 12 months in vivo in a goat model. J Orthop Res 2022 Oct;40(10):2402-2413.
          doi: 10.1002/jor.25274pubmed: 35128715google scholar: lookup
        17. Alizadeh Sardroud H, Wanlin T, Chen X, Eames BF. Cartilage Tissue Engineering Approaches Need to Assess Fibrocartilage When Hydrogel Constructs Are Mechanically Loaded. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021;9:787538.
          doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.787538pubmed: 35096790google scholar: lookup
        18. Drevet S, Favier B, Brun E, Gavazzi G, Lardy B. Mouse Models of Osteoarthritis: A Summary of Models and Outcomes Assessment. Comp Med 2022 Feb 1;72(1):3-13.
          doi: 10.30802/AALAS-CM-21-000043pubmed: 34986927google scholar: lookup
        19. Yan W, Dai W, Cheng J, Fan Y, Zhao F, Li Y, Maimaitimin M, Cao C, Shao Z, Li Q, Liu Z, Hu X, Ao Y. Histologically Confirmed Recellularization is a Key Factor that Affects Meniscal Healing in Immature and Mature Meniscal Tears. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:793820.
          doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.793820pubmed: 34957120google scholar: lookup
        20. Peng L, Zhang B, Luo X, Huang B, Zhou J, Jiang S, Guo W, Tian G, Tian Z, Shen S, Li Y, Sui X, Liu S, Guo Q, Li H. Small Ruminant Models for Articular Cartilage Regeneration by Scaffold-Based Tissue Engineering. Stem Cells Int 2021;2021:5590479.
          doi: 10.1155/2021/5590479pubmed: 34912460google scholar: lookup
        21. Yan J, Liu C, Tu C, Zhang R, Tang X, Li H, Wang H, Ma Y, Zhang Y, Wu H, Sheng G. Hydrogel-hydroxyapatite-monomeric collagen type-I scaffold with low-frequency electromagnetic field treatment enhances osteochondral repair in rabbits. Stem Cell Res Ther 2021 Nov 13;12(1):572.
          doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02638-6pubmed: 34774092google scholar: lookup
        22. Feng K, Xie X, Yuan J, Gong L, Zhu Z, Zhang J, Li H, Yang Y, Wang Y. Reversing the surface charge of MSC-derived small extracellular vesicles by εPL-PEG-DSPE for enhanced osteoarthritis treatment. J Extracell Vesicles 2021 Nov;10(13):e12160.
          doi: 10.1002/jev2.12160pubmed: 34724347google scholar: lookup
        23. Chakrabarti S, Ai M, Wong K, Newell K, Henson FMD, Smith ESJ. Functional Characterization of Ovine Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons Reveal Peripheral Sensitization after Osteochondral Defect. eNeuro 2021 Sep-Oct;8(5).
          doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0237-21.2021pubmed: 34544757google scholar: lookup
        24. Chu W, Hu G, Peng L, Zhang W, Ma Z. The use of a novel deer antler decellularized cartilage-derived matrix scaffold for repair of osteochondral defects. J Biol Eng 2021 Sep 3;15(1):23.
          doi: 10.1186/s13036-021-00274-5pubmed: 34479610google scholar: lookup
        25. Hulme CH, Perry J, McCarthy HS, Wright KT, Snow M, Mennan C, Roberts S. Cell therapy for cartilage repair. Emerg Top Life Sci 2021 Oct 29;5(4):575-589.
          doi: 10.1042/ETLS20210015pubmed: 34423830google scholar: lookup
        26. Salonius E, Meller A, Paatela T, Vasara A, Puhakka J, Hannula M, Haaparanta AM, Kiviranta I, Muhonen V. Cartilage Repair Capacity within a Single Full-Thickness Chondral Defect in a Porcine Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis Model Is Affected by the Location within the Defect. Cartilage 2021 Dec;13(2_suppl):744S-754S.
          doi: 10.1177/19476035211030988pubmed: 34308665google scholar: lookup
        27. Lotz B, Bothe F, Deubel AK, Hesse E, Renz Y, Werner C, Schäfer S, Böck T, Groll J, von Rechenberg B, Richter W, Hagmann S. Preclinical Testing of New Hydrogel Materials for Cartilage Repair: Overcoming Fixation Issues in a Large Animal Model. Int J Biomater 2021;2021:5583815.
          doi: 10.1155/2021/5583815pubmed: 34239571google scholar: lookup
        28. Rajagopal K, Dutt V, Balakumar B, Chilbule SK, Walter N, Nair PD, Madhuri V. Long-Term Evaluation of Allogenic Chondrocyte-Loaded PVA-PCL IPN Scaffolds for Articular Cartilage Repair in Rabbits. Indian J Orthop 2021 Aug;55(4):853-860.
          doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00290-5pubmed: 34194639google scholar: lookup
        29. Petrovova E, Tomco M, Holovska K, Danko J, Kresakova L, Vdoviakova K, Simaiova V, Kolvek F, Hornakova P, Toth T, Zivcak J, Gal P, Sedmera D, Luptakova L, Medvecky L. PHB/CHIT Scaffold as a Promising Biopolymer in the Treatment of Osteochondral Defects-An Experimental Animal Study. Polymers (Basel) 2021 Apr 11;13(8).
          doi: 10.3390/polym13081232pubmed: 33920328google scholar: lookup
        30. Thorp H, Kim K, Kondo M, Maak T, Grainger DW, Okano T. Trends in Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering: 3D Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sheets as Candidates for Engineered Hyaline-Like Cartilage. Cells 2021 Mar 13;10(3).
          doi: 10.3390/cells10030643pubmed: 33805764google scholar: lookup
        31. Martin AR, Patel JM, Locke RC, Eby MR, Saleh KS, Davidson MD, Sennett ML, Zlotnick HM, Chang AH, Carey JL, Burdick JA, Mauck RL. Nanofibrous hyaluronic acid scaffolds delivering TGF-β3 and SDF-1α for articular cartilage repair in a large animal model. Acta Biomater 2021 May;126:170-182.
          doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.013pubmed: 33753316google scholar: lookup
        32. van Hugten PPW, Jeuken RM, Roth AK, Seeldrayers S, Emans PJ. An optimized medial parapatellar approach to the goat medial femoral condyle. Animal Model Exp Med 2021 Mar;4(1):54-58.
          doi: 10.1002/ame2.12150pubmed: 33738437google scholar: lookup
        33. Monaco G, El Haj AJ, Alini M, Stoddart MJ. Ex Vivo Systems to Study Chondrogenic Differentiation and Cartilage Integration. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2021 Jan 5;6(1).
          doi: 10.3390/jfmk6010006pubmed: 33466400google scholar: lookup
        34. Kilmer CE, Battistoni CM, Cox A, Breur GJ, Panitch A, Liu JC. Collagen Type I and II Blend Hydrogel with Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells as a Scaffold for Articular Cartilage Defect Repair. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2020 Jun 8;6(6):3464-3476.
        35. Xin L, Mika J, Horbert V, Bischoff S, Schubert H, Borowski J, Maenz S, Huber R, Sachse A, Illerhaus B, Kinne RW. Systematic Postoperative Assessment of a Minimally-Invasive Sheep Model for the Treatment of Osteochondral Defects. Life (Basel) 2020 Dec 7;10(12).
          doi: 10.3390/life10120332pubmed: 33297497google scholar: lookup
        36. Ruediger T, Horbert V, Reuther A, Kumar Kalla P, Burgkart RH, Walther M, Kinne RW, Mika J. Thickness of the Stifle Joint Articular Cartilage in Different Large Animal Models of Cartilage Repair and Regeneration. Cartilage 2021 Dec;13(2_suppl):438S-452S.
          doi: 10.1177/1947603520976763pubmed: 33269611google scholar: lookup
        37. Rajagopal K, Ramesh S, Walter NM, Arora A, Katti DS, Madhuri V. In vivo cartilage regeneration in a multi-layered articular cartilage architecture mimicking scaffold. Bone Joint Res 2020 Sep;9(9):601-612.
        38. Watkins AR, Reesink HL. Lubricin in experimental and naturally occurring osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2020 Oct;28(10):1303-1315.
          doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.05.009pubmed: 32504786google scholar: lookup
        39. Yassin AM, AbuBakr HO, Abdelgalil AI, Khattab MS, El-Behairy AM, Gouda EM. COL2A1 and Caspase-3 as Promising Biomarkers for Osteoarthritis Prognosis in an Equus asinus Model. Biomolecules 2020 Feb 26;10(3).
          doi: 10.3390/biom10030354pubmed: 32111016google scholar: lookup
        40. Meng X, Ziadlou R, Grad S, Alini M, Wen C, Lai Y, Qin L, Zhao Y, Wang X. Animal Models of Osteochondral Defect for Testing Biomaterials. Biochem Res Int 2020;2020:9659412.
          doi: 10.1155/2020/9659412pubmed: 32082625google scholar: lookup
        41. Tothova C, Novotny J, Nagy O, Hornakova P, Zert Z, Varga M, Medvecky L, Vdoviakova K, Danko J, Petrovova E. Changes in the Acute-Phase Protein Concentrations and Activities of Some Enzymes in Pigs Following the Repair of Experimentally Induced Articular Cartilage Defects Using Two Types of Biocement Powder. Animals (Basel) 2019 Nov 7;9(11).
          doi: 10.3390/ani9110931pubmed: 31703315google scholar: lookup
        42. Blom RP, Mol D, van Ruijven LJ, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Smit TH. A Single Axial Impact Load Causes Articular Damage That Is Not Visible with Micro-Computed Tomography: An Ex Vivo Study on Caprine Tibiotalar Joints. Cartilage 2021 Dec;13(2_suppl):1490S-1500S.
          doi: 10.1177/1947603519876353pubmed: 31540553google scholar: lookup
        43. Campbell K, Naire S, Kuiper JH. A mathematical model of cartilage regeneration after chondrocyte and stem cell implantation - I: the effects of growth factors. J Tissue Eng 2019 Jan-Dec;10:2041731419827791.
          doi: 10.1177/2041731419827791pubmed: 30906518google scholar: lookup
        44. Khalilifar MA, Baghaban Eslaminejad MR, Ghasemzadeh M, Hosseini S, Baharvand H. In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Different Types of Rabbit Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Cartilage Repair. Cell J 2019 Jul;21(2):150-160.
          doi: 10.22074/cellj.2019.6149pubmed: 30825288google scholar: lookup
        45. Lepage SIM, Robson N, Gilmore H, Davis O, Hooper A, St John S, Kamesan V, Gelis P, Carvajal D, Hurtig M, Koch TG. Beyond Cartilage Repair: The Role of the Osteochondral Unit in Joint Health and Disease. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2019 Apr;25(2):114-125.
          doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2018.0122pubmed: 30638141google scholar: lookup
        46. Tothova C, Mihajlovicova X, Novotny J, Nagy O, Giretova M, Kresakova L, Tomco M, Zert Z, Vilhanova Z, Varga M, Medvecky L, Petrovova E. The Serum Protein Profile and Acute Phase Proteins in the Postoperative Period in Sheep after Induced Articular Cartilage Defect. Materials (Basel) 2019 Jan 3;12(1).
          doi: 10.3390/ma12010142pubmed: 30609876google scholar: lookup
        47. Xia T, Yu F, Zhang K, Wu Z, Shi D, Teng H, Shen J, Yang X, Jiang Q. The effectiveness of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells therapy for knee osteoarthritis in pigs. Ann Transl Med 2018 Oct;6(20):404.
          doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.09.55pubmed: 30498731google scholar: lookup
        48. van Schaik TJA, Gaul F, Dorthé EW, Lee EE, Grogan SP, D'Lima DD. Development of an Ex Vivo Murine Osteochondral Repair Model. Cartilage 2021 Jan;12(1):112-120.
          doi: 10.1177/1947603518809402pubmed: 30373381google scholar: lookup
        49. Ferguson GB, Van Handel B, Bay M, Fiziev P, Org T, Lee S, Shkhyan R, Banks NW, Scheinberg M, Wu L, Saitta B, Elphingstone J, Larson AN, Riester SM, Pyle AD, Bernthal NM, Mikkola HK, Ernst J, van Wijnen AJ, Bonaguidi M, Evseenko D. Mapping molecular landmarks of human skeletal ontogeny and pluripotent stem cell-derived articular chondrocytes. Nat Commun 2018 Sep 7;9(1):3634.
          doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05573-ypubmed: 30194383google scholar: lookup
        50. Kisiday JD, Schwartz JA, Tangtrongsup S, Goodrich LR, Grande DA. Culture Conditions that Support Expansion and Chondrogenesis of Middle-Aged Rat Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Cartilage 2020 Jul;11(3):364-373.
          doi: 10.1177/1947603518790047pubmed: 30056741google scholar: lookup
        51. Hsieh YH, Shen BY, Wang YH, Lin B, Lee HM, Hsieh MF. Healing of Osteochondral Defects Implanted with Biomimetic Scaffolds of Poly(ε-Caprolactone)/Hydroxyapatite and Glycidyl-Methacrylate-Modified Hyaluronic Acid in a Minipig. Int J Mol Sci 2018 Apr 9;19(4).
          doi: 10.3390/ijms19041125pubmed: 29642550google scholar: lookup
        52. Barboni B, Russo V, Berardinelli P, Mauro A, Valbonetti L, Sanyal H, Canciello A, Greco L, Muttini A, Gatta V, Stuppia L, Mattioli M. Placental Stem Cells from Domestic Animals: Translational Potential and Clinical Relevance. Cell Transplant 2018 Jan;27(1):93-116.
          doi: 10.1177/0963689717724797pubmed: 29562773google scholar: lookup
        53. Lo Monaco M, Merckx G, Ratajczak J, Gervois P, Hilkens P, Clegg P, Bronckaers A, Vandeweerd JM, Lambrichts I. Stem Cells for Cartilage Repair: Preclinical Studies and Insights in Translational Animal Models and Outcome Measures. Stem Cells Int 2018;2018:9079538.
          doi: 10.1155/2018/9079538pubmed: 29535784google scholar: lookup
        54. Huwe LW, Brown WE, Hu JC, Athanasiou KA. Characterization of costal cartilage and its suitability as a cell source for articular cartilage tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2018 May;12(5):1163-1176.
          doi: 10.1002/term.2630pubmed: 29286211google scholar: lookup
        55. Dhollander A, Malone A, Price J, Getgood A. Determination of knee cartilage volume and surface area in beagle dogs: a pilot study. J Exp Orthop 2017 Nov 6;4(1):35.
          doi: 10.1186/s40634-017-0109-1pubmed: 29105014google scholar: lookup
        56. Pot MW, van Kuppevelt TH, Gonzales VK, Buma P, IntHout J, de Vries RBM, Daamen WF. Augmented cartilage regeneration by implantation of cellular versus acellular implants after bone marrow stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies. PeerJ 2017;5:e3927.
          doi: 10.7717/peerj.3927pubmed: 29093996google scholar: lookup
        57. McCarrel TM, Pownder SL, Gilbert S, Koff MF, Castiglione E, Saska RA, Bradica G, Fortier LA. Two-Year Evaluation of Osteochondral Repair with a Novel Biphasic Graft Saturated in Bone Marrow in an Equine Model. Cartilage 2017 Oct;8(4):406-416.
          doi: 10.1177/1947603516675913pubmed: 28934879google scholar: lookup
        58. Ramezanifard R, Kabiri M, Hanaee Ahvaz H. Effects of platelet rich plasma and chondrocyte co-culture on MSC chondrogenesis, hypertrophy and pathological responses. EXCLI J 2017;16:1031-1045.
          doi: 10.17179/excli2017-453pubmed: 28900383google scholar: lookup
        59. Mancini IAD, Vindas Bolaños RA, Brommer H, Castilho M, Ribeiro A, van Loon JPAM, Mensinga A, van Rijen MHP, Malda J, van Weeren R. Fixation of Hydrogel Constructs for Cartilage Repair in the Equine Model: A Challenging Issue. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2017 Nov;23(11):804-814.
          doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0200pubmed: 28795641google scholar: lookup
        60. Cone SG, Warren PB, Fisher MB. Rise of the Pigs: Utilization of the Porcine Model to Study Musculoskeletal Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering During Skeletal Growth. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2017 Nov;23(11):763-780.
          doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0227pubmed: 28726574google scholar: lookup
        61. Yucekul A, Ozdil D, Kutlu NH, Erdemli E, Aydin HM, Doral MN. Tri-layered composite plug for the repair of osteochondral defects: in vivo study in sheep. J Tissue Eng 2017 Jan-Dec;8:2041731417697500.
          doi: 10.1177/2041731417697500pubmed: 28694960google scholar: lookup
        62. Katagiri H, Mendes LF, Luyten FP. Definition of a Critical Size Osteochondral Knee Defect and its Negative Effect on the Surrounding Articular Cartilage in the Rat. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2017 Sep;25(9):1531-1540.
          doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.05.006pubmed: 28506841google scholar: lookup
        63. Meloni GR, Fisher MB, Stoeckl BD, Dodge GR, Mauck RL. Biphasic Finite Element Modeling Reconciles Mechanical Properties of Tissue-Engineered Cartilage Constructs Across Testing Platforms. Tissue Eng Part A 2017 Jul;23(13-14):663-674.
          doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0191pubmed: 28414616google scholar: lookup
        64. Kazemi D, Shams Asenjan K, Dehdilani N, Parsa H. Canine articular cartilage regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells seeded on platelet rich fibrin: Macroscopic and histological assessments. Bone Joint Res 2017 Feb;6(2):98-107.
        65. Zahedi M, Parham A, Dehghani H, Mehrjerdi HK. Stemness Signature of Equine Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Int J Stem Cells 2017 May 30;10(1):93-102.
          doi: 10.15283/ijsc16036pubmed: 28222255google scholar: lookup
        66. Reisig G, Kreinest M, Richter W, Wagner-Ecker M, Dinter D, Attenberger U, Schneider-Wald B, Fickert S, Schwarz ML. Osteoarthritis in the Knee Joints of Göttingen Minipigs after Resection of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament? Missing Correlation of MRI, Gene and Protein Expression with Histological Scoring. PLoS One 2016;11(11):e0165897.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165897pubmed: 27820852google scholar: lookup
        67. Pot MW, Gonzales VK, Buma P, IntHout J, van Kuppevelt TH, de Vries RBM, Daamen WF. Improved cartilage regeneration by implantation of acellular biomaterials after bone marrow stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies. PeerJ 2016;4:e2243.
          doi: 10.7717/peerj.2243pubmed: 27651981google scholar: lookup
        68. Vindas Bolaños RA, Cokelaere SM, Estrada McDermott JM, Benders KE, Gbureck U, Plomp SG, Weinans H, Groll J, van Weeren PR, Malda J. The use of a cartilage decellularized matrix scaffold for the repair of osteochondral defects: the importance of long-term studies in a large animal model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2017 Mar;25(3):413-420.
          doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.08.005pubmed: 27554995google scholar: lookup
        69. Kutikov AB, Song J. Biodegradable PEG-Based Amphiphilic Block Copolymers for Tissue Engineering Applications. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2015 Jul 13;1(7):463-480.
        70. Nagai M, Ito A, Tajino J, Iijima H, Yamaguchi S, Zhang X, Aoyama T, Kuroki H. Remobilization causes site-specific cyst formation in immobilization-induced knee cartilage degeneration in an immobilized rat model. J Anat 2016 Jun;228(6):929-39.
          doi: 10.1111/joa.12453pubmed: 26989984google scholar: lookup
        71. Moran CJ, Ramesh A, Brama PA, O'Byrne JM, O'Brien FJ, Levingstone TJ. The benefits and limitations of animal models for translational research in cartilage repair. J Exp Orthop 2016 Dec;3(1):1.
          doi: 10.1186/s40634-015-0037-xpubmed: 26915001google scholar: lookup
        72. Mehrabani D, Babazadeh M, Tanideh N, Zare S, Hoseinzadeh S, Torabinejad S, Koohi-Hosseinabadi O. The Healing Effect of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Full-thickness Femoral Articular Cartilage Defects of Rabbit. Int J Organ Transplant Med 2015;6(4):165-75.
          pubmed: 26576262
        73. Peck Y, He P, Chilla GS, Poh CL, Wang DA. A preclinical evaluation of an autologous living hyaline-like cartilaginous graft for articular cartilage repair: a pilot study. Sci Rep 2015 Nov 9;5:16225.
        74. Pfeifer CG, Kinsella SD, Milby AH, Fisher MB, Belkin NS, Mauck RL, Carey JL. Development of a Large Animal Model of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee: A Pilot Study. Orthop J Sports Med 2015 Feb;3(2):2325967115570019.
          doi: 10.1177/2325967115570019pubmed: 26535380google scholar: lookup
        75. Pfeifer CG, Fisher MB, Carey JL, Mauck RL. Impact of guidance documents on translational large animal studies of cartilage repair. Sci Transl Med 2015 Oct 21;7(310):310re9.
          doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac7019pubmed: 26491080google scholar: lookup
        76. Baba R, Onodera T, Momma D, Matsuoka M, Hontani K, Elmorsy S, Endo K, Todoh M, Tadano S, Iwasaki N. A Novel Bone Marrow Stimulation Technique Augmented by Administration of Ultrapurified Alginate Gel Enhances Osteochondral Repair in a Rabbit Model. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2015 Dec;21(12):1263-73.
          doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2015.0128pubmed: 26414601google scholar: lookup
        77. Nover AB, Stefani RM, Lee SL, Ateshian GA, Stoker AM, Cook JL, Hung CT. Long-term storage and preservation of tissue engineered articular cartilage. J Orthop Res 2016 Jan;34(1):141-8.
          doi: 10.1002/jor.23034pubmed: 26296185google scholar: lookup
        78. Olstad K, Hendrickson EH, Ekman S, Carlson CS, Dolvik NI. Local Morphological Response of the Distal Femoral Articular-Epiphyseal Cartilage Complex of Young Foals to Surgical Stab Incision and Potential Relevance to Cartilage Injury and Repair in Children. Cartilage 2013 Jul;4(3):239-48.
          doi: 10.1177/1947603513480024pubmed: 26069670google scholar: lookup
        79. Hoemann C, Kandel R, Roberts S, Saris DB, Creemers L, Mainil-Varlet P, Méthot S, Hollander AP, Buschmann MD. International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Recommended Guidelines for Histological Endpoints for Cartilage Repair Studies in Animal Models and Clinical Trials. Cartilage 2011 Apr;2(2):153-72.
          doi: 10.1177/1947603510397535pubmed: 26069577google scholar: lookup
        80. Hurtig MB, Buschmann MD, Fortier LA, Hoemann CD, Hunziker EB, Jurvelin JS, Mainil-Varlet P, McIlwraith CW, Sah RL, Whiteside RA. Preclinical Studies for Cartilage Repair: Recommendations from the International Cartilage Repair Society. Cartilage 2011 Apr;2(2):137-52.
          doi: 10.1177/1947603511401905pubmed: 26069576google scholar: lookup
        81. Fonseca C, Server A, Esteves M, Barastegui D, Rosal M, Fontecha CG, Soldado F. An ultrasound-guided technique for axillary brachial plexus nerve block in rabbits. Lab Anim (NY) 2015 May;44(5):179-84.
          doi: 10.1038/laban.732pubmed: 25897939google scholar: lookup
        82. Caminal M, Peris D, Fonseca C, Barrachina J, Codina D, Rabanal RM, Moll X, Morist A, García F, Cairó JJ, Gòdia F, Pla A, Vives J. Cartilage resurfacing potential of PLGA scaffolds loaded with autologous cells from cartilage, fat, and bone marrow in an ovine model of osteochondral focal defect. Cytotechnology 2016 Aug;68(4):907-19.
          doi: 10.1007/s10616-015-9842-4pubmed: 25595211google scholar: lookup
        83. de Vries RB, Wever KE, Avey MT, Stephens ML, Sena ES, Leenaars M. The usefulness of systematic reviews of animal experiments for the design of preclinical and clinical studies. ILAR J 2014;55(3):427-37.
          doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilu043pubmed: 25541545google scholar: lookup
        84. Wei B, Gu Q, Li D, Yan J, Guo Y, Mao F, Xu Y, Zang F, Wang L. Mild degenerative changes of hip cartilage in elderly patients: an available sample representative of early osteoarthritis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2014;7(10):6493-503.
          pubmed: 25400727
        85. Fisher MB, Belkin NS, Milby AH, Henning EA, Bostrom M, Kim M, Pfeifer C, Meloni G, Dodge GR, Burdick JA, Schaer TP, Steinberg DR, Mauck RL. Cartilage repair and subchondral bone remodeling in response to focal lesions in a mini-pig model: implications for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A 2015 Feb;21(3-4):850-60.
          doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0384pubmed: 25318414google scholar: lookup
        86. Grässel S, Lorenz J. Tissue-engineering strategies to repair chondral and osteochondral tissue in osteoarthritis: use of mesenchymal stem cells. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2014 Oct;16(10):452.
          doi: 10.1007/s11926-014-0452-5pubmed: 25182680google scholar: lookup
        87. Kazemi D, Fakhrjou A, Dizaji VM, Alishahi MK. Effect of autologous platelet rich fibrin on the healing of experimental articular cartilage defects of the knee in an animal model. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:486436.
          doi: 10.1155/2014/486436pubmed: 25028656google scholar: lookup
        88. Cook JL, Hung CT, Kuroki K, Stoker AM, Cook CR, Pfeiffer FM, Sherman SL, Stannard JP. Animal models of cartilage repair. Bone Joint Res 2014;3(4):89-94.
          doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.34.2000238pubmed: 24695750google scholar: lookup
        89. Jeon JE, Vaquette C, Theodoropoulos C, Klein TJ, Hutmacher DW. Multiphasic construct studied in an ectopic osteochondral defect model. J R Soc Interface 2014 Jun 6;11(95):20140184.
          doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0184pubmed: 24694896google scholar: lookup
        90. Dresing I, Zeiter S, Auer J, Alini M, Eglin D. Evaluation of a press-fit osteochondral poly(ester-urethane) scaffold in a rabbit defect model. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2014 Jul;25(7):1691-700.
          doi: 10.1007/s10856-014-5192-6pubmed: 24668269google scholar: lookup
        91. Betsch M, Schneppendahl J, Thuns S, Herten M, Sager M, Jungbluth P, Hakimi M, Wild M. Bone marrow aspiration concentrate and platelet rich plasma for osteochondral repair in a porcine osteochondral defect model. PLoS One 2013;8(8):e71602.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071602pubmed: 23951201google scholar: lookup
        92. Jurgens WJ, Kroeze RJ, Zandieh-Doulabi B, van Dijk A, Renders GA, Smit TH, van Milligen FJ, Ritt MJ, Helder MN. One-step surgical procedure for the treatment of osteochondral defects with adipose-derived stem cells in a caprine knee defect: a pilot study. Biores Open Access 2013 Aug;2(4):315-25.
          doi: 10.1089/biores.2013.0024pubmed: 23914338google scholar: lookup
        93. Fonseca C, Caminal M, Peris D, Barrachina J, Fàbregas PJ, Garcia F, Cairó JJ, Gòdia F, Pla A, Vives J. An arthroscopic approach for the treatment of osteochondral focal defects with cell-free and cell-loaded PLGA scaffolds in sheep. Cytotechnology 2014 Mar;66(2):345-54.
          doi: 10.1007/s10616-013-9581-3pubmed: 23673652google scholar: lookup
        94. Schneider-Wald B, von Thaden AK, Schwarz ML. [Defect models for the regeneration of articular cartilage in large animals]. Orthopade 2013 Apr;42(4):242-53.
          doi: 10.1007/s00132-012-2044-2pubmed: 23575559google scholar: lookup
        95. Lampropoulou-Adamidou K, Lelovas P, Karadimas EV, Liakou C, Triantafillopoulos IK, Dontas I, Papaioannou NA. Useful animal models for the research of osteoarthritis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014 Apr;24(3):263-71.
          doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1205-2pubmed: 23508348google scholar: lookup
        96. Kon E, Filardo G, Robinson D, Eisman JA, Levy A, Zaslav K, Shani J, Altschuler N. Osteochondral regeneration using a novel aragonite-hyaluronate bi-phasic scaffold in a goat model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014 Jun;22(6):1452-64.
          doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2467-2pubmed: 23479056google scholar: lookup
        97. Coburn JM, Gibson M, Monagle S, Patterson Z, Elisseeff JH. Bioinspired nanofibers support chondrogenesis for articular cartilage repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012 Jun 19;109(25):10012-7.
          doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121605109pubmed: 22665791google scholar: lookup
        98. Hansen OM, Foldager CB, Christensen BB, Everland H, Lind M. Increased chondrocyte seeding density has no positive effect on cartilage repair in an MPEG-PLGA scaffold. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013 Feb;21(2):485-93.
          doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-1996-4pubmed: 22488013google scholar: lookup
        99. Efe T, Füglein A, Getgood A, Heyse TJ, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Patzer T, El-Zayat BF, Lakemeier S, Schofer MD. Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency leads to early instability of scaffold for cartilage regeneration: a controlled laboratory ex-vivo study. Int Orthop 2012 Jun;36(6):1315-20.
          doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1437-xpubmed: 22143317google scholar: lookup
        100. Efe T, Füglein A, Heyse TJ, Stein T, Timmesfeld N, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Schmitt J, Paletta JR, Schofer MD. Fibrin glue does not improve the fixation of press-fitted cell-free collagen gel plugs in an ex vivo cartilage repair model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012 Feb;20(2):210-5.
          doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1571-4pubmed: 21656187google scholar: lookup
        101. Lewis R, Asplin KE, Bruce G, Dart C, Mobasheri A, Barrett-Jolley R. The role of the membrane potential in chondrocyte volume regulation. J Cell Physiol 2011 Nov;226(11):2979-86.
          doi: 10.1002/jcp.22646pubmed: 21328349google scholar: lookup
        102. Efe T, Schofer MD, Füglein A, Timmesfeld N, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Stein T, El-Zayat BF, Paletta JR, Heyse TJ. An ex vivo continuous passive motion model in a porcine knee for assessing primary stability of cell-free collagen gel plugs. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010 Dec 15;11:283.
          doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-283pubmed: 21159196google scholar: lookup
        103. Bian L, Stoker AM, Marberry KM, Ateshian GA, Cook JL, Hung CT. Effects of dexamethasone on the functional properties of cartilage explants during long-term culture. Am J Sports Med 2010 Jan;38(1):78-85.
          doi: 10.1177/0363546509354197pubmed: 19959744google scholar: lookup
        104. Chu CR, Szczodry M, Bruno S. Animal models for cartilage regeneration and repair. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2010 Feb;16(1):105-15.
          doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2009.0452pubmed: 19831641google scholar: lookup
        105. Jee CSY, Ramlan A, Mohd Ali R, Khairuddin NH, Chen HC, Dawam A, Saw YC, Saw KY. Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cells With Adjuvant Hyaluronic Acid Enhance Cartilage Repair After Subchondral Drilling in a Sheep Model. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2025 Oct;7(5):101217.
          doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101217pubmed: 41583813google scholar: lookup
        106. Gülcek A, Erol H, Balcioğlu E, Koçyiğit A, Yildiz G. Effect of N-butyl cyanoacrylate on the regeneration of joint defects in mature male rats. Vet Res Forum 2025;16(10):565-571.
        107. Suderman RP, Hurtig MB, Grynpas MD, Kuzyk PRT, Changoor A. Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Drill Guides for an Ovine Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation Model. J Orthop Res 2025 Dec;43(12):2114-2124.
          doi: 10.1002/jor.70057pubmed: 40914834google scholar: lookup
        108. Klyucherev TO, Peshkova MA, Yurkanova MD, Kosheleva NV, Svistunov AA, Liang XJ, Timashev PS. Advances in Regenerative Therapies for Inflammatory Arthritis: Exploring the Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Extracellular Vesicles. Int J Mol Sci 2025 Jun 16;26(12).
          doi: 10.3390/ijms26125766pubmed: 40565230google scholar: lookup
        109. Gao Y, Li Q, Du Z, Yao Q, Jiang G, Huang W, Gao X, Li J, Dou T, Chen F, Li X, Wang A, Peng J. HAMA-SBMA hydrogel with anti-inflammatory properties delivers cartilage organoids, boosting cartilage regeneration. J Nanobiotechnology 2025 May 30;23(1):401.
          doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03475-ypubmed: 40448111google scholar: lookup
        110. Reihs E, Fischer A, Gerner I, Windhager R, Toegel S, Zaucke F, Rothbauer M, Jenner F. Beyond symptomatic alignment: evaluating the integration of causal mechanisms in matching animal models with human pathotypes in osteoarthritis research. Arthritis Res Ther 2025 May 17;27(1):109.
          doi: 10.1186/s13075-025-03561-4pubmed: 40382623google scholar: lookup
        111. Łabędź-Masłowska A, Wieczorek J, Mierzwiński M, Sekuła-Stryjewska M, Noga S, Rajca J, Duda P, Milian-Ciesielska K, Karnas E, Kmiotek-Caller K, Szkaradek A, Madeja Z, Ficek K, Jura J, Zuba-Surma E. Evaluation of the Safety and Regenerative Potential of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Extracellular Vesicles in a Transgenic Pig Model of Cartilage-Bone Injury In Vivo - Preclinical Study. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2025 May;21(4):1075-1095.
          doi: 10.1007/s12015-025-10853-4pubmed: 40380984google scholar: lookup
        112. Nernekli K, Mangarova DB, Suryadevara V, Hajipour M, Tang JH, Wang J, Liang T, Harris M, Ueyama T, Lyons JK, Moseley ME, Roudi R, Pisani L, von Krüchten R, Duwa R, Lu-Liang SY, Shokri Varniab Z, Vasyliv I, Das N, Murayama M, Shinohara I, Pratx G, Goodman SB, Meade TJ, Daldrup-Link HE. MRI detection of senescent cells in porcine knee joints with a β-galactosidase responsive Gd-chelate. Npj Imaging 2025;3(1):18.
          doi: 10.1038/s44303-025-00078-ypubmed: 40330124google scholar: lookup
        113. Pieringer AM, Milz S, Imhoff AB, Vogt S. Influence of cartilage defects and a collagen gel on integrity of corresponding intact cartilage: a biomechanical in-vitro study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024 Sep;144(9):4309-4317.
          doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05530-zpubmed: 39402141google scholar: lookup
        114. Barthold JE, Cai L, McCreery KP, Fischenich KM, Eckstein KN, Ferguson VL, Emery NC, Breur G, Neu CP. Integrative cartilage repair using acellular allografts for engineered structure and surface lubrication in vivo. NPJ Regen Med 2024 Sep 28;9(1):25.
          doi: 10.1038/s41536-024-00367-xpubmed: 39341829google scholar: lookup
        115. Chapman JH, Ghosh D, Attari S, Ude CC, Laurencin CT. Animal Models of Osteoarthritis: Updated Models and Outcome Measures 2016-2023. Regen Eng Transl Med 2024 Jun;10(2):127-146.
          doi: 10.1007/s40883-023-00309-xpubmed: 38983776google scholar: lookup
        116. Falcon JM, Karchner JP, Henning EA, Mauck RL, Pleshko N. Ethics of Using Animal Models as Predictors of Human Response in Tissue Engineering. Ethics Biol Eng Med 2019;10(1):37-49.
        117. Caffrey JM, Thomas PK, Appt SE, Burkart HB, Weaver CM, Kleinberger M, Gayzik FS. Contrast enhanced computed tomography of small ruminants: Caprine and ovine. PLoS One 2023;18(12):e0287529.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287529pubmed: 38127918google scholar: lookup
        118. Yan W, Maimaitimin M, Wu Y, Fan Y, Ren S, Zhao F, Cao C, Hu X, Cheng J, Ao Y. Meniscal fibrocartilage regeneration inspired by meniscal maturational and regenerative process. Sci Adv 2023 Nov 10;9(45):eadg8138.
          doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg8138pubmed: 37939174google scholar: lookup
        119. O'Brien TJ, Hollinshead F, Goodrich LR. Extracellular vesicles in the treatment and prevention of osteoarthritis: can horses help us translate this therapy to humans?. Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucl Acids 2023 Jun;4(2):151-169.
          doi: 10.20517/evcna.2023.11pubmed: 37829144google scholar: lookup
        120. Uzun E, Güvercin S, Günay AE, Kafadar İH, Bolat D, Yay AH, Güney A. The effect of oral hydroxychloroquine on chondral defect: An experimental study. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2023 Aug 21;34(3):628-639.
          doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1114pubmed: 37750268google scholar: lookup
        121. González Vázquez AG, Blokpoel Ferreras LA, Bennett KE, Casey SM, Brama PA, O'Brien FJ. Systematic Comparison of Biomaterials-Based Strategies for Osteochondral and Chondral Repair in Large Animal Models. Adv Healthc Mater 2021 Oct;10(20):e2100878.
          doi: 10.1002/adhm.202100878pubmed: 34405587google scholar: lookup