Analyze Diet
The Journal of experimental biology2000; 203(Pt 14); 2195-2200; doi: 10.1242/jeb.203.14.2195

Preferred speed and cost of transport: the effect of incline.

Abstract: Preferred speed is the behavioral tendency of animals to utilize a relatively narrow set of speeds near the middle of a much broader range that they are capable of using within a particular gait. Possible explanations for this behavior include minimizing musculoskeletal stresses and maximizing energetic economy. If preferred speed is determined by energetic economy (cost of transport, C(T)), then shifts in preferred speed should produce shifts in C(T). To test this hypothesis, preferred speeds were measured in trotting horses on the level and on an incline. The preferred trotting speed decreased from 3.29+/-0.24 m s(-)(1) on the level to 3.05+/-0.30 m s(-)(1) (means +/- s.d., N=6) on an 11.8 % incline. The rate of oxygen consumption was measured as a function of trotting speed on a treadmill and was a curvilinear function of speed in all horses under both conditions (level and 10 % incline). This curvilinear relationship resulted in a C(T) that was a U-shaped function of speed. The speed at which C(T) was minimal (i.e. at which trotting was most energetically economical) was very near the preferred speed on the level and decreased on the incline, again to a speed near the preferred speed on the incline.
Publication Date: 2000-06-23 PubMed ID: 10862731DOI: 10.1242/jeb.203.14.2195Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This article investigates how the preferred speeds of trotting horses change when they’re moving on level ground compared to an inclined surface. The researchers observe that the horses’ preferred speed, which they define as a frequently preferred range within their full speed capabilities, drops slightly when they’re moving uphill. The paper also discusses how this behavior impacts the animals’ energy consumption.

Understanding Preferred Speed and Cost of Transport

  • The article begins by defining preferred speed as the behavioral tendency of animals, specifically horses in this case, to use a set of speeds that is in the middle of their total speed capability. This term is important as it is crucial in understanding how horses expend their energy when trotting at different inclines.
  • The paper then moves on to discuss the potential explanations for this behavior. It highlights two possible motivations – minimizing musculoskeletal stress and maximizing energetic economy. By changing their speed, the horses might exert less pressure on their skeletal structures and utilize their energy more efficiently.

Investigating Changes in Preferred Speed and Energy Consumption

  • To investigate the changes in preferred speed, the researchers conducted an experiment where they made horses trot on level ground and an 11.8% incline. They observed that the preferred trotting speed dropped from an average of 3.29 m/s on level ground to an average of 3.05 m/s on the incline.
  • They then measured the horses’ oxygen consumption at various trotting speeds on a treadmill to examine how their energy consumption changes with speed. They observed a curvilinear relationship, which means that their energy consumption rates rise and fall as their speed changes.

Implications of the Findings

  • The findings confirm the hypothesis that changes in preferred speed result in changes in the cost of transport (C(T)), which is an indication of how efficiently an animal uses its energy.
  • The experiment showed that the speed at which energy consumption was at its lowest was very close to the preferred speed on level ground. This minimum C(T) speed also decreased on an incline, closely mirroring the previously discussed decrease in preferred speed when moving uphill.
  • These observations suggest that animals naturally adjust their speed to minimize energy consumption based on the conditions of their environment.

Cite This Article

APA
Wickler SJ, Hoyt DF, Cogger EA, Hirschbein MH. (2000). Preferred speed and cost of transport: the effect of incline. J Exp Biol, 203(Pt 14), 2195-2200. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.203.14.2195

Publication

ISSN: 0022-0949
NlmUniqueID: 0243705
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 203
Issue: Pt 14
Pages: 2195-2200

Researcher Affiliations

Wickler, S J
  • Equine Research Center and Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences and Department of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 91768, USA. sjwickler@csupomona.edu
Hoyt, D F
    Cogger, E A
      Hirschbein, M H

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Energy Metabolism / physiology
        • Female
        • Gait / physiology
        • Horses / physiology
        • Male
        • Motor Activity / physiology
        • Oxygen Consumption / physiology
        • Physical Conditioning, Animal
        • Physical Exertion / physiology

        Grant Funding

        • S06GM53933 / NIGMS NIH HHS

        Citations

        This article has been cited 12 times.
        1. Apte S, Falbriard M, Meyer F, Millet GP, Gremeaux V, Aminian K. Estimation of horizontal running power using foot-worn inertial measurement units.. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023;11:1167816.
          doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1167816pubmed: 37425358google scholar: lookup
        2. Saleri Lunazzi C, Reynaud AJ, Thura D. Dissociating the Impact of Movement Time and Energy Costs on Decision-Making and Action Initiation in Humans.. Front Hum Neurosci 2021;15:715212.
          doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.715212pubmed: 34790104google scholar: lookup
        3. Self Davies ZT, Spence AJ, Wilson AM. External mechanical work in the galloping racehorse.. Biol Lett 2019 Feb 28;15(2):20180709.
          doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0709pubmed: 30958128google scholar: lookup
        4. Shadmehr R, Reppert TR, Summerside EM, Yoon T, Ahmed AA. Movement Vigor as a Reflection of Subjective Economic Utility.. Trends Neurosci 2019 May;42(5):323-336.
          doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2019.02.003pubmed: 30878152google scholar: lookup
        5. Wilkinson H, Thavarajah N, Codd J. The metabolic cost of walking on an incline in the Peacock (Pavo cristatus).. PeerJ 2015;3:e987.
          doi: 10.7717/peerj.987pubmed: 26056619google scholar: lookup
        6. Takahashi T, Matsui A, Mukai K, Ohmura H, Hiraga A, Aida H. The Effects of Inclination (Up and Down) of the Treadmill on the Electromyogram Activities of the Forelimb and Hind limb Muscles at a Walk and a Trot in Thoroughbred Horses.. J Equine Sci 2014;25(4):73-7.
          doi: 10.1294/jes.25.73pubmed: 25558180google scholar: lookup
        7. Fischer S, Nolte I, Schilling N. Adaptations in muscle activity to induced, short-term hindlimb lameness in trotting dogs.. PLoS One 2013;8(11):e80987.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080987pubmed: 24236207google scholar: lookup
        8. Wagnild J, Wall-Scheffler CM. Energetic consequences of human sociality: walking speed choices among friendly dyads.. PLoS One 2013;8(10):e76576.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076576pubmed: 24194840google scholar: lookup
        9. Self ZT, Spence AJ, Wilson AM. Speed and incline during thoroughbred horse racing: racehorse speed supports a metabolic power constraint to incline running but not to decline running.. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2012 Aug 15;113(4):602-7.
        10. Carrier DR, Anders C, Schilling N. The musculoskeletal system of humans is not tuned to maximize the economy of locomotion.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011 Nov 15;108(46):18631-6.
          doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105277108pubmed: 22065766google scholar: lookup
        11. Tullis A, Andrus SC. The cost of incline locomotion in ghost crabs (Ocypode quadrata) of different sizes.. J Comp Physiol B 2011 Oct;181(7):873-81.
          doi: 10.1007/s00360-011-0582-2pubmed: 21567169google scholar: lookup
        12. Xiang Y, John P, Yakushin SB, Kunin M, Raphan T, Cohen B. Dynamics of quadrupedal locomotion of monkeys: implications for central control.. Exp Brain Res 2007 Mar;177(4):551-72.
          doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0707-0pubmed: 17006683google scholar: lookup